RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


joether -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 11:42:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
Internal polls in Wisconsin fully support Scott Walker and the republicans. I was in Madison today having a guiness with 3 members of the state assembly. I might ad, republican members. Not to worry. The law will stand up to court challenges. The state budget in Wisconsin will finally be balanced'..

Are you going to cite those polls or do we just have to take your word for it?


You should know by know, that he's a conservative, and as such, unable to publish FACTS and EVIDENCE that is both VERIFIABLE and UNBIASED.

Now the REAL numbers....

quote:

Rasmussen Reports

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Wisconsin voters shows that just 39% favor weakening collective bargaining rights and 52% are opposed. At the same time, 44% support a 10% pay cut for all state workers. Thirty-eight percent (38%) are opposed. That’s partly because 27% of Wisconsin voters believe state workers are paid too much and 16% believe they are paid too little. Forty-nine percent (49%) believe the pay of state workers is about right.


That source does go on to give quite a far bit of insight into the mood of Wisconsin citizens. They even publish the exact questions that were asked; which is very important when releasing poll numbers.

quote:

USATODAY

The poll found 61% would oppose a law in their state similar to such a proposal in Wisconsin, compared with 33% who would favor such a law.


quote:

The Pew Research

"Roughly four-in-ten (42%) say they side more with the public employee unions, while 31% say they side more with the governor, Scott Walker..."


Further down the same page, is the caption entitled "Lower-Income People Side with Unions while the Affluent are Split". Those making over $75,000 a year are nearly evenly divided over siding with the Union verse Gov. Walker. Were as those making under $75,000/year are very heavily siding with Unions. Unsurprisingly Democrats favor Unions, and the GOP Gov. Walker. Independents however, are closed divided, with a mere 5% favoring Unions over Gov. Walker. Unless someone was over 65 years of age, they voted in favor of the Unions.

Whites were nearly evenly divided supporting/opposing Gov. Walker, with 2% more, favoring the Unions. Non-Whites however, side with Unions over three times as much as those who support Gov. Walker.

Still not convinced?

Go read the entire article on GALLUP.

There is simply to much information to properly show it here. The very end of it, entitled 'Bottom Line' I believe gives a good summary:

quote:


As long as state governments can't print money, and their debt ratios are too high to continue borrowing, state lawmakers will be forced to consider raising taxes, cutting state programs, and reducing worker costs as three primary ways to balance their books. Americans don't love any of these choices, but cutting programs garners the least opposition, mainly because a solid majority of Republicans favor it. Raising taxes is the most unpopular, and is opposed by majorities of all party groups. Crafting budget policies that affect state workers may be especially difficult. The public isn't eager to see these fellow residents lose pay and benefits or union rights, but they aren't convinced unions are good for states either.

One aspect of public opinion on state employees not tested in the poll is whether Americans would rather see reduced pay and benefits for state workers or state program cuts that lead to major layoffs. This seems to be where the showdown in Wisconsin is heading, and may preview how budget battles will soon play out in state capitols across the country


So, servantforuse, where are those polls you say, that, and I quote from you "...fully support Scott Walker and the republicans"? They are unbiased and factual, right?




joether -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 11:49:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I think you are confused.

How did the bill come out of the Joint Conference Committee? The only way that happens is if it was added onto an existing bill that the conference had to reconcile different versions passed by both houses. That's why the Assembly passed the previous version on Feb. 25th, after the Senators left the state.

I think you are spinning so hard you look like a tilt-a-whirl. This is from the bill as introduced in January, and which the SENATORS skipped out on. hasnt got a fucking thing to do with it until each house has a version.

"This bill limits the right to collectively bargain for all employees who are not public safety employees (general employees) to the subject of base wages."


Do you even have a clue in reality of what exactly Collective Bargaining *IS*? Why dont you show me, you have a clue, by showing three seperate sources of the defination of "collective bargaining", and then YOUR understanding of the defination. Your are the master of spin! Even in the face of direct and provable evidence and facts, you will still spin your open lies as truth.




rulemylife -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 12:11:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

We will soon see if those polls are correct or not. What the country is seeing on TV is Madison, WI, the most liberal city west of the Mississippi. That is not the pulse of Wisconsin. Scott Walker was elected for a reason.


And that reason was?

You got bored with cow tipping?




servantforuse -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 12:17:11 PM)

He promised to balance the budget without raising taxes. He is doing just what he was elected to do.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 1:36:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
I think you are confused.

