LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hertz Two things strike me about this. Firstly, I am not convinced many of us go into marriage with the absolute ability to ensure that the vow we make today is something we will be able to live by tomorrow. Personally, I think this sort of 'forever and ever' vow was fine a thousand years ago when neither party was likely to live past 40, but nowadays, when both parties could live to be 90, and married for 70 years, I suspect it is a bit of a task to keep it going. We all understand the vows I am sure, but I suspect none of us realise what they might actually mean in any real sense. This might be short-sighted, but most of us, when it comes to this really are short-sighted. If you know at the age of 30 how you are going to feel about your partner at the age of 70, then you are a truly outstanding human being. I think we are looking at this in two different ways. I am coming at it from the standpoint that I am focusing on Me. I believe you are focusing on how one interacts with another. What I am weighing are essentially two different wants. One being sex and the other being integrity. That other person in the relationship doesn't have an influence on those. While I am not everyone and I am sure there are other people who would say differently, for Me, My integrity is always going to be more important than sex. It doesn't hinge on the other person's health, fidelity, or any other outside influence. The ability to look Myself in the mirror far surpasses the importance of what I get (or don't get as the case may be) between My legs. quote:
Secondly, not every long term relationship is a marriage in the conventional sense. Sometimes, long-term relationships are not created in the exchange of vows in a church, public building, or anywhere else for that matter. It doesn't make any practical difference that some relationships evolve from a drunken fumble at a party into a into long term relationship, but sometimes the basis on which a relationship is built may be less than clear, and it may not be possible to point at the vows made in a ceremony and say: 'This is what you contracted to do - now deliver!' Which is great. If somebody doesn't have that wonderful "in sickness and in health" clause, they don't have to abide by it. Anybody who wants to use that as a justification is free to do so. They are free to seek out partners who will accept this explanation for not meeting their spouse and proceed to fuck their brains out. At the same time, it won't be with Me. Personally, I happen to think that people need to get over this idea that kink, sex, or BDSM is an equivalent to EEO. If someone's got a sad story to tell along the lines of the spouse doesn't understand them or they are ill, I'll empathize with them. Yet, I'm not required to participate with them. (Trying to tie it into the original here.) My personal standards have to be met for Me to agree to do that. If someone can't verify that their spouse has agreed to that person's participation, that isn't My issue.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|