Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Women's March


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Women's March Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:04:00 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75

I never said that. You are putting words into my mouth. I am saying, we are contributing money to the US by buying from them Made in the USA products.


That third world shithole does not "contribute" a phoquing dime to amerika. That third world shithole called singapore is a retail customer for our comercial production


I am sure US buys nothing from us. So in that, they win, and we simply give them free money!

Wrong again sweet pea....that third world shithole called singapore does not give anything to amerika...but amerika does take a lot of your cpf and in return you get airplanes that wont fly...roflmfao



Not true again. You can print articles to criticize the government as long as it's constructive.

But many articles get on our local papers criticizing the government policies that people disagree with. Constructive ones, offering alternative solutions. These are things our government want to hear. IF you disagree. What are your solutions? And they do listen and implement if it makes sense. Especially in our last Election. We wrote so many complain letters about so many things and they made all the changes,

I think you are fuill of shit. How about you post up these critical articles that you claim are in the paper. Then how about you post up for us the official government website showing how these criticisms were addressed. Otherwise it is just some more of your usual chin music.


Because we fought for racial equality. IF you know anything about Malaysia. They only believe in Malay FIRST policies, all other races are second class citizens. So Chinese and indians will get inferior privileges. It's a very race based country. Singapore was fighting for equality for Indians and Chinese and got kicked out. Until today, Malaysia still haven't reached equality for all races. It's still a Malay First country.


How would that differ from your boy donnie's "amerika first" policy



(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:34:06 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Knew lots of women who participated. Very inspiring.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:01:28 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Complicated red tape....

Another term for that is "go directly to the gallows, no trial, no questions."

You don't trust your government to make fair decisions. That's why US courts have jury to help the judge make his decision. And our courts, UK courts, just have a judge who judges. We need to appoint the right judge to make the right judgement.

Same with ISA. Who-ever decides who is guilty, is almost like a Judge and gets to decide. That person is obviously carefully selected like a Judge is.

I've always been very outspoken and said alot of inflammatory things. I've even gone face to face to our Minister of Labour and argued with him heatedly about things, letting him know how I feel about at one point of time, the stupid foreign labour work permits and how it works.

IF ISA was unfair, I would have been arrested.

Yet ISA has been detaining potential Islamic Terrorists lately and really put to good use to prevent Lone Wolves attacks.


quote:

And any government that cannot tolerate criticism of any sort, constructive or not, is not one I would live under. Kind of reminds me of Stalinist Russia, Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Franco's Spain....Part of the value of free speech is the right to criticize the government WITHOUT fear of reprisal.

I think you aren't listening that constructive criticism is allowed. Disrespectful Criticism is not allowed. Asia as a whole, is all about respect for each other. Try insulting a King in Thailand and see what happens? Every Asian country believes in respectful dialogue. We actually think it's disgraceful like, how people are calling Obama words like "Monkey" and calling Michelle a "transsexual", because that's disrespectful and now, all the things they are calling Trump, "Orange Orang Utan" or something.

If they had express their criticism in a non-personal attack manner and stick to the issues and offer alternative solutions. This person would NEVER get in trouble.

If you notice, even in this political discourse, I refrain from personal attacks as much as possible, because when I am clashing with my government, I have to. It's what we are brought up to believe that political disagreement can be done in a respectful manner. And I am sure people can express their opposing views without making it personal. It IS possible ya know!

Not like the way you guys do it. But that's the West. And this is Asia. We believe in different ways of expressing disagreements with government. Respectful Tone is utmost importance over here.


In a free society (key word FREE) criticism of any kind is tolerated.

If the United States had your system, 90% of comics would be in jail, the rest would be accountants.

I got 'constructive' criticism is allowed, but who determines if it is constructive? Historically, the abolition of slavery was constructive, however, when you look at it from a slave owner's point of view, of which the governors and state legislatures of the slave states were made up of, it was not constructive at all.

Constructive is not just a matter of context, but point of view.

As for just a judge making a decision on guilt or innocence, that is putting too much power in the hands of one man, hence the jury system.

