Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 9:01:41 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

If your assailant didn't carry that flick knife for fear of being caught and prosecuted (jail time), you wouldn't have had to face that sort of attempted mugging.


You don't seem to be aware of this, but the fear of going to jail for the mugging didn't deter him.

And that would be why???
Could it be that DW is in Virginia, USA and thus not subject to our laws??

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
How can they ban bowie knives but allow homemade maces?
You super two by four has to be illegal.

Yep. It is absolutely illegal, I admit that.
Should I get into some battle with a mugger or intruder and harm them, if they pressed charges or it be noticed by the police, I would be up on a charge for using excessive force and using an illegal weapon.
I would also probably get a claim for injury compensation even though I was defending myself, my family and my territory.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 2:07:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

If your assailant didn't carry that flick knife for fear of being caught and prosecuted (jail time), you wouldn't have had to face that sort of attempted mugging.


You don't seem to be aware of this, but the fear of going to jail for the mugging didn't deter him.

And that would be why???
Could it be that DW is in Virginia, USA and thus not subject to our laws??

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
How can they ban bowie knives but allow homemade maces?
You super two by four has to be illegal.

Yep. It is absolutely illegal, I admit that.
Should I get into some battle with a mugger or intruder and harm them, if they pressed charges or it be noticed by the police, I would be up on a charge for using excessive force and using an illegal weapon.
I would also probably get a claim for injury compensation even though I was defending myself, my family and my territory.


Are you aware that mugging is against the law here? If the jail term for it was no deterrence the term for the weapon wouldn't be either.
Do you think you are the only one who will ignore the law?
Ever here of a zip gun.
btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 11/25/2014 2:12:55 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 2:17:53 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Do you think you are the only one who will ignore the law?
Ever here of a zip gun.
btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.

What about my constitutional right to be safer and NOT be surrounded nutcases with lethal weapons??
Searches are not an infringement if you have nothing to hide.
I welcome the searches and would press for even more of them.

And yes, I've heard of zip guns.
Not too many people have those hanging around since the 50's and they aren't that common in the first place.
Maybe in the US where guns are the norm - but not so much here.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 2:22:32 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.


And it's partly because you have such pisspoor constitutional protection against getting shot dead that we're more than glad to stay away.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 4:16:07 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.


And it's partly because you have such pisspoor constitutional protection against getting shot dead that we're more than glad to stay away.



As usual he doesnt know what he is on about Peon. If a cop has reasonable suspicion he can carry out a stop and search.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-bodine/federal-court-the-police-_b_5223918.html

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 4:34:26 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.


And it's partly because you have such pisspoor constitutional protection against getting shot dead that we're more than glad to stay away.



As usual he doesnt know what he is on about Peon. If a cop has reasonable suspicion he can carry out a stop and search.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-bodine/federal-court-the-police-_b_5223918.html


Of course he can. There's sod all protection in the constitution because 'reasonable cause' means sod all.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 4:42:55 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.

Makes ya wonder why it took until 1791 to do then.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 4:45:24 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.


And it's partly because you have such pisspoor constitutional protection against getting shot dead that we're more than glad to stay away.

Since this is a game folks like to play here sometimes . . . actually there's nothing at all in the Constitution about being shot; therefore, any law prohibiting citizens from shooting others is unConstitutional from a "constructivist" view.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 4:52:39 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.


And it's partly because you have such pisspoor constitutional protection against getting shot dead that we're more than glad to stay away.

Since this is a game folks like to play here sometimes . . . actually there's nothing at all in the Constitution about being shot; therefore, any law prohibiting citizens from shooting others is unConstitutional from a "constructivist" view.


I had the impression that the Constitution's protection regarding guns and shooting was all about *doing* the shooting - as has any major discussion around the twin ideas of 'guns' and 'freedom' since the Constitution was written. I've used the expression 'freedom from being shot' here many times in the past and, on each occasion, I've been treated as though I've just spoken in ancient Klingon. It's as though the gunsters here simply can't fathom the concept, as though they're thinking, 'Eh, what pinko Brit madness is this? How does removing the fear of getting shot make your life any freer?'

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 5:55:16 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Do you think you are the only one who will ignore the law?
Ever here of a zip gun.
btw We have constitutional protection against random searches, that is one of the reasons we sent the Brits packing.

What about my constitutional right to be safer and NOT be surrounded nutcases with lethal weapons??
Searches are not an infringement if you have nothing to hide.
I welcome the searches and would press for even more of them.

And yes, I've heard of zip guns.
Not too many people have those hanging around since the 50's and they aren't that common in the first place.
Maybe in the US where guns are the norm - but not so much here.


