quote:

In late September, five black cadet candidates found racial slurs scrawled on message boards on their doors at the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School. One candidate found the words "go home n---" written outside his room, his mother posted on social media, according to the Air Force Times.

The racist messages roiled the academy in Colorado Springs, prompted the school to launch an investigation. They led its superintendent to deliver a stern speech that decried the "horrible language" and drew national attention for its eloquence.

But on Tuesday, the school made a jolting announcement. The person responsible for the racist messages, the academy said, was, in fact, one of the cadet candidates who reported being targeted by them.

"The individual admitted responsibility and this was validated by the investigation," academy spokesman Lt. Col. Allen Herritage said in a statement to the Associated Press, adding: "Racism has no place at the academy, in any shape or form."
After racial slurs at Air Force Academy, leader delivers powerful speech on race

The cadet candidate accused of crafting the messages was not identified, but the Colorado Springs Gazette reported that the individual is no longer enrolled at the school. Sources also told the Gazette the cadet candidate "committed the act in a bizarre bid to get out of trouble he faced at the school for other misconduct," the newspaper reported.
source

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Look people we get it, the history of the United States is 200 years of bigotry, racism, inequality and even genocide. As a country we are trying to change this, and it started with the equal rights movement led by Martin Luther King jr.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

Actually, I think it started with the words "all men are created equal" but I get your meaning.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Problem is that that the liberals and others have turned this country into a nation of segregated Americans, segregated by labels, African American, White American, Native American, Asian American, Mexican American, and god knows how many other ______ Americans there are.

Its no longer politically correct or acceptable just to be an American.

quote:

A Rasmussen poll taken in 2013 asked American adults, "Are most white Americans racist?" "Are most Hispanic Americans racist?" and "Are most black Americans racist?" Of the three groups, the winner was blacks.

Thirty-seven percent said most blacks were racist; 18 percent felt most Hispanics were racist, and 15 percent said most whites were racist.

Thirty-eight percent of whites felt most blacks were racist. Even blacks agreed, with 31 percent saying most blacks were racist, while 24 percent of blacks thought most whites racist and 15 percent believed most Hispanics were racist.

[the comrades must be under-represented in the sample, because as we all know, everyone (but them) is a raaaaaaaaacist!]

This brings us to the Cornell University's Black Students United and whether the organization is engaging in racism -- against blacks. The BSU complains that the prestigious Ivy League school admits too many blacks -- from Africa and the Caribbean. "We demand that Cornell Admissions to come up with a plan to actively increase the presence of underrepresented Black students on this campus," the BSU student group said in its demands. "We define underrepresented Black students as Black Americans who have several generations (more than two) in this country."

Hold the phone. Isn't the mantra of modern higher education "diversity," "inclusion" and "overcoming disadvantage"? If so, the black African and Caribbean students would seem to nail all three.

Maybe the problem is that it is tough to explain why so many black foreign applicants outperform America-born blacks on what some call "culturally biased" standardized tests. A 2007 study by Princeton and University of Pennsylvania sociologists examined the standardized test scores of black students enrolled at 28 selective universities. As to the SAT, the test most colleges use as an important factor in offering admission, the study found that foreign-born black college-bound students earned a statistically significant advantage on SAT scores, averaging a score of 1250 (out of 1600) compared to 1193 average points for their American black counterparts. This explains, in large part, why first- or second-generation black immigrants made up 27 percent of the black student bodies at colleges nationwide. In the Ivy League, black immigrants comprised 41 percent of black students.

What is the basis for the black students' protest? Don't black foreigners face even more obstacles? After all, America spends more on education, K through 12, than the top 34 industrialized countries save Switzerland, Austria, Norway and Luxembourg. New York City and Washington, D.C., annually spend approximately $21,000 and $15,000 per student, respectively.

BSU might want to consider the letter to the editor of The Wall Street Journal written by a man from Congo:

"I grew up in the Congo and have numerous friends in the U.S. from the Congo and other African countries who are here for an education or a better life. Every one of them is grateful for the opportunity to secure an excellent education. ... Most come here from different cultures with minimal money and limited English language skills. Interestingly, I've never heard one complain about discrimination, obstacles or being a victim. Rather, they are grateful. Juxtapose this with Cornell's Black Students United (BSU) whose members feel they should be treated better than every other color or race if they have ancestors who've been here for more than two generations.

