Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Stupid question


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Stupid question Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Stupid question - 2/27/2017 4:32:46 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 4:46:28 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.


First thing that springs to mind: Cost. The people who are most into controlling borders tend also to be the ones who don't like paying high taxes to big-spending governments. Lots of military personnel across long, long borders; big prisons full of inmates .... those pennies add up.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 5:16:17 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
Deportation vs Incarceration
Deportation of criminal immigrants, both legal and illegal, is much cheaper than incarceration. You get a group processed for deportation. The deportees get on a bus. The bus goes across the border. The deportees get off.. sayonara! Or, if they are wanted in the receiving country, they get off the bus to be handcuffed.
This is not some new fascist concept. If you are working on a work visa in Canada and you get more than one DUI; you just may end up escorted to the border and let off at the U.S. entry port.

Deportation of illegal immigrants in lieu of spending money on prosecution and incarceration is quite common.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 5:24:52 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.


First thing that springs to mind: Cost. The people who are most into controlling borders tend also to be the ones who don't like paying high taxes to big-spending governments. Lots of military personnel across long, long borders; big prisons full of inmates .... those pennies add up.




Actually the cost of using US troops to patrol the borders is about 30% of the cost of maintaining all the bases in countries with a high anti American sentiment. Factor in the cost to lease the land those bases are on, it drops to 15%.

Thus, we get troops out of countries where they are obviously not welcome, boosting moral of the troops in the process.

Secondly, as for the prisons, I am thinking along the lines of work camps, lots of razor wire, high fences, small number of personnel needed. The inmates want to eat, they work. They dont work, well there are still warehouses full of old c-rations that are still technically safe to eat, although about as appealing as roasted dog shit.

The Detention centers presently in use are palaces compared to the average third world home, so make them worse than what they left behind.

As for the migrant workers that do the farm harvests, there was a program for that years ago, reinstate it. Non citizens can come into the country for the harvest season, and leave when its over.

And to track them, use a technique every NWO/one world government conspiracy theorist has been screaming about for years, implant them with an RFID chip. It works for dogs and horses, use it on people.

And I am not being sarcastic. I live in a part of the country with a high number of illegals. And the amnesty crap that has been pulled in the past just encourages more to come into the country.

I am saying zero tolerance.

The US already has a bad rep in some parts of the world, some of it only partially earned, lets forget winning hearts and minds (since it clearly is not working) and go for instilling the fear of god in some of these people.

For instance, some terrorist group executes an American citizen, how about the entire strike force of B52's pull round the clock carpet bombing on the area where it happened for 4 days. Granted the innocent will die along with the guilty, but then the innocents may grow a set and take out the assholes bringing down the hell on their heads.



_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 5:26:58 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech


Deportation of illegal immigrants in lieu of spending money on prosecution and incarceration is quite common.



What prosecution is needed?

As for deporting them, dont do much good when they come back a couple of months later.

And I am quite certain some people would have a problem of executing repeat offenders.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 5:34:41 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11270
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
Not that it is war or anything... But is is war. We are being mass invaded by a people who openly disrespect us as a nation, and who clearly have no desire to assimilate.

quote:



Jorge Ramos: America Is ‘Our Country, Not Theirs’—‘And We Are Not Going to Leave’

Univision senior anchor Jorge Ramos declared on Friday that the United States belongs to Latino migrants, emphatically stating to a Spanish-speaking audience that “it is our country, not theirs.”
Ramos took an unusual tack, pivoting from talk of diversity and togetherness into boasts of conquest. Mass immigration, particularly illegal immigration, was a fait accompli. There is nothing the U.S. can do about it, and they must accept that America is “not their” country and that illegal aliens, particularly Latinos, “are not going to leave,” he said.

“I am an immigrant, just like many of you,” Ramos said in Spanish, as translated by the Media Research Center. “I am a proud Latino immigrant here in the United States. My name is Jorge Ramos, and I work at Univision and at the Fusion network.”

“And you know exactly what is going on here in the United States. There are many people who do not want us to be here, and who want to create a wall in order to separate us,” he said.

“But you know what? This is also our country. Let me repeat this: Our country, not theirs. It is our country. And we are not going to leave. We are nearly 60 million Latinos in the United States,” he continued. “And thanks to us, the United States eats, grows and, as we’ve seen today, sings and dances.”

“So when they attack us, we already know what we are going to do. We are not going to sit down. We will not shut up. And we will not leave. That is what we are going to do,” he added.

Ramos gave his speech on Friday during Premios Lo Nuestro, or “Our Awards,” on Univision.

More


Video with English captions here



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 5:41:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

Deportation vs Incarceration
Deportation of criminal immigrants, both legal and illegal, is much cheaper than incarceration. You get a group processed for deportation. The deportees get on a bus. The bus goes across the border. The deportees get off.. sayonara! Or, if they are wanted in the receiving country, they get off the bus to be handcuffed.
This is not some new fascist concept. If you are working on a work visa in Canada and you get more than one DUI; you just may end up escorted to the border and let off at the U.S. entry port.

