RE: UK apology for India massacre? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Politesub53 -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 3:31:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

Well, I was producing evidence it occurred in specific case in English North America, the history of such conduct would certainly fill a forum and when dealing with such paladins of England it appears best to keep with simple sentences and ideas.


You produced no such thing. Just a wiki page suggesting it happened then suggesting it didnt.

As evidence goes, it is piss poor.




Politesub53 -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 3:35:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

What scares me is how many Americans seem hell bent on throwing the last 250 years of progress out the window.



1) Whats your own heritage or would you rather not say ?

2) Do you go around apologising for it on a DAILY BASIS ? Because that seems to be the standard you hold everyone else to.

Your idea of 250 years of progress isnt backed up by the facts.




Kirata -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 3:53:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

No this is the one I wanted to deal with. While there was a letter suggesting it, there is no evidence it was ever carried out. You would know that if you had read your own link brains.

"But, some subsequent scholars have raised doubts about whether the smallpox outbreak can be traced to blankets from Fort Pitt with certainty."

I could say you're the one who needs to read the link, but I think the problem is something rather different.

Officers at the besieged Fort Pitt had already attempted to do what Amherst and Bouquet were discussing, apparently on their own initiative. During a parley at Fort Pitt on June 24, 1763, Ecuyer gave Delaware representatives two blankets and a handkerchief that had been exposed to smallpox, hoping to spread the disease to the Native Americans in order to end the siege. William Trent, the militia commander, left records that showed the purpose of giving the blankets was "to Convey the Smallpox to the Indians."'

That established, let's go for the money...

It is uncertain whether this fully documented attempt to spread smallpox to the Native Americans was successful. Because many Native Americans died from smallpox during Pontiac's Rebellion, historian Francis Jennings concluded that the attempt was "unquestionably effective". But, some subsequent scholars have raised doubts about whether the smallpox outbreak can be traced to blankets from Fort Pitt with certainty. According to an eyewitness report, smallpox was spreading among the Ohio Native Americans before the blanket incident. Because smallpox was already in the area, it may have reached Native villages through a number of sources.

Readers will not fail to notice how the quote you cited, which I've highlighted in red, was lifted out of context and misrepresented in your post as supporting the false claim you're trying to sell.

K.




BamaD -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 1:27:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

No this is the one I wanted to deal with. While there was a letter suggesting it, there is no evidence it was ever carried out. You would know that if you had read your own link brains.

"But, some subsequent scholars have raised doubts about whether the smallpox outbreak can be traced to blankets from Fort Pitt with certainty."

I could say you're the one who needs to read the link, but I think the problem is something rather different.

Officers at the besieged Fort Pitt had already attempted to do what Amherst and Bouquet were discussing, apparently on their own initiative. During a parley at Fort Pitt on June 24, 1763, Ecuyer gave Delaware representatives two blankets and a handkerchief that had been exposed to smallpox, hoping to spread the disease to the Native Americans in order to end the siege. William Trent, the militia commander, left records that showed the purpose of giving the blankets was "to Convey the Smallpox to the Indians."'

That established, let's go for the money...

It is uncertain whether this fully documented attempt to spread smallpox to the Native Americans was successful. Because many Native Americans died from smallpox during Pontiac's Rebellion, historian Francis Jennings concluded that the attempt was "unquestionably effective". But, some subsequent scholars have raised doubts about whether the smallpox outbreak can be traced to blankets from Fort Pitt with certainty. According to an eyewitness report, smallpox was spreading among the Ohio Native Americans before the blanket incident. Because smallpox was already in the area, it may have reached Native villages through a number of sources.

Readers will not fail to notice how the quote you cited, which I've highlighted in red, was lifted out of context and misrepresented in your post as supporting the false claim you're trying to sell.

K.


You are surrounded by an enemy that has you vastly outnumbered. Defeat means not the possibility, but the certainty of torture and rape for all those under your protection. I would summon demons from Hell if it would save those people. You might be moral enough to subject your people to very few are. It's easy to critisize from the safty of your den in the field is tougher.




