RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 8:35:25 AM)

quote:

AA hirelings, even though you will never see it limit the people available as a proportion of the hirelings

Let me repeat this so you will get it straight in your good-old-boy's-brain. The Supreme Court has limited AA and ruled against quota systems. You are either ignorant of the law or lying.




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 8:45:26 AM)

quote:

Again all you are capable of seeing is race, facts do not matter to you.

Maybe I am more aware (and not in denial like you) of the long history of racial persecution in this country and of the ongoing theme of racial oppression even post Obama. You are the poster boy for denial of racial motivation in violence by white police, violence not only in gun violence but in disrespect of people of color that lies at the base of "stop and frisk without cause."

And let us not overlook the sly intentions of the OP in using race baiting in the headline of this thread.




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 8:47:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.



On close examination it becomes obvious that most leftists are not only retards, but also extremely racist



The only close examination you are capable of occurs when a leftist's ball sac is hitting your chin.




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 8:50:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.




longwayhome -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:35:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome

FR

This particular shooting is a bit puzzling. It sounds as if something went very wrong with this policeman's application of procedure or his training. Unless the officer himself can explain his actions it will remain a mystery.

Of course this is a tragedy like any shooting, in particular the shooting of an innocent woman who had called the police in the first place. The worrying thing is that this adds to the number of unnecessary shootings where there must have been different options and what appears to be a problem with de-escalating situations, which suggests a wider problem with training and/or the culture in some police departments.

Given the number of police shootings in the US compared to other rich western democracies it is clear at the very least that US policemen reach for a gun and use it more frequently than other places. Inevitably where guns are used in law and order situations there are going to be mistakes and miscarriages of justice that come along with a number of these shootings. This is less a criticism of the US, more an acknowledgement that there is a problem to be addressed.

As for the spurious race/religion issue raised by the OP, it would be surprising with so many police firearms incidents that police personnel of colour did not sometimes shoot white people and that some of those shootings would be questionable. That does nothing to mitigate the fact that people of colour are disproportionately killed in police shootings, both in comparison to the population as a whole and taking crime stats into account. There is a race issue here but it's not just a race issue.

Quite apart from the appalling tragedy for this woman and her family, the overwhelming concern is what makes the police reach so often for their guns and what makes them discharge them. Statistics and experiments suggest that even black officers disproportionately shoot black men, and react differently in test situations to black and white subjects. This suggests that there is something going on which is far more subtle than the overt racism which is sometimes evident.

Leaving aside the possibility that there are a number of cops who are just very trigger happy and have no regard for human life, there is at the least a deep-seated self-preservation instinct among the police that goes wrong in real life situations. This does work disproportionately, but not entirely, against non-white suspects, even if you yourself are a black policeman. If you think that you are in a war, you will feel the need to use your gun more often, whatever the consequences.

Apart from the normal cycle of message board blame and counter-blame, there would appear to be issues here which don't have easy solutions. If you were running a police department addressing these issues would be the most difficult part of your job. How do you hire, train and prepare people to do law enforcement jobs to keep the public safe, themselves safe and ensure that situations are appropriately de-escalated to minimise the risks of things going wrong, whilst at the same time rooting out conscious and unconscious racism, incompetence and the plain criminality of (hopefully) a small number of officers?

People continue to die unnecessarily at the hands of the police, in the full glare of an unsympathetic press and public. Of course the police are blamed because their fingers are on the triggers.

No easy solutions to a hugely socially divisive issue.


Non-white officers do just as often shoot unarmed white people but there is no ratings covering it and it weakens the claims so you just don't hear about it that much.
I had the same questions so I did some research and most of what I found was news people questioning the low key approach to black officers shooting white people to the extent that if the shooter is black his race is not initially released.


I am more concerned about all victims of police shootings and what the police can do about it. I specifically referred to black officers too because they are not immune to making mistakes with a gun in their hand.