And finally, the ability to hold an individual without trial for any length of time just because they disagreed with the government is not he sign of a free society, it is repressive and totalitarian.

Hence the problem that I have with the detention center at Gitmo. IF they actually had proof these detainees were terrorists that would stand up in a court of law, in ANY country, they would have been had a trial.

Everything you said and used the word respect is insanely naive. It is not respect that keeps people from saying what they truly think, it is fear.

Imprisoned for a political cartoon? Seriously?

Have you ever looked at the editorial cartoons in American Papers? Christ, everyone of those men and women would be in prison under your system.

And, from experience, there is a time when 'respectful criticism' stops working and you have to be an ass to make a point. If a government cant accept that, then it is time to get rid of the government.

I have many friends who are Asian, and yes, they are probably the most respectful people I know. But I have also seen them reach the point where respect be damned, and they speak exactly what they are thinking and feel.

Funny thing, when that point is reached, you cant help but listen.

And, with all that said, you missed my point.

Which was, no country or gender or religion has the right from ANY source to dictate to another country or countries how to run their own society.

If you believe that, then you would have to accept that if some future President of the United States decided that your government was too oppressive, then he would have the right to send troops in to force a cultural change within Singapore.

If that is wrong for some American president to do, then it is just as wrong for people to demand that Saudi Arabia or any country change to suit your idea of what is right or wrong.

It is one thing to voice the fact you think it is wrong, or condemn whatever it is. But when you demand they change to suit your ideas of right and wrong, you have over stepped the line.

Do I agree with how women are treated in some Muslim countries or cultures, no.
Do I think it is wrong, hell yes.
Do I have the right to demand they change, no.

Like every other people, they must decide on their own to make the changes. At that point I have the right to aid them financially or how ever I can.

Until that time, all I have the right to do is voice an opinion.

Of course there is a term for that, it is called respect.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:09:10 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Greta75


Because end of the day, as I said. Take Saudi for example. Women are hostages in their own country. Even if they want to run away, leave Saudi, they can't. It's illegal. They need their father's or husband's permission, or they will be punished and jailed for leaving the country without that permission.


I often wonder just how stupid you really are.
If a saudi woman left the country without the proper permission how would the saudi government arrest her. What country would extradite her?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


Greta said if they 'wanted' to run away... not actually already left.
And yes, they wouldn't get through passport control without their male escort and yes, they would indeed be arrested.

From usatoday: While traveling to Saudi Arabia is difficult for women, leaving can mean even more trouble. Women relocating to Saudi Arabia to marry, study or stay with a Saudi family need to be aware that leaving the country requires the permission of the Saudi male head of their household. Unmarried women and children require the permission of their father or male guardian.

They can be arrested and given jail sentences and public lashes just for not wearing their stoopid veils!!
They have a special police force called the 'morality' police that go around specifically looking for women breaking those crazy laws.

Yeah... it's a fucked-up country, like many Islamic countries.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:54:57 AM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline
Greta

quote:

Do you think Feminists took just ONE activity to instill voting rights, property rights, right to education to women? They took years of failures to finally reach there.


Jesus, does it determine how many protests feminists do? For example, one president or politician may say it takes 5 protests to make me change my mind. They have only done 3 for now, so they have to do 2 more to be rewarded their wish.

Can you see how ridiculous that is? Well, that's feminist thinking for you.

Feminists seem to take all the credit in what women gained that they didn't have before. I believe it may be to do with technological advancement and generally the changes in how the world works rather than what a bunch of squealing feminists said on the streets.

Feminists have been going apeshit on the streets for decades about domestic violence against women. Has this stopped domestic violence against women? Nope. Why would a man who knows it's going to hurt a woman and make her cry when he hits her but is an offender anyway change his mind of doing it ever again due to a bunch of whiny feminists on the street?

Feminists have been going apeshit on the streets for decades about rape against women. Has this stopped rape against women? Nope.What makes you think that a bunch of whiny feminists on the street is going to change the mind of a sociopath rapist who doesn't care if the woman is crying and screaming when he is raping the said victim?

