Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 12:39:22 AM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Homestead
An owner possesses a certain level of mental compartmentalization to keep his or her control. One one hand, one can have real affection for a piece of property..On the other, it is never forgotten why it is there-or what needs to be done to keep it so.

I am enjoying your words on this topic, Homestead, particularly this quote above. 

(in reply to Homestead)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 2:34:42 AM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
I found value in MarieToo’s practical insight. I’ll also point out one other post that was sharp, to the cutting edge and may have been overlooked. That was the one by MMMudd. Let’s not make too much of a coldly, psychological, scientific formula because there is so much more to people and M/s.

When we answer the OP we think we are coming from our own point of view in the same way we discuss politics when, in reality, we are coming more from a literary point of view where we want others to experience the story through our eyes since most of us are characters in the story.

We are the narrators and the position from which we observe the action can be detached or involved, inside or outside, far or near or any stage in between. We may even try to distance ourselves from the characters in a kind of omniscient, third person, scientific expose, but because we are also protagonists the distance between us and the characters is nearly imperceptible.

Actually, we are all far more breathing, feeling and loving characters in the story than narrators.

_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 4:37:15 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo
I dont think there is "shame" in any of it, as long as no one is being taken advantage of in a way that is going to leave them damaged.  This is the part that concerns me.  Submissives being convinced that they are somehow divine and meant to live their lives as slaves....I mean slaves.  After a while you're fucked.  You cant get out, you dont believe you can get out.  You dont want to get out.  Its just dangerous.  Your life as you know it is over.  And people havent a clue how serious it is. It agitates me how easily the word slave is thrown around by those who have no clue that this shit goes on to an extent that most have never and will never understand.

There was so much on this thread that I wanted to reply to, but your post really stood out to me, marie.

I agree with you fully that the word slave is thrown around rather casually.  What I do not understand is the first part of your post, in which you seem to be describing slavery to be a bad thing (unless I have misunderstood) .  Assuming you are speaking generically, how is slavery dangerous?  Or do you mean if it is in the wrong hands?  "Your life as you know it is over" is true, but why is that considered bad?  I thank God and Master that life as I knew it is over.  Perhaps we are looking at this from different angles.

In reading further, you do not equate slavery with romance; neither do I.  I agree with you there as well, which is why I had trouble understanding your other statements, which seemed negative toward slavery.  Again, please correct me if I have misunderstood.


There is nothing to correct. Your interpretation of my post is accurate.  But I know it came off obscure. I cant always lay down my words the exact way that my thoughts are crystallized in my head. That doesn't come easily for me under normal circumstances.  But this subject in particular tears through me very deeply for very personal reasons, which makes it even more difficult for me to explain in a hypothetical way.

To me its dangerous because as far as Im concerned slavery is a mindset more than anything, and any time we get so set in a particular belief of who we are it becomes limiting; sometimes to a point that it hinders growth.  

If you plant a tree in your backyard, over the years its roots will spread as far as they possibly can because it has all the room to do so.  If you plant that same tree in a pot, it will still grow and live but it can only spread out so far.  I cant accept the fact that some peoples lives were meant to be so limited so that another's life can be so vast.  That cant possibly be what the universe has in mind.

I understand perfectly well the feeling of fulfillment that comes from taking care of another, pleasing another, sacrificing for another and even existing for another.  But I cant believe that some people were created to live soley for that role.  I think people are victims in so many ways, and those who chose that type of slavery have done so as the result of nurture rather than nature. 

I think sometimes what people need is help to believe in themselves rather than the exploitation of their vulnerabilities. Which is where I think alot of "slaves" are born.

I think our service to another human being, should we choose that, is supposed to enhance who we are, not define it.  How does someone reach a point where they self-identify as a slave, first and foremost?  A slave.  Not a man, not a woman, not a human, but a slave.

Whats your occupation?  Im a slave.  Whats your purpose?  To live for my Masters benefit.  What do you do?  I do as Im told.  Are you happy this way?  Of course I am, Im a slave.  It reminds me of someone who has been lobotomized, and I find it sad. 

And yes, there are those who chose to live this way by their own consent and somehow that just makes it a-ok in everyone's mind.  But chosing something doesn't always mean its the best thing for a person.  There are so many possible reasons that a person may chose to live a certain way.   There are all types of people in poor relationships or hurtful relationships. 

