Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Should a presidential candidate be required to be a military veteran?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Should a presidential candidate be required to be a military veteran? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Should a presidential candidate be required to be a mil... - 1/10/2012 1:09:37 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
I was reading another thread about Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich and I was thinking that if presidential candidates were required to be military veterans maybe , just maybe we could by-pass the "deutch bag" factor.
What type of "honor" does someone like Newt Gingrich or Bill Clinton bring to the table never having served in uniform?
And, (I love this!) they're always throwing around the word, "leader" or "leadership" all the time!
Is being a little league coach considered "leadership?"
They don't realize that being president is a management job.
If you want real, fully involved, harsh leadership experience then join the military. That's where leaders come from.
Leaders are afraid too but they do their jobs sometimes under extreme conditions.
If you wanted to go into politics why wouldn't you want that experience behind you?
Wouldn't you trust a Master Seargeant in that job before someone like Bill Clinton or Barak Obama, Newt Gingrich et al?
What say you?

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 2:13:05 AM   
imdmb


Posts: 121
Joined: 9/3/2009
Status: offline
first off, Clinton not only brought us out of debt, we had a SURPLUS

we were financially BETTER then we had been in pretty much ever

the fact that george w. blew through ALL that cash doesn't mean that Bill didn't do his job, it means george screwed up big time

but anyways, the problem with having a militairy requirement is that it would actualy REQUIRE a war, so in order for us to have a president thousands of people have to die?

no... i don't think that's right...


_____________________________

this is all my own opinion! dont take it as anything but what i have experienced personaly! this is what has happened to me! results may vary!
im also usually half asleep when im on this forum...

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 4:01:17 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Think Hitler. One fucked up ex military man if ever I saw one.

Are we really suggesting GWB is more honourable than Obama Pops ?

To sum up the notion that a military man is somehow more (Or indeed less) honourable than anyone else..... Its just absurd.

(in reply to imdmb)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:16:32 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
To some extent, I had a vaguely similar reaction to pops. I wondered: 'what's the big deal about military heroes?

I tried to recall who the last President who was also a military hero was. I could be quite wrong but I couldn't think of anyone since Kennedy and Eisenhower*. It occurred to me that it might just be the case that you guys have had more draft dodgers, deferees and ineligibles than heroes as Presidents recently.

Kennedy initiated the slide into Vietnam. Since then you guys have only been directly involved in one major conflict - Iraq. So, if keeping the peace is the measure of a good successful President, you're better off with draft dodgers, deferees and ineligibles.

Just a thought ............

* Carter was a submarine commander IIRC, but where you locate him in the list of successful Presidents is up to you

_____________________________



(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:33:05 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Heroism is an amorphous definition, but Bush prime was one of the youngest fighter pilots in the pacific theatre during the second world war, so it was probably him.

(That said, there's been a few conflicts between French Indochina and the latest dust ups in Iraq and Afghanistan. There was the first Gulf War and the UN intervention in the former Yugoslavia, for a start, even if all of that business in central america during the '80s doesn't count...)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:40:03 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
By requiring military service many of our presidents never would have been in office.

Polk, Cleveland, Adams, Taft, Wilson....

FDR couldnt because he couldnt pass the physical.. he had contracted measles.

Making it a reqirement means many eligible men who physically cannot serve in the military would be barred from the Office.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:44:05 AM   
Raiikun


Posts: 2650
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: imdmb

first off, Clinton not only brought us out of debt, we had a SURPLUS



You might want to check your facts there...according to the National Treasury website, the National Debt still increased every year that Clinton was president. There was no real "extra cash" for Bush to blow through.

That said, I'd still take Clinton when it came to fiscal responsibility over anyone else that's been president for some time.

(in reply to imdmb)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:52:42 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

You might want to check your facts there...according to the National Treasury website, the National Debt still increased every year that Clinton was president.


You need to check yours.

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Markets/Pages/national-debt.aspx

Click on "Federal Debt: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions - An Update"

See Figure 8 on page 27.

