RE: Masterhood

RE: Masterhood (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

MadRabbit -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:00:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit The definition of responsibility is the state, quality, or fact of being responsible. The definiton of responsible is involving personal accountability or ability to act without guidance or superior authority. If your order is "Go bake a cake", then the slave is going to act without guidance or superior authority regarding what cake to bake, what tempature to set the oven, what kind of ingredients to use, how long to bake it. Unless you provide the guidance for all these details, then she is acting without your guidance and thus responsible for them. If you dont give your slave guidance and direction everytime she feals the urge to use the bathroom, then she is responsible for going to the bathroom since she is making the deciision outside the scope of your guidance and authority. I control who and what she is. Any flaws she has are ultimately my fault- whether she had them at the time when I acquired her, which I have willingly accepted, or if she has acquired them under my rule due to my control. She is my property. I am responsible for her. I will not lie to you that I can be sure that everything will always go right- maybe she's unaware of not putting tin foil in the microwave when I tell her to go heat up last night's dinner- but it is my failure in not having known her. I feel like you're a friend telling me I'm crazy for having kids, that they're too much responsibility. I'm telling you I know it's a lot, and I accept it. Thats not what I am saying at all. I am saying its impossible for someone to have complete and utter control over someone 24/7 like a tool. Because unlike the tool, the person has a will of its own that will continue to operate regardless of whether or not you are providing direction.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:06:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit I use Windows. When Window's crashes, I dont blame myself and say I am accountabile. Its the people who designed Window's fault. Even in the context of using actual tools, its impractical to think I am fully responsible for the failures of my tools unless I designed and built every single one of my tools. Just likes its unrealistic to think you are fully responsible for every fault and mistake of your slave unless you provide direction and instruction for every single decision your slave would have to make that could generate a possible mistake. I, however, do design my slave. Windows was made my Microsoft, without your agreement to accept its bugs. When I accepted my slave, I accepted all the problems she had as part of her. I accepted her for everything she was. Since then, as she's yet to be disobidient, any mistakes she makes are either due to a flaw she had that I had accepted or one she had acquired under me. No, I'm not able to make her into a perfect, flawless person. Yes, she'll make mistakes. However, I have accepted that. I hope you come to acknowlege both this and my right to have done so. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit On paper, your theory looks great. But in reality, its unrealistic. I can apprieciate you're trying to argue this point, but you're doing so from a limited thought base. You've only been presented with the idea last night.. I can see you haven't throught through all the solutions, but this does mean they don't exist. Continue presenting problems. I'll answer them. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Then is she responsible for the ensuing fire? You've already told me her actions are not your responsibility, regardless of the fact you order her. No she isnt. But she would be responsible if there WASNT a fire because she made the decision to set the microwave for 30 seconds as opposed to 3 minutes when I didnt provide the direction and thus she made a decision of her own will. Nor is she willfully disobeying me because I never provided an order for her to willfully disobey. Okay, so say you told her to microwave tin foil for three minutes at normal power. In an actual microwave as we know them today. You said it's not her fault. So is it your fault? Then, are you at fault for her action? quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit I rarely speak in these terms, but its impossible to think you can provide enough direction for a human being to operate 24/7 without at some point, acting on their own will and negating personal responsibility Just like its unrealistic for a slave to expect that kind of direction so they dont have to act on their own will ever and never be accountable for anything. She has a mind. Her mind is to serve me in the manner I set forward. She does the best she can. I teach her. She learns. She grows. She is my responsibility. I feel like you associate responsibility arbritarily to individual human beings. This is a typical assumption made to assign concepts such as fault- one made out of ease and convinence, not accuracy. It can not be applied to this case as this case deviates from the vanilla world in which such a concept is designed to work. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord My slave would do as ordered. She has accepted that she is under obligation to perform any action I order her. One might argue that this is an illogical choice for someone to make, or that it's contradictory to the nature of a human to do so. I would assure such an individual that common circumstance are only generalizations, as even electrons can escape from the quantum energy well of a nuetron under not altogether common circumstance. I would further add that, in allowing her mortality to be accessable by means of our dynamic, she gains honesty and fullness in our relationship. She is truly my property. There's no more pushing or trying to break down barriers or limits. We're at the end of establishing the foundation of our relationship, and we've moved onto living our lives together without limits and with a clear understanding. This was always my goal in this lifestyle. Once again, its solid on paper, but in reality its just not pausible. Plausible? It's reality. I hope you can see this is a paper reflecting a reality, not a paper on a possible reality. Above, you said it can't happen. It has. I would propose that you are at a loss for understanding how it has happened. I am willing to explain. Still, I hope you can see how it sounds silly to me that you're telling me my life is impossible. I mean, to me, how much more obvious can the possiblity be?

