RE: Romney antigay bully?

RE: Romney antigay bully? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

SternSkipper -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:40:24 PM)
quote: I doubt he's any close relation to Peepants. Give me some time[:D]

mnottertail -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:42:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SternSkipper quote: Stern, ain't that buddy hackett? Pretty close ... His Christian Name is Hugh Romney. Ben & Jerry's has an Ice Cream Named After him under his current name. It has already been established that Willard comes from a very long long line of fuckin clowns.

Moonhead -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:42:44 PM)
He is? You're fucking kidding. That'd have been all over the news* the second peepants threw his hat into the ring if Wavey was any relation, surely? *(Maybe not Faux, but I could see the other networks loving that...)

SternSkipper -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:44:30 PM)
quote: Nope. But I can send you a few tins of catfood if you're that hungry. You don't understand... I consider them Land Sushi.

Moonhead -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:46:47 PM)
I consider them filthy little bastards who eat vermin that even rats would turn their noses up at. I'd sooner eat in a MacDonalds than even consider a cat. [;)]

mnottertail -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:48:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead He is? You're fucking kidding. That'd have been all over the news* the second peepants threw his hat into the ring if Wavey was any relation, surely? *(Maybe not Faux, but I could see the other networks loving that...) Oh, you see that neo-con, teabagge whiney shit alla time...can you just imagine if Willard did that, the communist lefties would be all over them and it would make all sorts of liberally biased news.... nah, our expectations of these assclowns are so low, they have to at least fuck up supersonically to get a passing honorable mention.

SternSkipper -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 12:49:06 PM)
quote: He is? You're fucking kidding. That'd have been all over the news* the second peepants threw his hat into the ring if Wavey was any relation, surely? *(Maybe not Faux, but I could see the other networks loving that...) It's every bit as real as the news you'll see tonight on Fox. Like WillBe says ... Bank on it. Just wait and see if Mitt gets elected, we'll be hearing stories about Wavy laying in a tub in the 1st family's quarters with a 1/10 gram vial of Owsley and a secret service agent holding a boom box playing white rabbit. Bank on it.

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 1:08:45 PM)
So Romney is now on record apologizing for these things that he did when he was younger (in other words he is not denying that he did these things). He claims that he did not know the victim(s) were gay and that he was not harassing them for being gay. But he was harassing them for being different. I believe the words Romney used were, "“He can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!” Need anything more be said here? Again, I grant people some youthful ignorance, but nothing has changed here. This is simply ignorance that continues. Romney is a white Mormon male of privilege and has contempt for anyone different from him. I still can't get over the fact that a gay male was, up until recently, working on Romney's campaign.

tj444 -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 1:26:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess I still can't get over the fact that a gay male was, up until recently, working on Romney's campaign. really? so what? did someone force him to work for Romney?.. its nothing to compare to Andrew Young pretending to be dating Reile Hunter and knocking her up when all along he was covering for John Edwards who was the real one cheating on his sick wife with her.. and all the muck with that whole affair.. million bucks stolen, a public trial.. there is sleeze on both sides.. jmo..

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 1:37:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tj444 quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess I still can't get over the fact that a gay male was, up until recently, working on Romney's campaign. really? so what? did someone force him to work for Romney?.. its nothing to compare to Andrew Young pretending to be dating Reile Hunter and knocking her up when all along he was covering for John Edwards who was the real one cheating on his sick wife with her.. and all the muck with that whole affair.. million bucks stolen, a public trial.. there is sleeze on both sides.. jmo.. My post is not about one "side" vs the "other", whatever you even mean by that. My point is really quite specific. We have a man who bullied gay teens when he was young. I am surprised anyone who is gay would want to work for/with someone like that. A very limited point. Nowhere in my post am I talking about anything beyond that. As a bisexual, I would not want to be working with/for someone (anyone) who I found out used to physically attack people who were gay/lesbian for no other reason than they are not allowed to "look different". That is what I'm saying. It doesn't have anything to do with "sides".

Moonhead -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 1:42:32 PM)
Screw the "when he was young" bit: peepants is hardly all about gay rights and integrating the left footers as a political contender in the here and now, is he?

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 1:51:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead Screw the "when he was young" bit: peepants is hardly all about gay rights and integrating the left footers as a political contender in the here and now, is he? Trust me, I get that. Which is why I express my surprise that anyone gay would want to work on his campaign. He has never been, is currently not, and never will be a champion of gay rights.

SternSkipper -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 2:01:49 PM)
quote: It has already been established that Willard comes from a very long long line of fuckin clowns. I hear "Send in the Clowns" has been the theme song for Romney's birthday for the last 30 years.

