Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Putting it straight AGAIN


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Putting it straight AGAIN Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 2:22:02 PM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
Is all good ruffnecksbabygir...

Responce was linked to my name earlier Collarme must be having some server/techie probs. What with yours just now and a few others having been mentioned. Mods might want to check it out?


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to ruffnecksbabygir)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 2:52:04 PM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
Hmm..read all the posts to this point...wasn't sure if I could even post to this without going off an a tangent, luckily that's something my own control won't let me do. I'm not even going to touch the drug part of the original post, this has been argued up to the Supreme court with no definitive answer.

As for the cheating topic however, I would offer some food for thought for those who seem positive it's not wrong, swap it around and try to defend that it is right. I can play both sides of nearly any argument and would have a difficult time pulling that one off. Agreed there is no set in stone rules on morality, but I do think it goes further than that, it's respectful treatment toward another human being you have shared your most intimate moments and secrets with. Myself, I would owe that person my allegiance, my heart, my soul, my innermost repect. Believe what you want to believe, fine by me, I don't have to live or count on you. Myself, personally, I can sleep great at night knowing I can't say "been there, done that".


_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to RiotGirl)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 3:14:30 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsCameron


quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsCameron

quote:

It is a recognazation that there is no great moral authority, and that we all are responsible for our values and judgments. It opens the possibility that those who do things that we do not approve, might instead just be doing things we don't understand.


In everything I've read today, this one really hit.

Well said :) and if I ever meet you, I'd like to buy you a drink.

MsC



It is merely an objective assessment based on opinion as opposed to fact. 75% of the US population alone would beg to differ with you. The founding forefathers of the United States would beg to differ with you. The United States Constitution bears evidence that would beg to differ with you. US Law would beg to differ with you.

I have trouble saluting an opinion as a definitive answer. Not that I wouldn't by them a drink of course, just not on that premise.


AAARGH I can't type today.


Well then, it's probably a good thing I'm not American :) LOL

I just liked what Taggard wrote. I didn't say it would solve the worlds problems but it may be a good start.

smile,
MsC



lol :D Taggart has an excellent way of speaking his mind to be sure.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to MsCameron)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 3:15:52 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dark~angel

quote:

BTW, looking at another woman and drooling over her is not cheating, it's lust. :)


In your Opinion...(adds disclaimer for you)




lol. Actually I can point you to where that's defined. Buy yeah.. Anyways.. lol :D




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 3/14/2005 3:16:38 PM >


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 3:17:44 PM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

Myself, personally, I can sleep great at night knowing I can't say "been there, done that".


I could not sleep if I hadn't.

I say everynight, I did, I learnt, I move forward.

I love to 'be there-done that'.... on your terms? No. On others? Not ever.

On Mine? Damn right I have.
And what is mine?
Mine, is whatever Master Desires.

Peace and Love



I recommend getting your heart trampled on to anyone
I recommend walking around naked in your living room
Swallow it down (what a jagged little pill)
It feels so good (swimming in your stomach)
Wait until the dust settles
I recommend biting off more then you can chew to anyone
I certainly do
I recommend sticking your foot in your mouth at any time
Feel free
Throw it down (the caution blocks you from the wind)
Hold it up (to the rays)
You wait and see when the smoke clears

Wear it out (the way a three-year-old would do)
Melt it down (you're gonna have to eventually anyway)
The fire trucks are coming up around the bend

You live you learn
You love you learn
You cry you learn
You lose you learn
You bleed you learn
You scream you learn

You grieve you learn
You choke you learn
You laugh you learn
You choose you learn
You pray you learn
You ask you learn
You live you learn

ALANIS MORISSETTE
"You Learn"


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to ScooterTrash)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 3:23:05 PM   
MizSuz


Posts: 1881
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic

What's the point of coming into the forums and declaring it?



A few short weeks ago there was a series of posts regarding someone's difficulties with specific kinds of medications. They were 'quitting the meds and looking for a new doctor.'

Now its a few weeks later and there's a lot of what appears to be hypo-mania inspired judgements, declarations and morality issues being spewed in what could appear to be somewhat compulsive/obsessive posts here at the boards.

Now, if you combine those two seemingly separate pieces of information, what does it say to you?

To me it says "Ignore Inflammatory Posts."

