quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Chaska

Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd.


But he was a sgt in the air farce and an mp in the national fraud and he has only had one of his guns taken away from by a mugger who also took his lunch money???that must count for something???



You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Well there is the fact that an honest mechanic will make about three to four times what an honest cop (sorry for the contradiction in terms) would make.

That could account for why he lives in fear, carry's a gun and is so bias.

Honesty aside. The average salary for an auto mechanic was $39,980 in 2014, which is higher than what many comparable workers earn. For instance, landscapers and groundskeepers rake in $26,720 annually. With yearly earnings of $38,390, maintenance and repair workers also make less than auto techs. Fabricators and security guards also earn less, with annual salaries of $28,730 and $28,040, respectively. Patrol officers, however, out earn mechanics, claiming an average salary of $59,560 in 2014.

Of course, in two years that may have changed somewhat and vary by source and location. This

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.

Can we get the poster who claimed "The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years." into that as an honorable mention?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Chaska

Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd.


But he was a sgt in the air farce and an mp in the national fraud and he has only had one of his guns taken away from by a mugger who also took his lunch money???that must count for something???



You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Well there is the fact that an honest mechanic will make about three to four times what an honest cop (sorry for the contradiction in terms) would make.

That could account for why he lives in fear, carry's a gun and is so bias.

Honesty aside. The average salary for an auto mechanic was $39,980 in 2014, which is higher than what many comparable workers earn. For instance, landscapers and groundskeepers rake in $26,720 annually. With yearly earnings of $38,390, maintenance and repair workers also make less than auto techs. Fabricators and security guards also earn less, with annual salaries of $28,730 and $28,040, respectively. Patrol officers, however, out earn mechanics, claiming an average salary of $59,560 in 2014.

Of course, in two years that may have changed somewhat and vary by source and location. This

You should know that once again he is telling one lie after another about me.
And you should pay no attention to that idiot.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd.


No, but I know more than you do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.

We have already covered the academy and OJT. Are you saying all police officers also attend the FBI academy?
How well is the current system working? From all accounts its not working very well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.

Can we get the poster who claimed "The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years." into that as an honorable mention?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.

Can we get the poster who claimed "The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years." into that as an honorable mention?

Isn't that 4 months and one year?
Of course they are European and obviously they know more than we do.
Maybe their months are longer than ours and their years are much shorter than ours.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Chaska

Apparently you think you are the know it all when it comes to police work and have all the answers, which is utterly absurd.


But he was a sgt in the air farce and an mp in the national fraud and he has only had one of his guns taken away from by a mugger who also took his lunch money???that must count for something???



You're so blind you can't see your one sided bias when it comes to discussing this subject. As far as interacting with people, you overlooked I mention dealing with human beings is more complex, also conveniently overlook the vast difference in training time of an auto mechanic compared to a police officer.

Well there is the fact that an honest mechanic will make about three to four times what an honest cop (sorry for the contradiction in terms) would make.

That could account for why he lives in fear, carry's a gun and is so bias.

Honesty aside. The average salary for an auto mechanic was $39,980 in 2014, which is higher than what many comparable workers earn. For instance, landscapers and groundskeepers rake in $26,720 annually. With yearly earnings of $38,390, maintenance and repair workers also make less than auto techs. Fabricators and security guards also earn less, with annual salaries of $28,730 and $28,040, respectively. Patrol officers, however, out earn mechanics, claiming an average salary of $59,560 in 2014.

Of course, in two years that may have changed somewhat and vary by source and location. This

You should know that once again he is telling one lie after another about me.
And you should pay no attention to that idiot.

I know nothing of the sort, I do know in your own words you have expressed fear living in your neighborhood, you boost about carrying a gun and how proficient you are with it and your bias about police and guns is all over the forum.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.

Can we get the poster who claimed "The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years." into that as an honorable mention?

Isn't that 4 months and one year?
Of course they are European and obviously they know more than we do.
Maybe their months are longer than ours and their years are much shorter than ours.

And the mouth of the south has spoken once again true to form with more drivel. You already know I'm not European since you have viewed my profile.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.

We have already covered the academy and OJT. Are you saying all police officers also attend the FBI academy?
How well is the current system working? From all accounts its not working very well.

No, but more than you seem to think.
Clearly you don't read real well. Why would someone who goes to the FBI school need to share information if everone went?
The media makes sure that every mistake a cop makes is put in the worst possible light.
Then they claim that the screwup was typical.
And of course there are always people stupid enough to believe that is the case.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.

We have already covered the academy and OJT. Are you saying all police officers also attend the FBI academy?
How well is the current system working? From all accounts its not working very well.

No, but more than you seem to think.
Clearly you don't read real well. Why would someone who goes to the FBI school need to share information if everone went?
The media makes sure that every mistake a cop makes is put in the worst possible light.
Then they claim that the screwup was typical.
And of course there are always people stupid enough to believe that is the case.