I am opposed to slavery the way that I have seen it in my own experiences.   I am not saying that everyone who considers themselves a slave is in a detrimental relationship.  But I *am* saying that I have a hard time imagining the type of slavery that we're talking about here being good for anyone.  I wish I could view it in a more positive light with a more open mind.  But I just cant.

edited for a typo.

< Message edited by marieToo -- 8/2/2006 4:38:12 AM >

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 6:14:14 AM   
KennelDeSade2


Posts: 210
Joined: 9/19/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marksl
Pretending this is more than it is i want to learn so one day i can say yeah like a come down from ectasy i touched a bdsm god i felt the zen or is all that bullshit?


"We crawled from the Sea of Knowledge, soaked to the bone.  While the Humbug strolled out, without even the soles of his shoes being damp."

I'd say that from any experience, different people, take away different lessons.  The colorblind might feel art a waste of good paint, the tone deaf may find Bach lacks a decent beat.  The things that others see or the pleasures that others might find in the listening could be dismissed as affectations of the pretentious and viewed with contempt by critics without the same perceptions as the rest of the patrons.

But.  Because you don't understand what somebody else might find worthy, doesn't make it any less worthy to them.  It only means that your perceptions and theirs don't share many intersections.


_____________________________

Rules? Just one: I say, she does.
Everything else, is just details.

(in reply to marksl)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 6:48:01 AM   
Mavis


Posts: 828
Joined: 2/8/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

In a 24/7 relationship you could have a constant undercurrent of sexual tension that just doesn't exist in the vanilla world.


Really?  and to me, i think even if you take a Dom or sub natured person, put them in a nilla relationship, they'll carry their essential role with them and still not have a fully nilla relationship.   the fire might not be fed and stoked as much, but that simmer is always there because it comes from inside us.

A Dominant with a nilla parter will still always have an idea in His head of what He expects from her,  will always make love like a Dominant, will always be trying to shape her to His will in what ever ways she will allow.   He might never get the full recip / response He's seeking, but He's still going to Do and Be what He essentially is.  What's funny is they usually have subconsciously sought and found a sub-leaning parter.
[/end hijack]

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 7:45:10 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

Homestead: Yes. That's mostly my interpretation too. Although I don't seem to hear as much on the CM boards from those in the spartan category, I know there exist those I have seemed to put in one category, and then they turn out later to be in the other one, (or another altogether), because they either change, or else I haven't read enough of what they've written to be able to make a valid judgment about that for myself, really.  
- Susan


In MOO, I think part of the reason that one sees few posts from those in the spartan category is that they are in the minority...as has been noted...and many times, when they state that their viewpoint ((not stating here that this is their only viewpoint, just the one I am addressing at this time)) is that the dynamic of the D/s or M/s relationship itself comes before the romance does is regarded with suspicion. 
What do I mean by suspicion?  "Oh...the dynamic of the relationship comes before the romance...you mean you just want sex."  OR  "you're more interested in the rules and protocol and not about feelings...that is totally insensitive and borders on abuse". 
Look at some of the words that get thrown around when someone states that they can love a submissive, be in a D/s relationship with a submissive and yet state that they are NOT in love with the submissive.  While there are many who understand that there can be a relationship with love and sex and D/s and BDSM without it being an "in-love" relationship, there are also many who see this type of dynamic as "someone is being used".   In some cases, they might be right.  In some cases, they are not.

< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 8/2/2006 7:49:32 AM >

(in reply to SusanofO)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 7:50:45 AM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
Marie,

Thank you for such a well thought out and personal reply.  I think I can better understand the lense with which you see. 

My experience, which is all I can honestly reference, is different.  My experience has been that I have not known that freedom you speak of (roots stretching out) until I became enslaved to my Master.  Why?  Because I did not know how to grow outward on my own.  I was stunted.  Think of a rat in a maze, always bumping up against thw wrong walls, never finding the pathway to the next phase. Ending up with nothing but frustration and a headache :)

In my slavery, I have room to grow as far as my possibilities will stretch.  I have that room because I am allowed it.  Crumbs are laid out in my maze - I still must find my way but when I get stuck, I have clues and references which show me the right path to take.  You see slavery, or the need to serve, as a vulnerability which becomes exploited.  If in the wrong hands, this is an absolute risk.  But...what if in the right hands? 