There are surely issues about de-escalation, training and strategy. We are talking about policemen, not soldiers here (and even soldiers are trained about the risks of over-reacting in patrolling civilian areas).

Being a black man makes it more likely to be shot by the Police (in proportion to the population and crime stats), but even if you took away that bias there is still a problem, epitomised by the tragic shooting of this woman, who could just as easily have been shot by a white officer.

I have sympathy for the police in doing their job in a weaponised community, but the fact is that the high number of police shootings when there could have been other outcomes is an issue that needs to be addressed if the police are going to regain and retain the trust of their communities, black or white.

The higher rate of the shootings can be explained largely do to the fact that the crime rate among blacks is even a greater increase of that of others than the shooting disparity.
Don't get me wrong. A unjustified shooting in the highest crime area in the country is still wrong but it does help explain the disparity in shootings.
The more hostile contact the more shootings.


None of what you said is any grounds for complacency.

I was making two main points.

One - there is a problem with how the police use their weapons, especially in situations which might otherwise have been de-escalated.

Two - the higher rate of police shootings of non-white subjects is out of proportion with both the size of the non-white population and the related crime rates. In other words the number of police shootings is higher than would be suggested by higher crime rates.

Incidentally, just to prevent widening the debate in the thread out to much, I have tried to keep to police shootings and not tried to examine why non-white people commit more crime in the US and Western Europe. I haven't even touched on the relationship between income and crime, the lower average pay of people of colour and the inevitable consequence of not tackling deprivation in black communities. Add to the fact that in the US a black man is more likely to be arrested, convicted and given a custodial sentence for the same crime as a white man, and the you start to destroy the myth that black people are somehow culturally more likely to commit crime. Truth is differential crime figures reduce when people have similar income and opportunities, but that is not the point I was trying to make in this thread.

I am just asking the questions in relation to my first point about what the police can do to respond better so that fewer people die as a result of upholding the law. It's a sincere attempt to concentrate on positive solutions rather than throw blame around.





BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:40:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome

FR

This particular shooting is a bit puzzling. It sounds as if something went very wrong with this policeman's application of procedure or his training. Unless the officer himself can explain his actions it will remain a mystery.

Of course this is a tragedy like any shooting, in particular the shooting of an innocent woman who had called the police in the first place. The worrying thing is that this adds to the number of unnecessary shootings where there must have been different options and what appears to be a problem with de-escalating situations, which suggests a wider problem with training and/or the culture in some police departments.

Given the number of police shootings in the US compared to other rich western democracies it is clear at the very least that US policemen reach for a gun and use it more frequently than other places. Inevitably where guns are used in law and order situations there are going to be mistakes and miscarriages of justice that come along with a number of these shootings. This is less a criticism of the US, more an acknowledgement that there is a problem to be addressed.

As for the spurious race/religion issue raised by the OP, it would be surprising with so many police firearms incidents that police personnel of colour did not sometimes shoot white people and that some of those shootings would be questionable. That does nothing to mitigate the fact that people of colour are disproportionately killed in police shootings, both in comparison to the population as a whole and taking crime stats into account. There is a race issue here but it's not just a race issue.

Quite apart from the appalling tragedy for this woman and her family, the overwhelming concern is what makes the police reach so often for their guns and what makes them discharge them. Statistics and experiments suggest that even black officers disproportionately shoot black men, and react differently in test situations to black and white subjects. This suggests that there is something going on which is far more subtle than the overt racism which is sometimes evident.

Leaving aside the possibility that there are a number of cops who are just very trigger happy and have no regard for human life, there is at the least a deep-seated self-preservation instinct among the police that goes wrong in real life situations. This does work disproportionately, but not entirely, against non-white suspects, even if you yourself are a black policeman. If you think that you are in a war, you will feel the need to use your gun more often, whatever the consequences.

