RE: Doormats (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 12:12:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

But, I can promise anyone out there if they used that term in reference to him, I sure as hell wouldn't be happy about it.


'Doormat' doesn't set me, nor beth obviously, off in a rage. However, I can imagine circumstances and sources where addressing beth as 'beth' would.

Actions, context, source, expectation, and attitude conveyed are far more important to me than any attempt to mock by using a term the speaker deems insulting. I'll let a label applied to beth go by and, if anything, laugh at the ignorance displayed by the labeler. However, nobody gets away with an attempt to hurt her. No label assigned in an attempt to define her would, or could, do so.

Yes, and I've seen that by the things that have been posted in this thread.  I still wouldn't think it would be very courteous of Me to pick a label and apply it to her, especially if I felt negative about it. 


I agree..The comment that was made to julie about her being a "doormat" was a tad rude assumption..not anymore than the ones she made to me when she made negative assumptions about my personal desires but that doesn't make anything like that right...I'm from the two wrongs don't make a right group.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 12:25:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
quote:

But, I can promise anyone out there if they used that term in reference to him, I sure as hell wouldn't be happy about it.

'Doormat' doesn't set me, nor beth obviously, off in a rage. However, I can imagine circumstances and sources where addressing beth as 'beth' would.

Actions, context, source, expectation, and attitude conveyed are far more important to me than any attempt to mock by using a term the speaker deems insulting. I'll let a label applied to beth go by and, if anything, laugh at the ignorance displayed by the labeler. However, nobody gets away with an attempt to hurt her. No label assigned in an attempt to define her would, or could, do so.

Yes, and I've seen that by the things that have been posted in this thread.  I still wouldn't think it would be very courteous of Me to pick a label and apply it to her, especially if I felt negative about it. 


No fair because we know each other and I don't believe it possible.

To merge your point and mine, if you called her 'beth' and felt "negative about it"; the duel is on! [sm=fight.gif] Single tales or floggers? [sm=mistress.gif] Lady's choice of weapon! [sm=whip.gif]




juliaoceania -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 12:46:06 PM)

quote:

I agree..The comment that was made to julie about her being a "doormat" was a tad rude assumption..not anymore than the ones she made to me when she made negative assumptions about my personal desires but that doesn't make anything like that right...I'm from the two wrongs don't make a right group.


Am I the "Julie" that you are posting about? If I am what assumptions have I made about your personal relationships?




LadyPact -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 12:46:25 PM)

-Hijack-

One question.  Who are we gonna beat?

Kidding aside, the problem with this is that you do know Me, Merc.  Now, could you really see Me walking into your house, and calling anyone anything that I didn't find appropriate?  You know on a personal level that I don't work that way, even if I had your encouragement to do so.  If it didn't sit right with Me, even in a fun and games kind of way, it's still not going to sit right.

Not a problem in the world with calling her beth.  I think I've called her 'hon' once or twice and I think I referenced her as the score keeper during the Super Bowl.  (I couldn't help Myself on that one, as she was so adorable.)  But if we're talking about something that I felt negative about?  Pffft.  You've got better luck at the odds of Me showing up at your place and pissing on the carpet.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:23:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Kidding aside, the problem with this is that you do know Me, Merc.  Now, could you really see Me walking into your house, and calling anyone anything that I didn't find appropriate?  You know on a personal level that I don't work that way, even if I had your encouragement to do so.  If it didn't sit right with Me, even in a fun and games kind of way, it's still not going to sit right.

Not a problem in the world with calling her beth.  I think I've called her 'hon' once or twice and I think I referenced her as the score keeper during the Super Bowl.  (I couldn't help Myself on that one, as she was so adorable.)  But if we're talking about something that I felt negative about?  Pffft.  You've got better luck at the odds of Me showing up at your place and pissing on the carpet.

First of all - knowing you is not the problem - the distance between where we live is!

