LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt I think a major issue here is that people toss the term predator around when they shouldn't. A real true predator (sorry, sometimes I can't resist this shit) is very dangerous and poses an actual physical, emotional, and financial threat. They have developed an elegant veneer of charm that allows them to mimic emotion and act like everyone else. Jerks, creeps and assholes are never charming and rarely dangerous. In part, this is what was going along in My thoughts when I started the thread. Not just that the term was being overused, but why it was being applied. The term "predator" is the stronger term, and especially when someone hasn't actually *done* anything in attempt to harm another party. The lighter term would be "creepy". If I go to a play party, I tend to fit in pretty well. I'm a female top with a decent amount of experience in doing so and I have good social skills. Generally, I'll end up playing with at least one person through the course of the evening and often, it will be more than one. If I'm not playing, I'm either socializing or I might watch other people playing. Now, what if the situation were reversed? Let's say that it would be a male top, who was rather inexperienced, wasn't attractive, and fumbled in social areas? Maybe the guy who doesn't play much, even though he does ask people (perhaps a number of times over the course of a few events), getting turned down often, so he does a lot of watching for lack of the opportunity to participate. Between the two cases, are we quicker to throw those labels at the latter based on the outside attributes?
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|