songbird26
Posts: 72
Joined: 1/16/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin 1. I am not saying that I feel kink based relationships are wrong in anyway....what I am saying is that to say you are living D/s or M/s and the only thing you seem to incorporate is kink, is not an entirely accurate depiction of the common D/s, M/s relationship. One last try...here's the thing. By saying that their depiction is "not accurate," you are essentially saying "misleading and wrong," which can be extrapolated to "you shouldn't call your relationship D/s or M/s unless you do it a certain way, which is MY way." Which is clearly a judgement of others and the way they do things and, implicitly, a desire that people change the way they do things to match up with your personal expectations. Which is fine, it's your opinion (as you've stated), but you seemed to have formed it without taking into account that their relationship might NOT be based entirely on what you call "kink" (and what I would call sex-play, since for me the word "kink" incorporates power exchange as well), and that it simply might not be a D/s dynamic that you recognize or acknowledge because it is different from your personal experience. No attacks here, just clarification. To me, your original post could have been translated to "I don't like dirty people or people who behave in boorish, ill-mannered ways, and if they're in a bdsm relationship, their nasty behavior means that they're not doing it right, so they should change that." I think it's fair to say that we all wish people were always well-groomed, mannerly and presentable, and behaved just how we'd like 'em to, but kinky or vanilla, it's just not really feasible to expect that. And rant or not, conversion-attempt or not, when you make a post that is highly critical and judgemental of others, you can expect people to come in and offer differing views. You used strong and disapproving words, and expressed great frustration and even anger, so how could you possibly expect people to take it any other way than they did? And, as a final note, your respondants have focused on the 'dirty dishes, bad food, feral children' aspect of your rant because that is precisely the example that you provided us with. You did not say "as a hypothetical example." You used a highly descriptive passage that seemed to come from personal experience. So, in order to keep a reply relevant to the original post, of COURSE that's what your responders will refer to, given that it seemed to be the origin of your rant in the first place. I'm not personally offended or upset by your post: again, this is not an attack. But I think it's important that you realize that people react to words as you put them down on the page; we're not mind readers, and we don't know your intentions. We can only respond and react to the actual post you make. Cries of "but you don't understand" or "you got it wrong!" don't fly; burden of clarity and comprehensibility is on the original poster.
< Message edited by songbird26 -- 2/26/2005 8:29:35 AM >
|