Although I'll cop to spending way too much time here have you ever heard anything like this discussed or considered important in real life? All the titles, labels, and word game threads are amusing internet drama plot twists. They are commonly, although not in this case, started by those who wouldn't know which end of a flogger to use. Sure they sometimes touch upon sensitive, hot buttons, but I believe even in those cases after a few deep breaths people realize it's not worth getting frustrated over. A label, any label, doesn't change you, no matter how someone has twisted or infers its meaning.

I don't keep track of what you, or anyone calls beth. Truth be know - nobody called her beth until I did. she told me when we met she didn't like that name and preferred Liz, or Elizabeth. Ergo - I started calling her beth from day 1. To this day, and I don't even realize I do it, when I introduce her to anyone I usually introduce her as Elizabeth. In private I call her and use many other labels many would consider extremely offensive.

I know you. I respect you. We've seen each other naked! I think we've shared enough experiences to reach the point that any reference to each other would not be negative. Better yet if either of us thought it was, we are both confident enough to say so directly to the other and straighten it out between us.

The point I am trying to make is that the label some one handed web surfer assigns to us isn't me, isn't beth, and doesn't matter.
quote:

One question. Who are we gonna beat?

Regarding this most important question - The appropriate Dominant reponse is - "Anyone we want!"




Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:28:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

I agree..The comment that was made to julie about her being a "doormat" was a tad rude assumption..not anymore than the ones she made to me when she made negative assumptions about my personal desires but that doesn't make anything like that right...I'm from the two wrongs don't make a right group.


Am I the "Julie" that you are posting about? If I am what assumptions have I made about your personal relationships?



You know, you want partners that will stay where you put them when you sit them down, never speak out when someone metaphorically wipes the dog shit off their shoes onto them, never complains when they are left outside to get wet and tattered up... well dude, I respect your choices, but stop chastising those of us who aren't that way as if we are "intolerant" for wanting a little more in life than that...

What utter horseshit. 

I can see how tolerant you are.

I musta have read that wrong...Cause that's exactly what I do is treat them willy nilly and you would know this.




Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:42:33 PM)

quote:

Although I'll cop to spending way too much time here have you ever heard anything like this discussed or considered important in real life? All the titles, labels, and word game threads are amusing internet drama plot twists. They are commonly, although not in this case, started by those who wouldn't know which end of a flogger to use. Sure they sometimes touch upon sensitive, hot buttons, but I believe even in those cases after a few deep breaths people realize it's not worth getting frustrated over. A label, any label, doesn't change you, no matter how someone has twisted or infers its meaning.


The reason being..I'm sure you know is it's a discussion board..I for one don't take any of this home with me in the sens that it cause any discomfort..It's mainly for debating..In the grand scheme of things none of it matters like you say it doesn't make it any less interesting..

i would agree with you about the spending too much time here..I think i do too.[:D]




juliaoceania -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:44:23 PM)

quote:

You know, you want partners that will stay where you put them when you sit them down, never speak out when someone metaphorically wipes the dog shit off their shoes onto them, never complains when they are left outside to get wet and tattered up... well dude, I respect your choices, but stop chastising those of us who aren't that way as if we are "intolerant" for wanting a little more in life than that...

What utter horseshit.

I can see how tolerant you are.


I actually meant that to be tongue in cheek and smart assish...

You on the other hand have painted me as being intolerant on the last osf thread since I stated that I did not identify with being a doormat and I did not appreciate the assertion that osf made that all submissives are doormats...

I do not think you want the type of person that I listed above.. it is called "exaggeration". I think you know this and are painting me with your own brush because it suits your agenda... knock yourself out, dude.

I was waiting for a reply that listed some way I offended you on the last thread to the point that you carried your chip on your shoulder into this one.. and if I had said something offensive I was more than prepared to apologize for it, but since you are using my exaggeration for being a dick to me on both of these threads, I am not prepared to offer an apology...even though generally I do not relish offending people personally for no good reason, in this case I will take into account that your accusations of my intolerance came far before the post you quote up there....




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:49:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

You know, you want partners that will stay where you put them when you sit them down, never speak out when someone metaphorically wipes the dog shit off their shoes onto them, never complains when they are left outside to get wet and tattered up... well dude, I respect your choices, but stop chastising those of us who aren't that way as if we are "intolerant" for wanting a little more in life than that...