(in reply to Raiikun)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:55:54 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
What about someone who uses Senator Daddy's influence to stay stateside with a nice cushy position in the guard? It was VERY common for people on both sides of the aisle to shelter their kids that way during the 60's and early 70's.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:56:10 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

The House controls the purse strings, and wasnt Newt Gingrich holding the gavel around that time?

Regardless, Clinton was a draft dodger, so any demand now on the part of leftists that a Conservative candidate have a military background is disingenuous, at the very best

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

You might want to check your facts there...according to the National Treasury website, the National Debt still increased every year that Clinton was president.


You need to check yours.

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Markets/Pages/national-debt.aspx

Click on "Federal Debt: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions - An Update"

See Figure 8 on page 27.


< Message edited by Sanity -- 1/10/2012 5:58:09 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 5:58:10 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


The House controls the purse strings, and wasnt Newt Gingrich holding the gavel around that time?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

You might want to check your facts there...according to the National Treasury website, the National Debt still increased every year that Clinton was president.


You need to check yours.

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Markets/Pages/national-debt.aspx

Click on "Federal Debt: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions - An Update"

See Figure 8 on page 27.


What is it with the relentless partisan paranoia?

Yes, Newt and Bill worked effectively together. Last time a divided house and White House have done that.

The question raised was the data from the National Treasury website. That's what the answer addressed.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 6:01:07 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Raiikun and I had this discussion before. He and willbe kept insisting it was due to the trust funds. They insisted those funds were part of the Unified budget... they havent been since 1990.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 6:04:27 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Raiikun and I had this discussion before. He and willbe kept insisting it was due to the trust funds. They insisted those funds were part of the Unified budget... they havent been since 1990.

Not entering that debate. Simply noting that the source he cited doesn't say what he claims.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 6:05:44 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Regardless, Clinton was a draft dodger, so any demand now on the part of leftists that a Conservative candidate have a military background is disingenuous, at the very best

Like the sudden u turn the neocons did about the innate superiority of the military man when they were running the traitor Sorebutt against the Kenyan, rather than a draft dodger against Kerry, you mean?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 6:37:33 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
bush was supposedly a "military man".....and that major fuckup caused 45 hundred GIs to lose their lives.Pretty much killed the idea that being a veteran insures a good commander.


The concept is that a "military man" would have more insight,empathy,knowledge and perhaps more success if they were in the military.President Obama has proven that one wrong.


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 1/10/2012 6:38:09 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 7:31:10 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Your post makes no sense because they dont make war heroes like John McCain any more, I recall how leftists howled interminably that a great war hero like he wasnt the nominee over Bush in 2000

Though he never had an issue with Bushs service, and the leftist cacophony about Bushs service record was wholly manufactured by the likes of Dan Rather

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Regardless, Clinton was a draft dodger, so any demand now on the part of leftists that a Conservative candidate have a military background is disingenuous, at the very best

Like the sudden u turn the neocons did about the innate superiority of the military man when they were running the traitor Sorebutt against the Kenyan, rather than a draft dodger against Kerry, you mean?


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 7:39:02 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


What type of "honor" does someone like Newt Gingrich or Bill Clinton bring to the table never having served in uniform?
Abraham Lincoln never served in uniform......


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 7:42:18 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

I recall how leftists howled interminably that a great war hero like he wasnt the nominee


Do you.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 7:47:16 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
FR.
The concept that a military man cant be a douche bag is the biggest problem with that thought.
That a military man is the only type who can lead a country is ridiculous beyond compare.
We have innumerable numbers to point that fact out to be total crap.
Of course your definiton of douche bag may be different.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Should a presidential candidate be required to be a... - 1/10/2012 7:51:10 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Maybe we should have only Generals, like in totalitarian states...or at least Colonels....



< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 1/10/2012 7:52:46 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Should a presidential candidate be required to be a military veteran? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094