BamaD -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 1:34:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

Most the United States seem to fancy they are still English, or at least some other type of European colonial, you wonder why they bothered to revolt. Even those called every name in the book by the Europeans for being republicans, thinking they should be armed, thinking European governmental rule is worthless, etc.


I routinly tell Brits, Aussies, and Canadians what they can do with thier "you colonials need to grow up and do it our way" attitude. This however is about singleing out one coutry as evil for things done at time with a different morality is absurd. Particularly when by the standards of the day they were relativly mild.




BamaD -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 1:36:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

What scares me is how many Americans seem hell bent on throwing the last 250 years of progress out the window.
quote:







For once we are in complete agreement.




YN -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 3:30:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You are surrounded by an enemy that has you vastly outnumbered. Defeat means not the possibility, but the certainty of torture and rape for all those under your protection. I would summon demons from Hell if it would save those people. You might be moral enough to subject your people to very few are. It's easy to critisize from the safty of your den in the field is tougher.



So the proper use of a flag of truce and a parley is to secretly use biological weapons on the other side?

This treachery alone was against the laws of war, such as they were at the time.




Politesub53 -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 4:23:21 PM)

Flag of truce........ Your having a laugh. the Indians came to the fort to demand a surrender. Simeon Ecuyer, a swiss mercenery refused and gave them two blankets from the Infirmary. this was before the arrival of Bouquets force and a month before Amherst suggested it.

If Ecuyer did this deliberately, it was his off own doing. Thats unless he got a letter a month before it was sent.

Whichever way you look at it, its nonsense and certainly wasnt sanctioned by the British Government. Even if Amehurst did suggest it after it had already been done.





YN -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 5:18:18 PM)

So you now admit the incident actually occurred, and now must resort to flailing attempts to minimize it.





Powergamz1 -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 8:01:34 PM)

To be fair, the notion that war has rules, much less rules of fair play is counterintuitive.

But when you are surrounded by the armies and navies of empires that have you vastly outnumbered and outgunned, and defeat means torture and rape and slavery for all those under your protection, you sharpen your arrows, and use whatever means is available to send them back to where they came from... Hell, or across the ocean.
quote:

ORIGINAL: YN


So the proper use of a flag of truce and a parley is to secretly use biological weapons on the other side?

This treachery alone was against the laws of war, such as they were at the time.






YN -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 9:16:15 PM)

True, and this is merely a subset of the savagery it took Europeans to rob and enslave much of the world.

This dichotomy appears to confuse the lumpenbourgeoisie, who all believe in the nobility of the European ruling class and cannot reconcile this worship of them and their conduct with the brutal history of their empires.




BamaD -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 10:16:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You are surrounded by an enemy that has you vastly outnumbered. Defeat means not the possibility, but the certainty of torture and rape for all those under your protection. I would summon demons from Hell if it would save those people. You might be moral enough to subject your people to very few are. It's easy to critisize from the safty of your den in the field is tougher.



So the proper use of a flag of truce and a parley is to secretly use biological weapons on the other side?

This treachery alone was against the laws of war, such as they were at the time.


Have you given any thought to where the British got the smallpox to expose the blankets to?
This means the mere act of meeting with the British they may well have been exposed.




BamaD -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/25/2013 10:20:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

True, and this is merely a subset of the savagery it took Europeans to rob and enslave much of the world.

This dichotomy appears to confuse the lumpenbourgeoisie, who all believe in the nobility of the European ruling class and cannot reconcile this worship of them and their conduct with the brutal history of their empires.

As opposed to someone who insits on view thier every move in the worst possible light?
Again it is easy to judge when you do not even attempt to put yourself in the others position.




Politesub53 -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 2:10:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You are surrounded by an enemy that has you vastly outnumbered. Defeat means not the possibility, but the certainty of torture and rape for all those under your protection. I would summon demons from Hell if it would save those people. You might be moral enough to subject your people to very few are. It's easy to critisize from the safty of your den in the field is tougher.



So the proper use of a flag of truce and a parley is to secretly use biological weapons on the other side?

This treachery alone was against the laws of war, such as they were at the time.


