SirDiscipliner69
Posts: 2607
Joined: 2/1/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dakotabo Hello all, I am new here and just a little shy about posting to this topic, I do however have a question.. Welcome...please do feel free to express yourself regardless.. Sirdiscipliner69 I saw over and over that you said that dominance needs no emotion. Why not? The act of domination can hold it's own with out emotion. Some percieve this lack of emotion just topping. Isn't domination in itself a kind of feeling or emotion, that you hold over one other then yourself. Yes it can be. One might order a hamburger...someone wants cheese on it...someone wants all toppings..some want you to hold the pickles. Differnt versions yet essentially still a hambuger right? Isn't it infact control, control over not only a sub, A prision guard need not show emotion to guard a prisoner right? but also ones self, self -discipline control over a given situation, awareness and readiness control over all other emotions that may or may not come about at any given time, factual based but especially during play? Sometimes the sessions / handling / play do bring certain elements of the emotional physci that they may have not known were readily apparent yet need to be aware of possible outcome. There is nothing worse than having a submissive break in a session from previous abuse or rape. How is it then that there need not be emotion in dominance? I am not saying there is no need...in fact I do prefer it...but it is possible..just not prefered...something can exist yet not be prefered...it has been demonstated here by the responses just how important emotional connections are needed. Have a some how misunderstood what you have been trying to impart? I am often misunderstood..I am really not bad...just drawn that way. ;) Ross ©º°¨¨°º©
|