RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment?

RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 1:02:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity. But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough. And again you miss the point. No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult. It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote. Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period. I fuckin carry.

BamaD -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 1:13:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Oh God, you really do have trouble following a conversation don't you? No

BamaD -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 1:15:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity. But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough. And again you miss the point. No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult. It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote. Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period. I fuckin carry. Since I wasn't talking to you dizzychicks last post should have been aimed at you.

mnottertail -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 1:31:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity. But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough. And again you miss the point. No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult. It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote. Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period. I fuckin carry. Since I wasn't talking to you dizzychicks last post should have been aimed at you. Since I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to His (whoevers) point that he believed, but now the post can be aimed at you,

BamaD -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 1:52:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: That is because you don't like the 2nd, at no point does it require stupidity. But of course, people who oppose the 2nd come up with ridiculous scenerios and pretend to think the 2nd would support them. A child/toddler can not legally make such decisions for themselfs so the the parents have every right to keep them from guns, just like they have the right to not let them play with matches or sharp objects untill they are old enough. And again you miss the point. No I don't. His point is that he believes that we have to allow those incapable of being rational to exorcise the full rights of a functioning adult. It is like saying that if voting is a right we have to let toddlers vote. Your point then is that you are a functioning adult. Don't speak for me, first of all you are a fucking dipshit, and secondly my point is that by god nutsuckers carry into coffee shops, doughnuts shops, and daycares, but they wont carry into their own funcions? Their fidelity to the second amendment is as deep as their facts, and deep as their fiscal responsibility, their adeherence to the law, and their protection of the constitution. In other words about as deep as Ted Nugent swallowed turds as a coward avoiding the duty to his country. All nutsuckers are cowards, all nutsuckers are innumerate, all nutsuckers would felch adolph hitler if given a chance, but we return to the fact they are fucking factless cowards destroying this country period. I fuckin carry. Since I wasn't talking to you dizzychicks last post should have been aimed at you. Since I wasn't talking to you, I was talking to His (whoevers) point that he believed, but now the post can be aimed at you, The post said in reply to me.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 3:16:47 PM)
Well this is certainly an enlightened conversation.

Sahar4Blacks -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 3:34:51 PM)
Sure. A woman can do pretty much everything a man can do !

Awareness -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 3:49:59 PM)
I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match.

Sahar4Blacks -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 4:03:53 PM)
Can a woman be President of the US ? Sure. Should a woman be President of the US ? Probably. Should Hillary Clinton become President of the US ? Hell no. I don't like her. I don't trust her. To be fair, Donald Trump isn't qualified to be President either. He's evil, racist and dumb. Who does that leave ? Hmm, I am feeling the Bern. How about you ?

Dvr22999874 -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 4:04:53 PM)
Awareness, the thread could be about apples and oranges and their relative attributes and before the end of two pages it would have devolved into that same shit-sling, insult-hurling childish name-calling from the same perpetrators mate.....................it would also be a slanging match between pro-democrats and pro-republicans and how stupid the other side was..

Sahar4Blacks -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 4:08:41 PM)
Don't be so pessimistic, dude. People can surprise you.

Dvr22999874 -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 4:13:45 PM)
They invariably do, but they are usually not pleasant surprises. I don't believe I am pessimistic, just pragmatic

thompsonx -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 4:43:22 PM)
ORIGINAL: Awareness I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match. Since it is a printed page it should not be too difficult to see where the train left the track.

thompsonx -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 4:46:12 PM)
ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874 They invariably do, but they are usually not pleasant surprises. I don't believe I am pessimistic, just pragmatic I think it is a pretty straight line of progression from adolescent enthusiam through adult pesimism to aged pragmatism...then if we are lucky we die in our sleep.[;)]

Sahar4Blacks -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 5:47:13 PM)
Can a woman be President of the USA ? Sure. Should Hillary be President ? Hell no !

Dvr22999874 -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 6:18:33 PM)
Then I guess I had better get ready for my final patrol Thompson smile. I can almost hear the sergeant now "Guess who just volunteered for point ????"smile

BamaD -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 6:44:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match. Me either, particularly since, as you said, it was pretty clear from the outset that the Constitution didn't bar women. This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists.

BamaD -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 6:46:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sahar4Blacks Can a woman be President of the USA ? Sure. Should Hillary be President ? Hell no ! Agreed completly. Both parties are running headlong into nominating the worst person they have.

thompsonx -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 7:19:01 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD Me either, particularly since, as you said, it was pretty clear from the outset that the Constitution didn't bar women. This would cast doubt on your opinion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage_in_the_United_States This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists. Trap????Is your white male priviledge slipping through your pudgy little fingers?[8\|]

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? (4/2/2016 7:20:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness I can't believe a thread about a fairly clear constitutional question turned into another shit-slinging match. Me either, particularly since, as you said, it was pretty clear from the outset that the Constitution didn't bar women. This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists. Note from the OP: 1) I disagree that it is "pretty clear from the outset" that the Constitution doesn't bar women, There were a half dozen opinions (just opinions) that were expressed that Constitution doesn't bar women. People opine on all sorts of things. That doesn't make any fact "clear" at all. I believe that: a) The Constitution shouldn't bar women b) The Constitution needs to be (and SHOULD be) amended to allow women. 2) Your quite absurd statement *"This was just set up in an attempt to trap strict constructionists."*. Since I am the strict constructionist that STARTED the thread (having just obliterated Phydeaux in a previous Constitutional debate, as I was taking a strict constructionist position), your assertion would seem rather silly.

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.711914E-02