Have you given any thought to where the British got the smallpox to expose the blankets to?
This means the mere act of meeting with the British they may well have been exposed.


YN will believe what he wants to believe. I still think he is a sock and I am still waiting for Powergamz to explain his own wonderful heritage.




Kirata -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 3:24:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You are surrounded by an enemy that has you vastly outnumbered. Defeat means not the possibility, but the certainty of torture and rape for all those under your protection. I would summon demons from Hell if it would save those people. You might be moral enough to subject your people to very few are. It's easy to critisize from the safty of your den in the field is tougher.

I haven't criticized anything to do with the incident. My only beef was with someone insisting that "there is no evidence it was ever carried out," and lifting a quote out of context to support that assertion.

K.




YN -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 8:56:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Have you given any thought to where the British got the smallpox to expose the blankets to?
This means the mere act of meeting with the British they may well have been exposed.


True. And every other conquistadore also brought this and other "gifts" to the Americas. however considering the topic of this thread, you think an apology fron any European nation involved would be meaningful or sincere?

quote:


As opposed to someone who insits on view thier every move in the worst possible light?
Again it is easy to judge when you do not even attempt to put yourself in the others position.


Put yourself in the shoes of of any European country (Spain, Portugal,England, France, Holland etc) who were part of this worldwide colonial holocaust, Now imagine having to properly explain your nation's colonial conduct, in the case of trying to at least appear contrite.

Would you act as David Cameron did in this case, of going to India, claim a "special relationship" while offering to trade an "apology" for a large military aircraft deal, and expect anyone, let alone the Indians (we have already discussed and posted the negative responses of India,) to think the apology as sincere?




YN -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 9:07:58 AM)

doubled post.




YN -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 9:09:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN

quote:

China together with Russia and India and to a lesser extent the countries of South America are on balance expressing negative views relating to Europe and are quite happy to foster that feeling of disillusionment amongst the indigenous peoples as somehow caused in some part by problems in Europe.

No efforts have been made to address this perception, and foreign powers worldwide are tending to use the excuse of Europe and as a scapegoat for problems caused primarily by their failure to educate their citizens as to the benefits of Europe and as a model for their own success, preferring instead to offer or decline to counteract the populist view.


quote:

After considering what is required to stabilize the EU project as a whole and to educate not only European citizens as to the benefits of the Single Market and a United Strong Europe, but the wider world also, we should provide the equivalent level of budget to enforce and disseminate the virtues of Europe as those who would seek to inform the negative aspects.


quote:

An appropriate budget should be allocated with an initial three million Euros to conduct a detailed feasibility study and to prepare the ground for an extended campaign for the next five years.

We anticipate such a budget should be not less than two hundred and seventy five million Euros each year, with an annual review and cost benefit analysis and with an open mandate to escalate such budget as the need arises.





Any apologies are thus but a small part of an EU public relations campaign.




Politesub53 -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 11:23:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I haven't criticized anything to do with the incident. My only beef was with someone insisting that "there is no evidence it was ever carried out," and lifting a quote out of context to support that assertion.




Pot kettle and black.




Moonhead -> RE: UK apology for India massacre? (2/26/2013 11:30:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: YN
Put yourself in the shoes of of any European country (Spain, Portugal,England, France, Holland etc) who were part of this worldwide colonial holocaust, Now imagine having to properly explain your nation's colonial conduct, in the case of trying to at least appear contrite.

Would you act as David Cameron did in this case, of going to India, claim a "special relationship" while offering to trade an "apology" for a large military aircraft deal, and expect anyone, let alone the Indians (we have already discussed and posted the negative responses of India,) to think the apology as sincere?

So when did you lads apologise to your Indians for the genocide campaign that was waged against them, then?
There's still a few of them hanging around the reservations even now: get the Kenyan down to a casino and have him apologise right now if you're pissing and moaning about our conduct as an ex colonial nation.
(And as for the smallpox blankets thing, if you're seriously going to try to stick us with the moral responsibility for that one, then you owe us two hundred and forty years' arrears on the tea tax...)




Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875