Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? )


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 5:37:26 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
I'm trying to figure out what the point of this plane is. The US has the technology to attack anyone without it anyway, certainly against the countries they would attack anyway. They hardly replace ballistic missiles if their is an entanglement with Russia or China.

Oh well, I guess middle America will be safe from commies, even if it can't afford to protect its poor from lousy education and healthcare.


We are so rich ... we can afford to make it, just so you can have something else to gripe about.  

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 6:11:20 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
I'm trying to figure out what the point of this plane is. The US has the technology to attack anyone without it anyway, certainly against the countries they would attack anyway. They hardly replace ballistic missiles if their is an entanglement with Russia or China.

Oh well, I guess middle America will be safe from commies, even if it can't afford to protect its poor from lousy education and healthcare.


We are so rich ... we can afford to make it, just so you can have something else to gripe about.  


But you won't use this hi-tech equipement on anything other than ex-USSR armour or other obsolete rag tag armies and its pointless for fighting a guerilla war.

Or maybe for this.  http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2021434,00.html

Weeeell I guess I'm not one of the poor having my potential education and health care spent on bombing some stony hillside village.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 6:12:32 AM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

I cannot tell you how many arguments I had with bean counters. when I did computers, and tried to point out to to them that the fundamental law of electronics is not whether or not it will break, it is when it will break.

The cynical side of my nature holds this to be true in all
human endeavors.  "To err is human, to really foul things
up use a computer!"

Which is not to say that hydraulics do not break.  But a well designed hydraulic system will last a lot longer and be a lot easier to troubleshoot, fix, and get back into action than an electronic system.

Yes, the same type of short-term thinking applies to the
lack of funding for preventive medicine vrs. uninsured
people going to the Emergency Room because they
have no other choice.
 
Another example of this type of "penny-wise and
pound foolish" behavior applys to building, maintaining 
and repairing highways, bridges, levees, buildings and
other parts of the nation's infrastructure.

In the modern world, nobody replaces a component on a circuit board.  They replace the entire board and take the broken one back to the shop.

One of my brothers, who works in the high tech industry,
is fond of quoting the principle of "Designed Obsoletism".

Sinergy


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 6:19:01 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

Which is not to say that hydraulics do not break.  But a well designed hydraulic system will last a lot longer and be a lot easier to troubleshoot, fix, and get back into action than an electronic system.

Another example of this type of "penny-wise and
pound foolish" behavior applys to building, maintaining 
and repairing highways, bridges, levees, buildings and
other parts of the nation's infrastructure.




This is precisely what is done in Britain and getting around is shit. However, the Brits have the unfortunate advantage of hopping across the channel and seeing how the French and Germans do things. It seems a miracle of the modern age when comaparing the infrastructures of these two countries to Britain. Except it isn't a miraclebut using tax to invest in infrastructure instead of tagging onto Monkeyboy's adventures and pretending to be a world power.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 9:23:06 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Except for the fact that France, Russia and China gleefully sell all the high technology they can get their hands on to every tyrant, thug, terrorist and dictator who can scrape up a little bit of petty cash.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver



But you won't use this hi-tech equipement on anything other than ex-USSR armour or other obsolete rag tag armies and its pointless for fighting a guerilla war.



(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 9:34:22 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Except for the fact that France, Russia and China gleefully sell all the high technology they can get their hands on to every tyrant, thug, terrorist and dictator who can scrape up a little bit of petty cash.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

But you won't use this hi-tech equipement on anything other than ex-USSR armour or other obsolete rag tag armies and its pointless for fighting a guerilla war.




One thinks of pot and kettle here.

I think you will find it is Israel gleefully selling American technology.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 10:23:02 AM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Except for the fact that France, Russia and China gleefully sell all the high technology they can get their hands on to every tyrant, thug, terrorist and dictator who can scrape up a little bit of petty cash.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

But you won't use this hi-tech equipement on anything other than ex-USSR armour or other obsolete rag tag armies and its pointless for fighting a guerilla war.




One thinks of pot and kettle here.

I think you will find it is Israel gleefully selling American technology.


