RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tweakabelle -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 6:20:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

Our support of Israel has also made us a target.


Tell that crap to Bali.
Our being non-Muslim makes us a target.
Read the Koran.


You aren't seriously denying that American financial, military and diplomatic support for Israel has increased its attraction as a target to Islamist extremists, are you? That's just too silly even by your standards.




Sanity -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 6:31:15 AM)


Only Muslims are considered "persons" though.

quote:

Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures. (98:6)
Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve, then they would not believe. (8:55)


And yes, faithful or "true" Muslim believers are commanded to kill all nonbelievers:

quote:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."


By 'religion is for Allah" it means, until there are no other belief systems. But wait , theres more -

quote:


Qur'an (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

Qur'an (5:80) - "You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve; certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before for them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement shall they abide."


This is but the tip of the iceburg, there are many more verses urging violence and

quote:

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, most of the verses of violence in the Quran are open-ended, meaning that the historical context is not embedded within the surrounding text.  They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran.  

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm





Sanity -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 6:37:17 AM)


Considering how faithful Muslims are taught to see the Jewish people

quote:

Verse 7:176 compares unbelievers to "panting dogs" with regard to their idiocy and worthlessness.  Verse 7:179 says they are like "cattle" only worse.

Verse 5:60 even says that Allah transformed Jews of the past into apes and pigs.  This is echoed by verses 7:166 and 2:65


A hadith says that Muhammad believed rats to be "mutated Jews" (Bukhari 54:524, also confirmed by Sahih Muslim 7135 and 7136).




Yes, many Muslims may well hate us even more because we dont hate Jewish peoples as they do.



quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
You aren't seriously denying that American financial, military and diplomatic support for Israel has increased its attraction as a target to Islamist extremists, are you? That's just too silly even by your standards.




mnottertail -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 7:39:56 AM)

http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible3.htm 

vs the all encompassing all embracing Kumbaya christians, and that is our problem, nuke the fuckin works.




philosophy -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 8:01:38 AM)

FR

"Regarding the 30 years of violence during which the IRA killed over 1700 people, including over 600 civilians, King said, ""If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the IRA for it". "


"McKevitt was at the time a senior leader of the IRA and was its Quarter Master-General, in charge of arms acquisition. McKevitt planned a massive series of arms smuggling operations of weapons provided to the IRA by Libyan leader, Col. Muammar Gaddafi during the mid-1980's. During this time, King would stay in their home in Co. Louth while visiting Ireland and was also very close to the IRA's former Operations Officer in Belfast, Anto Murray, who was convicted in 1990 of kidnapping a suspected British spy. As Belfast Operations Officer, Murray planned or authorised every IRA bombing, shooting and killing in the city. King would stay with Murray and his wife Lucy during visits to Belfast and after Anto Murray was imprisoned, he hosted Lucy Murray on a tour of the Capitol when she visited the United States"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_T._King

....yup, his anti-terrorism credentials are impeccable.......





Sanity -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 8:25:52 AM)


1. I am no christuinan mnot, so your "mommy mommy they did it first' argument is fallacious on many levels to begin with

2. Atheist communist / socialist bastards such as Joe Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc etc etc are some of historys very worst serial mass murderes so your "nuke all religions" argument is even more nonsensical

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible3.htm 

vs the all encompassing all embracing Kumbaya christians, and that is our problem, nuke the fuckin works.




mnottertail -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 8:33:15 AM)

I don't know how that hangs together.

1.  not a mommy mommy, and there is no fallacy, since it is not opinion, it is what is in the bible, just like anyone posting what is in the Koran as asbsolute proof of something.

2.   The combination of non sequiturs leading to your conclusion of nonsensical leads me to believe that you are for opening a dialog of brotherhood with muslims then, or is that not the case?

I mean, do you read what you write, Tom?




Edwynn -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 8:44:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I mean, do you read what you write, Tom?



Ah, but then there's that "comprehension" thing to consider too.

Quite the sticky wicket that can be for some.







Edwynn -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:00:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

FR

"Regarding the 30 years of violence during which the IRA killed over 1700 people, including over 600 civilians, King said, ""If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the IRA for it". "





Yup.

It's good to be the king.

Then you are not called a terrorist, but a supporter of democracy or some such.

