fornowimjustlook
Posts: 3
Joined: 2/25/2008 Status: offline
|
I must say I am amazed at some of the responses that have lately come in to this thread, and at some of the assumptions and interpretations that have been made regarding what some people seem to think Lady Hathor said, as opposed to what she actually did say. quote:
ORIGNAL: flower2007 Thoughts? I'm offended just reading it. Why on earth would you assume someone DIDN'T have their finances together? None of those things are even on my radar screen, because they're non-issues. Why wouldn't I be debt free? Why wouldn't I pay my taxes? Why wouldn't I maintain my car as legally required? Wow! I think you should get over yourself. Offended because someone has standards, financial or otherwise regarding who they wish to let into their lives. Pleeeze. Also I don’t see where Lady Hathor has assumed anything, about anybody. She has simply stated some qualities that are important to her in a person she would consider getting involved with. Finally, I don’t know why you wouldn’t be debt free, or pay your taxes, or whatever, because I don't know you, but I do know that lots of people aren’t and don’t. The sad fact is that lots of people go through life running up all the financial obligations they can, and then ignoring them. If they can find someone to pay off these obligations for them, so much the better. Then they can run up a bunch more. Apparently Lady Hathor doesn’t want to get mixed up with any of these people and I don’t blame her. I wouldn’t want to either. quote:
ORIGNAL: SugarMYChurro Because I don't consider other adult human beings my financial responsibility I tend not to worry about the things on the OP's laundry list of requirements. I guess like a previous poster, I see the list as both redundant and with many items being a given in most cases. I wouldn't get involved with someone that had too many issues. But then I also avoid smokers and people with children. I am much more concerned with who the person in question actually is. I am also concerned with things like honesty and emotional maturity. You might find a human being could quickly become your financial responsibility if you don’t worry about things like this. Certainly these items are not a given any more than qualities like honesty and emotional maturity are. One must take the trouble to investigate for all qualities that are important to them. quote:
ORIGNAL: flower2007 By her requiring those, she's assuming her potential partner doesn't. It's like people who post on Craigslist and "require" someone who has a car. By requiring that, they're making an assumption someone wouldn't have a car. Again, I don’t see where Lady Hathor is assuming anything here, just stating her requirements, and by the way not everyone has a car. Further, some of those who do have a car only have it for as long as they can successfully keep it hidden from the repo man, the tax man and the police man. quote:
ORIGNAL: SugarMyChurro This is probably part of the whole negative profile thing. This laundry list is the wrong message to send out into the world. Far better to calculate it all in your own head and see whether a person is worth the risk. You have to take someone as a whole package and not as a discreet series of points to tick off from a list. Funny, From Lady Hathor’s post I didn’t get that she was posting this as a list, but in was, in fact, more or less, is doing the calculations in her nead. Further, while I agree with you that you have to take a person as a whole, the things she is talking about are part of the whole. Also, we all have deal killers. (Items that are so important to us that they would disqualify a person from consideration no matter what their other qualities might be.) Perhaps financial irresponsibility (which I think is what Lady Hathor’s list really comes down to) is a deal killer for her. I know it would be for me. quote:
ORIGNAL: SinergyNstrumpet I have noticed those who have the huge laundry lists and plenty of preconceived judgments about other people based upon shallow and superficial things (such as how much a person has in their 401k and what sort of car a person has) tend to be without a partner. I have noticed that people who jump into relationships without bothering to take the trouble to find out if the person they are jumping with has the qualities they desire are soon without a partner too. Unfortunately by the time they are without that partner they have usually been hurt or damaged in some way. By the way, I didn’t see anyone see anyone specifying dollar amounts or model of car here. What I see is someone asking for financial responsibility. This is not superficial. This is a core value. quote:
ORIGNAL: SugarMyChurro In a way, I care less what the problems are and more about how the person deals with those problems. I think the answers to the things on Lady Hathor’s list will go a long way in revealing how a person deals with their problems, or if they even deal with them at all. quote:
ORIGNAL: SugarMyChurro Going back to how one puts oneself out there, how do these approaches compare? Scenario A: -------------- I want this. I want that. I want this third thing. You must have accomplished this. You must have accomplished that. You must have accomplished this third thing. Scenario B: -------------- I offer this. I offer that. I offer this third thing. I have accomplished this. I have accomplished that. I have accomplished this third thing. Why pick one over the other? I would say that the best approach would be to combine elements of A and B, don’t you think? That way a viewer could see both some of what we are looking for, and some of what we have to offer right up front at the beginning. This could save a lot of time for all concerned. Well this thread has been most interesting, but it’s late here and I’m tired, so I’m off. I can’t wait to see where this has gone by tomorrow!
|