What utter horseshit.

I can see how tolerant you are.


I actually meant that to be tongue in cheek and smart assish...

You on the other hand have painted me as being intolerant on the last osf thread since I stated that I did not identify with being a doormat and I did not appreciate the assertion that osf made that all submissives are doormats...

I do not think you want the type of person that I listed above.. it is called "exaggeration". I think you know this and are painting me with your own brush because it suits your agenda... knock yourself out, dude.

I was waiting for a reply that listed some way I offended you on the last thread to the point that you carried your chip on your shoulder into this one.. and if I had said something offensive I was more than prepared to apologize for it, but since you are using my exaggeration for being a dick to me on both of these threads, I am not prepared to offer an apology...even though generally I do not relish offending people personally for no good reason, in this case I will take into account that your accusations of my intolerance came far before the post you quote up there....



i think the 2 of ya should go ahead and fuck.....the sexual tension is so thick, i can barely make out the fonts.....

[sm=horse.gif]




Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:54:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

You know, you want partners that will stay where you put them when you sit them down, never speak out when someone metaphorically wipes the dog shit off their shoes onto them, never complains when they are left outside to get wet and tattered up... well dude, I respect your choices, but stop chastising those of us who aren't that way as if we are "intolerant" for wanting a little more in life than that...

What utter horseshit.

I can see how tolerant you are.


I actually meant that to be tongue in cheek and smart assish...

You on the other hand have painted me as being intolerant on the last osf thread since I stated that I did not identify with being a doormat and I did not appreciate the assertion that osf made that all submissives are doormats...

I do not think you want the type of person that I listed above.. it is called "exaggeration". I think you know this and are painting me with your own brush because it suits your agenda... knock yourself out, dude.

I was waiting for a reply that listed some way I offended you on the last thread to the point that you carried your chip on your shoulder into this one.. and if I had said something offensive I was more than prepared to apologize for it, but since you are using my exaggeration for being a dick to me on both of these threads, I am not prepared to offer an apology...even though generally I do not relish offending people personally for no good reason, in this case I will take into account that your accusations of my intolerance came far before the post you quote up there....


Bull..Where that shoe Cinderella.





Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:56:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

You know, you want partners that will stay where you put them when you sit them down, never speak out when someone metaphorically wipes the dog shit off their shoes onto them, never complains when they are left outside to get wet and tattered up... well dude, I respect your choices, but stop chastising those of us who aren't that way as if we are "intolerant" for wanting a little more in life than that...

What utter horseshit.

I can see how tolerant you are.


I actually meant that to be tongue in cheek and smart assish...

You on the other hand have painted me as being intolerant on the last osf thread since I stated that I did not identify with being a doormat and I did not appreciate the assertion that osf made that all submissives are doormats...

I do not think you want the type of person that I listed above.. it is called "exaggeration". I think you know this and are painting me with your own brush because it suits your agenda... knock yourself out, dude.

I was waiting for a reply that listed some way I offended you on the last thread to the point that you carried your chip on your shoulder into this one.. and if I had said something offensive I was more than prepared to apologize for it, but since you are using my exaggeration for being a dick to me on both of these threads, I am not prepared to offer an apology...even though generally I do not relish offending people personally for no good reason, in this case I will take into account that your accusations of my intolerance came far before the post you quote up there....



i think the 2 of ya should go ahead and fuck.....the sexual tension is so thick, i can barely make out the fonts.....

[sm=horse.gif]

Funny [:D]..Nah It's not a sexual thing I assure you.




juliaoceania -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:57:15 PM)

quote:

i think the 2 of ya should go ahead and fuck.....the sexual tension is so thick, i can barely make out the fonts.....



I am not doormattish enough for him... truly, I am not....

Actually I do not see myself as very submissive overall... I mean I have my own income, my own apartment, a life, friends, and I take care of me... and as merc pointed out, submissives that do this and those who claim to be their dominants are not real nor true...