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:12:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord (Edit: More was backquoted here. Just cutting down on space it cutting out of the backquote.) I feel like you're a friend telling me I'm crazy for having kids, that they're too much responsibility. I'm telling you I know it's a lot, and I accept it. Thats not what I am saying at all. I am saying its impossible for someone to have complete and utter control over someone 24/7 like a tool. Because unlike the tool, the person has a will of its own that will continue to operate regardless of whether or not you are providing direction. A "will", or, proper, a "free will", is something that I, as a Chemical Engineer and scientist, do not believe in. We, like tools, are a physical process. Unlike most tools, proper, we are extremely complex. One human controlling another is prone to have far greater misunderstandings of his tool. This great potentiental for misunderstanding in cause/effect does not excuse me from my responsibility to use her as I see fit. Rather, I am doing so by definition. My slave is obligated to do her best to follow my orders. If I tell her to fly, she's going to try. But I can not fault her for a short coming she either had at the time of acquiring her or one she acquires in my rule- in other words, all. Maybe her short coming's more mundane. Maybe her knowledge on how to bake a cake is flawed, believing it should have a disproportionally high about of eggs in it, which messes it up somehow. It's still a short coming she had before collaring or she acquired. It is my responsbility as I have accepted it to be such. Edit: Typo.

MadRabbit -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:26:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord I, however, do design my slave. Windows was made my Microsoft, without your agreement to accept its bugs. When I accepted my slave, I accepted all the problems she had as part of her. I accepted her for everything she was. Since then, as she's yet to be disobidient, any mistakes she makes are either due to a flaw she had that I had accepted or one she had acquired under me. No, I'm not able to make her into a perfect, flawless person. Yes, she'll make mistakes. However, I have accepted that. I hope you come to acknowlege both this and my right to have done so. I will acknowledge that, but its not what I am debating. quote: I can apprieciate you're trying to argue this point, but you're doing so from a limited thought base. You've only been presented with the idea last night.. I can see you haven't throught through all the solutions, but this does mean they don't exist. Continue presenting problems. I'll answer them. Once again you are being arrogantly presumptious. I've been thinking about TPE vs absolute authority for quite awhile. The problem is your viewing this like an enginner. Sure, there is a solution to every problem. Sure, there is a WAY for you to make a human being into a tool that operates 24/7 purely based on your will. Just like there is a way for me to solve every single little problem in my kitchen. But I dont even try to solve every single little problem in my kitchen, because I dont have the time, energy, and resources to solve every single little problem in my kitchen on my own. Just like I dont have the time to ensure that a slave isnt acting on her own will 24/7. Why? Because I have a job and need time for myself. The idea that you can provide every single solution to every single problem that keeps your slave operating outside of your will IS not plausible and unrealistic. At some point, human beings are going to have to operate outside your will and make decisions that they are accounable for. quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Okay, so say you told her to microwave tin foil for three minutes at normal power. In an actual microwave as we know them today. You said it's not her fault. So is it your fault? Then, are you at fault for her action? Thats not the point. The point is I didnt provide the direction to microwave it for 3 minutes which is what I am argueing. Its not the theory that is flawed, but the fact that theory rarely ever matches up to reality. The point is you cant provide ample direction to negate someone else using their own will. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit She has a mind. Her mind is to serve me in the manner I set forward. She does the best she can. I teach her. She learns. She grows. She is my responsibility. I feel like you associate responsibility arbritarily to individual human beings. This is a typical assumption made to assign concepts such as fault- one made out of ease and convinence, not accuracy. It can not be applied to this case as this case deviates from the vanilla world in which such a concept is designed to work. No...I am just realizing that I am not responsible for mistakes created by her using that mind and will independentally of my own. quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Plausible? It's reality. I hope you can see this is a paper reflecting a reality, not a paper on a possible reality. Above, you said it can't happen. It has. I would propose that you are at a loss for understanding how it has happened. I am willing to explain. Still, I hope you can see how it sounds silly to me that you're telling me my life is impossible. I mean, to me, how much more obvious can the possiblity be? Just like I hope you understand how silly it is for you to be claiming to living a reality where your slave is in fact a tool that doesnt operate outside the scope of your will...because that, in all everyday common sense, is impossible. It would be like me telling you I lived a life where all I did everyday was count grains of sand on the beach. You would know thats not true because at some point I would have to stop counting grains of sands to eat/sleep/piss/shit.