Apart from the normal cycle of message board blame and counter-blame, there would appear to be issues here which don't have easy solutions. If you were running a police department addressing these issues would be the most difficult part of your job. How do you hire, train and prepare people to do law enforcement jobs to keep the public safe, themselves safe and ensure that situations are appropriately de-escalated to minimise the risks of things going wrong, whilst at the same time rooting out conscious and unconscious racism, incompetence and the plain criminality of (hopefully) a small number of officers?

People continue to die unnecessarily at the hands of the police, in the full glare of an unsympathetic press and public. Of course the police are blamed because their fingers are on the triggers.

No easy solutions to a hugely socially divisive issue.


Non-white officers do just as often shoot unarmed white people but there is no ratings covering it and it weakens the claims so you just don't hear about it that much.
I had the same questions so I did some research and most of what I found was news people questioning the low key approach to black officers shooting white people to the extent that if the shooter is black his race is not initially released.


I am more concerned about all victims of police shootings and what the police can do about it. I specifically referred to black officers too because they are not immune to making mistakes with a gun in their hand.

There are surely issues about de-escalation, training and strategy. We are talking about policemen, not soldiers here (and even soldiers are trained about the risks of over-reacting in patrolling civilian areas).

Being a black man makes it more likely to be shot by the Police (in proportion to the population and crime stats), but even if you took away that bias there is still a problem, epitomised by the tragic shooting of this woman, who could just as easily have been shot by a white officer.

I have sympathy for the police in doing their job in a weaponised community, but the fact is that the high number of police shootings when there could have been other outcomes is an issue that needs to be addressed if the police are going to regain and retain the trust of their communities, black or white.

The higher rate of the shootings can be explained largely do to the fact that the crime rate among blacks is even a greater increase of that of others than the shooting disparity.
Don't get me wrong. A unjustified shooting in the highest crime area in the country is still wrong but it does help explain the disparity in shootings.
The more hostile contact the more shootings.


None of what you said is any grounds for complacency.

One - there is a problem with how the police use their weapons, especially in situations which might otherwise have been de-escalated.

Two - the higher rate of police shootings of non-white subjects is out of proportion with both the size of the non-white population and the related crime rates. In other words the number of police shootings is higher than would be suggested by higher crime rates.

Incidentally, just to prevent widening the debate in the thread out to much, I have tried to keep to police shootings and not tried to examine why non-white people commit more crime in the US and Western Europe. I haven't even touched on the relationship between income and crime, the lower average pay of people of colour and the inevitable consequence of not tackling deprivation in black communities. Add to the fact that in the US a black man is more likely to be arrested, convicted and given a custodial sentence for the same crime as a white man, and the you start to destroy the myth that black people are somehow culturally more likely to commit crime. Truth is differential crime figures reduce when people have similar income and opportunities, but that is not the point I was trying to make in this thread.

I am just asking the questions in relation to my first point about what the police can do to respond better so that fewer people die as a result of upholding the law. It's a sincere attempt to concentrate on positive solutions rather than throw blame around.



It is out of proportion to the population, but not he crime rate. The majorities of murders in this country are committed by blacks.
Not I said means that there is cause for complacency, one unjustified shooting is too many, and the race involved is not important.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:46:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Simple, they are required to turn on the body cams when they see any chance of violence, the white cop didn't see any.
Remember he was surprised when this guy started shooting.
Your earlier outburst was to bigoted to understand that if he was hired to fill a quota that was the departments fault, not his.

I read that there are eight Somalians on the force; he was the first. There is no quota system anywhere; the Supreme Court has struck that down. You are full of shit.

He got lots of praise for being a Somali, none for being a good cop.
They can't set specific quotas but that doesn't mean they are a strict in hiring if you are the target group.
Funny he totally screwed up bt since he is a minority you want to absolve him of guilt, everyone but the killer is wrong.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:49:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

AA hirelings, even though you will never see it limit the people available as a proportion of the hirelings

Let me repeat this so you will get it straight in your good-old-boy's-brain. The Supreme Court has limited AA and ruled against quota systems. You are either ignorant of the law or lying.