So your read minds? I read well thank you. I asked you a question, there is a big difference in sharing information and attending the FBI academy. There you go again with excuses, which is unusual you see problems then make excuses instead of looking for solutions. I rely
on facts not the media or any BS others try to say. If you want to be stupid enough to believe anything that's on you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.

We have already covered the academy and OJT. Are you saying all police officers also attend the FBI academy?
How well is the current system working? From all accounts its not working very well.

No, but more than you seem to think.
Clearly you don't read real well. Why would someone who goes to the FBI school need to share information if everone went?
The media makes sure that every mistake a cop makes is put in the worst possible light.
Then they claim that the screwup was typical.
And of course there are always people stupid enough to believe that is the case.

So your read minds? I read well thank you. I asked you a question, there is a big difference in sharing information and attending the FBI academy. There you go again with excuses, which is unusual you see problems then make excuses instead of looking for solutions. I rely
on facts not the media or any BS others try to say. If you want to be stupid enough to believe anything that's on you.

The media only gives you the facts they want you to have.
If you have actually been reading my posts over the period you would need to make the claims about me you would know that over the past few months I have comdemed almost as many shooting by cops as I have sided with the cops. Two that come to mind are Tulsa, the indident in FL where they shot the theropist when wrongly shooting and the autistic man, and the incident when the woman was killed during a shoot / don't shoot demonstration. However since I don't jump on the band wagon to lynch every cop who pulls a gun I am biased in favor of cops. Think about it. I condemn cops and ccw holders part of the time and I amd biased? But people who have never seen a cop shooting where they aren't positive the cop is guilty and condemn every dgu as outright murder aren't?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Obviously, you think making excuses is the best solution , not to try and consider other alternatives. Like more education and training that would be beneficial to all concerned. Go ahead, keep your head in the sand and see how that works out.


It would be nice if you had actually read and understood what I said.
OJT is just one part of the training.
There is the academy.
There are inhouse training sessions.
The are as pointed out FBI classes, afterwhich the attendes go back to their departments and share any new information.
There are constant evaluations.
And there is OJT, or mentoring of younger officers by the more experienced offices.

We have already covered the academy and OJT. Are you saying all police officers also attend the FBI academy?
How well is the current system working? From all accounts its not working very well.

No, but more than you seem to think.
Clearly you don't read real well. Why would someone who goes to the FBI school need to share information if everone went?
The media makes sure that every mistake a cop makes is put in the worst possible light.
Then they claim that the screwup was typical.
And of course there are always people stupid enough to believe that is the case.

So your read minds? I read well thank you. I asked you a question, there is a big difference in sharing information and attending the FBI academy. There you go again with excuses, which is unusual you see problems then make excuses instead of looking for solutions. I rely
on facts not the media or any BS others try to say. If you want to be stupid enough to believe anything that's on you.

The media only gives you the facts they want you to have.
If you have actually been reading my posts over the period you would need to make the claims about me you would know that over the past few months I have comdemed almost as many shooting by cops as I have sided with the cops. Two that come to mind are Tulsa, the indident in FL where they shot the theropist when wrongly shooting and the autistic man, and the incident when the woman was killed during a shoot / don't shoot demonstration. However since I don't jump on the band wagon to lynch every cop who pulls a gun I am biased in favor of cops. Think about it. I condemn cops and ccw holders part of the time and I amd biased? But people who have never seen a cop shooting where they aren't positive the cop is guilty and condemn every dgu as outright murder aren't?

Did I not just tell you I don't buy into the bullshit the media pushes on the populous? Am I clear?
You just said in post # 113 your LT. said you should get a gun and you followed his direction.
Aren't you a grown man capable of deciding what is in your best interest and make decisions on your own without being told?
I question if the same holds true when you're told anything.
I'm not trying to discuss whether these or any shooting are righteous or not or am going to at this time.

Look, the bottom line is this. You see problems, make excuses refusing to look at any alternatives that can possible help resolve
problems. I see problems and try to find solutions when possible, I realize all problems may not have a resolution mainly because
the parties involved can't come to an agreement. So we are at an impasse were its impossible to try discussing police training
because you wont or do not want to look at possibilities for improvement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD

Maybe the army should take over law enforcement, would that make you happy.


Another graduate of the university of dumb ass pukes shit out of his mouth once again.
How can you be this phoquing ignorant? How is it that you do not know that the military cannot be used for civil law enforcement without a declaration of martial law?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

please tell us who the stupid one is here:

the one who uses obvious sarcasm in an attempt to either make a point, or take a jab at the other person in the conversation.

or the person who completely misses that the point was sarcastic and acts as if it was a serious consideration? and to make it even worse (that is, more stupid), assumes that the poster doesn't know something that he has actually demonstrated knowledge of in the past here on the forums.

in other words, again, look in the mirror and apply your favorite saying.

Can we get the poster who claimed "The average amount of training to become a police office is 19 to 21 weeks lets say 3 months, while to become a certified auto mechanic it is 51 weeks rounded equals 2 years." into that as an honorable mention?

I stand respectfully corrected,insomnia can make one daft There is still more training for a mechanic.