_____________________________

“The more you love, the more you can love—and the more intensely you love. Nor is there any limit on how many you can love. If a person had time enough, he could love all of that majority who are decent and just.”
- Robert Heinlein

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 3:34:08 PM   
quietkitten


Posts: 1082
Joined: 2/5/2005
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ruffnecksbabygir

expressing my own opinion is somehow shoving it down your throat, yet you expressing yours isn't?





It is apparent you are not getting my point at all....
I am not saying that I disagree (or agree) with the initial points made in the thread... or any other thread. I am saying that you/me/anyone does not have the right to decide what is right/wrong/immoral for ANYONE else!!
Telling me what is right for me is shoving your opinion down my throat.

_____________________________

The number 1 cause of stress is reality.

I miss my old Avatar :(

<< I am a depressed procrastinator with Alzheimers -- I am going to end it all.... tomorrow... or the next day.

Now what was I talking about again?

(in reply to ruffnecksbabygir)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 5:59:50 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
/me runs out that way --------------->

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to quietkitten)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 6:32:31 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
Access denied.

< Message edited by RiotGirl -- 3/15/2005 11:36:23 PM >

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 8:48:05 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blk4u2

quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176

Ahh, but how many threads do you see where the OP is preaching about the immorality of cheating? It doesn't happen much if ever. The usual pattern is an OP asking how to do it better or make it more gratifying or otherwise seeking some form of tacit approval. My position is don't publicise it if you aren't willing to have it discussed. It's no different than anything else posted for public discussion on the boards, is it?
And for the record, it's my position that the unknowing spouse is always harmed by the cheating spouse. She's being deceived and robbed of the attention and the fidelity that was promised to her. Her marriage is lessened by the cheaters actions.
To say that she isn't harmed because she doesn't know is analagous to saying she's not a crime victim if she doesn't know that her stuff's been stolen/her car's been stripped/her house has been vandalized, etc. The injury is still there, whether she knows it now or finds out tomorrow or next year. I don't jump up on my soapbox and shout it to the world but these are my beliefs and when the subject comes up I will feel just as free to share my POV as the guy whining about how the wife he won't leave doesn't need to know he's screwing around.
I will rest easier knowing that some of the newbies that wander in here may be reassured that some of us do, in fact, have standards of right and wrong in our daily lives than I ever would keeping my mouth shut out of a misguided need to be as inoffensive as possible to people I radically disagree with. I have never told anyone they can't do whatever foolish thing they want to do but I have no compunction at all explaining precisely why I would not take that path.
My personal POV is that cheaters should slink back under their slime-covered rocks and hide their disgraceful cowardice from the light of day. I do not, however, flame them when they choose to post about their adulterous affairs, telling them they have no business masquerading as doms and subs nor do I tell them they have no business talking about their shameful behavior among decent people.
On the contrary, I respect their right to say what they will and do what they will, regardless of how wrong it is. It's only when they choose to open their choices to public discussion that I make my opinion known. Even then I hold myself to a clear standard of civil discourse.
I would reverse your question, if I may. What's the point of coming into the forums if you aren't willing to speak up about your values, your beliefs, your thoughts, comments and opinions? It is a forum for the exchange of ideas and information, why would yours not have as much value as anyone else's?
Timothy



Why does it only pertain to a woman ? I'm just making the obvious arguement. I'm not ashamed to admit i was the "abused" in my past marriage as my ex cheated on me with another woman. I just needed to get that out there that it irks me to no end that it's always assumed that the man is cheating. With engraved conceptions like that, it makes it very difficult for men to have actual equal rights in court.


By no means am I suggesting that women don't cheat on their husbands, far from it. I used the generic he and she because it's easier to construct a sentence that way than writing he/she.

(in reply to Blk4u2)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 9:05:32 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic


quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176

Ahh, but how many threads do you see where the OP is preaching about the immorality of cheating? It doesn't happen much if ever. The usual pattern is an OP asking how to do it better or make it more gratifying or otherwise seeking some form of tacit approval. My position is don't publicise it if you aren't willing to have it discussed. It's no different than anything else posted for public discussion on the boards, is it?


Agreed, 100%, however, if seeing a post asking you to condone cheating upsets you so much you need to do more than post in that thread, why not just ignore it?

Sure, there are lots of posts asking people to say "it's ok that you're doing this." If you believe it is morally wrong, say that on the thread, and leave it at that. There don't need to be blanket statements made in the entire forum based on my morality, because it certainly isn't the universal morality.