Deportation of illegal immigrants in lieu of spending money on prosecution and incarceration is quite common.

Sounds good, however, how about all those criminals who kill someone after being deported 6 or seven times.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 5:43:21 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.

Nothing, unless you are out to bring the country down.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 6:52:57 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.


First thing that springs to mind: Cost. The people who are most into controlling borders tend also to be the ones who don't like paying high taxes to big-spending governments. Lots of military personnel across long, long borders; big prisons full of inmates .... those pennies add up.




Actually the cost of using US troops to patrol the borders is about 30% of the cost of maintaining all the bases in countries with a high anti American sentiment. Factor in the cost to lease the land those bases are on, it drops to 15%.

Thus, we get troops out of countries where they are obviously not welcome, boosting moral of the troops in the process.

Secondly, as for the prisons, I am thinking along the lines of work camps, lots of razor wire, high fences, small number of personnel needed. The inmates want to eat, they work. They dont work, well there are still warehouses full of old c-rations that are still technically safe to eat, although about as appealing as roasted dog shit.

The Detention centers presently in use are palaces compared to the average third world home, so make them worse than what they left behind.

As for the migrant workers that do the farm harvests, there was a program for that years ago, reinstate it. Non citizens can come into the country for the harvest season, and leave when its over.

And to track them, use a technique every NWO/one world government conspiracy theorist has been screaming about for years, implant them with an RFID chip. It works for dogs and horses, use it on people.

And I am not being sarcastic. I live in a part of the country with a high number of illegals. And the amnesty crap that has been pulled in the past just encourages more to come into the country.

I am saying zero tolerance.

The US already has a bad rep in some parts of the world, some of it only partially earned, lets forget winning hearts and minds (since it clearly is not working) and go for instilling the fear of god in some of these people.

For instance, some terrorist group executes an American citizen, how about the entire strike force of B52's pull round the clock carpet bombing on the area where it happened for 4 days. Granted the innocent will die along with the guilty, but then the innocents may grow a set and take out the assholes bringing down the hell on their heads.




I would also add implanted birth control for the women. And if the must take a pregnancy test before entering the US.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 8:14:41 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?


Obviously, you're a racist, xenophobic, immigrant hater. That's what's wrong with that.

Or, nothing wrong with deporting illegals. It's one of those two.

quote:

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.
Which leads me to the next idea:
Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.


Aren't mines outlawed by the UN, or is that just for certain applications (real question)? I'd rather we use newly discharged military as US BP and/or ICE as a "step down" from military life to civilian life.

quote:

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.


Put them up in Guantanamo.

quote:

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.


I do believe we need to make the legal process faster, easier, and less costly. That just might help reduce the number of immigrants attempting illegal entry. Granted, it won't drop the number of illegal attempts all that much, but it would have some impact.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 8:23:08 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


I would also add implanted birth control for the women. And if the must take a pregnancy test before entering the US.

Would this apply to everyone entering the US or just those with brown skin?

You realize that the men can procreate to produce US born babies too.. and "Casanova's" can have a lot more of them in less time than the women...




_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 8:23:35 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Thats way too retarded Canada Bob, we would become in one generation a nation of eunuchs and useless sluts.Very Wannasee of you old boy.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 8:56:31 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?


Obviously, you're a racist, xenophobic, immigrant hater. That's what's wrong with that.

Or, nothing wrong with deporting illegals. It's one of those two.

quote:

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.
Which leads me to the next idea:
Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.


Aren't mines outlawed by the UN, or is that just for certain applications (real question)? I'd rather we use newly discharged military as US BP and/or ICE as a "step down" from military life to civilian life.

quote:

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.


Put them up in Guantanamo.

quote:

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.


I do believe we need to make the legal process faster, easier, and less costly. That just might help reduce the number of immigrants attempting illegal entry. Granted, it won't drop the number of illegal attempts all that much, but it would have some impact.



The Ottawa treaty prohibits their use, stockpiling and manufactor of said devices.

The US said it will abide by the terms except in certain areas, primarily the border between north and south Korea, but did not sign the treaty, so....

I have a great idea on where we could put about 20 million or so that we have in surplus.

so if you took a 1500 foot wide strip along the entire Mexican border and mined it with 20 million or so mines we have stockpiled, you could put one mine in every square foot and still have plenty left over to re seed.

Not only would it stop the illegals from coming across to work, it would put a definite dent in the number of on foot drug caravans coming across.

We could call it 'constructive disposal.'

Of course, put up warning signs in all applicable languages as well, so they would be warned.

Of course, there was the trick the VC used on our guys in Vietnam, they took dud artillery shells and bombs, put pressure detonators on em and used them as land mines as well.

And as I said before, we have shitloads of dumb bombs still stockpiled, might as well use em for something.

As for making it easier to come to the US, fine.

