ServosCor
Posts: 267
Joined: 9/3/2012 Status: offline
|
While there is no doubt that pit bulls have been involved in numerous animal/human attacks, one has to wonder how were those individual dogs raised/treated through out their lives. We cannot discriminate against a breed due to the problems associated with some dogs. The number of pit bulls and pit mixes is unbelievably high compared to the those instances where dogs cause problems. Pit bulls have been known as great family dogs for decades. It is only since the 70's, when the breed became popular and dog fighting escalated that the dog aggression w/ humans began. The old time pit men would euthanize any dog that showed aggression towards humans. So where does the blame lie? The owners. The greed factor in what your dog can make you, money wise, if he wins the fight. The ways and means people accept to make dogs viscious and untrustworthy. Personally, I think anyone who owns pits should be required to achieve a CGC certificate (temperament test), attend at least basic obedience classes, and have the dog spayed or neutered unless they are willing to post a high dollar bond proving responsibility. This would surely cut down on breeding pits & owning pits. For those who follow the law anyway. The plight of the APBT is pathetic in this country as well as in others. (see post from Maria B). Pit bulls in general are fantastic family dogs, great deterrants of those with less than good intentions, and wonderful 'best friends". At this moment I'm currently waiting to add a new pit pup to my crew of 5 dogs/5 cats/1 mule. This will be the third pit I've owned and I can't think of a better choice for my next 'buddy'. ~servos cor~ ( ps........ Just as an fyi, I've been training dogs professionally since 1977, was a Chief Temperament Tester for ATTS, owned and operated a boarding/training facility for over 20 years, taught tracking/obedience/protection classes, competitor in AKC & Schutzhund trials, etc ........ I do have a bit of knowledge on this subject :)
|