RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/6/2016 10:07:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

No, I said that the 4 months traning before going on duty is hardly the end of their training.
When possible they ride with another cop for a year or so. This means they have constant supervision over that period of time.
To follow your example it isn't as if a novice mechanic is let loose on your car, it is as if he works under the guidence of a master mechanic.


Incorrect, you had not mention anything about the length of training in this thread until now. You did make the unsubstantiated claim they train until they retire. Until you can back that up with facts it stands as on the job training other than the initial 3 months training. Which leads to yet another question "if" they are supervised, how much training does the supervisor have? As far as auto mechanic trainees being supervised its in a class room environment not the auto repair shop that hires certified mechanics to do the actual work, you also failed
to answer questions asked.

Niether did anyone else so that is just blowing hot air.
You don't know much about police work do you?
Most police work is interacting with people.
Not only is that hard to teach in the classroom(the student knows nothing there it real) but you don't see how they react untill they are in the field.
I have known people who said and did all the right things in the class but when they got into the field they were afraid every minute they are out there or push to hard.
They ride with proven, experienced officers with good records.
These officers have, of course, gone through the academy. They have served several years without problems, and have done well in the periodic traing ugrades trough thier service.
Yes ojt is part of thier training but police work is the sort of thing were OJT is the only test that matters.




Chaska -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 12:43:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

No, I said that the 4 months traning before going on duty is hardly the end of their training.
When possible they ride with another cop for a year or so. This means they have constant supervision over that period of time.
To follow your example it isn't as if a novice mechanic is let loose on your car, it is as if he works under the guidence of a master mechanic.


Incorrect, you had not mention anything about the length of training in this thread until now. You did make the unsubstantiated claim they train until they retire. Until you can back that up with facts it stands as on the job training other than the initial 3 months training. Which leads to yet another question "if" they are supervised, how much training does the supervisor have? As far as auto mechanic trainees being supervised its in a class room environment not the auto repair shop that hires certified mechanics to do the actual work, you also failed
to answer questions asked.

Niether did anyone else so that is just blowing hot air.
You don't know much about police work do you?
Most police work is interacting with people.
Not only is that hard to teach in the classroom(the student knows nothing there it real) but you don't see how they react untill they are in the field.
I have known people who said and did all the right things in the class but when they got into the field they were afraid every minute they are out there or push to hard.
They ride with proven, experienced officers with good records.
These officers have, of course, gone through the academy. They have served several years without problems, and have done well in the periodic traing ugrades trough thier service.
Yes ojt is part of thier training but police work is the sort of thing were OJT is the only test that matters.


So you admit to not saying anything about training as I stated? Yes, someone did mention training of 2 to 3 years in other country's read the quote from "binymph" ^ and your comment to it, (speaking of blowing hot air). Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd. You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Why is to hard to teach in a class room sitting and why not have additional field training exercises ( not necessarily with the general public) as well? Nobody can predict how they will react in all situations, although more training can be helpful. If a police officer is
afraid or can't handle the pressure of the job than he/she has no business being one. You have shown no proof that a trainee officer rides with a supervisor or does so for any specific time frame or any training the supervisor has or to train. Your word is not sufficient or even creditable based on your post history. You apparently advocate turning novice police loose for the bulk of their "on the job training" as their testing grounds on the general populous.

At the end of the day you miss the point that extensive training for police officers would not only benefit the populous, the system, but the police as well.




thompsonx -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 4:02:13 AM)


ORIGINAL: Chaska

Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd.


But he was a sgt in the air farce and an mp in the national fraud and he has only had one of his guns taken away from by a mugger who also took his lunch money???that must count for something???



You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Well there is the fact that an honest mechanic will make about three to four times what an honest cop (sorry for the contradiction in terms) would make.




BamaD -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 8:03:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

No, I said that the 4 months traning before going on duty is hardly the end of their training.
When possible they ride with another cop for a year or so. This means they have constant supervision over that period of time.
To follow your example it isn't as if a novice mechanic is let loose on your car, it is as if he works under the guidence of a master mechanic.