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:27:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord She began her reply with a blantantly incorrect idea, something she misunderstood at the very core. It is not presumptious to assume she did not understand. Actually, no. Your original post in all this was over generalized and you have since modified your language to be more limited in scope. There are still flaws with this scope.

MadRabbit -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:29:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord (Edit: More was backquoted here. Just cutting down on space it cutting out of the backquote.) I feel like you're a friend telling me I'm crazy for having kids, that they're too much responsibility. I'm telling you I know it's a lot, and I accept it. Thats not what I am saying at all. I am saying its impossible for someone to have complete and utter control over someone 24/7 like a tool. Because unlike the tool, the person has a will of its own that will continue to operate regardless of whether or not you are providing direction. A "will", or, proper, a "free will", is something that I, as a Chemical Engineer and scientist, do not believe in. We, like tools, are a physical process. Unlike most tools, proper, we are extremely complex. One human controlling another is prone to have far greater misunderstandings of his tool. This great potentiental for misunderstanding in cause/effect does not excuse me from my responsibility to use her as I see fit. Rather, I am doing so by definition. My slave is obligated to do her best to follow my orders. If I tell her to fly, she's going to try. But I can not fault her for a short coming she either had at the time of acquiring her or one she acquires in my rule- in other words, all. Maybe her short coming's more mundane. Maybe her knowledge on how to bake a cake is flawed, believing it should have a disproportionally high about of eggs in it, which messes it up somehow. It's still a short coming she had before collaring or she acquired. It is my responsbility as I have accepted it to be such. Edit: Typo. All right. I will concede on this point since your at least taking into the account the imperfections that make this flawed. Even though I disagree with your reasoning and beliefs regarding will. But thats not a debate I am going to get into tonight because I am already drained enough.

MagiksSlave -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:45:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote: ORIGINAL: MagiksSlave quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist All I can say is that LA and MadRabbit covered everything perfectly. Yup I they said exactly what I felt and was trying to say!! Both of you put words to what I couldnt seem to convay thanks saved me the effert!!! Magik's slave I would appreciate you find your own words so that I may address you. If you are incapable or unwilling, I hope the responses to the other surfice to answer your inquaries. scuse me??? No need to find my own words their words did just fine and I didnt ask for you to respond I was simply agreeing with other posters.. And you should really work on not beeing so rude condisending I for one know I dont apreasiate it and Im sure others dont eather Magik's slave

