Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
CP, "kinky vanilla" is an oxymoron. Since this woman *doesn't* claim to be submissive, and he just thinks she ought to be because she enjoys doing certain sexual things, I think he is the one who is out of line in his expectations. I've run into that attitude from a couple of people I've played with casually, before I learned to screen them better, and it's extremely awkward when someone blathers about how "submissive" I am when I was just bottoming! It's pretty much as if he were going on about how many orgasms I'd had, when I didn't come at all. Unless I've specifically agreed to a D/s or M/s relationship, they don't have authority to control me. I don't pick fights, and I'm not at all difficult to be with, and am pretty compliant most of the time, but expecting authority that I haven't given over would get me seriously annoyed. Focus, I disagree that bottoms and bedroom-only submissives are automatically selfish or self-centered. Ideally, in any relationship, both (or all I suppose, if they're poly) people should get what they need, and at least some of what they want. If that isn't happening, then they are a poor match, regardless of their D/s orientation or relationship dynamic. I've been in a few kinky egalitarian relationships, where there wasn't any overt constant control coming from either side, but they were willing to do things they didn't necessarily enjoy as much to make me happy, and vice versa.
|