How did the bill come out of the Joint Conference Committee? The only way that happens is if it was added onto an existing bill that the conference had to reconcile different versions passed by both houses. That's why the Assembly passed the previous version on Feb. 25th, after the Senators left the state.

I think you are spinning so hard you look like a tilt-a-whirl. This is from the bill as introduced in January, and which the SENATORS skipped out on. hasnt got a fucking thing to do with it until each house has a version.

"This bill limits the right to collectively bargain for all employees who are not public safety employees (general employees) to the subject of base wages."


Do you even have a clue in reality of what exactly Collective Bargaining *IS*? Why dont you show me, you have a clue, by showing three seperate sources of the defination of "collective bargaining", and then YOUR understanding of the defination. Your are the master of spin! Even in the face of direct and provable evidence and facts, you will still spin your open lies as truth.



ROFLMAO. You fucking idiot, advising union/employer boards are 70% of our business. Ive participated in collective bargaining for 2 strikes that were high profile enough for the Administrations at the time to intervene in.




joether -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 1:44:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse
He promised to balance the budget without raising taxes. He is doing just what he was elected to do.


Actually, he was elected to represent ALL the people of Wisconsin, not just 20% of them.

Do you balance a budget by giving $140 million dollars in tax give-aways to corporations, and then bitching about the budget being $140 million behind? And to concluded that the best way to make that $140 million go away, is to attack the folks that had nothing to do with it in the first place?

If this 'governor' (read: dictator) Walker truely represented the people of Wisconsin, how often did he go down to meet his fellow citizens when they were protesting in the same building that he was in? When he signed the measure in to law, was it 'in the open and public'? Or 'behind closed doors with very few people in the room'? Go ahead servantforuse, try to tell me he signed it in to law 'out in the open' and 'in the public'.

I notice that you STILL havent posted all those unbiased and verifable polls that show MORE support for Governor Walker and his Republican yes-men, and LESS support for Unions in Wisconsin. We going to get those poll results sometime this millennium?




joether -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 1:52:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
ROFLMAO. You fucking idiot, advising union/employer boards are 70% of our business. Ive participated in collective bargaining for 2 strikes that were high profile enough for the Administrations at the time to intervene in.


You know willbeurdaddy, I do make an effort not to insult people directly, even though sometimes they really do deserve the insult. I would appricate it if you could be alittle more of an adult, and less a 6th grader in mind and attitude.

What exactly *IS* your business? Do you own this business? Are you a major player of the business? Where is the business located? What credentials does it hold in terms of organized labor law in the United States of America?

If you have participated in two collective bargaining efforts, then it would be fair to say, you should be able to give me an accurate defination of 'collective bargaining'. Why did you take the time to bash me, rather then, answer my question in a mature fashion?

Finally, which Administrations were these strikes associated with? The exact dates of the strikes, and the exact, unbiased information on why the strikes were conducted? What was the final outcome (again, unbiased information, please) of each strike?




Lucylastic -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 1:55:01 PM)

Hes a legend in his own lunch break Joe, how DARE you question him
If brains were dynamite he wouldnt have enough to blow his nose




jlf1961 -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 1:57:58 PM)

The only poll that shows support for Walker and the anti union bill is FOX News. Every other poll shows low support for the bill, and the fact that there have been no large protests in support of the bill speaks volumes.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 1:59:51 PM)

Polling within Wisconsin is highly dependent on the wording of the question. When its a generic "limiting collective bargaining rights" it splits pretty evenly. When its "limit collective bargainging rights to wages and benefits" it favors the limitiations by about 10 points, when it is specific about the rights that will be taken away or specifies financial changes (increasing pension and health care costs) the are overwhelmingly in favor of the limitations. (As I recall that is registered voters, not likely voters)




joether -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 2:05:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Hes a legend in his own lunch break Joe, how DARE you question him
If brains were dynamite he wouldnt have enough to blow his nose


RIM SHOT!




joether -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 2:18:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Polling within Wisconsin is highly dependent on the wording of the question. When its a generic "limiting collective bargaining rights" it splits pretty evenly. When its "limit collective bargainging rights to wages and benefits" it favors the limitiations by about 10 points, when it is specific about the rights that will be taken away or specifies financial changes (increasing pension and health care costs) the are overwhelmingly in favor of the limitations. (As I recall that is registered voters, not likely voters)


You really have a problem with FACTS, particularly when they go against your arguements.

