barelynangel
Posts: 6233
Status: offline
|
To me this is a hard question to answer because the concept of control is progressive but it also involves absolute trust. Its about trust and i would imagine in a Master/slave relationship there does come a time when that step of absolute trust must be taken to fully appreciate the dynamic. If, to me, a woman doesn't trust a Man enough that she doesn't wish to have absolute trust in him with her most important aspects of her life, then why try and live in an M/s concept? I don't believe slave can exist if she is determined to maintain control over her most important aspects of her life. Why? Because that step the religuishing of control is the step i think needs to expect and be taken to fully emerce yourself in his existance as your Master. I think many times there is a misunderstanding about the "absolute control" People seem to indicate a negative concept when it comes to this because of fear. I see when people are speaking of not giving up control, its based on fear that he will determine something for them that they don't want, no matter what it is. To me, this is a trust issue. Why be with a Man, call and indicate he is your "Master" when you don't trust him with the MOST IMPORTANT aspects of your life. To me, it makes no sense. He is -- to you -- your Master. How can you not have absolute trust in him? When i was a slave and he had absolute control over my life, i never worried his will would be something i couldn't deal with, or something negative to my well being or my happiness. I didn't view him as someone who would want to hurt me or hinder me for his own gain. While i did question him at times and discussed things with him and gave him insight, i never once worried after he had made the decision -- worrying was HIS responsibility. But i will admit, we were together for a long time and it was a PROGRESSIVE process and didn't happen overnight. I am just thankful he was a Man who was capable of taking the control when i fought him for it and he showed me that he was capable of my absolute trust. However, i will say this, with absolute trust also comes with consequences and is utterly agonizing when its no longer there. I am not saying women shouldn't be with men they don't absolutely trust and who put conditions on the control the man has, i just wonder why call it M/s -- isn't it more of a D/s concept -- a contract of sorts? As many know however, my understanding of M/s is a lot different from many. Sp to me, in the end, if i can't have absolute confidence in him that he will eventually have absolute control over all aspects of me and my life especially those which i feel are the most important to me, I have to believe i will have the expectation of achieving absolute trust in him, or else i wouldn't call him my Master. So for a Master -- no areas of my life would be off limits. For a Dom or boyfriend yeah -- i would maintain control over certain aspects of my life, but then, they wouldn't be having absolute control over my life as they wouldn't own me or have the goal of absolute mastery over me. angel
< Message edited by barelynangel -- 12/5/2010 10:31:54 AM >
_____________________________
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. R.W. Emerson
|