Incorrect, you had not mention anything about the length of training in this thread until now. You did make the unsubstantiated claim they train until they retire. Until you can back that up with facts it stands as on the job training other than the initial 3 months training. Which leads to yet another question "if" they are supervised, how much training does the supervisor have? As far as auto mechanic trainees being supervised its in a class room environment not the auto repair shop that hires certified mechanics to do the actual work, you also failed
to answer questions asked.

Niether did anyone else so that is just blowing hot air.
You don't know much about police work do you?
Most police work is interacting with people.
Not only is that hard to teach in the classroom(the student knows nothing there it real) but you don't see how they react untill they are in the field.
I have known people who said and did all the right things in the class but when they got into the field they were afraid every minute they are out there or push to hard.
They ride with proven, experienced officers with good records.
These officers have, of course, gone through the academy. They have served several years without problems, and have done well in the periodic traing ugrades trough thier service.
Yes ojt is part of thier training but police work is the sort of thing were OJT is the only test that matters.


So you admit to not saying anything about training as I stated? Yes, someone did mention training of 2 to 3 years in other country's read the quote from "binymph" ^ and your comment to it, (speaking of blowing hot air). Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd. You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Why is to hard to teach in a class room sitting and why not have additional field training exercises ( not necessarily with the general public) as well? Nobody can predict how they will react in all situations, although more training can be helpful. If a police officer is
afraid or can't handle the pressure of the job than he/she has no business being one. You have shown no proof that a trainee officer rides with a supervisor or does so for any specific time frame or any training the supervisor has or to train. Your word is not sufficient or even creditable based on your post history. You apparently advocate turning novice police loose for the bulk of their "on the job training" as their testing grounds on the general populous.

At the end of the day you miss the point that extensive training for police officers would not only benefit the populous, the system, but the police as well.

I used to work with our sheriffs office.
Working under the guidence of an experianced office is not turning them loose on the public.
The department I worked for (admin) never unleashed a rookie untill he had proven himself under close supervision.
I know you have this idea that the day they get out of the academy they get a badge and a gun and are unleashed.
Maybe you have watched "Training Day" too many times.
You clearly want to follow the example given earlier were you keep spending money on people for 2-3 years who, during that time are unproductive.
When you count the washouts and the ones who when they are finally allowed in the field can't do the job you will spend half your manpower budget on these people.
Your obviously don't understand that mean people don't know if they can hack it till they get into the field.
Do you think as was implied when I asked how long they had to sign up for that they had to commit for life.
Maybe just twice as many years as they train?
Then when they can't cut it you have dead weight for a couple of years.
Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.




thompsonx -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 8:58:32 AM)


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.




Termyn8or -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 9:33:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



You are fucking stupid thinking the law or Constitution means shit to this government except as toilet paper.

T^T




Nnanji -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 9:48:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD


I use full powered hornady critical defense.
And when I shoot at twenty paces, an etreme range for a gunfight, I don't miss.

Not a good enough shot to use fmj[8|]
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



I hate to get into this because it's a stupid OP and a stupid debate, but, I'd like to point out its phoquing stupid to take FMJ or TMJ to any place but the range.




Nnanji -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 9:57:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

Hum...51/21 = 2.4 not 8. To quote Tompsonxx, phoquing stupid were you smoking fags and blowing boys behind the shit house while elementary math was taught?

In point of fact, having one certified mechanic in the shop and several uncertified is common. Learning on the job is common and dates back hundreds of years to apprentice/master relationships.

I should also add that 51 weeks is a classic example of phoquing stupid governmental regulations. That sort of thing was handled for hundreds of years by trade masters with apprentices. The only need for the phoquing government to be involved is so it can tax the process.




Nnanji -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 10:07:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

No, I said that the 4 months traning before going on duty is hardly the end of their training.
When possible they ride with another cop for a year or so. This means they have constant supervision over that period of time.
To follow your example it isn't as if a novice mechanic is let loose on your car, it is as if he works under the guidence of a master mechanic.


