FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Yes. it does sort of make one splutter to be rebuked for genocide, wars of agression, imperialism, diplomatic stitch up jobs and internecine conflict by the USA. Just as it makes one sputter for the US to be rebuked for genocide, wars of aggression, imperialism, diplomatic stitch up jobs and internecine conflicts by Europeans. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen But every country acts for its own interests, and thats the way it always will be I'd venture. None is better or worse than any others in this regard, and especially none can claim holier than thou status. We can look at governments past and present and make value judgements about their conduct; in the end, even the nazis were acting in what they thought were Germany's interests, even given the odious nature of the way they went about it. But there is little room for morality when it comes to protecting interests and especially not when extending interests. So all this sniping back and forth is stupid really. Whatever any country does or is doing, some other country has been there before or would if it had the chance. More humorously, that we Europeans are so awful.....is this why the USA is going about things in the world the way we did in former times? Or is it rather, that we did it so well, that we are worthy of emulation? Truer words I've rarely seen "spoken" here on CM when it comes to political discussions. I forget who said it (Churchill?), but nations don't have "friends", they have "interests". "Interests" and the ability to further those interests through force or bribery are the mainstays of international politics. This can seem cold and calculating to individuals who attempt to project individual morality on nation-states, and this anthropomorphization of nation-states and their actions is one of the key confusions that people have when discussing and debating international politics. It's an easy analogy to make, and useful at times, but fraught with the possibility of deception. A commonality of interests on the world stage makes for "friends". Because of cultural and political world-views that are more similar than different, the US and Europe have been "friends". The greater cultural and political world-views between the US and the UK has made these two nations even "closer friends". What I find humorous about many European's condemnation of the US is the fact that - for the most part - our interests have been shared in bringing about a world in which there is a high level of reliance on norms ("laws"), in which disputes can be adjudicated through peaceful means. The US, since WWII has been the primary architect of a world system in which reliance on laws govern international relations. But, "laws" are based on the ability and willingness to use force. Europe has built a system based on an international environment in which the final arbiter of force has been the US. Without this environment, the European reliance on "diplomacy" would likely falter, and the "internecine conflict" normal to international relations would likely return. Does this mean that the US should "get a pass" on all things? No, of course not. But the truth is that there is currently no other international force that has both the ability, the crediblity or the historical precedence of actions that is reassuring enough to be "trusted" with protecting a world in which democratic based nations can thrive and prosper. So, when Europeans take on a "holier than thou" type of attitude, I grimly and humorously contemplate a world in which they get their wish of a withdrawn and isolationalist US of A. The thought crosses my mind: "Be careful of what you ask for. You just might get it." FirmKY
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|