Practically everything Israel has was developed in the 1970s and 80s. They just appear to be much higher tech because everyone around them is using ancient soviet weapons. Israel doesnt even have the more advanced F18s.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 10:49:38 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Right. You know that Egypt has F-16's too? Ancient Soviet Weapons, right. And the new mobile SAM that Iran just purchased, that's ancient, too?



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 2:04:12 PM   
sleazy


Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
Egypt's F-16s are C/D block 40 models, hardly the state of the art block 60 model E's currently supplied to uncle sam. I suspect also that the Iranian SAM system whilst technically current is far from state of the art. The F22 is a stealth aircraft, its radar cross-section, and thermal signatures are far below what would normally be expected of an airframe that size with such powerplants. Jack Northrop built the first stealth bomber way back in the 40s & 50s, but nobody bought into the idea, as the aircraft design was not stable enough to make a good platform or be safe to fly.

As for defence against RPG's the only half decent defence is active armour, and that’s a one shot deal. Anything that requires shooting off an intercepting missile is just not going to work in a lot of instances due to the time factor in that most untrained RPG users shoot from very short ranges.

The SR71 had a little known predecessor the YF-12 that actually remained classified long after the blackbird was admitted to by the airforce, however when one crashed it was admitted to being an A-12 as there were plans to equip the mach3 plane with a missile system for interceptor roles.

There has not been a front line fighter in decades that is inherently stable enough in normal flight to not require computer assistance, a stable aircraft cannot manoeuvre very well, and an unstable aircraft can pull the tight turns etc, but is practically beyond human capabilities to fly safely and normally.


_____________________________

Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 4:23:08 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Right. You know that Egypt has F-16's too? Ancient Soviet Weapons, right. And the new mobile SAM that Iran just purchased, that's ancient, too?




Egypt has only 220 F16s. Israel has 362.
By comparison, the United States has 2,507

The Russian TOR-M1 mobile SAMS that Iran recently bought is not that much of a threat. Iran bought only 29 of the TOR-M1s (cost them $1 bilion). Which means if an enemy lauches 58 cruise missiles simultaneously, the system will be overwhelmed. Both the US and Israel can do that. Iran also bought a number of Chinese Silkworm cruise missiles designed to sink ships.
Sadaam tried to use the Chinese anti-ship Silkworm missiles against Kuwait and they completely missed their targets. So they are not even a realistic threat.
The TOR-M1s are also highly sensitive to electromagnetic pulse. A nuclear explosion high in the atmosphere will render the systems useless.

Iran's outside the 15 mile radius of a target are also very weak.

China and Russia are making a ton of money by selling these obsolete weapons to African and mideast countries that are decades old and are no match for Israel or the US.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 4:34:26 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sleazy

Egypt's F-16s are C/D block 40 models, hardly the state of the art block 60 model E's currently supplied to uncle sam. I suspect also that the Iranian SAM system whilst technically current is far from state of the art. The F22 is a stealth aircraft, its radar cross-section, and thermal signatures are far below what would normally be expected of an airframe that size with such powerplants.


Apparently, it's computer also freaks out if it sees too *many* radars. As in flying over them Middle East straits, with all those naval ships, air traffic radars, etc and suchlike. Oh well, maybe in the next update they'll get that software patched, too. ( Doesn't ANYONE test edge conditions anymore? ) Unless it's a problem on a board, then it'll take a little longer. The more shit there is, the more shit there is to go wrong.

How did I see it put elsewhere today?

"Advice to F-22 pilots: 1) Superglue a handheld GPS into your cockpit. 2) Carry a backup radio. Superglue this to your cockpit. 3) Remove your cockpit, and superglue it onto an A-10. 4) Fly safe. Carry superglue."


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to sleazy)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 4:57:24 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
"and an unstable aircraft can pull the tight turns etc, but is practically beyond human capabilities to fly safely and normally. "

Indeed. But there is another factor coming into play with this maneuverability, G force. They are already deconditioning pilots in a centrifuge, and giving them inflatable pants to try to keep some blood in the brain during hard maneuvers.