Feminists have been going apeshit on the streets for decades about wage gap. Has this stopped wage gap? Nope. Even that their wage gap theory is totally bogus, that's why I think feminists just can't solve the imaginary problem. Anyway, so let's pretend the feminist theory of wage gap is the truth. Still protesting I see? How many more years?

I can go on and on but I'm getting sick of typing this post already. I guess in magical feminist fairy land, they know this secret conspiracy. The evil patriarchy powers that be are demanding feminists to do at least a million protest or so for the evil patriarchy to grant them their wishes. Unfortunately one feminist can't do all of this in her life time. This is why it's taking many decades, too many to reach the million mark or so. It's hard for these poor feminazis to keep up.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 8:37:56 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
I think you are fuill of shit. How about you post up these critical articles that you claim are in the paper. Then how about you post up for us the official government website showing how these criticisms were addressed. Otherwise it is just some more of your usual chin music.

Gosh too bad it's not election season now, otherwise, there would be plenty to pull out. These letters are usually published in the Straits Times Forum. And then the government responds also in the Straits Times Forum. I'd just have to wait for our government to make another big Boo Boo, and then you'd see swarms of citizens criticizing their "incompetence" and demanding they do better. Our government get alot of crap because of their high salaries and we are like their bosses. Currently, besides suffering heavy non stop rains and floodings, which they will be blamed for not making our drainage system good enough, and our Made in China trains are still breaking down. There is no major political disagreement going on in our country. I am not happy with the Made in China Trains because we used to buy trains from Germany and Japan that has zero problems. Ever since they switch to China, the train keeps breaking down. Certainly an area where it's a great mistake for our government to save cost on. When we criticize the government, it's always about competency and efficiency. We just want everything to work.

Here's one complain:http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/all-complaints-about-lifts-must-be-taken-seriously

And Government respond: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/housing/hdb-bans-firm-from-new-lift-projects-after-breakdowns
http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/govt-roll-out-s450m-programme-improve-hdb-lifts-safety-features

Our country don't have major issues because everything is run efficiently, our government is over all doing a great job, so basically, these are things we complain about. And even then, it gets taken care of.

Here's one criticising the changes to re-employment law: http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/changes-to-re-employment-act-do-not-guard-against-ageism
Government reply: http://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/changes-to-re-employment-law-offer-more-opportunities-for-older-workers

As you can see, the tone is very respectful, but pragmatic. If the government can fix it, they will fix it. IF it's a valid criticism they need to do something about it.

quote:

How would that differ from your boy donnie's "amerika first" policy

America First protects Americans of ALL races. Malay First only Protects the specific race Malays. You can be Malaysian Chinese or Malaysian Indian or Malaysian Caucasian and you will not be protected. Trump plans to protect black americans, hispanic americans, white americans, asian americans, all americans.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 1/24/2017 9:00:58 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 9:19:24 AM   
itsSIRtou


Posts: 836
Joined: 3/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

You people constantly whine abiut Trump on this forum....so what are you doing about it? How are you in the process of stopping Trump?

Same standards, fair competition :)

Greta for example complains about muslims a lot. So what is she doing about it?

See how easy it is to point out the idiotic hypocrisy?



I dont think you would understand the concept of activism, because if you did, you would take the advice that has been offered to you over and over again over the years.
Even by other misogynists and their other halves or thirds or however many they have...all props to them.
So, im sorry, but you need to read some of your old threads about how people here do things they are passionate about.
its all been said...
you just dont seem to be able to get it...






I don't take your so called advice because I'm not stupid like you.

You are asking me to do things that will result to nothing. What's the point of doing something that doesn't end at the result I want? That's how I'm smarter than you.

You see how no one can come up with an answer and show actual citations and evidence that this march achieved something?

This is exactly what I mean. Your so called advice is laughable. Just because I'm not stupid like you, that doesn't mean I'm too slack to do anything. The problem is there is absolutely nothing I can do.

Making a cunt of myself on the street, shouting and holiding signs, isn't going make problems magically disappear.

