RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 [5] 6 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 5:08:31 AM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bondageerone

dear Great...... you are entitled to your way,
and the amount of men that want me, purely for sex,
shows me how pathetic they really are.
xx

Yup, no man hating here at all.
Us gals can be pretty pathetic too.

(in reply to bondageerone)

Profile

Post #: 81

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 6:11:47 AM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

fR--ok maybe I missed something but when has sexual preference become bigotry. I think people need to go understand the definition. I won't fuck or have a relationship with a lesbian but that has nothing to do with whether I accept them as a person or what they are. it is just astounding how some people become personally offended by something that has nothing to do with them.

Not wanting to fuck someone for what ever reason should be accepted. Period. No one has the right to try and shame or guilt or manipulate people into sexually accepting something they don't wish to explore or engage. It's a concept of nonconsent.
.

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)

Profile

Post #: 82

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 7:40:11 AM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

I don't have to accept their reason. Objecting to a person reasoning doesn't mean I want to fuck them or want them to fuck me.

I can object to whatever I want, as can they.

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 83

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 8:50:34 AM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

Actually no you can't why because it's none of your business. Objecting to something that is none of your business is thinking people owe you something and your determinations about their sex life is somehow important. Your whole tone against this woman is judgment and the like and you imply her determinations regarding her sex life somehow is about you. Many people here are telling you it's not and you have no right to object to her reasoning because again it doesn't involve you.

you seem to think you are entitled to someone's reason for their decision about who they have sex with. You have attempted to use shame, guilt, and manipulation to get her to change her mind. If a guy would do that to a woman to get her to have sex with him that is wrong. You are doing the same thing to get this woman to accept people she doesn't want to have sex with and put them in her acceptable sex partners because she isn't politically correct and you say her reasons are wrong? Really? That begs the question who the fuck are you? Especially to her.

She has no issue with men outside the sex concept or sexual attraction. It boggles my mind that you claim she should accept others sexual choices while you sit here objecting to hers.

< Message edited by ohthat1percent -- 10/13/2016 8:52:00 AM >

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to Greatlilbabygirl)

Profile

Post #: 84

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 9:01:24 AM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

She asked a question on a message board and made it other people's business. And I could care less if she changed her mind. Her choice. But her reason sucks. She hates bisexual women because penis is gross and men are pathetic? It literally makes no sense.

< Message edited by Greatlilbabygirl -- 10/13/2016 9:02:37 AM >

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 85

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 9:04:21 AM

WickedsDesire

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

I have explained the formula to a successful website umpteen times now and I truly feel sorry for all genuine men looking

ohthat1percent You do not strike me as stupid, ah reincarnation - yes, of course I know this. But you are caught within your own delusions and creations and defended a man with stolen pictures pretend creature is a women. All can feast on that one do not enable its false identity- non identity

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 86

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 9:11:16 AM

Greta75

Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl
Yup, no man hating here at all.
Us gals can be pretty pathetic too.

Lol! This is funny to me, because precisely she is a pure lesbian because she doesn't like men at all!

That's what make her lesbian. They don't like men at all! They aren't suppose to!

I expect them to find men unattractive and gross. That's what being not straight feels like lol.

I find women unattractive and gross, so I have no desire to fuck them. And the thought of having physical contact with another woman makes me sick and revolted.

What is funny is, I don't know why sometimes I have men try to convince me to try a woman, telling me, they are good at giving me orgasms. Like WTF? Little hands touching me, slim wrists! Breasted chests! Yucks!

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 10/13/2016 9:23:22 AM >

(in reply to Greatlilbabygirl)

Profile

Post #: 87

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 9:51:01 AM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

You can not be attracted to someone and not find them gross. That's just mean.

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 88

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 9:59:41 AM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

She asked about lesbians. You are the one whose made this discussion about bisexuals. She gave her reason and instead of respecting that you act as if she is wrong in her decision and must change her mind. It seems because YOU are bixesual. Unless I missed a post she doesn't hate bisexual women anymore than she hates men. She is not attracted to bisexual women. Domt use dramatics and decide someone hates someone because they aren't attracted to them.

Her statements makes ALOT of sense to many people. Perhaps it's you being closed minded and refusing to understand 1) her reasoning are her own, 2) most times there really isn't a way to articulate clearly the objection to being sexually not attracted to certain genders or practices of sex by others.

So no you made it about bisexuals she has been clear as to her not wanting anything but pure lesbian.