Many have blacked out, some have died. Lots of planes now have a system that will level the plane off automatically if it is in a dive for more than a predetermined number of seconds.

I think we will see a trend toward drones in the future. The technology does exist and has been tested. However the demands of a fighter pilot might not be met by current technology. The interface would have to be extensive.

As far as any doubts about hydraulics though, observe the hydraulic schematic of a Turbo-hydramatic 400 automatic transmission used in GM cars and trucks though a few decades. That system controls the shift points and converter dump, and passing gear and everything every bit as well as a computer could. They are considered to be the best three forward speed automatic transmission in the world, and at least one foreign auto maker actually bought them for their V12 sportscars. IIRC Rolls Royce uses,or at least used to use them.

If anyone expresses interest I will scan the schematics and upload them somewhere. I have studied it, and read the corrollary and understand it. I found it fascinating, and I am impressed.

It was designed in the 60s. The valve body is the same thing as a circuit board, it is just a different kind of circuit. It literally functions as a basic analog computer. It has inputs, and carries out actions based on those inputs. When governor or vacuum modulator pressure changes, a piston, called an accumulator moves proportionally. This is analogous to a register in a microprocessor. Inside the piston are other pistons, and once the main piston moves, it passes ports which then start or stop pressure on certain elements of the accumulator. This acts as a schmitt trigger, so that once it shifts, it is reluctant to shift back.  It can be persuaded to do so though, by the main inputs, which are calibrated hydraulic pressures dependant on manifold vacuum and vehicle speed. It's passing gear is also faster and more effective being the only electrical input to the system.  Floor it and the switch closes which puts it into like an "emergency" mode and provides maximum acceleration.

Really, nobody seems to think about it this way, but you can almost do anything with hydraulics that you can with electronics, it is not as easy of course, but it can be done.

Of course the control circuitry of the "analog computer" that is strictly hydraulic will not be light. It is probably more maintenence, but it is more of a sure fire system.

This is no piece of cake either, we are talking feedback, and totally hydraulic strain guages on the actual operating linkages. The feedback is not easy. And then to factor in the air load makes it look easy because factoring in that one last parameter would give the Cray a headache.

So I think that they are taking the easy way out in using electronics. I could see for the weapon systems of course, but for basic flight control I just don't think it is a good idea. There is a reason we do not have electronic power steering in cars. The system has been designed and built, but never marketed.

In an electronic power steering system, one bipolar transistor can short out and cause death. That is near impossible in a hydraulic system. You cannot see on a molecular level, what shape that transistor is in, but hydraulic valves and such can be inspected.

T

(in reply to sleazy)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 8:38:39 PM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
I remember the same type of things being a HUGE problem back when the M-1 Abrams first hit production.
Screams and hollars about all that money being spent and the result being a terrible product.
I would say the odds are high that this will turn out the same way, they find the bugs fix them and within a few years of being deployed the F-22 will be the fighter everyone wants to emulate.



(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/26/2007 8:48:53 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
I'm not the expert that most here seem to be, but don't most modern weapons systems have serious growing pains?
 
I was watching some show about the Osprey, and all the difficulties they had with it. Two decades to get delivery. The Army and Marines sure seem to like them now ... five times the range, three times the speed, and ten times the payload as what they were using before.
 
(I now await the predicted meatcleaver response, pointing out that the Osprey isn't helping us in Iraq )

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/27/2007 3:56:10 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

(I now await the predicted meatcleaver response, pointing out that the Osprey isn't helping us in Iraq )


Well no it isn't caitlyn. Occupying a country requires troops on the ground with small arms in the age old way.

Such high technology only really makes sense if you want to blast someone back to the stoneage and keep them off your home turf. It might make sense if you want to defeat a standing army but not many will be stupid enough to engage the US in a war between standing armies. Asymetrical warfare is the only way to engage the USA which I guess is what Iran is planning.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/27/2007 5:45:10 AM   
sleazy


Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle
Apparently, it's computer also freaks out if it sees too *many* radars. As in flying over them Middle East straits, with all those naval ships, air traffic radars, etc and suchlike. Oh well, maybe in the next update they'll get that software patched, too. ( Doesn't ANYONE test edge conditions anymore? ) Unless it's a problem on a board, then it'll take a little longer. The more shit there is, the more shit there is to go wrong.