Again, you see how no one has anything to show that this march achieved anything? As no one comes up with evidence that it has, this pretty much proves my point. I win the argument. I rest my case.



instead u make a cunt AND ass of urself here just about every day. u have nothing to show that u've directly changed anything anywhere.

ur constant whining (what u call posting.)  in most cases does exactly the opposite of ur intent, - it pushes forward the notion that it does not take intelligence to be a conservative or just being a white male.   it just takes contempt for anyone not u.

The greatest indicator of disgust with ur own life is the effort ur puting into trying bringing down others lives and THAT indeed is what u project in about every thread Ive seen u post or post in.

At least when those THOUSANDS of people go home they do so with a positive attitude that will carry into doing positive things in their neiborhoods. All ur going to do is post another thread that shows how sucky ur life is and ur pissed off at everyone else for ur self-suckyness. 

Again, u see how no one has anything to show that ur posting achieved anything?  As no one CAN come up with evidence that it has, Or ever will.... that pretty much proves My point.

I win ur argument. I rest My case.




_____________________________

I will allways be a knight, instead of a prince.

What would the internet be like if we couldn't say trump is a moron?

The Republican party complains government doesnt work for people, and then makes darn sure it cannot.

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 9:23:38 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Greta... a lot of women didn't agree with the women's march, so it is not giving a platform to 'Women'... just a segment of women.

While I respect a woman's right to want to be dependent on a man.
But over all, it is not practical unless 100% of women are guaranteed a good man who will not abuse them and treat them well. Which is not a reality in this world.

So yes, there are women out there who do not support Feminism that are not represented in this Women's March.

But to me. The core of Feminism is about giving women choices or encouraging women to make choices in life that will not give them the potential of being a victim. So even if for example if a woman chooses to focus on family and her man. These women still needs to be encourage to for example, still have her own money separate from her husband, have her own savings. Maintain some sort of independence. Which is why Feminists talk about homemaker allowances as a salary. To make sure these women will always have their own dough in case of abuse and they got to leave.

Their agenda is right.

I think it serves no purpose to include voices of women who wants to promote the dependent on men way of life, and just taking a back seat and letting the men run the world, because I believe, it makes a woman helpless, IF she didn't find a good man to take care of her. And that is dangerous to her own well being IF she chose the wrong man in my opinion.

If she chooses the right one, then of course, it will be a very happy life for her.

I want Muslim women to have choices for example. Currently they do not. And if after being given choices, they still choose what was enforced upon them, then, all is good, the key is. I want them to do it by choice and not by force which most of them in Muslim countries are doing right now.

It's not a choice when you can get in trouble with the law for not following.

I just see the woman's march an inspiration to women stuck in Islamic countries where they have no choices and are oppressed as women. That one day, they can have their own women's march there too, unite and have a voice.

Because end of the day, as I said. Take Saudi for example. Women are hostages in their own country. Even if they want to run away, leave Saudi, they can't. It's illegal. They need their father's or husband's permission, or they will be punished and jailed for leaving the country without that permission. That is not right! And being imprisoned in a country that only favours men cannot possibly be paradise.

Even western women who fantasizes about extreme slavery wouldn't want to live in Saudi Arabia. Because they know they will experience real slavery there and their choice would truly be taken away from them forever even if they change their minds later.



It's not that conservative women necessarily want to be dependent on a man or not.

It is the moral issues which many of these women represent that conservative women completely disagree with. To call it a 'women's march' when many women disagree with abortion, for example, doesn't seem right. They should call it a feminist march, not a women's march.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 9:45:00 AM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

You people constantly whine abiut Trump on this forum....so what are you doing about it? How are you in the process of stopping Trump?

Same standards, fair competition :)

Greta for example complains about muslims a lot. So what is she doing about it?

See how easy it is to point out the idiotic hypocrisy?



I dont think you would understand the concept of activism, because if you did, you would take the advice that has been offered to you over and over again over the years.
Even by other misogynists and their other halves or thirds or however many they have...all props to them.
So, im sorry, but you need to read some of your old threads about how people here do things they are passionate about.
its all been said...
you just dont seem to be able to get it...