SternSkipper -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 2:04:14 PM)
quote: He claims that he did not know the victim(s) were gay and that he was not harassing them for being gay. But he was harassing them for being different. I believe the words Romney used were, "“He can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!” I hope the news beats the "Romney Bashes Gays" stickers to the printer.

SternSkipper -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 2:06:59 PM)
quote: He has never been, is currently not, and never will be a champion of gay rights. Maybe the Log Cabin Republicans are busy calculating how much they will save on haircuts.

tj444 -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 2:59:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess quote: ORIGINAL: tj444 quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess I still can't get over the fact that a gay male was, up until recently, working on Romney's campaign. really? so what? did someone force him to work for Romney?.. its nothing to compare to Andrew Young pretending to be dating Reile Hunter and knocking her up when all along he was covering for John Edwards who was the real one cheating on his sick wife with her.. and all the muck with that whole affair.. million bucks stolen, a public trial.. there is sleeze on both sides.. jmo.. My post is not about one "side" vs the "other", whatever you even mean by that. My point is really quite specific. We have a man who bullied gay teens when he was young. I am surprised anyone who is gay would want to work for/with someone like that. A very limited point. Nowhere in my post am I talking about anything beyond that. As a bisexual, I would not want to be working with/for someone (anyone) who I found out used to physically attack people who were gay/lesbian for no other reason than they are not allowed to "look different". That is what I'm saying. It doesn't have anything to do with "sides". oh I know you want to bash Romney and all Rs where ever you can and pretend that the Ds are all lily white and ignore their faults and transgressions when it suits you.. you wonder why a gay man would work for him? yet you dont wonder why women worked for womanizing user sleazoid Democrats like Edwards and Clinton, all the way back to JFK?.. its the exact same thing..

thompsonx -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 4:00:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet No importance whatsoever. I am soooo surprised that a self confessed zenophobe and biggot would find nothing important about the homphobic behaviour of a presidential candidate.

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 4:08:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tj444 quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess quote: ORIGINAL: tj444 quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess I still can't get over the fact that a gay male was, up until recently, working on Romney's campaign. really? so what? did someone force him to work for Romney?.. its nothing to compare to Andrew Young pretending to be dating Reile Hunter and knocking her up when all along he was covering for John Edwards who was the real one cheating on his sick wife with her.. and all the muck with that whole affair.. million bucks stolen, a public trial.. there is sleeze on both sides.. jmo.. My post is not about one "side" vs the "other", whatever you even mean by that. My point is really quite specific. We have a man who bullied gay teens when he was young. I am surprised anyone who is gay would want to work for/with someone like that. A very limited point. Nowhere in my post am I talking about anything beyond that. As a bisexual, I would not want to be working with/for someone (anyone) who I found out used to physically attack people who were gay/lesbian for no other reason than they are not allowed to "look different". That is what I'm saying. It doesn't have anything to do with "sides". oh I know you want to bash Romney and all Rs where ever you can and pretend that the Ds are all lily white and ignore their faults and transgressions when it suits you.. you wonder why a gay man would work for him? yet you dont wonder why women worked for womanizing user sleazoid Democrats like Edwards and Clinton, all the way back to JFK?.. its the exact same thing.. So now we are comparing CONSENSUAL sexual acts between adults to physically attacking someone gay because they look "different". You can't be serious? Why are you even on this site if you don't believe in consensual sexual acts between two adults? And if it is adultery that is your issue, then I suggest you leave that to the couple involved. Marriages and relationships are complicated things, and I don't think it is for anyone outside the relationship to judge what happens over the course of a marriage/relationship. Monogamy is an issue that many couples struggle with - and not all are successful. I don't put failure at monogamy in the same category as physically attacking a gay person for being "different". Not to mention many married people don't even believe in monogamy. For those of you who equate these acts (gay bashing with consensual sex between two adults), then fine. Obviously for YOU, these are equally egregious. [&:]

fucktoyprincess -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 4:12:51 PM)
p.s. I hope that those of you who feel there is nothing wrong with this behavior never have a loved one bullied in school. I have to assume you feel this way because it is impossible for you to imagine your children, nieces, nephews, grandchildren, children of friends, etc. ever being bullied by some jerk who feels he is entitled to physically attack someone for looking "different". [&o]

thompsonx -> RE: Romney antigay bully? (5/10/2012 4:13:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead I consider them filthy little bastards who eat vermin that even rats would turn their noses up at. I'd sooner eat in a MacDonalds than even consider a cat. [;)] But they taste sooooooo good when you put them on the barbie with some shrimp.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875