Hawkins
Posts: 31
Joined: 10/14/2004 From: I'm English but I live in the Netherlands Status: offline
|
First post; hi everyone. I only have the experience of one submissive under my belt. She lead me into BDSM, with no expereince other than on the inside of her head. We gave each other/determined names (which we still use online and in play). Our neophyte reading introduced us to the idea of safewords, but as we have 'real life' names as well as the names we use in D/s, we really understood it was the use of another's 'real life' name that constituted a red flag. We've barely ever used it. In fact, I think I'm the only one who's ended a scene that way. There've been occasions where Kate has been unable, due to gagging, to say my 'real' name, or any safeword beyond "Mwuphwhhhp", which sounds very similar to "Mwurphwhhrp" but mean something very different. On one occasion through a quick set of rythmical knocks (whilst bound gagged to a table) Kate alerted to me to something I had just become aware of due to a change in her breathing that did not fit in with what 'should be happening' - she'd started crying, and her nose was blocked because of it, which with a rag in your mouth makes beathing somewhat difficult. On other occasions, through me seeing her reaction change in an unexpected way, or some other non-verbal communication on Kate's part, we've stopped play due to a problem. We have the benefit of knowing each other very well indeed. I could probably know the difference between a good albeit subbed to the max look and a "get me out of here" look, even if she were gagged and shrink-wrapped into a saucege with just a hole for her eyes and her nose. And in a situation like that I'd BETTER know the difference between the two looks! But if it's the first time, or the first few times, depending on the experience and chemistry of the pairing, you will not be able to have the reassurance of being able to accurately read your partner. Some form of safeword system is quite reasonable then. However, if you are playing at a level where the submissive can say 'your hitting my tail bone Sir', then a safeword is far less useful than saying the above. It might be a bit 'un' certain protocols, but it's less disruptive to the scene than 'blanket' follwed by an explanation. So it would seem a safeword is reasonable with new partners who will play to a level where the submissive might be unable to form a coherent objection but could remember 'blanket'. And that opens up the question of 'is it wise to play to a point where you can't respond coherently with someone who doesn't know you well enough to see there's a problem'? If they don't know you that well, can you know them well enough to be sure they would stop? But, in the scenario presented, they were ignored, so the question of whether a slave in training should be allowed safewords is rather overshadowed by a person who ignored a submissive effectively withdrawing consent. That's abuse. Kate (sat at my feet eating walnuts) is in full agreement on this. Use of a safeword doesn't imply it will be adhered to. I can see their use, but people should get to a point where you know there's a problem. 'Denial' of a safeword as an imposition upon someone who feels they need one is not something I am happy with, and someone trying that would ring alarm bells. Hawkins & Kate .
|