Point of fact, I -agree- with RiotGirl. And I generally say so on a given thread. What I don't get is allowing it to make you so upset that you -need- to attempt to force everyone into that world view.

The same thing goes for definitions. Ok, as you like, there is "one" definition. Think that, be happy, and -move on- Don't expect everyone -else- to think it because you do.

quote:


And for the record, it's my position that the unknowing spouse is always harmed by the cheating spouse. She's being deceived and robbed of the attention and the fidelity that was promised to her. Her marriage is lessened by the cheaters actions.


I partially agree here as well. I should have been clearer. I think that if someone is in immediate, mortal danger, it is the obligation of every person that becomes aware to -do- something. Potential, future danger? Well, there are -lots- of people in that positon and while I abhore it, I don't believe it is my duty as a good human to fix that. I was trying to say "if someone isn't being killed/mutilated/murdered et al while it sucks, it isn't our duty to remove them from the situation"

quote:


"I would reverse your question, if I may. What's the point of coming into the forums if you aren't willing to speak up about your values, your beliefs, your thoughts, comments and opinions? It is a forum for the exchange of ideas and information, why would yours not have as much value as anyone else's?"


Didn't say you should speak up. Say anything you like -in the appropriate place- which would be on the threads invovling the things you object to. If you notice, I do exactly that. I speak up on the threads, and state my opinions. '

What I -don't- understand are creating whole threads to, basically, bash someone elses ideas.

Anyone who is on this forum frequently knows at least one perso who is in a committed relationship with someone who may or may not be cheating. To create an entire post saying that his/her life is -wrong- is...well...misguided in my view. Tell him/her that in threads that relate and where it is warented.

again, like financial domination. WHY do people feel the need to create entire threads saying it's wrong? Or, write to someone, unsolicited, to tell them they are evil?

I see those situations as one where, well, there is nothing benificial happening from doing so. I believe the same is true here.



I'm terribly confused. I didn't start an entire thread to preach about my opinons, I only responded to RiotGirl's OP. However, if I felt strongly enough about it, why wouldn't I start a new thread? It's just as valid a topic as many others out there on the boards, don't you think? For some of us, it touches respect, honor, trust and commitment, all of which are intregal parts of many relationships. For at least a minority of those who practice wiitwd, cheating is a big issue.
Furthermore, spounting my position on ANY topic is not the same as forcing anyone to comply with my standards. AS a matter of fact, I explicitly stated this in my post, writing, " I have never told anyone they can't do whatever foolish thing they want to do but I have no compunction at all explaining precisely why I would not take that path." and again when I wrote, " My personal POV is that cheaters should slink back under their slime-covered rocks and hide their disgraceful cowardice from the light of day. I do not, however, flame them when they choose to post about their adulterous affairs, telling them they have no business masquerading as doms and subs nor do I tell them they have no business talking about their shameful behavior among decent people.
On the contrary, I respect their right to say what they will and do what they will, regardless of how wrong it is. It's only when they choose to open their choices to public discussion that I make my opinion known. Even then I hold myself to a clear standard of civil discourse." At no time do I demand anyone on these forums accept my definitions or standards. I relate my opinions and those judgements which rule my life. I really fail to see how my doing so is any less appropriate than anyone relating his or her POV that odds with mine. Although Taggard and I are on opposite sides of the fence on some things, I don't suggest he doesn't have the right to practice whatever morals he finds appropriate or speak his mind about mine or anyone else's. I can and will say, however, that I disagree and explain why I disagree. This is called discussion and debate.
Timothy

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 9:34:22 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline
If speaking up about her POV makes her look closed-minded, inexperienced, illogical and like a simpleton, then she obviously has plenty of company. Face it, some of us have real opinions that won't be dissuaded by name calling or other attempts at belittling us on a personal level. Some of us are secure enough in ourselves and believes to call a spade a spade. If that strikes you as closed-mindedness, that's you're opinion and you're entitled to it, even if I don't agree with it. Furthermore, If she chooses to espouse opinions that you find to be those of a inexperienced simpleton, she's entitled to do so. As for myself, those who defend cheating as a choice are most definitely scorned, as I find the behavior they rationalize to be harmful to all parties, including the spouse who is injured without consenting to the action.
This may be a place of support and community, but it is only conditionally so. There are topics which are clearly not welcomed on these boards because they have been found to be inappropriate by the powers that be. whether or not one agrees with those exceptions, they clearly demonstrate this is not meant to be a place of unconditional acceptance, regardless of what activities one practices. One cannot expect the "community" to offer unconditional support to each and every type of situation or dynamic that finds its way ont the boards. As rational, reasoning individuals, we have the ability to jdge some things as good and others as bad. You're choice to accept things as good that I choose to decry is just that, your personal choice.
I find the idea that I should accept whatever evil someone is promoting because vanilla society is judgemental and unaccepting to incredibly ridiculous and poorly thought out. Whatever vanilla society deems bad must therefore be good? I should understand that judgement is sometimes fallible and therefore refuse to use my ability to judge for myself? This is simply a red herring and has no intellectual value in this discussion.
You and I do agree in one area however. It is a good thing that RiotGirl and others who have strong opinions speak up as often as they do. I do hope "those with even a bit of intelligence will see them for what they are."
Timothy