Even without set quotas if your goal is to increase the makeup with a specific demographic you still have the same problems.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:51:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Again all you are capable of seeing is race, facts do not matter to you.

Maybe I am more aware (and not in denial like you) of the long history of racial persecution in this country and of the ongoing theme of racial oppression even post Obama. You are the poster boy for denial of racial motivation in violence by white police, violence not only in gun violence but in disrespect of people of color that lies at the base of "stop and frisk without cause."

And let us not overlook the sly intentions of the OP in using race baiting in the headline of this thread.

And let us not ignore that you want to pretend this idiot followed procedure.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:54:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.


I was 30 before I set foot in the south, so as usual you are talking though your hat.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 9:55:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.

Nobody threatened violence.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 10:56:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.


As usual you have it backwards. I can make gentle posts because I am right, you have to be abusive and insulting because that's all you have.




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 2:32:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.


As usual you have it backwards. I can make gentle posts because I am right, you have to be abusive and insulting because that's all you have.


No, I am abusive and insulting to you because you were the same to me. Even after I asked you to stop making me the subjects of your posts you had the audacity to claim I hated police because I must be a felon knowing I had been a school teacher for thirty years. That was after you said I was an angry negro. When I pointed out I am white you said I looked black on your PC, so if I am white I am motivated by white guilt. You just can't make up your mind, dumb fool.

And I am also properly calling you a racist for your comment in your post #60 that being a minority he (the shooter) didn't believe the rules applied to him, and for all your other comments about diversity hires and quota systems, which have been struck down by SCOTUS.

Now you have the nerve to say you are right.




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 2:38:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

AA hirelings, even though you will never see it limit the people available as a proportion of the hirelings

Let me repeat this so you will get it straight in your good-old-boy's-brain. The Supreme Court has limited AA and ruled against quota systems. You are either ignorant of the law or lying.

Even without set quotas if your goal is to increase the makeup with a specific demographic you still have the same problems.

There you go, lumping a people of color as a set of problems. Tell me that isn't racist thinking. [8|]




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 2:53:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.


As usual you have it backwards. I can make gentle posts because I am right, you have to be abusive and insulting because that's all you have.


No, I am abusive and insulting to you because you were the same to me. Even after I asked you to stop making me the subjects of your posts you had the audacity to claim I hated police because I must be a felon knowing I had been a school teacher for thirty years. That was after you said I was an angry negro. When I pointed out I am white you said I looked black on your PC, so if I am white I am motivated by white guilt. You just can't make up your mind, dumb fool.

And I am also properly calling you a racist for your comment in your post #60 that being a minority he (the shooter) didn't believe the rules applied to him, and for all your other comments about diversity hires and quota systems, which have been struck down by SCOTUS.

Now you have the nerve to say you are right.

You start out with a distortion. I did not say you must be a felon. In fact I clearly stated stated that I was
assuming no such thing.
You never did tell me why he felt free to ignore the rules, come up with a better reason. In fact you seem determined to absolve him of guilt and blame it on the whole dept but him, sure looks like bias.

The only thing he was ever praised for was being Somali, but you pretend that has nothing to do with his hiring.

And you are to stupid to realize that the absence of formal quotas doesn't mean that when an organization decides to increase a particular demographic they don't give preference
to people of that demographic to the extent of hiring people who if they were white wouldn't have a chance. Example is some organization they are "fair" because it is based on a point system. You get extra points for being black.
Some using the same king of system can't hire white people until all blacks in the teir are hired. But you think that is A fair, and B give you the same quality of people as if they did not give preference to what ever the group was.




BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 2:58:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

AA hirelings, even though you will never see it limit the people available as a proportion of the hirelings

Let me repeat this so you will get it straight in your good-old-boy's-brain. The Supreme Court has limited AA and ruled against quota systems. You are either ignorant of the law or lying.

