Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 2:51:34 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

No one does hissy fits better than the Tweeter in Chief.

I beg to differ. The snowflake left has shown you to be wrong on this matter more than enough.

the shitflake right is the ones who are standing there shivering in the garish light of day caught felchgobbling each other and russians. You retards cant hide whats in plain sight.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 2:52:27 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

Andy Borowitz: "The White House had thought they had enough votes to replace Obamacare, but it turns out the person doing the math was Betsy DeVos."

Lol, that's funny, mostly because it's the little minds on the left that project that image, but it's funny.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 2:53:19 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		We laugh because its funny, we laugh because its true.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 3:24:39 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: smartsub10

I knew it. You knew it. We all knew it. It was so obvious this would happen.


Trump can go fuck himself with his threats against the conservatives who kept pushing for the REPEAL promise that was made, that isn't how it works. Time to get back in touch with your base, Mr President

Welcome to the reality -- Trump is not an honest man.


You alt left radicals keep tripping over yourselves trying to claim that this is a lie, or that is a lie, while never proving a single lie ever

That said, even if your lies had any basis in reality President Trump beats Hillary (who conspired with CNN and the DNC to cheat Bernie Sanders out of the Democratic nomination) in more ways than just the honesty department

We don't march in lockstep under the banner of Dear Leader like the DemoKKKratiKKK party perhaps, but that's plenty okay with me. I like dissension and debate, we don't pepper spray women or beat old people who get out of line like you do

That you can't admit he lied even when you call him out for lying is a conflict you'll have to resolve within yourself.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 3:28:00 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

I'm not really watching the details, but my dad said that they are literally trying to cut people's healthcare worth about $880 billion and cut rich peoples taxes by $886 billion.

Ouch.

Sounds like Ryan's work.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 3:32:15 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Laughing at another of trumps lies...job one..
choker, couldnt close it.
With his own side.
Now what will happen with his friends (the insurance companies) for the next under the table deal.

not that the repubs deserve any sympathy either, after how many years, they still failed dismally with their bill, over and over again
campaign promises you say
people care more about healthcare and the anger from this utter shit action is gonna hurt everyone on the right, in 18.
ALtho I do with the freedom caucus genitalia fester. Their lack of humanity is astounding.

This is the best thing Ive heard all day
altho Nunes stepping on his cock yesterday was close.


Maybe Scrotus WILL still surprise me and go for single payer or expand medicaid for all

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 3:32:35 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

No one does hissy fits better than the Tweeter in Chief.

I beg to differ. The snowflake left has shown you to be wrong on this matter more than enough.

Vive la difference!

But really, it's hard to get snowflakier than a president sending his press secretary to scold the media about the size of inauguration crowds. Unless maybe it's asking folks at the National Prayer Breakfast to seek divine intervention for Celebrity Apprentice ratings. Or perhaps tweeting about a rap video parody.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 3:37:37 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		Yeah, he gives unhinged a whole new bend.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 3:38:06 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

Trump can go fuck himself with his threats against the conservatives who kept pushing for the REPEAL promise that was made, that isn't how it works. Time to get back in touch with your base, Mr President



LMAO nooooo hes amazing, he is doing gods work, he is the best thing to happen to the US God Bless the Scrotus.
Party before country, yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay

this time, stupid might hurt.
Good

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 3/23/2017 4:01:40 PM >

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:18:33 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline 		FR

As for a snowflaky hissy fit, it's hard to top the "War on Christmas."

A Walmart cashier wished me "happy holidays!" I'm scarred for life!

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:26:24 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:29:37 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:29:52 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11234
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


They were elected to repeal it, that is what they need to do and then, and only then, get to work on repairing the damage that government interference in the free market has done to health care over the years

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:40:57 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.



two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition.

the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:42:45 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


They were elected to repeal it, that is what they need to do and then, and only then, get to work on repairing the damage that government interference in the free market has done to health care over the years


ive been hearing roughly that's supposedly the idea behind the stage 2 and stage 3 formulations...

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:44:41 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.



two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition.

the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare.



Everyone should have the right to healthcare.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:53:24 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11234
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.



two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition.

the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare.



Everyone should have the right to healthcare.



And food, and housing, nice clothes, high speed Internet, public utilities, transportation, hair care professionals, mad money, pets...

Everything that Chairman Mao promised, and more


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:54:31 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.



two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition.

the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare.



Everyone should have the right to healthcare.



And food, and housing, nice clothes, high speed Internet, public utilities, transportation, hair care professionals, mad money, pets...

Everything that Chairman Mao promised, and more



Balance.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:56:36 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition.

That makes sense in theory, but doesn't seem to be borne out in reality:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danmunro/2014/06/16/u-s-healthcare-ranked-dead-last-compared-to-10-other-countries/#9f2b632576fd

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/health-costs-how-the-us-compares-with-other-countries/

* * *


Two personal notes from someone with a fair bit of experience with U.S. healthcare:

(a) Today, I had to reschedule a much-needed CT scan at a (nongovernmental) hospital because my (nongovernmental) insurance company is still conducting "medical review" to decide if I need what my doctor prescribed. The review, I learned, can take 2-15 (!!) days.

(b) Shopping by price, a key element of the free market, is much harder to do with healthcare than, say, groceries or cars.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" - 3/23/2017 4:59:57 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11234
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

almost anything that doesn't emphasize movement towards a free market is a non-starter for me. I haven't followed closely enough to say for sure but I suspect that's the freedom caucus folks' main objection too.

anything with the government involved is going to be Obamacare-lite. unfortunately, once you "give" something to someone, no matter even if its bad, taking it back is a challenge.


You know... in everything there has to be balance. Personally i don't think healthcare should be a money-making enterprise.



two things--one is, nothing produces excellence like a free market. if you want the best healthcare for the least amount of dollars spent, allow competition.

the other, despite the lefties who read way too much into too little of our constitution, people don't have a "right" to healthcare.



Everyone should have the right to healthcare.



And food, and housing, nice clothes, high speed Internet, public utilities, transportation, hair care professionals, mad money, pets...

Everything that Chairman Mao promised, and more



Balance.



Okay, provide assistance to the most needy and fill gaps where private insurance fails. We are 20 trillion in debt. Just for fun, and to see how big that number is start counting now, and let us know when you get to 20 trillion


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ..."arch-conservatives rejected it" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109