Incorrect, you had not mention anything about the length of training in this thread until now. You did make the unsubstantiated claim they train until they retire. Until you can back that up with facts it stands as on the job training other than the initial 3 months training. Which leads to yet another question "if" they are supervised, how much training does the supervisor have? As far as auto mechanic trainees being supervised its in a class room environment not the auto repair shop that hires certified mechanics to do the actual work, you also failed
to answer questions asked.

Niether did anyone else so that is just blowing hot air.
You don't know much about police work do you?
Most police work is interacting with people.
Not only is that hard to teach in the classroom(the student knows nothing there it real) but you don't see how they react untill they are in the field.
I have known people who said and did all the right things in the class but when they got into the field they were afraid every minute they are out there or push to hard.
They ride with proven, experienced officers with good records.
These officers have, of course, gone through the academy. They have served several years without problems, and have done well in the periodic traing ugrades trough thier service.
Yes ojt is part of thier training but police work is the sort of thing were OJT is the only test that matters.


So you admit to not saying anything about training as I stated? Yes, someone did mention training of 2 to 3 years in other country's read the quote from "binymph" ^ and your comment to it, (speaking of blowing hot air). Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd. You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Why is to hard to teach in a class room sitting and why not have additional field training exercises ( not necessarily with the general public) as well? Nobody can predict how they will react in all situations, although more training can be helpful. If a police officer is
afraid or can't handle the pressure of the job than he/she has no business being one. You have shown no proof that a trainee officer rides with a supervisor or does so for any specific time frame or any training the supervisor has or to train. Your word is not sufficient or even creditable based on your post history. You apparently advocate turning novice police loose for the bulk of their "on the job training" as their testing grounds on the general populous.

At the end of the day you miss the point that extensive training for police officers would not only benefit the populous, the system, but the police as well.

TO (Training Officer) is a slot on every police force that is, generally, a competitive position based on Time in Grade, class room testing and experience in the field. Pretty much all police departments send people to be trained at places like the FBI academy whose training is then deciminated into the field. Those American training academies generally take people from all over the world and are the source for training in many European countries.




Chaska -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 12:38:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

No, I said that the 4 months traning before going on duty is hardly the end of their training.
When possible they ride with another cop for a year or so. This means they have constant supervision over that period of time.
To follow your example it isn't as if a novice mechanic is let loose on your car, it is as if he works under the guidence of a master mechanic.


Incorrect, you had not mention anything about the length of training in this thread until now. You did make the unsubstantiated claim they train until they retire. Until you can back that up with facts it stands as on the job training other than the initial 3 months training. Which leads to yet another question "if" they are supervised, how much training does the supervisor have? As far as auto mechanic trainees being supervised its in a class room environment not the auto repair shop that hires certified mechanics to do the actual work, you also failed
to answer questions asked.

Niether did anyone else so that is just blowing hot air.
You don't know much about police work do you?
Most police work is interacting with people.
Not only is that hard to teach in the classroom(the student knows nothing there it real) but you don't see how they react untill they are in the field.
I have known people who said and did all the right things in the class but when they got into the field they were afraid every minute they are out there or push to hard.
They ride with proven, experienced officers with good records.
These officers have, of course, gone through the academy. They have served several years without problems, and have done well in the periodic traing ugrades trough thier service.
Yes ojt is part of thier training but police work is the sort of thing were OJT is the only test that matters.


So you admit to not saying anything about training as I stated? Yes, someone did mention training of 2 to 3 years in other country's read the quote from "binymph" ^ and your comment to it, (speaking of blowing hot air). Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd. You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Why is to hard to teach in a class room sitting and why not have additional field training exercises ( not necessarily with the general public) as well? Nobody can predict how they will react in all situations, although more training can be helpful. If a police officer is
afraid or can't handle the pressure of the job than he/she has no business being one. You have shown no proof that a trainee officer rides with a supervisor or does so for any specific time frame or any training the supervisor has or to train. Your word is not sufficient or even creditable based on your post history. You apparently advocate turning novice police loose for the bulk of their "on the job training" as their testing grounds on the general populous.

At the end of the day you miss the point that extensive training for police officers would not only benefit the populous, the system, but the police as well.

