Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Women's March


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Women's March Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 2:14:42 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
And are you going to claim that the total vote for a party makes any difference there?
We both know better?

In quite a few elections.... yes, it would have made a difference.
Much like some of your elections over there.

For example, UKIP had over 4 million votes yet only got one single seat in parliament.
Where they campaigned, they frequently and significantly beat one of the major parties into 3rd or 4th place and comprehensively beat the Lib Dems in almost all of their 'home' areas.
Yet the Lib Dems managed to hold 8 seats in parliament. Go figure.

But we have what systems we have and I don't see them changing any time soon.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 2:20:08 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
And are you going to claim that the total vote for a party makes any difference there?
We both know better?

In quite a few elections.... yes, it would have made a difference.
Much like some of your elections over there.

For example, UKIP had over 4 million votes yet only got one single seat in parliament.
Where they campaigned, they frequently and significantly beat one of the major parties into 3rd or 4th place and comprehensively beat the Lib Dems in almost all of their 'home' areas.
Yet the Lib Dems managed to hold 8 seats in parliament. Go figure.

But we have what systems we have and I don't see them changing any time soon.


Remove the bean from your eye before you complain about the mote in your neighbors eye.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 2:22:24 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
I'm dissing both systems - equally.

I think Proportional Representation for voting is simpler and more representative of the voting public.
Neither of us are using such a system.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 4:51:19 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I'm dissing both systems - equally.

I think Proportional Representation for voting is simpler and more representative of the voting public.
Neither of us are using such a system.




Screw it, make me God Emperor of the Planet, and I promise fair and impartial treatment for everyone.....

Okay, maybe with the exception of a certain twit from Singapore....

I promise a tax rater of no higher than 4% of gross income per person.
I promise that government money will NOT be spent on such things as the mating habits of some spider in the Amazon, unless such study will prevent injury or death to some citizen in said Amazon.

I promise a two part health care system, if you want free health care, great, however you will have the option to go to a private insurance carrier and pick your own doctors and treatments... understanding you can never switch back because the insurance carrier decided that whatever illness you get is too expensive to treat.

I promise reasonable and sensible gun control laws, and the penalty for using a gun to commit a crime is a minimum of 50 years BEFORE eligible for parole, kill a person with a gun, simple, you hang in the court house square in the city where the crime was committed.

Dealers of illegal drugs will face mandatory minimums of not less than 20 years.

Addicts to illegal drugs will get treatment for their addiction, and be monitored for not less than 10 years... one dirty drug test, five years in prison.

Marijuana will be legalized and taxed in the same way as alcohol.

Salary caps on professional sports players. Forget this 5 million a season crap. Bring back people playing the game because the love the game not because they want to get rich.

There will be one new holiday created....

kick a brit in the butt day

I am of Welsh ancestory and have a genetic disposition against brits, or those claiming to be brits since they are actually a mix of Anglo Saxons, Jutes, Normans, Britons, with a bit of Romans left over... might be some Gauls in there as well.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 5:52:41 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I am god...have i settled this?


That aside did any of you dim wits catch the Ewan McGregor and Piers Morgan row over Good Morning Britain appearance http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38729770

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 5:55:33 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

It's not that conservative women necessarily want to be dependent on a man or not.

It is the moral issues which many of these women represent that conservative women completely disagree with. To call it a 'women's march' when many women disagree with abortion, for example, doesn't seem right. They should call it a feminist march, not a women's march.



I don't recall the exact circumstance, but a women's pro-life group was somehow not allowed to join in.


This is in response to both of you.

As I said, Feminism at core is about giving woman choices. So women who want to ban abortion, IS against giving women choices. That would be taking away a choice from a woman.

I know pro-life people believe the baby's life is more important than the mother.

But Women's March is about Woman's well being FIRST, not Babies well being First. That is the key of what it is.

So they can't really include pro-life woman since pro-life women are against giving women choices on what they want to do with their foreign object in their bodies.

I would still support a pro-life regime over a Islamic regime. As anyway, I am a woman who practice safe sex so thoroughly, it's impossible for me to have an unwanted pregnancy to have to face such an issue. It has never happened despite my own highly sexual lifestyle since a teen.

But in all pure essence about giving women choices. You can't be pro-life. That is taking away one of their choices.