I don't take your so called advice because I'm not stupid like you.

You are asking me to do things that will result to nothing. What's the point of doing something that doesn't end at the result I want? That's how I'm smarter than you.

You see how no one can come up with an answer and show actual citations and evidence that this march achieved something?

This is exactly what I mean. Your so called advice is laughable. Just because I'm not stupid like you, that doesn't mean I'm too slack to do anything. The problem is there is absolutely nothing I can do.

Making a cunt of myself on the street, shouting and holiding signs, isn't going make problems magically disappear.

Again, you see how no one has anything to show that this march achieved anything? As no one comes up with evidence that it has, this pretty much proves my point. I win the argument. I rest my case.



instead u make a cunt AND ass of urself here just about every day. u have nothing to show that u've directly changed anything anywhere.

ur constant whining (what u call posting.)  in most cases does exactly the opposite of ur intent, - it pushes forward the notion that it does not take intelligence to be a conservative or just being a white male.   it just takes contempt for anyone not u.

The greatest indicator of disgust with ur own life is the effort ur puting into trying bringing down others lives and THAT indeed is what u project in about every thread Ive seen u post or post in.

At least when those THOUSANDS of people go home they do so with a positive attitude that will carry into doing positive things in their neiborhoods. All ur going to do is post another thread that shows how sucky ur life is and ur pissed off at everyone else for ur self-suckyness. 

Again, u see how no one has anything to show that ur posting achieved anything?  As no one CAN come up with evidence that it has, Or ever will.... that pretty much proves My point.

I win ur argument. I rest My case.






This is a random forum and everyone on here posts random shit about topics. Whatever is posted on here in this politics forum, no matter what member of the forum, it will never go any further than collarspace. Meaning... it will never gain more importance compared to the existence of collarspace.

This forum is entertainment. Nothing more. If you think it's more, it shows how damn empty your life is, dude.

I can't see anything positive about a march when it's all based on RANTS. Seriously, dumbass. As if people go home with a positive attitude about being in something that incites their anger even more than what they had to begin with.

(in reply to itsSIRtou)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 9:47:23 AM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline
quote:

It is the moral issues which many of these women represent that conservative women completely disagree with. To call it a 'women's march' when many women disagree with abortion, for example, doesn't seem right. They should call it a feminist march, not a women's march.


Absolutely correct!

That throws a big spanner in the feminazi works.


(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 9:58:47 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
In a free society (key word FREE) criticism of any kind is tolerated.

If the United States had your system, 90% of comics would be in jail, the rest would be accountants.

If United States had our system, the comics like SNL will change their tone and make their jokes less inflammatory, less mean and more light hearted. They will adjust. And they will be fine.

I am not trying to convince you that our system is better than your system. Because different society have different culture and beliefs that works perfectly for their country. In my Utopia, I do wish we live in a world where we can always have honest exchanges and disagreements without resorting to violence. For that to happen, we need a very mature thinking society.

And it's good on US, your core belief as an American, although the lefties might threaten this as they wanna criminalize hate speech right? But Hate Speech is still free speech right? Hate speech is definitely criminalize in my country. But your core belief as an American is that, you can disagree, say whatever you want strongly, and that's what American society is based on. You are willing to risk possible consequences, you'd rather deal with the possible consequences like offended people retaliating with violence than to give up your right to say whatever you want. To me, that's American culture. And I don't want you guys to change that. It's uniquely what makes America.

And no matter what, in a free speech society, there will always be somebody who feels offended by words enough to take action to do something violent in response. It happens in the US and other Western Nations. But when an incident happen, they are a big country, it's usually just at some small area, they recover from it.

For us, I keep saying, it just takes 4 hours to walk from north to south of my country. We can't afford the possibility of such things going on. So for my country. Total Free Speech will never be right for us. We can't handle the consequences and all the non-stop protests and possible riots that could result in it. It would be too disruptive to our country.

quote:

Constructive is not just a matter of context, but point of view.

