Greta75 -> RE: Voter laws (7/31/2016 7:11:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD The purpose of state ID is to allow people without a dl to do the things that require them. So the answer is of course, except of course for those states that do not require voter ID, they just require that you be a Democrat. Do you realize what a portable fingerprint scanner for every polling place in America would cost. Do you realize that not everyone has ever been fingerprinted. If people object to a picture ID thing what they would say about requiring finger prints . They can implement compulsory finger printing of all citizens for their data base. It's good for alot of things. One time cost of implementing this. Efficiency for many many years to come. In my country, all our IDs have our photo and our finger print on it. Super thorough. I mean, the left complain is that, black/poor/homeless gets discriminated from voting, as they are unable to produce proper ID. Perhaps they may be tardy and unable to keep an ID without losing it. And homeless people will definitely not receive voting slips IF they did not have a home address. Fingerprinting to me, works the best. I mean, I don't know about the US, over here, even opening bank accounts, there are finger printing records, because what if you fail your signature test? Which I often do. I can't sign a consistent signature and always have problems at bank cashing out money due to their insistent that my signature is not the same in their records, although to me, I have only had one signature my whole life but to them, it's always different. So then, finger print is second layer of verification you are indeed who you say you are, when you withdraw money from your own account. And the thing with banks is, even if you produce an ID, but if you fail your signature test, they will refuse to let you access to your account. I understand the tight security.
|
|
|
|