I used to work with our sheriffs office.
Working under the guidence of an experianced office is not turning them loose on the public.
The department I worked for (admin) never unleashed a rookie untill he had proven himself under close supervision.
I know you have this idea that the day they get out of the academy they get a badge and a gun and are unleashed.
Maybe you have watched "Training Day" too many times.
You clearly want to follow the example given earlier were you keep spending money on people for 2-3 years who, during that time are unproductive.
When you count the washouts and the ones who when they are finally allowed in the field can't do the job you will spend half your manpower budget on these people.
Your obviously don't understand that mean people don't know if they can hack it till they get into the field.
Do you think as was implied when I asked how long they had to sign up for that they had to commit for life.
Maybe just twice as many years as they train?
Then when they can't cut it you have dead weight for a couple of years.
Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.




Chaska -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 12:42:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

Hum...51/21 = 2.4 not 8. To quote Tompsonxx, phoquing stupid were you smoking fags and blowing boys behind the shit house while elementary math was taught?

In point of fact, having one certified mechanic in the shop and several uncertified is common. Learning on the job is common and dates back hundreds of years to apprentice/master relationships.

I should also add that 51 weeks is a classic example of phoquing stupid governmental regulations. That sort of thing was handled for hundreds of years by trade masters with apprentices. The only need for the phoquing government to be involved is so it can tax the process.


If you want to play with numbers 24/3 = 8. Either way its more time spent training which is the point, take your insult and apply it to
yourself.

I'm aware of apprenticeship programs, although auto mechanics don't typically have a badge and carry guns, forcing anyone to do business with them. They can't arrest, imprison or shoot you for not doing business with them or refusing to pay them for a shitty job (but there are nut cases in all jobs) they can put a mechanics lien on your car not much more.

I don't make government regulations or agree with all of them it is what it is until changed.
Absurdity is a common trait of bureaucracies. But nothing says “we have no clue about the laws we pass” more than state requirements for law enforcement training. More info here




Chaska -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 1:16:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
...
Shoot them in the leg my ass, no gun training ever teaches that.

T^T


Obviously not where you are.

That is one of the differences between some countries with short term training periods of a handful of weeks and other countries with minimum training of 2-3 years for police forces.

Effective use of weapons without killing as well as de-escalation of potentially dangerous situations requires brains and long training.



2-3 YEARS to train a cop? Where does the money come from?
Pay a man for three year to not help on the streets?
I find that hard to believe.
How long do they have to sign up for?
Friends of mine tell stories of seeing people being beaten to a pulp for saying agreesive threatening things like what when dealing with German cops.




The money is well paid for training cops that are able to do a proper job. It is a job for lifetime possibly so the money is well invested. They get trained in units called Bereitschaftspolizei which during training periods are used to support regular police units at sports events, demonstrations asf. and regular police units at intervals. It is not a matter of "belief" - get informed.

I guess your "friends" with bad manners did not stop at saying aggressive threatening things ...




Our cops train from the day they join up till they retire.


What you're saying is, you see no benefit in extensive training for police officers and that on the job training is the best and only option.
Would you let someone work on your car with minimal training as an auto mechanic, that is expected to learn primarily on the job?
The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years. So it takes 8 times more training to be an auto mechanic than to be a police officer. Are cars more important and of greater value than human beings? Not to mention dealing with human beings is a more complicated issue.

No, I said that the 4 months traning before going on duty is hardly the end of their training.
When possible they ride with another cop for a year or so. This means they have constant supervision over that period of time.
To follow your example it isn't as if a novice mechanic is let loose on your car, it is as if he works under the guidence of a master mechanic.


Incorrect, you had not mention anything about the length of training in this thread until now. You did make the unsubstantiated claim they train until they retire. Until you can back that up with facts it stands as on the job training other than the initial 3 months training. Which leads to yet another question "if" they are supervised, how much training does the supervisor have? As far as auto mechanic trainees being supervised its in a class room environment not the auto repair shop that hires certified mechanics to do the actual work, you also failed
to answer questions asked.