Even without set quotas if your goal is to increase the makeup with a specific demographic you still have the same problems.

There you go, lumping a people of color as a set of problems. Tell me that isn't racist thinking. [8|]


Not at all. First you can't comprehend what I said (nothing new there) any time you hire based on anything other
than qualifications you dilute the workforce. Places used to do this by not hiring blacks, now some have reversed the process.
At no point did I say anything about the individuals, I was attacking the system that counts race, any race in hiring.




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 3:03:12 PM)

~FR~

In Minneapolis black activists and young whites have been leaders in protesting the killing of Ms Damond.

Whatever one thinks about their tactics, the group of protesters that interrupted that media conference on Friday was diverse, with a large contingent of young white protesters and several long-time black activists in the lead. Was this is a new trend that Criss and Love had missed?

The truth is that black activists have been at the forefront since day one.

Last Saturday night, Damond, a 40-year-old spiritual healer from Sydney, Australia, called 911 to report a possible sexual assault. She was in her pyjamas when she approached the Minneapolis squad car that responded. Officer Mohamed Noor, who was in the passenger seat, shot her through the driver’s side window.

While it’s impossible to paint activists of color with one brush – they have different approaches, tactics, affiliations and ideologies – those rallying around the Diamond shooting share a belief that her death was caused by the kind of police violence they have been working to stop. They also believe that as, community members, they have a duty to show up.

The influence of such activists could have been missed by outside observers. While they support the larger movement for police reform and racial equity, they do not necessarily fall under the easily Googled banner of “Black Lives Matter”. BLM has a chapter in Minneapolis that has at times been hugely influential. But it is far from the only group working on issues related to police shootings.

Shaun King, a columnist with the New York Daily News who covers police brutality and Black Lives Matter, says critics questioning the willingness of black activists to address police violence against white victims often do so in error.

The diversity of protesters in Minneapolis was impossible to miss on Thursday, as hundreds marched through Damond’s neighborhood. Also clear was the thread that so many saw connecting Damond’s death with that of Philando Castile. His mother, Valerie Castile, hugged Dom Damond, Justine’s fiance. John Thompson, a friend and coworker of Castile who became an activist after his death, gave an impassioned speech, as he has at many other protests over the last year.

In a media conference on Wednesday, assistant police chief Medaria Arradondo, who is now set to become chief, addressed the “trigger happy” charge by pointing to a move the department made last year to require officers to use de-escalation tactics, and to resort to force only as as a last resort. The “sanctity of life” was a guiding principle for how Minneapolis police officers interact with the public, he said.

On Thursday, then police chief Janeé Harteau disavowed Noor’s conduct, saying Damon “didn’t have to die”. What happened was the result of an “individual officer’s actions”, she said, frustrating activists who believe systemic changes are needed.

Another common belief among activists of color protesting Damond’s case is that it might lead to change that could benefit the city. Since Damond was a white woman who lived in a wealthy and influential neighborhood, and since the government of Australia is now supporting her family, they hope the case will at least force the city and police leaders to consider new reforms.

“I just hope that the people from that community rise up,” said Jones. “Her death does not have to be in vain, this tragedy can help the entire city take a serious look at how the police treat communities.


Some snips in the posting.

SOURCE









BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 3:31:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

~FR~

In Minneapolis black activists and young whites have been leaders in protesting the killing of Ms Damond.

Whatever one thinks about their tactics, the group of protesters that interrupted that media conference on Friday was diverse, with a large contingent of young white protesters and several long-time black activists in the lead. Was this is a new trend that Criss and Love had missed?

The truth is that black activists have been at the forefront since day one.

Last Saturday night, Damond, a 40-year-old spiritual healer from Sydney, Australia, called 911 to report a possible sexual assault. She was in her pyjamas when she approached the Minneapolis squad car that responded. Officer Mohamed Noor, who was in the passenger seat, shot her through the driver’s side window.