Yes they are without good reason.
Ban guns and they will become popular here, I wasn't talking about the UK.
How can you tell us we need your laws when you blatantly violate them. That discredits anything you say.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 6:38:59 PM   
ThirdWheelWanted


Posts: 391
Joined: 4/23/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

What about my constitutional right to be safer and NOT be surrounded nutcases with lethal weapons??
Searches are not an infringement if you have nothing to hide.
I welcome the searches and would press for even more of them.



I'm sorry, but you are the one who insists that his neighborhood is so unsafe that he has to have a weapon handy 24/7, and don't feel safe unless you have your morning-star at hand while walking down the street, right? Yet you keep insisting that banning guns made you safer?

I'm glad you want to give up ever more of your freedoms by allowing searches whenever the hell the police feel like it. Here in the US, we tend to get a might pissy with the idea of cops searching us at random, but more power to you over there.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 7:32:20 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThirdWheelWanted

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

What about my constitutional right to be safer and NOT be surrounded nutcases with lethal weapons??
Searches are not an infringement if you have nothing to hide.
I welcome the searches and would press for even more of them.



I'm sorry, but you are the one who insists that his neighborhood is so unsafe that he has to have a weapon handy 24/7, and don't feel safe unless you have your morning-star at hand while walking down the street, right? Yet you keep insisting that banning guns made you safer?

I'm glad you want to give up ever more of your freedoms by allowing searches whenever the hell the police feel like it. Here in the US, we tend to get a might pissy with the idea of cops searching us at random, but more power to you over there.

Correction, his illegal morning star, he doesn't obey the laws he wants us to adopt.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ThirdWheelWanted)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 10:56:31 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I've used the expression 'freedom from being shot' here many times in the past and, on each occasion, I've been treated as though I've just spoken in ancient Klingon. It's as though the gunsters here simply can't fathom the concept...

What you frame as a "freedom from being shot" can only be effected by a totalitarian state. You may argue that it's not a totalitarian state if the people want it and vote for it, but that is a species of sleight of hand. The mere fact that people voted for it doesn't make it less totalitarian. You are idolizing democracy. Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on lunch. We recognize certain rights as inalienable, among them the right to self-defense, which is vaporous absent an effective means to do so, and our constitution expressly protects these rights against the fond tyrannies of utopia-obsessed majorities besotted with the notion that things would be ever so much nicer if people didn't have them.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 11/25/2014 11:43:07 PM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 11:02:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I've used the expression 'freedom from being shot' here many times in the past and, on each occasion, I've been treated as though I've just spoken in ancient Klingon. It's as though the gunsters here simply can't fathom the concept...

What you frame as a "freedom from being shot" can only be effected by a totalitarian state. You may argue that it's not a totalitarian state if the people want it and vote for it, but that is a species of sleight of hand. The mere fact that people voted for it doesn't make it less totalitarian. You are idolizing democracy. Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on lunch. We recognize certain natural and inalienable rights, among them the right to self-defense, which is vaporous absent an effective means to do so. Accordingly, our constitution expressly protects certain rights against the fond tyrannies of utopia-obsessed majorities besotted with the notion that things would be ever so much nicer if people didn't have them.

K.



Don't laws against assault an murder codify the right not to be shot, or stabbed, or clubbed?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 11:08:55 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Don't laws against assault an murder codify the right not to be shot, or stabbed, or clubbed?

No, because their application depends on the circumstances.

K.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 11:34:40 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Don't laws against assault an murder codify the right not to be shot, or stabbed, or clubbed?

No, because their application depends on the circumstances.

K.



Suppose I add the word unjustifiably?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/25/2014 11:37:45 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Don't laws against assault an murder codify the right not to be shot, or stabbed, or clubbed?

No, because their application depends on the circumstances.

Suppose I add the word unjustifiably?

Well, then you no longer have a right not to be shot.

K.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/26/2014 12:18:20 AM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I've used the expression 'freedom from being shot' here many times in the past and, on each occasion, I've been treated as though I've just spoken in ancient Klingon. It's as though the gunsters here simply can't fathom the concept...

What you frame as a "freedom from being shot" can only be effected by a totalitarian state. You may argue that it's not a totalitarian state if the people want it and vote for it, but that is a species of sleight of hand. The mere fact that people voted for it doesn't make it less totalitarian. You are idolizing democracy. Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on lunch. We recognize certain natural and inalienable rights, among them the right to self-defense, which is vaporous absent an effective means to do so. Accordingly, our constitution expressly protects certain rights against the fond tyrannies of utopia-obsessed majorities besotted with the notion that things would be ever so much nicer if people didn't have them.

K.



Don't laws against assault an murder codify the right not to be shot, or stabbed, or clubbed?