You seem to believe asking impersonal questions here ENTITLES you to more information. If her op was im not attracted to bisexuals but law ve lesbians let's discuss why that is - or posts such as your own what am I thread - then sure she's making her choices open to public review. She asked about the shortage of non fluctuating lesbians. Her post was not about her choices and for you to determine who she is attracted to is correct.

Here's the pretty simple idea - it doesn't have to make sense to you. It does make sense to many so maybe it's not her determination that makes no sense but your need for it to make sense. She's not obligated to justify her determinations as to who she finds fuckable.

I won't have sex or get into a relationship with bisexual men and I'm straight. Having the equipment is one thing but if I don't like how you use it even when you aren't with me affects my attraction. It's really that simple. It's rather funny because I've seen discussions where submissive chime in if they would be with or stay with a dominant who was bisexual. There were many responses that said no. I thought that was interesting and no one accused them of being wrong or a bigot or implying it makes no sense.

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 89

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 10:02:14 AM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

Lol Wickeddesires, it's a message board. I like the discussion. It's not as deep as you are making it.

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 90

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 10:24:08 AM

WickedsDesire

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

depth sock one you dare try my glory creature of not one modicum of reality - wretch you dare sit in judgement of I- you are lucky Op is a man (sometimes it has many different stolen women's pictures on its profiles, and yet it continually screetches errant mad waffle and I do not think the two of you combined could be sold for a nice bit of cake

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 91

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 10:24:13 AM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ohthat1percent

She asked about lesbians. You are the one whose made this discussion about bisexuals. She gave her reason and instead of respecting that you act as if she is wrong in her decision and must change her mind. It seems because YOU are bixesual. Unless I missed a post she doesn't hate bisexual women anymore than she hates men. She is not attracted to bisexual women. Domt use dramatics and decide someone hates someone because they aren't attracted to them.

Her statements makes ALOT of sense to many people. Perhaps it's you being closed minded and refusing to understand 1) her reasoning are her own, 2) most times there really isn't a way to articulate clearly the objection to being sexually not attracted to certain genders or practices of sex by others.

So no you made it about bisexuals she has been clear as to her not wanting anything but pure lesbian.

You seem to believe asking impersonal questions here ENTITLES you to more information. If her op was im not attracted to bisexuals but law ve lesbians let's discuss why that is - or posts such as your own what am I thread - then sure she's making her choices open to public review. She asked about the shortage of non fluctuating lesbians. Her post was not about her choices and for you to determine who she is attracted to is correct.

Here's the pretty simple idea - it doesn't have to make sense to you. It does make sense to many so maybe it's not her determination that makes no sense but your need for it to make sense. She's not obligated to justify her determinations as to who she finds fuckable.

I won't have sex or get into a relationship with bisexual men and I'm straight. Having the equipment is one thing but if I don't like how you use it even when you aren't with me affects my attraction. It's really that simple. It's rather funny because I've seen discussions where submissive chime in if they would be with or stay with a dominant who was bisexual. There were many responses that said no. I thought that was interesting and no one accused them of being wrong or a bigot or implying it makes no sense.

Nope. Wrong
Never tried to change her mind. Just thought her reason sucked and still do. Calling men gross and pathetic then dismissing bisexuals because we've touched penis, it doesn't make sense. Penis isn't contagious. Lol

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 92

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 10:44:18 AM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

It does make sense to her. It doesn't have to make sense to you. You insisting that it must make sense to you for it to be ok is sanctimonious. Sorry but despite your insistence it somehow involves you and it's about you and damnit she has not right to make such a determination about her own sexual preferences and attractions cause gee it will hurt someone feelings makes you sound like a child who doesn't understand why someone thinks chocolate ice cream is disgusting cause you enjoy it.

you aren't as open minded as you believe you are. You are very closed minded if this discussion is anything to go by. You judge others choices by your own ignorance as to sexual desire attraction and the like and all that contributes to same do to affect same.

Don't presume your sexual determinations are pure of "make more sense" to anyone but you. just st as the ops determinations make sense to her. That's all that matters. Again, open your closed mind and you may find yourself less confused over her or anyone's sexual choices because they aren't about YOU. Stop trying to figure her out by using your preferences, and perceptions. That is how your judgment is flawed. She's not you.

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to Greatlilbabygirl)

Profile

Post #: 93

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 11:44:48 AM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

No, you are totally not getting what I'm saying at all.

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 94

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 11:56:39 AM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

what I see you saying is the op is wrong in her sexual determinations and decisions of the people she has sex with because you don't approve of her reasons for not incorporating bisexuals and you don't accept it because to you it makes no sense and if I read it correctly it's "mean."

