philosophy
Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
ORIGINAL: hlen5 I have served, and I do not agree that the military is an example of incompetence. Have you served, Heretic? So you've served (and yes, I did), without being aware of the percentage of support personnel to combat troops? Without seeing the levels of chickenshit and bureaucracy? Completely unaware of the procurement process? Never ran across rules set based on the politically correct theories of people with no conception of the facts on the ground? .......well, does that mean you favour privatisation of the US military? If you do, then i'd ask you to consider the potential effects on US foreign policy. If you don't, then all you're saying is that nothing is perfect, whether state or privately run, but that some things are best run by the state. The latter point is the main point made by those of us who have lived or live under nationalised healthcare systems. It aint perfect, there is waste, but we willingly trade that against the problems faced by the current US system....those in need can be turned down for purely economic reasons. To some of us, this is a travesty. Which brings us back to compassion. How many millions are not capable of accessing health care in the US under the current system? How many millions can not access simple drugs to alleviate their symptoms because of their economic circumstances, or because a privately run health system can't make a profit out of them? The OP points at individuals who are putting economics above compassion. Who see a man in need of health care and what's their first thought? Their wallets. It is that attitude that is a symptom of a bigger problem in the US. Money is too important to some people. It over-rides their ability to see someone in need and want to help them. Suppose all working Americans were asked to pay $10 a year (two Mcdonalds happy meals) and, in return, no child would ever want for a medicine to treat a preventable disease. The problem is that. right now, a significent number of people would oppose it.
|