Well edge testing costs money, the closer the edge the more money it costs, and so many US residents already think they pay too much in tax, unfortunately you cant have it both ways. You must either build to a price or build to a mission, the two are pretty much mutually exclusive.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
So I think that they are taking the easy way out in using electronics. I could see for the weapon systems of course, but for basic flight control I just don't think it is a good idea. There is a reason we do not have electronic power steering in cars. The system has been designed and built, but never marketed.

In an electronic power steering system, one bipolar transistor can short out and cause death. That is near impossible in a hydraulic system. You cannot see on a molecular level, what shape that transistor is in, but hydraulic valves and such can be inspected.

T


Electronic power steering is around and has been used for years by GM here in europe, and lets not forget it is electronic assistance, the steering still works with no electrical power much a hydraulic assistance unit would work if the pump was not pumping. Most modern motors have "fly by wire" throttle control, some even have similar transmission control too. There is even one manufacturer producing vehicles with an electronicall controlled and actuated braking system.

Our equivalent of the Chevy Cobalt (Vauxhall/Opel Astra) has been using an electrically assisted rack for all of the current model, and I think the previous model too. I think that the Vectra (Malibu platform) also uses an electrical system.

_____________________________

Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/27/2007 6:41:19 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
The problem with unconventional warfare, is that it requires the large conventional army to play nice.
 
Joseph Macabee thought it a great idea against the Romans, right up until Titus decided that it wasn't. The Magyar/Bulgar alliance felt the same way when fighting the Byzantines, right up until Basil II sent the army to clean house. History provides a long list.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/27/2007 6:49:45 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
Even in "normal" warfare, playing nice is a very difficult way to win. Things have gotten to the point that if one tiny little thing goes wrong and just one civilian gets hurt then the mainstream media acts like it's the end of the world. Is that because they want us to lose, or do they really expect everything to go perfectly in a war?

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

The problem with unconventional warfare, is that it requires the large conventional army to play nice.
 
Joseph Macabee thought it a great idea against the Romans, right up until Titus decided that it wasn't. The Magyar/Bulgar alliance felt the same way when fighting the Byzantines, right up until Basil II sent the army to clean house. History provides a long list.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/27/2007 7:00:38 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

The problem with unconventional warfare, is that it requires the large conventional army to play nice.
 
Joseph Macabee thought it a great idea against the Romans, right up until Titus decided that it wasn't. The Magyar/Bulgar alliance felt the same way when fighting the Byzantines, right up until Basil II sent the army to clean house. History provides a long list.


Let's assume the US attacks Iran, no doubt it will kill many civilians in the process. I think the idea Iran has when it says it will retaliate if the US attacks is that it will not attack the US military but US civilians and interests, any place, anywhere.

However, we don't live in the ancient world or the middleages where superpowers can commit genocide at will, we live in a small world. If the US goes over the top against Iran the pressure will be on all other muslim countries to not sell oil to the US, even the US's allies will be revulsed and pressure will be put on friendly governments by its citizens to put pressure on the US to stop.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) - 2/27/2007 7:06:36 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
We've gotten pretty good at surgical strikes, maybe too good - now that's what everyone demands, even when it comes to stopping a young and upcoming Adolph Hitler, just like the Iranian President there. And no, not all Muslim countries are behind Iran, not by a long shot. The guy is a nut, and not at all the friendly hero that some would lead us to believe.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Let's assume the US attacks Iran, no doubt it will kill many civilians in the process. I think the idea Iran has when it says it will retaliate if the US attacks is that it will not attack the US military but US civilians and interests, any place, anywhere.

However, we don't live in the ancient world or the middleages where superpowers can commit genocide at will, we live in a small world. If the US goes over the top against Iran the pressure will be on all other muslim countries to not sell oil to the US, even the US's allies will be revulsed and pressure will be put on friendly governments by its citizens to put pressure on the US to stop.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Your Taxdollars at Work ( Who needs enemies? ) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094