In my country, it is very clear, that if what you said caused social discord, or if you are encouraging people to protest, riot, things like that, that's not constructive. And Chia Thye Poh was all about causing social discord rather than anything constructive. He basically declared "the means of the struggle would be "street demonstrations, protest meetings, strikes"". Even in today's Singapore if someone openly declare that they are going go against the government with all THESE means. ISA is gonna come knocking at their door.

Things like London Riots, and all the Black Lives Matters Protest and Trump Protests. Really we don't want all that things here. It's disruptive. There wasn't even Women's March in Singapore because it's disruptive! Not legal for them to do it.

quote:

As for just a judge making a decision on guilt or innocence, that is putting too much power in the hands of one man, hence the jury system.
And finally, the ability to hold an individual without trial for any length of time just because they disagreed with the government is not he sign of a free society, it is repressive and totalitarian.

Well in many ways, after watching so many "Practice" and "Boston Legal" episodes. Those programs exposes so many flaws in the Jury system. And how you can also influence the Jury if you knew in advance their demographic. So I don't think it's really working either for a really fair trial.

Whereas if you can figure out a system where you keep appointing really fair and honourable people as Judges. You can always get fair judgement done all the time too. And the whole point of a Judge is, this person does have alot of power, to decide what you deserve for your crimes. Same type Calibre person, with very clear parameters, of how their decision should be made, can also decide who deserves ISA detention very fairly. Until today, I absolutely do not believe people will be detained in ISA without being serious threats to the peace of our country. The only reason you are detained under ISA is if they believe you are gonna do something that disrupts the day to day peace of our lives.

I don't feel the Jury System is the fairer system at all, especially when people like OJ can get off.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 1/24/2017 10:07:56 AM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 10:27:56 AM   
itsSIRtou


Posts: 836
Joined: 3/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen


quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

You people constantly whine abiut Trump on this forum....so what are you doing about it? How are you in the process of stopping Trump?

Same standards, fair competition :)

Greta for example complains about muslims a lot. So what is she doing about it?

See how easy it is to point out the idiotic hypocrisy?



I dont think you would understand the concept of activism, because if you did, you would take the advice that has been offered to you over and over again over the years.
Even by other misogynists and their other halves or thirds or however many they have...all props to them.
So, im sorry, but you need to read some of your old threads about how people here do things they are passionate about.
its all been said...
you just dont seem to be able to get it...






I don't take your so called advice because I'm not stupid like you.

You are asking me to do things that will result to nothing. What's the point of doing something that doesn't end at the result I want? That's how I'm smarter than you.

You see how no one can come up with an answer and show actual citations and evidence that this march achieved something?

This is exactly what I mean. Your so called advice is laughable. Just because I'm not stupid like you, that doesn't mean I'm too slack to do anything. The problem is there is absolutely nothing I can do.

Making a cunt of myself on the street, shouting and holiding signs, isn't going make problems magically disappear.

Again, you see how no one has anything to show that this march achieved anything? As no one comes up with evidence that it has, this pretty much proves my point. I win the argument. I rest my case.



instead u make a cunt AND ass of urself here just about every day. u have nothing to show that u've directly changed anything anywhere.

ur constant whining (what u call posting.)  in most cases does exactly the opposite of ur intent, - it pushes forward the notion that it does not take intelligence to be a conservative or just being a white male.   it just takes contempt for anyone not u.

The greatest indicator of disgust with ur own life is the effort ur puting into trying bringing down others lives and THAT indeed is what u project in about every thread Ive seen u post or post in.

At least when those THOUSANDS of people go home they do so with a positive attitude that will carry into doing positive things in their neiborhoods. All ur going to do is post another thread that shows how sucky ur life is and ur pissed off at everyone else for ur self-suckyness. 

Again, u see how no one has anything to show that ur posting achieved anything?  As no one CAN come up with evidence that it has, Or ever will.... that pretty much proves My point.

I win ur argument. I rest My case.






This is a random forum and everyone on here posts random shit about topics. Whatever is posted on here in this politics forum, no matter what member of the forum, it will never go any further than collarspace. Meaning... it will never gain more importance compared to the existence of collarspace.