Niether did anyone else so that is just blowing hot air.
You don't know much about police work do you?
Most police work is interacting with people.
Not only is that hard to teach in the classroom(the student knows nothing there it real) but you don't see how they react untill they are in the field.
I have known people who said and did all the right things in the class but when they got into the field they were afraid every minute they are out there or push to hard.
They ride with proven, experienced officers with good records.
These officers have, of course, gone through the academy. They have served several years without problems, and have done well in the periodic traing ugrades trough thier service.
Yes ojt is part of thier training but police work is the sort of thing were OJT is the only test that matters.


So you admit to not saying anything about training as I stated? Yes, someone did mention training of 2 to 3 years in other country's read the quote from "binymph" ^ and your comment to it, (speaking of blowing hot air). Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd. You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Why is to hard to teach in a class room sitting and why not have additional field training exercises ( not necessarily with the general public) as well? Nobody can predict how they will react in all situations, although more training can be helpful. If a police officer is
afraid or can't handle the pressure of the job than he/she has no business being one. You have shown no proof that a trainee officer rides with a supervisor or does so for any specific time frame or any training the supervisor has or to train. Your word is not sufficient or even creditable based on your post history. You apparently advocate turning novice police loose for the bulk of their "on the job training" as their testing grounds on the general populous.

At the end of the day you miss the point that extensive training for police officers would not only benefit the populous, the system, but the police as well.

TO (Training Officer) is a slot on every police force that is, generally, a competitive position based on Time in Grade, class room testing and experience in the field. Pretty much all police departments send people to be trained at places like the FBI academy whose training is then deciminated into the field. Those American training academies generally take people from all over the world and are the source for training in many European countries.

Thanks, that's all I wanted was to answer my question. Next, the time spent with the TO (Training Officer) vary's by location, wouldn't be advantageous to have a standard time frame across the board?




Chaska -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 1:48:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Chaska

Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd.


But he was a sgt in the air farce and an mp in the national fraud and he has only had one of his guns taken away from by a mugger who also took his lunch money???that must count for something???



You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Well there is the fact that an honest mechanic will make about three to four times what an honest cop (sorry for the contradiction in terms) would make.


That could account for why he lives in fear, carry's a gun and is so bias.

Honesty aside. The average salary for an auto mechanic was $39,980 in 2014, which is higher than what many comparable workers earn. For instance, landscapers and groundskeepers rake in $26,720 annually. With yearly earnings of $38,390, maintenance and repair workers also make less than auto techs. Fabricators and security guards also earn less, with annual salaries of $28,730 and $28,040, respectively. Patrol officers, however, out earn mechanics, claiming an average salary of $59,560 in 2014.

Of course, in two years that may have changed somewhat and vary by source and location. This




thompsonx -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 1:48:44 PM)

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



You are fucking stupid thinking the law or Constitution means shit to this government except as toilet paper.

I was in oxford miss. because kennedy declared martial law there.
Get a clue and a history book written for someone beyond the fifth grade.





bounty44 -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 1:53:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.




please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.




mnottertail -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 1:57:07 PM)

who performed the greater sarcasm?




thompsonx -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 2:03:25 PM)


ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: BamaD


I use full powered hornady critical defense.
And when I shoot at twenty paces, an etreme range for a gunfight, I don't miss.

Not a good enough shot to use fmj[8|]
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



I hate to get into this because it's a stupid OP and a stupid debate, but, I'd like to point out its phoquing stupid to take FMJ or TMJ to any place but the range.

I took .45 fmj to cuba,columbia,viet nam,cambodia,laos and a few other places. No one I ever shot with it ever got up to tell me that it was only for use at the range.




thompsonx -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 2:09:09 PM)


ORIGINAL: bounty44
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.




please tell us who the stupid one is here:


It is pretty obvious that the two gradustes of the university of dumbass are the clear winners.


the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

It is pretty obvious that one moron is capable of reading the other morons mind. I read fairly well in english and not at all in gibberish or mind reading.





WickedsDesire -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 2:26:21 PM)

shakes his head




BamaD -> RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA (10/7/2016 3:33:28 PM)

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125