"The counterintuitive posturing of American blacks denying other blacks from Africa or the Caribbean is appalling. First-generation African or Caribbean students have more obstacles to overcome to get into any university, much less a prestigious one like Cornell. Furthermore, the liberal American blacks who worship at the altar of 'diversity' and 'victimhood' should welcome real Africans or Caribbeans versus seeking preferences for those American blacks who truly have the superior advantage of having grown up in the U.S.

"If my Congolese friends are grateful for their opportunities here and have more challenges to overcome, why should American blacks get special treatment? Call this action what it is: racism. And it's being pushed and protected under the guise of alleged victimization and preferential treatment at the expense of others of all colors and walks of life. So I challenge the BSU folks to start focusing on the concept of succeeding in life instead of always dwelling on the idea that the system is rigged against them."

The black immigrant culture rejects the victicrat mentality embraced by so many American blacks. In "The Triple Package," a 2014 book about immigrants' children, a son of Nigerian-born parents says, "If you start thinking about or becoming absorbed in the mentality that the whole system is against us, then you cannot succeed."

Rather than complain about the success of foreign-born blacks, why not give failing urban schools some competition through vouchers to give parents greater choice in where to educate their children, a policy currently pushed by the Trump administration? In the Detroit public school district, for example, just seven percent of eighth-graders are proficient or better in reading and just four percent are sufficient or better in math, despite total expenditures per student of over $18,000, according to the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress tests.

Isn't this the real problem?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Problem is that that the liberals and others have turned this country into a nation of segregated Americans, segregated by labels, African American, White American, Native American, Asian American, Mexican American, and god knows how many other ______ Americans there are.

Its no longer politically correct or acceptable just to be an American.

Are you suggesting that it's all the liberals' fault? It sure sounds that way.

Americans have always been segregated by racial fault lines. Liberals didn't introduce segregation - that preceded the modern concept of a 'liberal' by at least a century. Jim Crow laws were on the statute books long before anyone conceived of the noton of a liberal. Liberals didn't create the ghettoes - ghettoes also preceded the concept of a contemporary liberal by many decades.

What 'liberals' did do is draw attention to the many existing, decades-old fault lines in American society with the intention of developing policies that sought to abolish those fault lines.

Liberals here in Australia do exactly the same yet get criticised for the same reasons as our US counterparts. Here, the criticism usually comes from the same quarters that have opposed every measure, policy and/or law designed to improve the living standards of people marginalised by outdated social phobias such as racism.

In many cases, the argument you propose is adopted, then advanced enthusiastically by self proclaimed racists, who deeply resent being put on the same level ("Its no longer politically correct or acceptable just to be an American") as the people they hate. Their aim is to increase racial tensions, to solidify divisions and hate, and to keep the marginalised parts of Australian society 'in their place'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Problem is that that the liberals and others have turned this country into a nation of segregated Americans, segregated by labels, African American, White American, Native American, Asian American, Mexican American, and god knows how many other ______ Americans there are.
Its no longer politically correct or acceptable just to be an American.

Are you suggesting that it's all the liberals' fault? It sure sounds that way.
Americans have always been segregated by racial fault lines. Liberals didn't introduce segregation - that preceded the modern concept of a 'liberal' by at least a century. Jim Crow laws were on the statute books long before anyone conceived of the notion of a liberal. Liberals didn't create the ghettoes - ghettoes also preceded the concept of a contemporary liberal by many decades.
What 'liberals' did do is draw attention to the many existing, decades-old fault lines in American society with the intention of developing policies that sought to abolish those fault lines.
Liberals here in Australia do exactly the same yet get criticised for the same reasons as our US counterparts. Here, the criticism usually comes from the same quarters that have opposed every measure, policy and/or law designed to improve the living standards of people marginalised by outdated social phobias such as racism.
In many cases, the argument you propose is adopted, then advanced enthusiastically by self proclaimed racists, who deeply resentbeing put on the same level ("Its no longer politically correct or acceptable just to be an American") as the people they hate. Their aim is to increase racial tensions, to solidify divisions and hate, and to keep the marginalised parts of Australian society 'in their place'.
These are the people that you ought to be pointing an accusing finger towards, not those who are striving to remove racism from society.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

If you think its whoever it is, block them, then you can stop whinging.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

If you think its whoever it is, block them, then you can stop whinging.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

I will make the observation, and point it out, that you are whining.

quote:

I believe in equal rights for all races, sexes, and religions, but my idea of equal rights does not include special consideration because of religion, race or sex. Equal rights means just that equal.