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:45:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit I will acknowledge that, but its not what I am debating. Alright, then so we agree she's my responsibility despite her mistakes. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: I can apprieciate you're trying to argue this point, but you're doing so from a limited thought base. You've only been presented with the idea last night.. I can see you haven't throught through all the solutions, but this does mean they don't exist. Continue presenting problems. I'll answer them. Once again you are being arrogantly presumptious. I've been thinking about TPE vs absolute authority for quite awhile. I said "this point", referring to the point you were arguing. It's a direct reference to the TPE vs. absolute authority you're argueing. This isn't arrogantly prsumptious.. it's.. accurate. :P quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit The problem is your viewing this like an enginner. Sure, there is a solution to every problem. Sure, there is a WAY for you to make a human being into a tool that operates 24/7 purely based on your will. Just like there is a way for me to solve every single little problem in my kitchen. But, here, you're assuming I want to solve every little problem in my own kitchen. Either you're drawing a bad analogy or you're misunderstanding me. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit But I dont even try to solve every single little problem in my kitchen, because I dont have the time, energy, and resources to solve every single little problem in my kitchen on my own. Nor do I. One of the primer ascepcts of a human tool is that it can learn. I'm still responsible for her learning, as she's finding it in places I've provided and in manners under my direction, but that doesn't mean I'm making the soundwaves that bounce to her ears and teach her concepts. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit Just like I dont have the time to ensure that a slave isnt acting on her own will 24/7. Why? Because I have a job and need time for myself. The idea that you can provide every single solution to every single problem that keeps your slave operating outside of your will IS not plausible and unrealistic. At some point, human beings are going to have to operate outside your will and make decisions that they are accounable for. Pft, I'm a Chemical Engineer/Physics double major with a job on the side. Trust me, I get busy. I'm finding no end to the joy in the novelty that I have time to use forums this weekend. I have no obligation to provide direct answers. I provide answers- or don't- as I see fit, to include manner and rate. If she messes up- she fails me- then I live with it. If she bakes a bad dinner, then my dinner isn't great, or I find a new one. If she damages something, I'll just have to replace it or live with in damaged. It's quite possible. Seriously, I like you, but you're being so rude in suggesting it's not. How would you like it if I said your girl wasn't really your slave? Your relationship with her isn't real? I hope you come to understand how rude it is. The fact I can defend it doesn't detract from the intent. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Okay, so say you told her to microwave tin foil for three minutes at normal power. In an actual microwave as we know them today. You said it's not her fault. So is it your fault? Then, are you at fault for her action? Thats not the point. The point is I didnt provide the direction to microwave it for 3 minutes which is what I am argueing. Its not the theory that is flawed, but the fact that theory rarely ever matches up to reality. The point is you cant provide ample direction to negate someone else using their own will. Her will is a function and interpretation of my own. Her assumptions are based on thought processes she either had when I collared her or that I gave her. I am therefore responsible for them and their consquences. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: She has a mind. Her mind is to serve me in the manner I set forward. She does the best she can. I teach her. She learns. She grows. She is my responsibility. I feel like you associate responsibility arbritarily to individual human beings. This is a typical assumption made to assign concepts such as fault- one made out of ease and convinence, not accuracy. It can not be applied to this case as this case deviates from the vanilla world in which such a concept is designed to work. No...I am just realizing that I am not responsible for mistakes created by her using that mind and will independentally of my own. In your case- don't confuse it with mine. I accept responsibility for the actions of my slave and her thoughts, as I dictitate them. If you don't, that's fine, but it's truly frustrating to see the false parallels coming up as assumptions in your interpretation. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Plausible? It's reality. I hope you can see this is a paper reflecting a reality, not a paper on a possible reality. Above, you said it can't happen. It has. I would propose that you are at a loss for understanding how it has happened. I am willing to explain. Still, I hope you can see how it sounds silly to me that you're telling me my life is impossible. I mean, to me, how much more obvious can the possiblity be? Just like I hope you understand how silly it is for you to be claiming to living a reality where your slave is in fact a tool that doesnt operate outside the scope of your will...because that, in all everyday common sense, is impossible. It is my will that she lives as she does. This is, therefore, living by my will, by definition. If you need to, think about it. I know you're not used to it, but it's very logically sound. quote: ORIGINAL: MadRabbit It would be like me telling you I lived a life where all I did everyday was count grains of sand on the beach. You would know thats not true because at some point I would have to stop counting grains of sands to eat/sleep/piss/shit. You've made the assumption that I'm saying I must micromanage her. In my orginial definition, I said: his guidelines and under his orders. (In italics, there, too!) Guidelines can be vague. I do not have to micromanage to give her guidelines. You might come to argue, "Then how can you be responsible for decisions she makes under vague guidelines?" I would point out you tell a computer to open a file, not all the millions of subcommands. It's still an order. You are to understand the strengths and weaknesses, and accept the flaws, in that process if you designed the system and failed to provide a more specific instruction.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:49:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord She began her reply with a blantantly incorrect idea, something she misunderstood at the very core. It is not presumptious to assume she did not understand. Actually, no. Your original post in all this was over generalized and you have since modified your language to be more limited in scope. There are still flaws with this scope. My opening post was entirely accurate. If I made a post, "A man can live in the universe", you would say, "Impossible! There's no air." I'd say, "There is on Earth." You'd say, "You've since corrected your scope to be more limited, but thre are still flaws in it." (i.e., he can't live in the molten core of the Earth). I propose your logic is faulty. A man can live in the universe- I never said he could live anywhere in it. With the same regard, my OP was accurate. You have failed to understand the specific scope in which it is accurate. I've since gone about narrowing it down for you. Do not, however, propose this means that a broader statement was inaccurate as I never claimed it was all inclusive.