This forum is entertainment. Nothing more. If you think it's more, it shows how damn empty your life is, dude.

I can't see anything positive about a march when it's all based on RANTS. Seriously, dumbass. As if people go home with a positive attitude about being in something that incites their anger even more than what they had to begin with.



thank u for confirming My post....

The explanation is simple.......u cant see anything positive in those marchers because u aren't a positive person in ur own life... u DO nothing positive in ur own life.... and u come here to fake & fool urself doing something here.

ur MISREABLE!!  all u RANT is screaming ur misery.  And also thank u for now agreeing ur ranting ur misery and ur faking doing something about it here is entertainment.  

so what ur posting here is meaningless...what else does that say about u....exactly?


< Message edited by itsSIRtou -- 1/24/2017 10:39:35 AM >


_____________________________

I will allways be a knight, instead of a prince.

What would the internet be like if we couldn't say trump is a moron?

The Republican party complains government doesnt work for people, and then makes darn sure it cannot.

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 10:30:00 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
And again you failed (no great surprise) to address the key question I asked, or the point I made in my original post about human rights abuses in your country.

Which is (and I will help you see it):

Do you really believe that any group of people OR country has the right to demand or threaten a country and demand they change the way they do things just because you or some group thinks they are wrong?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 12:24:54 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Don't feel bad about not understanding our system, most liberal Americans do not understand that we had 51 separate elections, and that Trump won most of them.

I have a reasonable understanding of your system.
I don't quite understand why some states have winner takes all and some don't tho.
It should be consistent across the board.

I've looked at EC numbers too.
Not sure I agree with the demographics of it, but that's what you have.
I think the simplest and fairest system is one man one vote.
A simple majority wins the pot - right down to the last vote.

If you had that system, HRC would have won.
Though I'm not convinced she would be any better.

I just hope Trump doesn't screw up and drop the USA in the shit.


A I am convinced that she would have been much worse, and I have been watching her for more than two decades.
B When are you going to that system? Are you going to tell me that if one party sweeps London and several other large cities but loses everything outside the cities so that it turns out the party with the cities gets more votes but the other party get the majority of parliament that you give the Prime Ministers's position to the cities candidate? Would you reallyignore who had the majority of parliament?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 1:11:52 PM   
itsSIRtou


Posts: 836
Joined: 3/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Don't feel bad about not understanding our system, most liberal Americans do not understand that we had 51 separate elections, and that Trump won most of them.

I have a reasonable understanding of your system.
I don't quite understand why some states have winner takes all and some don't tho.
It should be consistent across the board.

I've looked at EC numbers too.
Not sure I agree with the demographics of it, but that's what you have.
I think the simplest and fairest system is one man one vote.
A simple majority wins the pot - right down to the last vote.

If you had that system, HRC would have won.
Though I'm not convinced she would be any better.

I just hope Trump doesn't screw up and drop the USA in the shit.


oh that's pretty much a certainty IF rump and the repugnicans deficit spend & tax cut their way into the next recession ...according to just about every economist on google....it will make the 2007-08 recession look like a Sunday school picnic. 

bamad only watched Hillary on rumpTV or else he'd seen how much rumps economic policies really suck.   

but don't look for the true "shit" to come out until after the 2020 election when rumps got nothing to lose.   then Im feeling America will be rumps chapter11 #7.


.

< Message edited by itsSIRtou -- 1/24/2017 1:18:40 PM >


_____________________________

I will allways be a knight, instead of a prince.

What would the internet be like if we couldn't say trump is a moron?

The Republican party complains government doesnt work for people, and then makes darn sure it cannot.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 1:15:06 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

It's not that conservative women necessarily want to be dependent on a man or not.

It is the moral issues which many of these women represent that conservative women completely disagree with. To call it a 'women's march' when many women disagree with abortion, for example, doesn't seem right. They should call it a feminist march, not a women's march.



I don't recall the exact circumstance, but a women's pro-life group was somehow not allowed to join in.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 1:21:32 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Don't feel bad about not understanding our system, most liberal Americans do not understand that we had 51 separate elections, and that Trump won most of them.