But I do not care to be real or true... I am only wanting to be "me".. wherever that falls on the continuum of submissiveness or dominance, I care very little...

I am done here, unless of course Icarys provides me with an example of how I offended him personally starting on that other thread, then I would be more than happy to apologize to him, publicly. I do not like offending people in regard to how they run their relationships or their lives.....




WyldHrt -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 1:59:37 PM)

quote:

But I do not care to be real or true... I am only wanting to be "me".. wherever that falls on the continuum of submissiveness or dominance, I care very little...

[sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif] Well said!




juliaoceania -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 2:06:13 PM)

quote:

Bull..Where that shoe Cinderella.


Your metaphorical post has completely went over my head

Are you saying I am doing housework?

Are you saying I have that I have evil stepsisters with big feet?

Are you saying that I am waiting for Prince Charming?

Are you saying I am beautiful?

Are you saying I have animal friends?

Or are you really saying that there are no examples of my directly insulting you on that other thread, nor this one, and you have just got yourself into a pissing contest and no way out of it? That is my vote. Like I said, if you can find one instance of my insulting you personally the way you have repeatedly insulted me as being "intolerant", I will be more than happy to apologize, because I try to treat people the way I want to be treated... just me etc




Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 2:06:18 PM)

So that's what has you all hot and bothered? Something that osf said on the other thread?

My comment was to let you know when you go stomping about saying how offended you are and in the very next thread try to do the same thing..It's kinda odd.

I'm not offended by it..Just stating facts. I'd have to really care what a person says in order to be offended. All the rest is debate.

So I don't need an apology.




Icarys -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 2:08:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

Bull..Where that shoe Cinderella.


Your metaphorical post has completely went over my head

Are you saying I am doing housework?

Are you saying I have that I have evil stepsisters with big feet?

Are you saying that I am waiting for Prince Charming?

Are you saying I am beautiful?

Are you saying I have animal friends?

Or are you really saying that there are no examples of my directly insulting you on that other thread, nor this one, and you have just got yourself into a pissing contest and no way out of it? That is my vote. Like I said, if you can find one instance of my insulting you personally the way you have repeatedly insulted me as being "intolerant", I will be more than happy to apologize, because I try to treat people the way I want to be treated... just me etc


I'm sure you wish that was the case then you could feel like you've won something..

You win..I'll send you some flowers.




juliaoceania -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 2:10:35 PM)

I am not offended for me, as I do not even care if others think that I am a submissive or a slave or that I am the biggest bitch that ever walked on two feet. I am offended that he blithely posts shit like that to insult submissive women, which i believe is his intention. He has this attention whore fetish, and I certainly shouldn't oblige him, true.

Good thing you do not need an apology....




LadyPact -> RE: Doormats (2/24/2010 2:26:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Kidding aside, the problem with this is that you do know Me, Merc.  Now, could you really see Me walking into your house, and calling anyone anything that I didn't find appropriate?  You know on a personal level that I don't work that way, even if I had your encouragement to do so.  If it didn't sit right with Me, even in a fun and games kind of way, it's still not going to sit right.

Not a problem in the world with calling her beth.  I think I've called her 'hon' once or twice and I think I referenced her as the score keeper during the Super Bowl.  (I couldn't help Myself on that one, as she was so adorable.)  But if we're talking about something that I felt negative about?  Pffft.  You've got better luck at the odds of Me showing up at your place and pissing on the carpet.

First of all - knowing you is not the problem - the distance between where we live is!

Agreed.

quote:

Although I'll cop to spending way too much time here have you ever heard anything like this discussed or considered important in real life? All the titles, labels, and word game threads are amusing internet drama plot twists. They are commonly, although not in this case, started by those who wouldn't know which end of a flogger to use. Sure they sometimes touch upon sensitive, hot buttons, but I believe even in those cases after a few deep breaths people realize it's not worth getting frustrated over. A label, any label, doesn't change you, no matter how someone has twisted or infers its meaning.

The reason they are interesting in My opinion, is that we all are different.  My participation in them has more to do with that aspect than anything else.