While it’s impossible to paint activists of color with one brush – they have different approaches, tactics, affiliations and ideologies – those rallying around the Diamond shooting share a belief that her death was caused by the kind of police violence they have been working to stop. They also believe that as, community members, they have a duty to show up.

The influence of such activists could have been missed by outside observers. While they support the larger movement for police reform and racial equity, they do not necessarily fall under the easily Googled banner of “Black Lives Matter”. BLM has a chapter in Minneapolis that has at times been hugely influential. But it is far from the only group working on issues related to police shootings.

Shaun King, a columnist with the New York Daily News who covers police brutality and Black Lives Matter, says critics questioning the willingness of black activists to address police violence against white victims often do so in error.

The diversity of protesters in Minneapolis was impossible to miss on Thursday, as hundreds marched through Damond’s neighborhood. Also clear was the thread that so many saw connecting Damond’s death with that of Philando Castile. His mother, Valerie Castile, hugged Dom Damond, Justine’s fiance. John Thompson, a friend and coworker of Castile who became an activist after his death, gave an impassioned speech, as he has at many other protests over the last year.

In a media conference on Wednesday, assistant police chief Medaria Arradondo, who is now set to become chief, addressed the “trigger happy” charge by pointing to a move the department made last year to require officers to use de-escalation tactics, and to resort to force only as as a last resort. The “sanctity of life” was a guiding principle for how Minneapolis police officers interact with the public, he said.

On Thursday, then police chief Janeé Harteau disavowed Noor’s conduct, saying Damon “didn’t have to die”. What happened was the result of an “individual officer’s actions”, she said, frustrating activists who believe systemic changes are needed.

Another common belief among activists of color protesting Damond’s case is that it might lead to change that could benefit the city. Since Damond was a white woman who lived in a wealthy and influential neighborhood, and since the government of Australia is now supporting her family, they hope the case will at least force the city and police leaders to consider new reforms.

“I just hope that the people from that community rise up,” said Jones. “Her death does not have to be in vain, this tragedy can help the entire city take a serious look at how the police treat communities.


Some snips in the posting.

SOURCE







A You ignore the fact that nobody sees this as a justified shooting.
B You want to pretend that this makes everyone but the black guy responsible for what happened.
C Say just once that his action violated not only procedures but common sense.
D Like the close minded person you are you try to pretend that anyone who disagrees with you
must only oppose this because he is black. I know that when I read this I thought he was a moron,
at best before I knew he was black. You do know that not all Moslems are black don't you?




vincentML -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 3:39:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.


As usual you have it backwards. I can make gentle posts because I am right, you have to be abusive and insulting because that's all you have.


No, I am abusive and insulting to you because you were the same to me. Even after I asked you to stop making me the subjects of your posts you had the audacity to claim I hated police because I must be a felon knowing I had been a school teacher for thirty years. That was after you said I was an angry negro. When I pointed out I am white you said I looked black on your PC, so if I am white I am motivated by white guilt. You just can't make up your mind, dumb fool.

And I am also properly calling you a racist for your comment in your post #60 that being a minority he (the shooter) didn't believe the rules applied to him, and for all your other comments about diversity hires and quota systems, which have been struck down by SCOTUS.

Now you have the nerve to say you are right.


You start out with a distortion. I did not say you must be a felon. In fact I clearly stated stated that I was
assuming no such thing.
You never did tell me why he felt free to ignore the rules, come up with a better reason. In fact you seem determined to absolve him of guilt and blame it on the whole dept but him, sure looks like bias.

The only thing he was ever praised for was being Somali, but you pretend that has nothing to do with his hiring.


And you are to stupid to realize that the absence of formal quotas doesn't mean that when an organization decides to increase a particular demographic they don't give preference
to people of that demographic to the extent of hiring people who if they were white wouldn't have a chance. Example is some organization they are "fair" because it is based on a point system. You get extra points for being black.
Some using the same king of system can't hire white people until all blacks in the teir are hired. But you think that is A fair, and B give you the same quality of people as if they did not give preference to what ever the group was.


