Awareness
Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer A, look, to make this perfectly clear: To make things clear would require you to construct a thought and express it coherently. Given this is a task which you've yet to complete successfully, I'm not holding out any hope. quote:
I've known people who've been able to run rings around me intellectually. Well, that's to be expected, given your position on the bell curve. quote:
I've mixed with lots of them, in fact. But none of them, not one, in all the decades I've been doing what I do, has taken the attitude nor adopted the tone that you consistently take. They've never been anything but polite. You, on the other hand, can't get through a post without pouring as much scorn as possible on the person to whom you're talking. Your aggressiveness; your obsessive need to belittle ... it just makes talking to you an ugly, unpleasant experience. Ye Gods, you're a stupid little man. A) Online dialogue suffers from the online disinhibition effect. Which makes practically everybody on this forum into an unpleasant fucking turd. Including you. So I find your complaints about my attitude hypocritical at best and downright delusional at worst. B) Part of the problem here is that you suffer from a massive case of gnostic knowledge. You think holding the right opinions based upon the right indoctrination is the key to winning any argument. That's an approach so fundamentally opposed to reason that it belittles any pretensions you might have to competence. C) Another part is that you're a product of a class-based society. Your attitude is replete with the idea that "one shouldn't argue with one's betters" - a pompous arrogance which Australians like myself have been pricking for nearly a hundred years. You're a petulant windbag asking to be taken down a peg and I have no compunction about doing exactly that. Your sputtering, incoherent responses are just the icing on the cake. D) There's no connection between intelligence and grace. Who you fucking know and how they've acted in a social setting is completely fucking irrelevant. Whatever point you're trying to make is lost under the weight of fallacious non-thought you're using to make it. quote:
Why would I bother? What's in it for me? Oh, that's clear - you're obsessed. Duh. quote:
I might have put up with it, for a short while, if you'd asked questions or made points that made it worthwhile. But you don't do either. You ask gobsmackingly facile questions like 'Why is there a need for feminism, when there's already a movement for equality?' No, you fucking moron, I don't ask questions (and I've certainly never asked that one), I make statements. I put forward propositions which you're too incompetent to counter, so your response is invariably, "the secret feminist knowledge says you're wrong" - which is just basic lunacy on your part. quote:
and you make points, like that of the 'one true Scotsman' without, apparently, the slightest realisation of how much of a beginner's point it is nor what it could imply beyond the blindingly obvious. Don't be stupid. If it was that elementary, you'd counter it with argument - except you can't because: A) I'm right. B) You're not - as I've pointed out before - remotely competent at the arguing thing. You have no idea how to even begin to construct an argument and it's fucking tedious watching you flail away while desperately trying to avoid having to do so. I'll give you this: You sure as shit know if you tried that you'd have your ass handed to you. Your avoidance of logic and reason is astoundingly consistent. quote:
And when I've responded ... you've always made it abundantly clear that you're not hear to listen or understand. You're here to 'win a competition'. When I get tired of this and begin to ignore you, you triumphantly claim victory, while not - of course - losing the opportunity of braying about what a coward I am for not continuing. Your only response is the assertion of nonsense without a trace of logic, reason or evidence to back it up. To you, feminism is a religious belief which cannot be questioned. This makes you nothing less than a fanatic. quote:
But I can't see any point in continuing. It would be the forum-equivalent of a competition to see which one of us can throw the largest number of dog-turds at the other. We're both going to end up dirty and smelly and I, for one, don't like that feeling and see no benefit from it. I'll believe it when I see it. You're like an Islamic fundamentalist who cannot tolerate any criticism of his Holy Prophet. You're unable to tolerate any criticism - no matter how well founded - of your holy feminist religion. Your entire opposition to criticism is based on dogmatic assertion of what I will - with charity - describe as "utter fucking nonsense". quote:
You say you don't care what I think of you. Fine. I don't need you to. But if you can't learn this - this most fundamental thing about debating - you'll end up with just your own ego to debate with. Dude, what the FUCK do you think you know about debating? You are utterly crap at it. You assert indefensible idiocy as axiomatic then act as though I have a problem because I don't agree with your axioms. The reason I don't agree with your axioms is that they're fucking cross-eyed badger sputum. quote:
Ratchet it down, mate. Seriously. It's doing you no good. Oh for fuck's sake, lift your game. I'm not dropping my IQ down to your level just to make things easy for you. If you can't keep up, that's entirely your own problem.
_____________________________
Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.
|