I wouldn't say this thread in particular, but the thread it sprang from, probably is a testament of you being correct.  If you put a dart in someone's hand who is wearing a blindfold, they've got a shot at hitting the board once in a while.  It would be amusing.  We'd probably even laugh about it.  Yet, when the game is over, and it's time to go on to other interesting things, there are some originators of posts who really have nothing else of this life to hold on to but just that blindfold in the otherwise empty hand.

quote:

I don't keep track of what you, or anyone calls beth. Truth be know - nobody called her beth until I did. she told me when we met she didn't like that name and preferred Liz, or Elizabeth. Ergo - I started calling her beth from day 1. To this day, and I don't even realize I do it, when I introduce her to anyone I usually introduce her as Elizabeth. In private I call her and use many other labels many would consider extremely offensive.

I don't keep track of it either in regard to My own.  I named him when I got him.  I'd probably be surprised if we were in the company of other BDSM folks and they intentionally called him something else.  It's happened accidentally, because 'chip' is more common than 'clip' but I've corrected it with no issues.

quote:

I know you. I respect you. We've seen each other naked! I think we've shared enough experiences to reach the point that any reference to each other would not be negative. Better yet if either of us thought it was, we are both confident enough to say so directly to the other and straighten it out between us.

Yes, and I'm surprised you didn't loose your eyesight from the occurrence.  LOL.

I do have to wonder if knowing each other away from this place takes a role in that.  If it ever has an effect during such discussions.  Perhaps not in our case, but in general.  I know that with us, specifically, we come from much different places, but find a lot of common ground.

quote:

The point I am trying to make is that the label some one handed web surfer assigns to us isn't me, isn't beth, and doesn't matter.
quote:

One question. Who are we gonna beat?

Regarding this most important question - The appropriate Dominant reponse is - "Anyone we want!"

Only the volunteers, Merc.  Only the volunteers.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Doormats (2/25/2010 12:23:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedbyPF

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4

I would expect any sub/slave to be able to adhere to a set of boundaries that their Dominant partner establishes. (i.e. No Drinking without permission) and to not be a doormat when interacting with other people and be assertive about it. (i.e. No thank you I'm not drinking tonight, or let me make a phone call first). This would require Discipline.

A sub/slave lacking Discipline, just might give in to the pressure of social influence of friends, family, neighbors or whoever and end up breaking boundaries because of her Doormatted Submissive Nature.

All of which has nothing to do with the concept of being a Doormat that lends itself to abuse. Because she is letting other people walk all over her and the boundaries set forth by her Dom/Master/Owner.

Intially I was not looking at Doormat being applied in this context, but rather with regards to abuse.



Except that having Masters orders to focus on is what enabled me to become less of a doormat to the rest of the world. Before I was with him I sucked at boundaries, self discipline and all the rest. I could muster up assertiveness if I reallly really had to, but otherwise not at all. Ever since my Master has put all of these boundaries and rules into place for me, and my primary objective in life is to please him, it's easy for me to say no to someone else... hmmm being focussed on his pleasure and his rules gives me the backbone to not be a doormat to the world... a doormat only to him ;)

Having said that though I must add on that anytime someone wants something from me that doesn't conflict with my obedience to my Master..... I'm right back to doormat. In other words he is my guide. If someone says "can you..." or "will you..." My immediate thought goes to what my Master would want me to do. If I know the answer is no, then I have no problem saying no, now. If i'm not sure then I have to ask Mr.Man because otherwise I will slide right into some dumb comittment I never should have made and want to kick myself in the ass for, but can't bear to go back on! Essentially it's like I need him to tell me it's okay to say no.

