justheather -> RE: Dysfunctional Dominants (7/23/2006 12:42:07 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MHOO314 quote:
And who is the one who will define "dysfunctional"? What are the terms--you have a better house? You make more money? So another is dysfunctional because they live in an apartment, make an hourly wage? Is that the definition? Or because they have issues? What about depth of emotion, compassion, tenderness-what price tag do you put on those? How does being a Dominant in that scenario differ from humanity--so many variations on a theme----how arrogant we are to think we are better than---pffftttt. Oh my gosh, MHOO I almost completely agree with you. Did anyone else feel the disturbance in the force? Too much emphasis is placed, and most often I think by the subs, and that includes me, on doms being somehow baggage-free. Too many people think that a "true" dom "should" be the breadwinner, provider, master, protector, spider-killer, knows-no-fear, psychologist, uber-evolved being who saves them from having to earn a living, pay for their own movie ticket, deal with their own emotions, drive a crappy car, actually seek out professional therapy (and pay for it) and find (and stay on) their own path. Lots of people dont expect all this, but I think the danger exists. Some of the coolest people Ive met so far in my life cant seem to balance their checkbooks. Some of the most insightful people Ive met, poets, lovers, dreamers....have enough difficulty taking responsibility for their own emotional health to take on the task of caretaker for mine. That's why partnerships are supposed to be based on mutual respect and a desire to bring out the best in the person you are with. Of course, that said, sure, there are some major you-know-what-holes out there who call themselves doms. There are some major you-know-what-holes out there calling themselves accountants too, so I keep my radar up in most new situations (especially around April 15ht) just to be safe.
|
|
|
|