Gauge
Posts: 5689
Joined: 6/17/2005 Status: offline
|
First of all, I want to thank everyone for their responses. There were a few points that I thought that were noteworthy: quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75 I would like to think universally, at least maturity is a pre-requisite to be a dominant. This is a good point. If you are talking about maturity as having one's own shit together, I agree. Although it also brings up the question of how maturity is defined. I am 50, and I would like to think that I have most of my shit together. There are some areas that I need to work on to be sure, but do those areas reduce my credibility as a dominant as a result? quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact Imagine the cartoon me. The cartoon me just grew horns, chucked, and thought about asking you just how much fun you'd like to have with this thread? I imagined the cartoon you... scary shit. However, if you want to make other points, I am certainly willing to listen. quote:
ORIGINAL: Kaliko So doesn't someone who calls himself Master have to be self proclamed as such? Who else can do it for them? Well, there is that Master Richard that gives a one day crash course and gives you a certificate all for just $100. All kidding aside, In answering who else can do it for them, I might say their partner... but that is also subjective. I have seen the threads from young dominants (I do not do the caps thing, sorry), who, very obviously do not have any fucking idea what they are talking about. Very often, in those threads, I have seen people attack the OP for their age. I have seen other threads where a posters age comes into question relative to their status within the context of BDSM. Make no mistake, I have done this too... mostly to the "One Twue Wayers" and the Pay Princesses. Over the last few days, I have been reviewing old threads, and I started noticing that even young dominants and submissives that appear to have their shit together, get told that they are young and not experienced enough. This disturbed me quite a bit, simply because there is no clear definition of how much experience or what age is sufficient to call one's self a dominant and have credibility as a result. I am reticent to use the word 'ageism' because I do not think that is the case all of the time, but certainly there is an element of it and that bugs me for some reason. The person cannot help that they are their age, and sometimes it gets held against them, and I don't think that is fair. Again, the ones that come here and spew tripe basically earn what they get in return, but the ones that don't and they say something a little wrong, their age sometimes gets pointed to as the cause for their error. While that may be true, it also may not be true simply because they are still learning. I must say, I am enjoying the discussion. Thanks everyone.
_____________________________
"For there is no folly of the beast of the earth which is not infinitely outdone by the madness of men." Herman Melville - Moby Dick I'm wearing my chicken suit and humming La Marseillaise.
|