Let me give you my personal example. Since becoming enslaved to Master, I have done the following as a result of his instruction:

* I went to New York to reconcile a three year rift with my sister
* I became reacquainted with my family, from whom I was isolated and cast, and like the Prodigal Son, was welcomed "home" with open arms.
* I ended the abuse I was receiving in a marriage that was emotionally killing me (ie; two suicide attempts in past years)
* I am back in school, finishing my degree
* I was promoted at work, yet interviewing for another, higher level position
* I learned to love myself again
* I now enjoy self confidence and a healthy self esteem
* I learned to communicate better so that (hopefully) I am better understood
* I learned to analyze my own thoughts and feelings, so that I could better understand myself - who I am, who I want to be, and where I must travel to get there
* I discovered I have the strength of a lion in me, and can endure the un-endureable
* I learned (and am experiencing) what real love is, and that it is OK to be happy - it really is OK.
* I have let go of an incredible amount of baggage that was holding me back in life
* I have become a sexual, sensual being who enjoys her sexuality and her body and its capabilities.

Not to drone on and on, but these are the examples that fall off the top of my head.  Is my life enhanced?  In more ways that I could have ever imagined.  I do live for my Master's benefit, and he pushes me hard.  He has enjoyed watching me evolve, and he knows exactly how much pushing I need.  But this is the result of living for his benefit.  I am better, stronger, (faster....bionic!). 

Some say he micromanages.  Some say he is too strict, too controlling.  Some say he is outright "mean."  Those who know me closely all say the same thing:  "He is good for you.  You are finally happy and strong." 

Hopefully this gives you a different perspective of what slavery can be.  I understand your truth, and how it can be unhealthy.  But that is not the only way it can be. 

Thank you again for your reply, Marie.  Hopefully  my own reply in return offers some hope that slavery can indeed be a wonderful state.

Edited for typos

< Message edited by ownedgirlie -- 8/2/2006 8:11:06 AM >

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 8:06:37 AM   
BillsGalSusan


Posts: 69
Joined: 7/18/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

I am opposed to slavery the way that I have seen it in my own experiences.   I am not saying that everyone who considers themselves a slave is in a detrimental relationship.  But I *am* saying that I have a hard time imagining the type of slavery that we're talking about here being good for anyone.  I wish I could view it in a more positive light with a more open mind.  But I just cant.



What an intriguing post, marieToo. Thank you.

I think there is something else going on, as well, having to do with what we use as our frame of reference in our relationships. When I was a little girl, perhaps ten or so, I had dreams/fantasies about something I now identify as suspension bondage. I also played with other children in ways that I now know are fairly typical for women who later identify themselves as submissives or slaves--serving, being punished for being bad, being controlled by others.

I didn't have language for any of that then, and later, in the 70s, when my relationship with Bill began, I still didn't have knowledge of the Master/slave (or even the Dom/sub)  community/scene/culture.

There are advantages to that, I think, in that we didn't have some sort of "ideal standard" to measure up to as our relationship developed, over time. We didn't develop some sort of sense of kinky political correctness either. I'd like to try to give you an example, from our everyday life.

Last night, we were watching TV after dinner. At about 8 PM, I asked Bill if he would like some dessert. He asked me what we had in the house, and decided to have a small dish of ice cream with  fresh berries. I said I thought I would like some berries with yogurt. He nodded and  I went into the kitchen and returned with the dessert, then, after he was done, returned the empty bowls to the kitchen and placed them in the dishwasher.

How vanilla is that?

I could, with no lack of accuracy, describe the same thing this way:

Last night, I was curled up on the couch, my head in Master's lap, as is his preference. Master often likes dessert two hours after dinner, so at 8 PM, I asked him if he would like me to serve him dessert. Standing before him, I recited the list of choices available, and awaited his reply. I then asked for permission to have yogurt and berries. I'd really prefer ice cream too, but Master watches his slaves weight and health, and would never agree to this variance from her prescribed diet. When Master indicated he was done, I quietly gathered up the plates and slipped out of the room so that I might complete my nightly chores.

Hummmm, am I less submissive because of my language choice? Is what goes on in our relationship really any less hot?  Can anyone, other than Bill and me, actually know the answer to these questions?

Another Susan

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 8:07:38 AM   
Homestead


Posts: 1005
Status: offline
marieToo wrote:
quote:

I think our service to another human being, should we choose that, is supposed to enhance who we are, not define it.  How does someone reach a point where they self-identify as a slave, first and foremost?  A slave.  Not a man, not a woman, not a human, but a slave.

Whats your occupation?  Im a slave.  Whats your purpose?  To live for my Masters benefit.  What do you do?  I do as Im told.  Are you happy this way?  Of course I am, Im a slave.  It reminds me of someone who has been lobotomized, and I find it sad. 


