RapierFugue
Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006 From: London, England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead I dunno about that: in most cases there's a political side to religious bombings (and religious violence in general) and that factor's just used to justify something that's done more for other reasons to whichever halfwit is actually suckered into doing the dirty work. $cientology, on the other hand, is notorious for being the only religious body in existence that maintains a war chest (have a look on wiki, which I think names a few prominent contributors: I know people who've stopped buying Beck records over that) in order to sue and otherwise harass enemies of the church, and a distaste for the cult seems to be the only factor at work there. The $Sea org don't seem to have any agenda for doing that besides $cientology. I don't think there's another religion in existence that does that. That said, if they could go around killing people with the same impunity, I'm sure they'd be happy to try that as well. It's a downside of the cult being composed of rich westerners rather than dirt poor and appallingly poorly educated types from the middle east. Still, I'm sure that's a weight of James Randii's mind, isn't it? The point being though, that they never have utilised murder for their own ends, unlike branches of most other churches, be it Catholics, Muslims, whatever. I'm not saying they're not evil, unprincipled scumbags, because I happen to think they're about as evil as certain other religions which embrace physical (as opposed to the Scientologists' psychological) violence, but I find it interesting they haven't gone down that route. Presumably they can get done what they have to by the application of money alone?
|