We don't have good numbers on how many Irish civilians were killed by British troops or, to the question here, by the Orangemen et al. groups do we?

Of course the victors write the most accurate history, we know.


" ....yup, his anti-terrorism credentials are impeccable....... " speaking of King, the terrorist "outer"  de jour ...


I hear you, but it's actually worse than that.


The nation that imposed dictatorships in Latin America and in Africa for decades now imposing democracy in the ME,

talk about credentials ... 








Sanity -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:35:26 AM)


Again,

quote:

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, most of the verses of violence in the Quran are open-ended, meaning that the historical context is not embedded within the surrounding text.  They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran.  

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm




quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I don't know how that hangs together.

1.  not a mommy mommy, and there is no fallacy, since it is not opinion, it is what is in the bible, just like anyone posting what is in the Koran as asbsolute proof of something.

2.   The combination of non sequiturs leading to your conclusion of nonsensical leads me to believe that you are for opening a dialog of brotherhood with muslims then, or is that not the case?

I mean, do you read what you write, Tom?




philosophy -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:44:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


And yes, faithful or "true" Muslim believers are commanded to kill all nonbelievers:

quote:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."





...except the words you quote don't mean what you say they mean.

That quote doesnt say kill all non-believers...it says if you're being persecuted then its better to fight than to allow the persecution to continue.

"And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out"

It doesn't say kill everyone who's not a Muslim...it says if you've been driven out then fight back.

Or would you rather everyone just rolls over whenever they're persecuted?

You probably didn't mean to quote the second part of that, did ya......





Sanity -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:50:43 AM)


Nice creative editing philo, I see you havent changed your stripes




truckinslave -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:51:13 AM)

They invent one grievance after another.
If we nuked Israel for them it would only increase their contempt for us.




Sanity -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:53:09 AM)


quote:



The Quran:


Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."  There is a good case to be made that the textual context of this particular passage is defensive war, even if the historical context was not.  However, there are also two worrisome pieces to this verse.  The first is that the killing of others is authorized in the event of "persecution" (a qualification that is ambiguous at best).  The second is that fighting may persist until "religion is for Allah."  The example set by Muhammad is not reassuring.

  Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

  Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding caravans with this verse.

  Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

  Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

  Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle, as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  Here is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

  Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

  Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."



Again, there are many more.








kalikshama -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 9:57:35 AM)

quote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_T._King ....yup, his anti-terrorism credentials are impeccable.......


Rep King also doesn't consider the IRA terrorists because they have not attacked the US.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-march-10-2011/radical-muslim-hearings---ira-terrorism
John Oliver acknowledges that the IRA killed innocent civilians, but it's not terrorism if it didn't happen in the United States. (02:57)

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-march-10-2011/radical-muslim-hearings
Peter King ironically launches hearings to investigate American Muslims while defending his ties to the IRA.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-march-8-2011/peter-king-wants-to-investigate-any-american-muslim-who-is-not-actively-stopping-terrorist-plots-
Peter King may have ties to the IRA, but he believes that Muslim Americans should be investigated for failing to denounce terrorist organizations. (05:42)

Some of the segments have stats on how Muslim DOMESTIC terrorism is less of a threat than not. (IIRC, white supremacist is the greater threat.)




truckinslave -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 10:01:03 AM)

Even their hero Bill Maher describes the Koean as "hate-filled".




mnottertail -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 10:02:37 AM)

As he does republicans in wisconsin. 




Edwynn -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 10:03:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

You probably didn't mean to quote the second part of that, did ya......





Once again, that "reading comprehension" thing rears its ugly head for those invoking what they are incapable of understanding, as argument.


All this is, however, explanatory in that selective interpretation works  across the board, both in seeking to promote one and vilify the other.


I'm still waiting, as for further amusement, further expounding on how one tome finds itself in "historical context" while another is "open ended." I've not yet read anything in the Bible or the Torah that said, regarding genocide, war, slavery, etc. "but that was way back when, we shouldn'a done that, and we shouldn't do it anymore."






truckinslave -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 10:05:20 AM)

Your only value is found in those rare moments you make me smile.




mnottertail -> RE: Republican Islamaphobia in terrorist hearings (3/14/2011 10:06:33 AM)

I am a man of some pretty goddamn good prospects, with or without your endorsement of value.

[:D]




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875