All talk of the dynamic aside, this is also what I find to be objectionable. And why I think fostering too much dependency in this is not a good thing. My focus in this cannot be entirely self centered, my conscience will not allow me to be that sociopathic. To me, the Stewardship implies that I help a person to realize a potential beyond mere service.

For I will not feel good about the potted plant when an entire universe is out there. And roots that spread wide also bring good things to me. I should not have to insecurely control every thought and outiside influence that comes to a girl of mine. Not only is it impossible, but it contravenes the gift of divine free will.

An unforgiveable sin. Should she choose to serve, it will be bcause I offer her more, and encourage more potential to be fullfilled in her- than she could do alone.

Is this altruistic? No, it is purely selfish on my part. It also vastly enhances the value of my property..And allows me to feel good about myself, my partner-and what we do together.

And let's face it..If  I overcontrol, if I distrust, if I have to constantly micromanage every detail......it speaks very poorly of both myself, and who I have chosen to take into my home.

Rather, I have a need to be able to deligate with trust.

To relish and applaud competence and intiative.

And to feel at peace...

With myself, and my source.

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 8:09:40 AM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Homestead
Is this altruistic? No, it is purely selfish on my part. It also vastly enhances the value of my property..And allows me to feel good about myself, my partner-and what we do together.


Master has expressed similar sentiments.  The more I grow and develop, the more useful I am to him, and the more pleasure he gets from me.

(in reply to Homestead)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 8:34:16 AM   
Homestead


Posts: 1005
Status: offline
The balance in benevolent Dictatorship, is to know exactly what dynamics best serve the state.

The state also serves it's subjects.

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 1:43:05 PM   
SusanofO


Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005
Status: offline
Creative: What you said made me think that - it's starting to strike me as ironic that people want to separate a spartan deliverence of M/s from the romance,(or romantic feelings it can elicit) since, I think for some, (whether they admit it, or realize it or not) that whole spartan idea of M/s may be just where some of the romance comes from in the first place (if a romantic conceptualization of M/s is there at all for them, which I realize for some it might not be, always).

I believe that for some, a more spartan idea of M/s  truly could be the "starting point" - and could definitely help elicit the emotions that can go along with a feeling of wanting to be Owned, and serving more completely (and I assume the same can maybe be true for Masters,as far as wanting to Own, and command someone, but am not a Master, so won't comment on that).

I know people can quibble about what level of delivery of M/s actvity should perhaps include, but to me, the whole spartan (as opposed to flowery) concept of implementation is the actual romantic part for some people. I could be wrong, though. I was just thinking about that when I read your post.

*Otherwise, why aren't many here off at eHarmony or on Match.com, and logging onto FTD, ordering up flowers and candy for someone instead?

*Has there never been a case where more spartan 'rules and protocol' helped to actually create romantic feelings instead of killing them off? Why the separation of these two ideas? I suppose it's an individual preference, but am simply saying that I am not sure why the distinct demarcation line here seems to exist for some, simply due to what looks, to me, like an implementation issue (and I probably sound like an idiot. But, it does seem a little odd to me in some ways).

I hope this post isn't misconstrued - I have a feeling I am being less than clear in what I am trying to say, and it may not be a point even worth noting, but it's the best I can do for now. 

- Susan 

< Message edited by SusanofO -- 8/2/2006 2:09:59 PM >


_____________________________

"Hope is the thing with feathers,
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without the words,
And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 1:58:47 PM   
MHOO314


Posts: 3628
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline
Yep, you are so right---this is a game--for you--
 
you see most of us want someone who can articulate and spell--I know we are sooo sadistic--then we don't use drugs--its just so hard to hear the safe word when One is stoned Man--and as far as getting our rocks off----well I am sure you just did---- check?
 
No...checkmate

_____________________________

SLUTS: Southern Ladies Under Tremendous Stress...

Mistress Hathor


(in reply to marksl)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 3:52:54 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

Marie,

Thank you for such a well thought out and personal reply.  I think I can better understand the lense with which you see. 