< Message edited by Greta75 -- 1/24/2017 5:58:39 PM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:00:45 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

It's not that conservative women necessarily want to be dependent on a man or not.

It is the moral issues which many of these women represent that conservative women completely disagree with. To call it a 'women's march' when many women disagree with abortion, for example, doesn't seem right. They should call it a feminist march, not a women's march.



I don't recall the exact circumstance, but a women's pro-life group was somehow not allowed to join in.


This is in response to both of you.

As I said, Feminism at core is about giving woman choices. So women who want to ban abortion, IS against giving women choices. That would be taking away a choice from a woman.

I know pro-life people believe the baby's life is more important than the mother.

But Women's March is about Woman's well being FIRST, not Babies well being First. That is the key of what it is.

So they can't really include pro-life woman since pro-life women are against giving women choices on what they want to do with their foreign object in their bodies.



The women's body is an object too, if that's how you want to look at things. Like clothes.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:09:42 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Do you really believe that any group of people OR country has the right to demand or threaten a country and demand they change the way they do things just because you or some group thinks they are wrong?

Asian culture do not believe in interfering in other country's culture no matter how wrong it looks like to us. Their business is not our business. Which is why also we don't get involve in giving foreign aid to anybody in trouble. We rather just focus on ourselves.

But for me personally, I think a group of people, if they see injustices done to a certain group of people in another country. I mean, Dubai's stoning women to death for adultery, even though she was actually raped, latest case was just in 2013, and I believe it was a western woman?

While some people see certain things we do in my own country as barbaric, like keeping the caning system, and putting drug traffickers to death. But those are easily avoidable. Don't smuggle drugs. Don't vandalize. That is no where near the real injustice of a woman being stoned for getting sexually assaulted against her will which I would argue women are more protected here than most other places against sexual assault, even better than the west, when it comes to sexual assault.

IF there is anything they can do to help pressure the government of that country to change those ways of real injustices. Yes they should.


< Message edited by Greta75 -- 1/24/2017 6:13:41 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:18:06 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
The women's body is an object too, if that's how you want to look at things. Like clothes.

There is nothing stopping pro-life women from keeping their babies. So pro-life women aren't having their rights trample upon. IF they have an unwanted pregnancy. They are free to keep the baby. Feminism does not stand in their way of wanting to keep the baby.

But this is about women who do not want to keep the baby. Pro-life women wants to have a say on what other woman is allowed to do with their bodies.

That is dictating another woman's body and not giving her a choice.

Different from my stances on clothes. I want Islamic countries to stop enforcing the dress code on women. So that those Muslim women can have a choice whether to wear their burkas or not. IF they choose to wear burkas, that is their choice and will not be taken away from them. But the KEY thing is. THEY NEED to have THE CHOICE. Which they do not have in Islamic countries right now.

Which is why it pisses me off when Muslim woman claim wearing Hijab is about Freedom of Choice. Because there is no Freedom of Choice to wear the Hijab or Burka in a Muslim country. It's mandatory. And it can be criminal offense if women refuse to wear them.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 1/24/2017 6:22:03 PM >

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:24:16 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Piggery....oink oink abject messes do not understand nuances blithering half wit, nor i fat arses...were you electorated before you came in here with 40 000 volts

Oh"!and you two idiots bother me not

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 1/24/2017 6:29:13 PM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:29:14 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I thought women slid on their pussies snatching at the shoes...i myself hammered someone so hard they slid 500 yards and the fire brigade had to ptu it out ..just me this one probably

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:40:20 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
The women's body is an object too, if that's how you want to look at things. Like clothes.

There is nothing stopping pro-life women from keeping their babies. So pro-life women aren't having their rights trample upon. IF they have an unwanted pregnancy. They are free to keep the baby. Feminism does not stand in their way of wanting to keep the baby.

But this is about women who do not want to keep the baby. Pro-life women wants to have a say on what other woman is allowed to do with their bodies.

That is dictating another woman's body and not giving her a choice.

Different from my stances on clothes. I want Islamic countries to stop enforcing the dress code on women. So that those Muslim women can have a choice whether to wear their burkas or not. IF they choose to wear burkas, that is their choice and will not be taken away from them. But the KEY thing is. THEY NEED to have THE CHOICE. Which they do not have in Islamic countries right now.