AquaticSub -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:53:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord She began her reply with a blantantly incorrect idea, something she misunderstood at the very core. It is not presumptious to assume she did not understand. Actually, no. Your original post in all this was over generalized and you have since modified your language to be more limited in scope. There are still flaws with this scope. My opening post was entirely accurate. If I made a post, "A man can live in the universe", you would say, "Impossible! There's no air." I'd say, "There is on Earth." You'd say, "You've since corrected your scope to be more limited, but thre are still flaws in it." (i.e., he can't live in the molten core of the Earth). I propose your logic is faulty. A man can live in the universe- I never said he could live anywhere in it. With the same regard, my OP was accurate. You have failed to understand the specific scope in which it is accurate. I've since gone about narrowing it down for you. Do not, however, propose this means that a broader statement was inaccurate as I never claimed it was all inclusive. So basically, you failed to be specific enough to be understood easily and now you are shifting blame. Got it.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:55:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MagiksSlave quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote: ORIGINAL: MagiksSlave quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist All I can say is that LA and MadRabbit covered everything perfectly. Yup I they said exactly what I felt and was trying to say!! Both of you put words to what I couldnt seem to convay thanks saved me the effert!!! Magik's slave I would appreciate you find your own words so that I may address you. If you are incapable or unwilling, I hope the responses to the other surfice to answer your inquaries. scuse me??? No need to find my own words their words did just fine and I didnt ask for you to respond I was simply agreeing with other posters.. And you should really work on not beeing so rude condisending I for one know I dont apreasiate it and Im sure others dont eather You have expressed agreement with views contrary to my own. I have, politely, asked you to clarify yours so that I may address them. Further, I stated that if you are unwilling or unable, that I hope my responses to those with who you claim to have similar views will answer your own. This is both earnest and sincere. If you find it rude, then I'd encourage you to reconsider the spirit you orginially made your response in as it may have possessed a malicious quaility that would upset you to have to admit to. I'm not here to be rude. It is against my identity and doing so would be determental to such, thus being against my interests. I do detect hostility from you, though, which you seem to only redouble when politely addressed. In any case, I'm not up for an emotional or indignant arguments. My orginial point stands. If you have a concern or issue to address with my OP, you are free to make it, and I would be happy to address it. If not, I would suspsect your intentions to be less than amiable, though I am disconcerned with ill will.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 2:57:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord She began her reply with a blantantly incorrect idea, something she misunderstood at the very core. It is not presumptious to assume she did not understand. Actually, no. Your original post in all this was over generalized and you have since modified your language to be more limited in scope. There are still flaws with this scope. My opening post was entirely accurate. If I made a post, "A man can live in the universe", you would say, "Impossible! There's no air." I'd say, "There is on Earth." You'd say, "You've since corrected your scope to be more limited, but thre are still flaws in it." (i.e., he can't live in the molten core of the Earth). I propose your logic is faulty. A man can live in the universe- I never said he could live anywhere in it. With the same regard, my OP was accurate. You have failed to understand the specific scope in which it is accurate. I've since gone about narrowing it down for you. Do not, however, propose this means that a broader statement was inaccurate as I never claimed it was all inclusive. So basically, you failed to be specific enough to be understood easily and now you are shifting blame. Got it. So, basically, I stated a case, assuming readers would be either understanding or able to ask for clarification in earnest. You were aggressive and rude when a logical point is made. Why?