My experience, which is all I can honestly reference, is different.  My experience has been that I have not known that freedom you speak of (roots stretching out) until I became enslaved to my Master.  Why?  Because I did not know how to grow outward on my own.  I was stunted.  Think of a rat in a maze, always bumping up against thw wrong walls, never finding the pathway to the next phase. Ending up with nothing but frustration and a headache :)

In my slavery, I have room to grow as far as my possibilities will stretch.  I have that room because I am allowed it.  Crumbs are laid out in my maze - I still must find my way but when I get stuck, I have clues and references which show me the right path to take.  You see slavery, or the need to serve, as a vulnerability which becomes exploited.  If in the wrong hands, this is an absolute risk.  But...what if in the right hands? 

Let me give you my personal example. Since becoming enslaved to Master, I have done the following as a result of his instruction:

* I went to New York to reconcile a three year rift with my sister
* I became reacquainted with my family, from whom I was isolated and cast, and like the Prodigal Son, was welcomed "home" with open arms.
* I ended the abuse I was receiving in a marriage that was emotionally killing me (ie; two suicide attempts in past years)
* I am back in school, finishing my degree
* I was promoted at work, yet interviewing for another, higher level position
* I learned to love myself again
* I now enjoy self confidence and a healthy self esteem
* I learned to communicate better so that (hopefully) I am better understood
* I learned to analyze my own thoughts and feelings, so that I could better understand myself - who I am, who I want to be, and where I must travel to get there
* I discovered I have the strength of a lion in me, and can endure the un-endureable
* I learned (and am experiencing) what real love is, and that it is OK to be happy - it really is OK.
* I have let go of an incredible amount of baggage that was holding me back in life
* I have become a sexual, sensual being who enjoys her sexuality and her body and its capabilities.

Not to drone on and on, but these are the examples that fall off the top of my head.  Is my life enhanced?  In more ways that I could have ever imagined.  I do live for my Master's benefit, and he pushes me hard.  He has enjoyed watching me evolve, and he knows exactly how much pushing I need.  But this is the result of living for his benefit.  I am better, stronger, (faster....bionic!). 

Some say he micromanages.  Some say he is too strict, too controlling.  Some say he is outright "mean."  Those who know me closely all say the same thing:  "He is good for you.  You are finally happy and strong." 

Hopefully this gives you a different perspective of what slavery can be.  I understand your truth, and how it can be unhealthy.  But that is not the only way it can be. 

Thank you again for your reply, Marie.  Hopefully  my own reply in return offers some hope that slavery can indeed be a wonderful state.

Edited for typos


ownedgirlie:

Thanks for addressing my post.   I read your post this morning and mulled it over for most of the day then came back to comment on it.  I had this  response all typed out and just as I hit the button to post it, I  got knocked off line. Anyway, its happened about 4 times today, so Im typing my ass off over here hoping to get this in before it happens again. 

I do of course see your point .  As you said in so many words, we are the sum of our experiences.  Anytime that I hear a postive story like yours, I automatically assume that it cant possibly be slavery, because its not negative.  That isnt to say that its *not* slavery.  It just goes to say that my own perception of it has been so chisled out and nailed shut that the very definition of slavery carries a negative connotation.  (Or is it denotation?)  I dont know. But you know what Im saying.

When I hear someone talking about slavery in its purest sense,  I cant help but see a son-of-a-bitch who plans on trainwrecking someone after they've been drained of everything they are and everything they ever will be.  Consciously I know why this is and I know its wrong. And yet its something that I havent been able to shake off for a while.  Perhaps someday my  perception will change. I dont know. 

Your opinion and explanation is valid and beautiful.  Im glad you went into it at length. I appreciate all you had to say.  I heard every word. 

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 3:59:10 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain


We are the narrators and the position from which we observe the action can be detached or involved, inside or outside, far or near or any stage in between. We may even try to distance ourselves from the characters in a kind of omniscient, third person, scientific expose, but because we are also protagonists the distance between us and the characters is nearly imperceptible.

Actually, we are all far more breathing, feeling and loving characters in the story than narrators.


Yes.

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 4:09:24 PM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BillsGalSusan

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

I am opposed to slavery the way that I have seen it in my own experiences.   I am not saying that everyone who considers themselves a slave is in a detrimental relationship.  But I *am* saying that I have a hard time imagining the type of slavery that we're talking about here being good for anyone.  I wish I could view it in a more positive light with a more open mind.  But I just cant.



What an intriguing post, marieToo. Thank you.

I think there is something else going on, as well, having to do with what we use as our frame of reference in our relationships. When I was a little girl, perhaps ten or so, I had dreams/fantasies about something I now identify as suspension bondage. I also played with other children in ways that I now know are fairly typical for women who later identify themselves as submissives or slaves--serving, being punished for being bad, being controlled by others.