I have a reasonable understanding of your system.
I don't quite understand why some states have winner takes all and some don't tho.
It should be consistent across the board.

I've looked at EC numbers too.
Not sure I agree with the demographics of it, but that's what you have.
I think the simplest and fairest system is one man one vote.
A simple majority wins the pot - right down to the last vote.

If you had that system, HRC would have won.
Though I'm not convinced she would be any better.

I just hope Trump doesn't screw up and drop the USA in the shit.


A I am convinced that she would have been much worse, and I have been watching her for more than two decades.
B When are you going to that system? Are you going to tell me that if one party sweeps London and several other large cities but loses everything outside the cities so that it turns out the party with the cities gets more votes but the other party get the majority of parliament that you give the Prime Ministers's position to the cities candidate? Would you reallyignore who had the majority of parliament?

We don't have that system for voting a party into power.
We have something called 'first past the post' system which I don't like.
But for each constituent area (each single MP), we do use that single-vote system.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 1:28:44 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Don't feel bad about not understanding our system, most liberal Americans do not understand that we had 51 separate elections, and that Trump won most of them.

I have a reasonable understanding of your system.
I don't quite understand why some states have winner takes all and some don't tho.
It should be consistent across the board.

I've looked at EC numbers too.
Not sure I agree with the demographics of it, but that's what you have.
I think the simplest and fairest system is one man one vote.
A simple majority wins the pot - right down to the last vote.

If you had that system, HRC would have won.
Though I'm not convinced she would be any better.

I just hope Trump doesn't screw up and drop the USA in the shit.


If you think that we have one election instead of 51 you have no understanding of our system.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 1:31:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Don't feel bad about not understanding our system, most liberal Americans do not understand that we had 51 separate elections, and that Trump won most of them.

I have a reasonable understanding of your system.
I don't quite understand why some states have winner takes all and some don't tho.
It should be consistent across the board.

I've looked at EC numbers too.
Not sure I agree with the demographics of it, but that's what you have.
I think the simplest and fairest system is one man one vote.
A simple majority wins the pot - right down to the last vote.

If you had that system, HRC would have won.
Though I'm not convinced she would be any better.

I just hope Trump doesn't screw up and drop the USA in the shit.


A I am convinced that she would have been much worse, and I have been watching her for more than two decades.
B When are you going to that system? Are you going to tell me that if one party sweeps London and several other large cities but loses everything outside the cities so that it turns out the party with the cities gets more votes but the other party get the majority of parliament that you give the Prime Ministers's position to the cities candidate? Would you reallyignore who had the majority of parliament?

We don't have that system for voting a party into power.
We have something called 'first past the post' system which I don't like.
But for each constituent area (each single MP), we do use that single-vote system.



Are you actually trying to tell me that the majority party doesn't get the Prime minister ?
So while you are trying to hide it that is exactly how it works.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 1:34:36 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Don't feel bad about not understanding our system, most liberal Americans do not understand that we had 51 separate elections, and that Trump won most of them.

I have a reasonable understanding of your system.
I don't quite understand why some states have winner takes all and some don't tho.
It should be consistent across the board.

I've looked at EC numbers too.
Not sure I agree with the demographics of it, but that's what you have.
I think the simplest and fairest system is one man one vote.
A simple majority wins the pot - right down to the last vote.

If you had that system, HRC would have won.
Though I'm not convinced she would be any better.

I just hope Trump doesn't screw up and drop the USA in the shit.


A I am convinced that she would have been much worse, and I have been watching her for more than two decades.
B When are you going to that system? Are you going to tell me that if one party sweeps London and several other large cities but loses everything outside the cities so that it turns out the party with the cities gets more votes but the other party get the majority of parliament that you give the Prime Ministers's position to the cities candidate? Would you reallyignore who had the majority of parliament?

We don't have that system for voting a party into power.
We have something called 'first past the post' system which I don't like.
But for each constituent area (each single MP), we do use that single-vote system.



And are you going to claim that the total vote for a party makes any difference there?
We both know better?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Women's March Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.137