I am definitely a doormat and I'm entirely okay with that. In fact, I would go one step futher and say one of the reasons I am so grateful for the way my life is, is because with my Master i can be me... I can be a doormat, I can be less than brilliant, I can struggle with assertiveness... and it's all okay with him, he doesn't make me feel bad or ashamed of any of it. So now I can say I'm a doormat and honestly not care what anyone else thinks of it... not prideful, not ashamed... just matter of fact... doormat.
~s

editted for a lil clarity:)


Truely enjoyed this post. Priceless. :-) I believe NZ commented it falling upon the character of the Dominant. In order for the Dominant to be in control, this requires some form of Discipline and mental bondage. The mental bondage aspects would affect the motivators (motivation). afkarr in post# 120 brought up the topic regarding motivation. There would have to be some form of motivation for a Doormat to make adjustments. So considering the Mental bond of the D/s relationship, the Dominant instilling into the sub/slave a framework that guides behavior that the sub is bound to. Mental Bondage affects the Discipline and Behavior of the submissive. Boundaries are set and the sub asserts those boundaries.

tazzygirls posting on the thread, made me stop back and look at doormats are just not a doormat in a relationship, but doormats to all kinds of other people. (friends, family, neighbors, and etc...). After reading the article she shared (somebody else share link to another excellent article) it was painfully clear that steps needed to break free from being a doormat required certain actions/steps to take place. Clear a matter of one taking charge and control of thier own behaviors, which is a matter of Discipline. Many people tend to think of Discipline in regards to punishment. Anyways, if one is not in a D/s relationship clearly this matter is that of self-Discipline. In a D/s relationship it would be a combination of D/s Discipline and self Discipline.

I would think any Dominant in their right mind, would address this issue with a submissive partner that was, well basically submitting to the whole damn world. Enter the world of training, shaping and molding. (fuck all the people that are so against shaping and molding, because it has it's place and purpose). Anyways, there would have to be some adjustments made, so the submissive would be less of a doormat to the whole wide world. Structure.

On a personal level, I would be working at trying to instill the concepts or similar concepts in that the articles tazzygirl and afkarr shared in their posts.

http://www.ehow.com/how_5265493_not-doormat-people.html

http://www.tellinitlikeitis.net/2010/01/people-pleasers-and-doormats-care-what-people-think-about-them.html

Because I would (my preference) want the sub/slave to be able to function independently in accordence to the framework laid out and understood. Else, I would have to be engaged in a higher level of so called "Micro management" of her doormattedness. This would result in only taxing me personally with a higher work load (pass on that, thank you). However, I would engage in using "Micro Management" in this case for a period of time for training, or otherwise to make an effort to affect the required behavior modification as required. Mind you I would be using information such as that contained in the links shared above, as a guideline along with incorperating whatever personal Prime Directives (Sorry for Star Trek Joke) lol... rules that i wanted to frame at this time. i.e. Motivational stuff. This way they would have a clear understanding of the positive/negative consequences for thier own actions. Gotta have accountability along with responsibility. (at least this is my thing).

Now personally, I've never had to deal with somebody who was this much of a Doormat, ever in my life. However, I'm simply applying the processes here that I'm used to. Everybody has their own styles when it comes to D/s. I've always tried to tackle things as realistically as possible. Because in many regards when it comes to making changes, both the Dominant and sub have to dedicate some time, engergy and work to it. After awhile, things should be able to work on auto-pilot without a lot of effort.

What's Ironic, is that my methods come from the Vanilla world. I don't try to stand over somebody with a fucking whip and expecting Pain to be the motivator for change. Bad fucking Slave, Wack Wack Wack...

I've taken heat before in the topic of Shaping & Molding and even Micro Management as a training tool. I tend to engage in these practices without casting a label upon it. I don't sit down and tell somebody Today, we are going to engage in Training. Now sit down at your desk and take out a pen, turn to chapter 10 of your books. Pfffft.. Seriously, I never tell somebody I'm training you. Instead I've presented them with information and talked about issues and engaged in discusssion regarding what needs to be done. I actually let them have an active voice in establishing the game plan too. But that's a topic for another time.

Anyways, yeah... gonna post this now.

Be Well










Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Doormats (2/25/2010 12:29:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WyldHrt
quote:

But I do not care to be real or true... I am only wanting to be "me".. wherever that falls on the continuum of submissiveness or dominance, I care very little...

[sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif] Well said!


Ditto...




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375