Questions that are asked. This is a link from the Rasmussen Reports found from the source, listed from Post #240 above.

The polls conducted in the time frame, since the Governor signed off on the law, have shown steadily across Wisconsin, and at large, the nation, to support the Unions, and NOT, Governor Walker and Republicans. If you say they are all wrong, and not showing the correct viewpoint of Americans; perhaps you should create a list of twenty unbiased questions, and conduct an actual poll of random persons in Wisconsin, and publish the methodology, the data, and the conclusions.

Of course, that would imply you still have any credibility left, that your data wasn't tampered with, to fit, 'just fine' into your current arguement.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 2:21:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
ROFLMAO. You fucking idiot, advising union/employer boards are 70% of our business. Ive participated in collective bargaining for 2 strikes that were high profile enough for the Administrations at the time to intervene in.


You know willbeurdaddy, I do make an effort not to insult people directly, even though sometimes they really do deserve the insult. I would appricate it if you could be alittle more of an adult, and less a 6th grader in mind and attitude.

What exactly *IS* your business? Do you own this business? Are you a major player of the business? Where is the business located? What credentials does it hold in terms of organized labor law in the United States of America?

If you have participated in two collective bargaining efforts, then it would be fair to say, you should be able to give me an accurate defination of 'collective bargaining'. Why did you take the time to bash me, rather then, answer my question in a mature fashion?

Finally, which Administrations were these strikes associated with? The exact dates of the strikes, and the exact, unbiased information on why the strikes were conducted? What was the final outcome (again, unbiased information, please) of each strike?


You have been a condescending jackass since the day you started posting. You get back what you put in.
My business is business and investment modeling based on economic forecasting. Im a partner in it.
Given that its my business Im not going to get in some asinine discussion with a know-nothing about what collective bargaining is. Download the Taft Hartley act and masturbate on it.

I can only specify one, because it was with a former company and no longer confidential. The West Coat Longshoreman's strke against the Pacific Maritime Association. Youre free to look for the details yourself. Google is your friend.




servantforuse -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 2:35:00 PM)

There have been papers filed in Wisconsin for 16 re-call elections. 8 republicans and 8 democrats. We will see soon enough if I am right or the liberals are right. The dems might just lose a couple of more seats.




jlf1961 -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 2:48:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Hes a legend in his own lunch break Joe, how DARE you question him
If brains were dynamite he wouldnt have enough to blow his nose




Lucy, in point of fact, his IQ drops every time he has a bowel movement.




Lucylastic -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 2:56:58 PM)

You wouldn’t know it if you were relying only on cable news, but according to the city of Madison, today’s protest was the largest yet. 85,000-150,000 Wisconsin residents took to the streets to stand up for their freedoms
http://www.politicususa.com/en/wisconsin-bigger-beck

http://www.cityofmadison.com/news/view.cfm?news_id=2543
OWNTOWN DEMONSTRATION Rally Spills Off Of Capitol Square The largest gathering of the recent sustained protest movement took place Saturday, March 12th with an estimated 85,000 to 100,000 people coming to downtown Madison. They mixed with about 50 farmers on tractors, and some officers reported one donkey among the masses. At the end of the rally, there had been no arrests, and only a couple of minor medical emergencies. Law enforcement would again like to thank everyone who came to the Isthmus for keeping the peace, for being patient, and for respecting those with opposing views.




servantforuse -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 3:30:31 PM)

A majority of these protesters are not from Wisconsin. They are being brought in from all around the country. Leaders from SEIU, AFL-CIO my former union CWA and others are flooding Madison. They see the hand writing on the wall.




mnottertail -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 3:41:22 PM)

Mene mene tekel upharsin.




DomKen -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 3:57:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

A majority of these protesters are not from Wisconsin. They are being brought in from all around the country. Leaders from SEIU, AFL-CIO my former union CWA and others are flooding Madison. They see the hand writing on the wall.

Yeah all those farmers on the tractors were bussed in from LA and NYC. You should have seen the long convoys of busses pulling trailers filled with tractors going north on I-94.

I also notice that the clever folks being bussed in had gotten hold of lots of Badger and Packer wear including stocking caps and parkas.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/03/12/955694/-Updated-WisconsinCan-we-throw-a-protest-rally-or-what!-(Photo-Diary)




servantforuse -> RE: Wisconsin loses collective bargaining (3/13/2011 4:00:29 PM)

I guess you missed Jessi Jackson and Richard Trumpka and the fatso Michael Moore.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875