You are so confused. I am not surprised. My complaint with your ad hom comments stems from out discussions in the Philandro Castile thread.

You are still living in the 1970s. The fact is that big city police departments are having difficulty recruiting people of color be cause preference is given to military veterans, who are white by 9 out of 10. You really should do some research before you make antiquated statements.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/30/vet-hiring-preference-hinders-police-diversity/99689054/

http://www.wbur.org/news/2015/06/22/boston-police-force-racial-diversity

or by bureaucratic push back and stalling: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/20/nyregion/black-police-applicant-frustrated-by-hiring-process.html






BamaD -> RE: Black Muslim Refugee Cop Shoots Unarmed White Female Homeowner (7/22/2017 3:47:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Class AA deep south racism. He's a nigger. He broke a rule (he didn't) Must be because he is a nigger. Hell, don't sugarcoat your racism. Bull Conner would be ashamed of your reticence.


on the whole, bama shows remarkable and gentle restraint with you. in reality, you deserve to have your ass kicked.


Because I speak the truth you resort to threatening violence? Bama writes long gentle screeds to camouflage his southern roots.


As usual you have it backwards. I can make gentle posts because I am right, you have to be abusive and insulting because that's all you have.


No, I am abusive and insulting to you because you were the same to me. Even after I asked you to stop making me the subjects of your posts you had the audacity to claim I hated police because I must be a felon knowing I had been a school teacher for thirty years. That was after you said I was an angry negro. When I pointed out I am white you said I looked black on your PC, so if I am white I am motivated by white guilt. You just can't make up your mind, dumb fool.

And I am also properly calling you a racist for your comment in your post #60 that being a minority he (the shooter) didn't believe the rules applied to him, and for all your other comments about diversity hires and quota systems, which have been struck down by SCOTUS.

Now you have the nerve to say you are right.


You start out with a distortion. I did not say you must be a felon. In fact I clearly stated stated that I was
assuming no such thing.
You never did tell me why he felt free to ignore the rules, come up with a better reason. In fact you seem determined to absolve him of guilt and blame it on the whole dept but him, sure looks like bias.

The only thing he was ever praised for was being Somali, but you pretend that has nothing to do with his hiring.


And you are to stupid to realize that the absence of formal quotas doesn't mean that when an organization decides to increase a particular demographic they don't give preference
to people of that demographic to the extent of hiring people who if they were white wouldn't have a chance. Example is some organization they are "fair" because it is based on a point system. You get extra points for being black.
Some using the same king of system can't hire white people until all blacks in the teir are hired. But you think that is A fair, and B give you the same quality of people as if they did not give preference to what ever the group was.


You are so confused. I am not surprised. My complaint with your ad hom comments stems from out discussions in the Philandro Castile thread.

You are still living in the 1970s. The fact is that big city police departments are having difficulty recruiting people of color be cause preference is given to military veterans, who are white by 9 out of 10. You really should do some research before you make antiquated statements.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/30/vet-hiring-preference-hinders-police-diversity/99689054/

http://www.wbur.org/news/2015/06/22/boston-police-force-racial-diversity

or by bureaucratic push back and stalling: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/20/nyregion/black-police-applicant-frustrated-by-hiring-process.html





I know exactly what comments you are referring to.
The systems I am referring to are far more recent than the 70's, maybe you should do real research
rather than just reading propaganda sites.
I notice that you apparently still stand by your argument that I am displaying the "fact" that I am a long time southerner.
Before I set foot in the south I lived in Ill, Mo, Ca, Md, and Tx which is much different than the southeast.
It would appear that I have a far more diverse geographic background than you.
You are aware that far more than 10% of the military is minority.
Military have an earned preference, not a granted one, and I realize you don't understand that either.
Big cities have a problem getting qualified minorities because minorities who go for police jobs are treated like race traitors.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625