sleazy
Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006 From: UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent Popeye, I imagine many will agree with you. Ultimately, the question revolves around what people want from a health care system. For me, social welfare is about satisfying need, first and foremost. In Britain, there isn't enough money to go around (assuming we remain a conservtive nation and prefer to direct taxes towards "defence"). So, there has to be an allocation of limited resources and those most in need should be first in line. The british defence budget is less than 1/3rd of the healthcare portion of the welfare state alone. As a result of that people serving the nation are sent out with inadequate protection or even worse none at all, lets not forget simple things like boots, cellular phones and such are being bought out of their own pockets. So the amount of cash directed at defence is not really that great. quote:
I know little of the US, but from the attitudes I've read on this board I'll be amazed if you can raise the taxes, or redirect taxes, to cover a high standard of healthcare, on demand, for the entire nation. Thus, at some point, you will need to make a decision on who gets the limited resources. Any democratic government that raises taxes no matter the reason alienates voters that may not get a return on it themselves. Ask any person who pays taxes how they feel about welfare payments that they dont recieve, and then about healthcare that they do. In most instances the former will be resented and the latter not so. Its reasonable therefore to assume that any healthcare should be available for all to minimise resentful feelings from the taxpayers/voters quote:
In terms of the practicalities of our National Health Service, my experiences have been positive. Strangely, horror stories crop up "we waited 36 years to get seen to", but it's never happened to me or anyone I know. I've had x-rays, physio treatment, neurologist appointments etc for a mild back problem and I've never had to wait longer than 3 weeks (which is impressive considering I don't have a problem that needs immediate treatment). There are positive stories about the NHS, bad happenings are to be expected with any organisation, the problem as I see it is that many of the failings of the NHS are as a direct result of interference by people who have no real understanding of the issues down on the wards or out in the ambulances. Worse these problems are happening in areas where just about anyone can see that there is the potential for serious consequences, or are based on performance indicators that have no real world relevance.
_____________________________
Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C
|