I didn't have language for any of that then, and later, in the 70s, when my relationship with Bill began, I still didn't have knowledge of the Master/slave (or even the Dom/sub)  community/scene/culture.

There are advantages to that, I think, in that we didn't have some sort of "ideal standard" to measure up to as our relationship developed, over time. We didn't develop some sort of sense of kinky political correctness either. I'd like to try to give you an example, from our everyday life.

Last night, we were watching TV after dinner. At about 8 PM, I asked Bill if he would like some dessert. He asked me what we had in the house, and decided to have a small dish of ice cream with  fresh berries. I said I thought I would like some berries with yogurt. He nodded and  I went into the kitchen and returned with the dessert, then, after he was done, returned the empty bowls to the kitchen and placed them in the dishwasher.

How vanilla is that?

I could, with no lack of accuracy, describe the same thing this way:

Last night, I was curled up on the couch, my head in Master's lap, as is his preference. Master often likes dessert two hours after dinner, so at 8 PM, I asked him if he would like me to serve him dessert. Standing before him, I recited the list of choices available, and awaited his reply. I then asked for permission to have yogurt and berries. I'd really prefer ice cream too, but Master watches his slaves weight and health, and would never agree to this variance from her prescribed diet. When Master indicated he was done, I quietly gathered up the plates and slipped out of the room so that I might complete my nightly chores.

Hummmm, am I less submissive because of my language choice? Is what goes on in our relationship really any less hot?  Can anyone, other than Bill and me, actually know the answer to these questions?

Another Susan



Ive always maintained that the undercurrent is present even if people are not conscious of it.  Someone else made a statement on this thread about the point to which you are speaking.  Mavis, post #104  ( lol. I feel like Im quoting bible scriptures). 
I agree with you and with her post.  I think we just *are* whatever we are, quite naturally, as far as being dominant and or submissive   And I think we automatically surround ourselves with those with whom we can express it.  We arent even always aware of this.

Like you, I also had those weird experiences as a child.  Of course I didnt know there was a name for it either.  But dominance and submission is all over the place. In every relationship we have, if you *really* think about it.

(in reply to BillsGalSusan)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 5:14:54 PM   
MistressSassy66


Posts: 1675
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
This is in respnose to there being more sexual stress in a D's relationship than in Vanilla...I was vanilla and married...and CONSTENTLY felt pressure to have sex.

In My life now...there is no tension...it is as it is...sex is not the most important thing.
It has been put in its place in the scheme of everday life.

_____________________________

Mistress Sassy

http://www.mistresssassy.com

In the Immortal Words of Bob....Fuck the dumb shit.

"I love you not only for what you are,But for what I am when I'm with you."- Opening line from a poem by Roy Croft

(in reply to marieToo)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 5:59:03 PM   
Daddysredhead


Posts: 23574
Joined: 11/6/2005
From: Northern (yet still part of the South) Virginia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RavenMuse

quote:

ORIGINAL: marksl
Does anyone view this as all a game or is it just me.


For me, sure BDSM play is just that, play, fun, nothing serious... D/s however is something natural to me. No zen-like crapolla, I have a Dominant personality, in a relationship I take the Dominant role, I am suited to having (And tend to attract) partners who are submissive in nature. Nothing fancy, nothing deep, just who I am and who she is. No games, no masks and certainly not just sex. Simply what works, for me and for those who end up involved with me.



This response is similar to what my Master would say.  He has a Dominant personality and I feel most comfortable in my submissive "skin" with a strong, intelligent Male Dom as my partner.  Therefore, D/s or M/s is who we are with each other.  The S&M element is spice to our play or our intimate lives.  It isn't about just sex...  at least not for us. 

_____________________________

Founding Member, Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's

Do not challenge me to a battle of wits & come to fight unarmed.

Are you really that stupid? ~ Bless your heart

13th doughnut


(in reply to RavenMuse)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 7:48:57 PM   
BillsGalSusan


Posts: 69
Joined: 7/18/2006
Status: offline
I don't think the pressure is sexual per se, at least for me. It's more like a constant sense of *being in relation to* rather than existing, acting, being on my own. I'm probably not being clear about that <sigh>.

Another Susan

(in reply to Daddysredhead)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? - 8/2/2006 8:03:57 PM   
Homestead


Posts: 1005
Status: offline
Having tension present does no mean it must be given instant gratification.

(in reply to BillsGalSusan)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Who Takes this Game Seriously? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109