I'd have thought a few of the posters here actually understood how the Police powers of the State are exercised in most Western nations. No one has a right not to be ..whatever, under criminal law. They may have under Civil Law. Which is a totally different set of rules and consequences. The law criminalizes certain conduct After the fact and does little or nothing before. Even 'conspiracy'. The police are a reactive force, and rarely anticipate. That's not how our legal punitive social control measures work. (Raising sane people would be the primary alternative and an obvious interference with a 'free' people's parental rights?) The attempts to control behavior before the fact (Prohibition, War on Drugs, etc.) have been hugely problematic and as warned above, usually lead to draconian dictatorial bureaucracies.
Changing social mores has worked, we are seeing attempts now in a number of areas. Smoking, rape, child abuse and child pornography are current focuses? I'm seeing little effect on the obesity front. Changing attitudes takes generations, it works better than a massive police state?

The OP topic is pretty embarrassing to educated people. Try living in a neighborhood where knife violence is the predominate criminal activity on the street. Just as with guns, concentrated police and prosecutor work can greatly diminish the amount and degree of such violence. ONE USA city actually had a good working relationship between local police, prosecutors and the local US District Attorney. They followed up and fully prosecuted all of both State and Federal laws on all illegal carry and gun violence offenses. Street illegal carry plummeted and gun violence massively dropped as it was a given offenders who were arrested would do hard time, usually in Federal pens. Which isn't why most people carry and use illegal guns? Budget priorities and jurisdictional disputes and defenses everywhere else often mean few if any offenders see real jail time if even detected.
The marches in GB are aimed at creating social pressure on the police, prosecutors and legislators to be proactive in using what powers they do have to make the now ubiquitious-in-some-areas knife crime far more risky for the offenders and punished so as to remove them from social interactions as best possible given the sentencing standards of the community. I doubt anyone thinks making knives illegal is the point or is workable. Carrying obvious weapons and more, the Use of knives in criminal enterprises is what the security apparatus of the State is being urged to concentrate on?
From my knowledge of the juvenile criminal cultures where I live, it's the existence of known individuals who are successfully doing illegal things that's the most encouraging to the rest of the 'culture'. If every police contact with a criminal use of a weapon results in an early jail time served, these people Aren't seen as effective role models and the ideas lose their luster. It's where the police/prosecutors can't or won't arrest and effectively prosecute weapons offenders that the problems get worse.

< Message edited by epiphiny43 -- 11/26/2014 12:20:21 AM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/26/2014 5:11:26 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I've used the expression 'freedom from being shot' here many times in the past and, on each occasion, I've been treated as though I've just spoken in ancient Klingon. It's as though the gunsters here simply can't fathom the concept...

What you frame as a "freedom from being shot" can only be effected by a totalitarian state. You may argue that it's not a totalitarian state if the people want it and vote for it, but that is a species of sleight of hand. The mere fact that people voted for it doesn't make it less totalitarian. You are idolizing democracy. Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on lunch. We recognize certain rights as inalienable, among them the right to self-defense, which is vaporous absent an effective means to do so, and our constitution expressly protects these rights against the fond tyrannies of utopia-obsessed majorities besotted with the notion that things would be ever so much nicer if people didn't have them.

K.




Plenty of people get shot in totalitarian regimes.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! - 11/27/2014 1:39:46 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:


ORIGINAL: Kirata

What you frame as a "freedom from being shot" can only be effected by a totalitarian state.


I'm not sure what you can mean by say this, K. Obviously, liberal democracies the world over have almost (though not completely, of course) enabled freedom from being shot as a day-to-day reality. This is true not just in countries (like the UK) that have very strong limitations of gun ownership, but many countries that are more relaxed about gun ownership.

quote:

You may argue that it's not a totalitarian state if the people want it and vote for it, but that is a species of sleight of hand. The mere fact that people voted for it doesn't make it less totalitarian. You are idolizing democracy. Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.


That might be true in theory, but it rarely is in practice. In practice first world countries - including the USA and the UK - are *liberal* democracies. All these blend some idea of democracy (majority of people get what they want) with natural rights. Very few people would want it otherwise and I'm certainly not one of them. I, like most people, hold to the idea that the value of human life is not something to be dispensed with just because a majority want it on a given occasion.

This has nothing to do with the principles of democracy, nor does it make sense to invoke utopianism. The spectre of totalitarianism, despite being beloved of the gun lobby and conjured up wherever possible to frighten those who might just become enemies of their cause. In fact it has to do with the most essential of natural rights, that of life. The implication that it's the paramount right is carried in Jefferson's phrase in the Declaration of Independence, of 'life, liberty and pursuit of happiness'. The British version, 'life, liberty and estate (or 'property', in the sense of the word during the time) clearly also puts 'life' first. The British version was John Locke's phrase, of course. Liberal, but hardly a democrat. Jefferson's phrase in the Declaration of Independence is widely thought to have been based on it.

It's my sense is that it's the erosion of this most fundamental of natural rights that strikes me most about shootings in the USA, particularly. I have the suspicion that the right to self defence - which always had the theoretical potential to clash with that of the right to life - has been pushed so much that it actually has had the effect of diminishing the value of human life.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Stop Knives! Save Lives! Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125