ZenrageTheKeeper
Posts: 237
Joined: 6/26/2005 Status: offline
|
There are three possibilities: 1. God exists 2. God may exist 3. God does not exist 1. God exists. This requires evidence that god exists. There is no such evidence outside religious faith, and no methodology to obtain any such evidence. This statement is false. 2. God may exist. To claim that god may exist requires the assumption that God could exist under the right circumstances and that there is evidence to support that under these circumstances, God exists. Regardless of what knowledge may exist in the future, there is no such evidence now. This statement is currently false. 3. God doesn't exist. This requires no evidence because to assume it is false would be to state that one of the other statements is true and must have evidence to support them - which they don’t. Ergo, by default and until evidence exists to show otherwise, God does not exist. The notion of "god" or "goddess" is not a valid default for a lack of scientific understanding or a lack of critical thinking regardless of how long the notion has been around. Religious or otherwise spiritual faith is not a subsititute for real empirical evidence that can be obtained in controlled circumstances, measured, reporduced, and compared. In civilized society, critical thinking will always be held as superior to merely "letting things slide" philosophically. Just because less knowledgeable people in the past believed in spooks and specters, does not mean they existed, only that they were superstitious. As part of a social stucture, the notion of religions, souls and other assorted boogeymen, outside of personal aesthetics, is entirely obsolete. Turn off the cosmic night light and grow up.
_____________________________
If Men never thought with their penises, all you girls would still have cooties.
|