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty

quote:

ORIGINAL: ruffnecksbabygir
Why not just speak her mind and give her take on it?


Ummm...because it makes her look like a closed-minded, inexperienced, illogical simpleton who believes that she knows the real "right and wrong" and anyone who disagrees with her is worthy of scorn?

...because this board could be a place of support and community, instead of a distributer of scartlet letters?

...because there is enough judgment and criticism of what we do from those who don't understand or participate?

I think it is good that she posts as much as she does, actually. It makes her completely harmless, as opposed to those who say one or two harmful things and then vanish for days or weeks. With posts like this, those with even a bit of intelligence will see them for what they are. The damage from the other types is much harder to counter.

Taggard


(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 10:37:39 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
Access denied.

< Message edited by RiotGirl -- 3/16/2005 12:16:00 AM >

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 10:43:43 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
Access denied.

< Message edited by RiotGirl -- 3/16/2005 12:16:10 AM >

(in reply to malepleases4ever)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 10:53:00 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
Access denied.

< Message edited by RiotGirl -- 3/16/2005 12:16:21 AM >

(in reply to stormiKnightBEAR)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 11:07:21 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
Access denied.

< Message edited by RiotGirl -- 3/16/2005 12:16:29 AM >

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 11:21:53 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RiotGirl

Wait a second. i think i made a serious error here. You were looking for a serious debate from me huh? Well i ask you this Tag, why should i seriously debate anything with you if you're going to resort to insulting me? Isnt that like.. Not really a debate at all?


Actually, RiotGirl, it's what poor debaters do when they can't win an argument. It's right there on page 32, "When all else fails and you're outwitted or otherwise unable to defend your position, attack the dissenting speaker." It usually falls out of favor away from the playground atmosphere, where it originated, but one does see it as a recurring theme among politicians.

(in reply to RiotGirl)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 11:26:34 PM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MizSuz


quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic

What's the point of coming into the forums and declaring it?



A few short weeks ago there was a series of posts regarding someone's difficulties with specific kinds of medications. They were 'quitting the meds and looking for a new doctor.'

Now its a few weeks later and there's a lot of what appears to be hypo-mania inspired judgements, declarations and morality issues being spewed in what could appear to be somewhat compulsive/obsessive posts here at the boards.

Now, if you combine those two seemingly separate pieces of information, what does it say to you?

To me it says "Ignore Inflammatory Posts."


One would presume that those of us who believe in certain standards of behavior should be drugged until we attain the level of tolerance proposed by the enlightened?
lol, now THAT's a tolerant opinion.

(in reply to MizSuz)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/14/2005 11:39:40 PM   
RiotGirl


Posts: 3149
Status: offline
Access denied.

< Message edited by RiotGirl -- 3/16/2005 12:16:39 AM >

(in reply to MizSuz)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Putting it straight AGAIN - 3/15/2005 2:08:22 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
This is not aimed at any individuals.
(Geez, these disclaimers are doing my head in...lol)

How we feel and react to situations, discussions, actions are formed within our brains.
How we perceive a situation is influenced on how we see(with our eyes), how we smell, how we touch, how we taste, how we hear. Our bodies react to these thoughts and feelings. Sometimes, our thoughts are influenced by the chemical changes within our bodies. Sometimes, our thoughts and perceptions of a situation, influence our body's chemical changes. If chemicals are added to our body, or taken away, this again, causes our perceptions and reactions to change.

Our mental state effects how we walk, talk, sweat, and perceive right from wrong, happy from sad, sarcasam from honest observation.

Thats not hearsay. Thats biological fact.


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to RiotGirl)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Putting it straight AGAIN Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094