OnlyHis -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:05:17 PM)
quote: These views are all fascinating to me. Most slaves I know never are permitted nor desire any time "away from the lifestyle" I agree with you LA, at least in my case. Master does permit me to have what He calls "free time" when i am allowed to do what i want. Now if He is not present this is time for me to catch up on some reading or maybe play a video game or watch a movie. So i do have fun using this time He has given me. But... If Master is present i have no desire to have free time as to me i should be always ready to serve Him. Even in the little ways such as getting a glass of water for Him.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:09:05 PM)
Anyhow, to all, I supppose it's time to sum it up. The sort of relationship I live in is possible, and exists. I am responsible for the actions of my slave, and she lives under my rule, by both order and guideline. This is a more extreme M/s sort of relationship, though this is not to say it's better- some posters are Dom/sub, some are only top or bottom in the bedroom! It's a life choice. Please, don't take offense from something being different. I'm going to be off for a while- I've spent too much time on the forums and finals are next week. =/ I'll probably check back pretty regularly- I'm ADD like that- but I doubt I'll be able to posts pages of reponses again for a bit. Smaller posts will be easier for me to respond to. Take it easy, and catch you all later. And, whatever dynamic you live with, I hope it's working well for you.

AquaticSub -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:15:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord So, basically, I stated a case, assuming readers would be either understanding or able to ask for clarification in earnest. You were aggressive and rude when a logical point is made. Why? You stated an opinion that was both inclusive and exclusive. I am, or at least attempting to, have you examine your opinion as I consider it illogical. In your example, you would have failed to be clear. If you are comparing what you actually said to the universe example, then you are saying that you failed to be clear and it's our fault for not reading your mind. I'm hardly being aggressive. I'm responding to a post that I feel like responding to. If you can not handle the responses that are not singing your praises, then perhaps you should not put yourself and your opinions in this position.

MadRabbit -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:18:23 PM)
quote: You've only been presented with the idea last night.. This was the point you were being presumptious on. I've heard the debates a lot and I have found absolute authority to be more plausible and applicable then the notion of total power (Power in the sense of control). But....regardless.... It wasnt my intention to be rude or to say your relationship isnt real. Its not what I saying at all. I dont doubt your relationship isnt real. My viewpoint was to show how the notion of maintaining total control over someone is flawed by the realities of life and how total responsibility is negated by the lack of total control. Hence why I go with absolute authority... You've shown how your dynamic works and functions even with the flaws so I cant dispute it or say its anymore wrong than my views. Since your not argueing with me on the grounds that you are maintaining total control but rather having a dynamic that works despite that, I can mututally agree with you.

OnlyHis -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:22:32 PM)
MagiksSlave, Myself i am enjoying this whole thread or as far as i have gotten so far. This kind of debate, as long as it stays civil, tends to make me see that there are more sides to serving, responsibilities and clearly see even more that this lifestyle has so many interesting facets to it. Thank you LA, Curious, Rabbit and Magik for these thought provoking posts.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:35:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord So, basically, I stated a case, assuming readers would be either understanding or able to ask for clarification in earnest. You were aggressive and rude when a logical point is made. Why? You stated an opinion that was both inclusive and exclusive. I am, or at least attempting to, have you examine your opinion as I consider it illogical. In your example, you would have failed to be clear. If you are comparing what you actually said to the universe example, then you are saying that you failed to be clear and it's our fault for not reading your mind. I'm hardly being aggressive. I'm responding to a post that I feel like responding to. If you can not handle the responses that are not singing your praises, then perhaps you should not put yourself and your opinions in this position. Ah, but you see, my point was that I enjoy my lifestyle, and I was trying to share it, like one might say "the human body is beautiful" in my universe example. I never expected to get posts saying, "The human body can't exist!" My post didn't fail. I stated my point, and it was accurate. I'm answering concerns related to it, but it's fine. And, please, the language you use is less than friendly- you take it to insulting extremes, such as "not singing your priases". If you don't realize you're being offensive, I encourage you to reconsider how you come across.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:36:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OnlyHis MagiksSlave, Myself i am enjoying this whole thread or as far as i have gotten so far. This kind of debate, as long as it stays civil, tends to make me see that there are more sides to serving, responsibilities and clearly see even more that this lifestyle has so many interesting facets to it. Thank you LA, Curious, Rabbit and Magik for these thought provoking posts. Thank you, too, for your participation! I love these sorts of debates, as you said, as line as they remain civil.

CuriousLord -> RE: Masterhood (5/5/2007 3:41:16 PM)
It's been good hearing your views, MadRabbit. It's sort of off topic, but since we have dozens of on topic posts already (and it's not like the OP'er will object), how'd you come to the theme in your alias and signature? It's pretty neat.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875