thompsonx -> RE: Memorial Day /Is health care a Privilege or a Right? pro's/con's (5/29/2012 7:08:41 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote:
ORIGINAL: Marini Do you think/believe that people that can't afford insurance, or get quality "free care" from whatever is available for them these days, should just die? Many of us know for a FACT, that you often do not get anywhere near the same level of care for many medical conditions without good insurance. Would you have any sort of validation for this insipid opinion? quote:
Without GOOD insurance in the United States: You almost always do NOT, get the same level of care, consideration, CHOICE of physicians, availability to see specialists, in-depth tests, labs, etc. medications, protocols, second opinions, treatment OPTIONS,or even availability of appointments, etc. I do and I have no insurance. I live in the u.s. The federal government provides for all of my health care needs as outlined above and far in excess for less cost. quote:
Please be honest, I need to hear it. I do think this is how many people feel, but are too chicken shit to just admit it. Most people would have acquainted themselves with the facts and would be ashamed to post such idiotic nonsense. Are you a insurance salesman? quote:
Do you think/believe that people that can't afford insurance, or get quality "free care" from whatever is available for them these days, should just die? quote:
What I think is irrelevant In addition to being ignorant and unsubstantiated. quote:
Let me give you one fact. No matter if one is in the UK, EU, Australia, Canada, etc... Not everyone who needs shall receive. That is a fact due to limited resources, both in materials and costs. This exists whether in the free market or government controlled providing. Once again a half truth trying to supprt a whole lie. The difference here is in the level of who shall recieve. First: Do not equate "free market" with "capitalism" They are not the same. They are anti-thetical to one another and mutually exclusive. second: In the for profit insurance system service is limited by how much you (the idividual) can pay. In he socialized medicine system service is limited by what the not for profit system decides is most appropriate. Due to the economies of scale it is reasonable to expect that level of care to be higher by several orders of magnitude from the best available from for profit sources. quote:
Therefore I prefer the free market which has shown itself to be better at pricing and distribution than any governmental body, in any respect. You have shown absolutely no evidence to support this peurile nonsense. quote:
I don't want to get off track but I think it should be noted that governmental intrusions into the market always skew it. Oversight for fraud, corruption etc are not skewing intrusions. Fraud, corruption, etc. are skews. Would you have some sort of validation for this nonsense or are we to take this fabrication as "ex cathedra"? quote:
Many of us know for a FACT, that you often do not get anywhere near the same level of care for many medical conditions without good insurance. Insurance is one of those things that when done right and for the proper purpose is a good thing. Unfortunately, when government gets involved beyond oversight and intrudes in the insurance market there exists a skew. For instance this skew is seen in states where i.e. one is both required to have car insurance and is also denied the ability to shop for the best coverage at the best price (cross state lines, even go foreign); states limiting competition denies the market finding lower prices. Where there is greater competition lower prices will be found. Which state denies you the right to shop for competitive prices among those insurers licensed to do business in that state? Which state denies you the right to self insure? quote:
The medical industry is highly skewed these days due to many and various factors, not the least of which is government. Again your post is filled with unsubstantiated inane rhetoric....would it be within your capabilities to at least allude to whch of these "various factors" the government contributes to the problem or must we guess? quote:
It's the high cost stuff that's really at stake. Would you prefer private insurance where you have the choice of insurance, meaning the right to contract for your insurance needs with whatever insurance company you choose, or would you prefer government bureaucrats telling you what insurance you shall receive and what you shall pay? It seems to suit your purpose to conflate all bad decisions of government to some nameless bureaucrat. When the govt had a problem...remember the statement "houston we have a problem"...If I remember correctly the "nameless govt. bureaucrats" managed to solve that problem. The insurance corporations operate from a "for profit" mindset...why do you presume that those charged with administering a socialized medicine progrm would be likewise motivated? quote:
The insurance industry is broken like everything else is. No it is not it is making money for the shareholders at near record rates. quote:
Government is not the answer. You would have the faux guard the hen house?
|
|
|
|