I admittedly have not read all your responses so if you've indicated something else please advise or point me to the post #(s) that says otherwise. Your most resent posts are very clear to me but again I may have taken them out of context as to your whole idea going on here.

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to Greatlilbabygirl)

Profile

Post #: 95

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 12:10:31 PM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: bondageerone

lesbian means women for women,
the site of a mans c...
makes me sick...
I do not hate men..
my pleasure comes from women only.
so bi girls who play both ways are out for me...
xx

So, the mere fact that they like men as well as women, rules them out?

I'm not the only one who questioned her reasoning.

I'm not trying to or even desire having sex with her. But because you find a certain type of person disgusting and a potential partner had been with that type of person in the past being a reason why you automatically don't like them, it's illogical.

I find large tall men unattractive, but I don't think less of a guy or gal who has been with a large tall man. Does that even make sense? How can one complain about a small pool of potential partners when they make that pool small on purpose with their own prejudices?

(Reply to 1percent)

(in reply to OsideGirl)

Profile

Post #: 96

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 12:43:15 PM

ohthat1percent

Posts: 167
Joined: 9/24/2016
Status: offline

I don't care what others are saying - that's not a relevant response to someone questioning your argument. That's a child's response.

Again her reason is illogical TO YOU. Not to her. Again you are viewing things with your closed mind of what's correct when it comes to sexual attractionn. She doesn't want a woman who is bisexual. Attraction especially sexual attraction is not LOGICal. You again are viewing her choices based on your perception.

Again I haven't read all her responses but I didn't get the gist she doesn't this less of people in general only based on her ability to be sexually attracted to them. You seem to be making this far more expanddd than it Really is.

I complain about the lack of men capable of playing in my playing field and my expectations. Doesn't mean my solution is to convince myself to accept people I wouldn't connect with no matter how great of a person they are. I'm not willing to be that dishonest with myself or them. It doesn't mean there isn't frustration at the lack of choices and until this post was detracted from regarding bisexual choices for her - she might have gotten some ideas of how else to search or find exactly what she is looking for.

Again a persons sexual determination for partners is theirs and theirs alone- who are you to imply or state they are deciding incorrectly?

Again you are looking at this with a closed mind. Until you are willing to see it from her perspective - you will never get it. It's ok to be closed minded. I am very much so in a lot of things. But admit you aren't willing to acknowledge her perspective.

< Message edited by ohthat1percent -- 10/13/2016 12:44:01 PM >

_____________________________

A dominant man is not a man who is content to simply receive submission; a dominant man is not so obliging.

(in reply to Greatlilbabygirl)

Profile

Post #: 97

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 12:48:49 PM

WickedsDesire

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

I doubt there are 10 genuine women on this place with a reality - why wicked you have that and et no one else does shall you crush them all

(in reply to ohthat1percent)

Profile

Post #: 98

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 1:00:40 PM

UllrsIshtar

Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

I doubt there are 10 genuine women on this place with a reality

You know, you can keep saying that over and over again, in any thread you find until the end of time, but the women on here are STILL not going to be dumb enough to react by thinking that they somehow owe it to you -or themselves- to prove you wrong.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to WickedsDesire)

Profile

Post #: 99

RE: ON C/S A REAL SHORTAGE OF - 10/13/2016 2:13:27 PM

Greatlilbabygirl

Posts: 786
Joined: 9/9/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ohthat1percent

I don't care what others are saying - that's not a relevant response to someone questioning your argument. That's a child's response.

Again her reason is illogical TO YOU. Not to her. Again you are viewing things with your closed mind of what's correct when it comes to sexual attractionn. She doesn't want a woman who is bisexual. Attraction especially sexual attraction is not LOGICal. You again are viewing her choices based on your perception.

Again I haven't read all her responses but I didn't get the gist she doesn't this less of people in general only based on her ability to be sexually attracted to them. You seem to be making this far more expanddd than it Really is.

I complain about the lack of men capable of playing in my playing field and my expectations. Doesn't mean my solution is to convince myself to accept people I wouldn't connect with no matter how great of a person they are. I'm not willing to be that dishonest with myself or them. It doesn't mean there isn't frustration at the lack of choices and until this post was detracted from regarding bisexual choices for her - she might have gotten some ideas of how else to search or find exactly what she is looking for.

Again a persons sexual determination for partners is theirs and theirs alone- who are you to imply or state they are deciding incorrectly?

Again you are looking at this with a closed mind. Until you are willing to see it from her perspective - you will never get it. It's ok to be closed minded. I am very much so in a lot of things. But admit you aren't willing to acknowledge her perspective.