You want to come to the US, you must enlist in the US military or if not able to do that, enter public service (even if it means picking up trash on the highway) for a period of not less than 10 years.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 9:16:14 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Just what the fuck is wrong with deporting illegals?

I mean granted, we deport them, they come back and we do it again.

Which leads me to the next idea:

Bring our troops home to patrol the border, and mine the shit out of it.

Ships bringing illegals into ports can be seized, the illegal passengers thrown out and if caught again, put em in a fucking hell hole of a prison till they rot.

Sorry, but I really am tired of the debate, if they really want to come to this country, let em do it legally, or face something that will actually deter others from trying.


The other side of the coin.. due to the US dumping corn & subsidizing US farmers caused Mexico to lose over 900,000 farming jobs and cost their farmers $1 billion/year.. they lost their livelihood, what did you expect them to do? (yeah, I know, y’all don’t give a shite about them) Why do you think those farmers in the Heartland that voted for Trump are so upset now, Mexico is negotiating with Brazil to supply corn, soybeans, etc that presently comes from the US..

Mexico lost over 900,000 farming jobs in the first decade of NAFTA, according to data from the United States Department of Agriculture.
Mendoza says her small town of Santa Ana Zegache is now inhabited mostly by women and the elderly because working-age men went to the United States looking for jobs -- the vast majority crossing over illegally.
NAFTA opened the Mexican market to U.S. corn producers who were subsidized by the U.S. government.
That led to a boom in U.S. corn exports to Mexico -- and a bust in Mexican farming jobs like Benancio's. In the first decade of NAFTA, U.S. corn exports to Mexico quadrupled while Mexican corn prices fell 66%, according to Tufts University professor Tim A. Wise, a trade expert.
The U.S. is the world's number one producer and exporter of corn - and Mexico is its number one export market. “

http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/09/news/economy/nafta-farming-mexico-us-corn-jobs/

“For years developing countries have complained that rich countries undermine their agricultural development by “dumping” surplus commodities on them—that is, by exporting their grains and other products at prices below what it cost to produce them. But how much does such dumping cost farmers in developing countries? According to my new study of U.S. dumping on Mexico after NAFTA, Mexican farmers on average lost more than $1 billion per year during the nine-year period of 1997–2005, with more than half the losses suffered by the country’s embattled corn farmers.”
https://nacla.org/article/mexico-cost-us-dumping


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 9:42:31 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
You would need listening devices strung along the border too Jeff, to listen for tunnelling and then of course, the appropriate shaped charges to halt said tunnelling, once it was on the American side of that border. If the Palestinians can do it, I'm sure the Mexicans can.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 10:06:54 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

You would need listening devices strung along the border too Jeff, to listen for tunnelling and then of course, the appropriate shaped charges to halt said tunnelling, once it was on the American side of that border. If the Palestinians can do it, I'm sure the Mexicans can.



We got lots of those too, developed for the Vietnam war.

The Border Patrol and DEA been begging for those bad boys for years but the Defense department needs an act of congress to release them for use on domestic soil....

In Vietnam when they detected tunnels, they used a drill rig to drill into the tunnel and pump tear gas into the mine, followed by fougasse which was ignited.

I guess we could leave the fougasse out of it and just pump in tear gas and maybe a lot of pepper spray.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Stupid question - 2/27/2017 10:16:43 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
Or maybe have somebody with a bit of savvy, teach those DEA boys how to make said shaped charges ? What mob were you with Jeff ? *smile*. Didn't they used to make them up almost as needed ?

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 4:37:32 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
The thing about illegal immigration isn't that it's not a problem, it's that there is no magic bullet. Amnesty seemed like the cheapest, best way to solve at least part of the problem-- that of illegals undercutting legals.

I really don't think that putting RFID chips in people, mining the border and detaining people in horrifying nightmare prisons would go over well with human rights commissions. Maybe it makes you feel good to imagine people you don't like suffering, but others prefer reason to revenge.

To be honest, I don't think it's worse than the wealthy criminals from Russia and China inflating real estate prices to launder their money... those people are fucking scum. Oh yeah, and they won't be touched because Trump was heavily involved with said schemes.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 6:02:18 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


I would also add implanted birth control for the women. And if the must take a pregnancy test before entering the US.

Would this apply to everyone entering the US or just those with brown skin?

You realize that the men can procreate to produce US born babies too.. and "Casanova's" can have a lot more of them in less time than the women...





I was referring to migrant farm workers for harvests.

If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Stupid question - 2/28/2017 6:12:51 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


If we could temporarily sterilize the males as cheaply, safely, and with as little side effects as we could the females, I would be in favor of it. But we can't. So it is a moot point. Just because something cannot be perfect does not mean that we should not do anything at all.

This sounds like it was lifted word for word from Dr Strangelove. The last people to propose and deploy mass sterilizations were the Nazis. No one would ever propose something like this if those on the receiving end were white Europeans. This is straight out of the Nazi guide on how to treat untermenschen.

Horrifying.

_____________________________



(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Stupid question Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125