Which is why it pisses me off when Muslim woman claim wearing Hijab is about Freedom of Choice. Because there is no Freedom of Choice to wear the Hijab or Burka in a Muslim country. It's mandatory. And it can be criminal offense if women refuse to wear them.


The difference between you and me Greta is that you view human beings as objects (body = object) and i don't. If you view the baby as an object, then the mother is an object too... just like the clothes you have on are objects. That was the point i was making about the clothes.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:51:07 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Do you really believe that any group of people OR country has the right to demand or threaten a country and demand they change the way they do things just because you or some group thinks they are wrong?

Asian culture do not believe in interfering in other country's culture no matter how wrong it looks like to us. Their business is not our business. Which is why also we don't get involve in giving foreign aid to anybody in trouble. We rather just focus on ourselves.

But for me personally, I think a group of people, if they see injustices done to a certain group of people in another country. I mean, Dubai's stoning women to death for adultery, even though she was actually raped, latest case was just in 2013, and I believe it was a western woman?

While some people see certain things we do in my own country as barbaric, like keeping the caning system, and putting drug traffickers to death. But those are easily avoidable. Don't smuggle drugs. Don't vandalize. That is no where near the real injustice of a woman being stoned for getting sexually assaulted against her will which I would argue women are more protected here than most other places against sexual assault, even better than the west, when it comes to sexual assault.

IF there is anything they can do to help pressure the government of that country to change those ways of real injustices. Yes they should.



Please note the part I put in bold, and answer the following:

It would therefore be perfectly acceptable for people in this country to try and pressure your government to allow for more freedoms of the press, less oppressive justice system and basically changing everything about your legal and government control of the press, and failing that, pressure our president into sending troops to force change?


In case you have not grasped the the situation, consider the uproar caused when your justice system ordered the caning of a foreign national for graffiti, when it would have been just as easy to deport him out of the country (which was done anyway.)

My point is that your country is less than a century old, and you agree that people should force a cultural change that has been a way of life for close to a thousand years.

No amount of women's protest is going to accomplish that, the ONLY way is for an internal revolution, and sorry to say, when that happens the regime is usually changed to one that will make the current system look like Utopia, or an invasion of troops from another country, in which case you are looking at innocent women, children and non-combatants getting caught in the crossfire.

To give you an example, a coalition of western forces invaded Iraq to depose a dictator.

Over 200 thousand Iraqi civilians who were non combatants either were killed or wounded in the invasion and subsequent occupation.

The devastated infrastructure still has not been rebuilt, and with the current situation with ISIS and other insurgent groups, it probably never will be.

So, now you have a country that cannot rule itself, has very limited access to clean drinking water, food and medical aid, and to top it off, more people are dying as a result of that little military operation on a daily basis than all the political prisoners and ethnic groups killed by the regime we replaced.

So, for you and the ladies who want this changed immediately, since the odds are better for me to hit the next 12 lotto jackpots than it is for these regimes to change their system, which is worse?

A) one or two women stoned to death under an archaic and cruel judicial system

or

B) Two or three hundred men, women and children either starving to death or dying from diseases that could be prevented with good sanitation facilities and clean water, or out right murdered by an extremist sect with an even more warped reading of the religious law?

We are, after all, talking about a religious belief system with a built in judicial code. It took the Catholic church 400 years to stop referring to Mary Magdalene as a repentant prostitute.

It took the Catholic Church and the Catholic based royalty in European countries 200 years to actually END the inquisition system. It took the entire Christian world 600 years to quit burning, hanging or drowning men and women accused of witch craft.

In other words people, the Salem Witch Trials in the Massachusetts bay colony was NOT the last series of witch trials where men and women were executed for the crime of witch craft.

And I must point out that in witchcraft trials, 'spectral' evidence was not only allowed, but usually the only evidence presented to prove a woman guilty.

So, there is really no third option, and given the historic rate in which a religious doctrine changes, I estimate you may some small changes beginning in maybe 100 years, short of military force.

And if you think that the non Muslim world is going to consider using economic sanctions to force a change, you can forget that. Unfortunately, this planet is dependent on the oil that comes out of those countries, which is the primary reason why the UN or any other international agency has turned a blind eye to women being stoned to death for adultery or being raped.

And while biofuels are a possible alternative, there is not economic reason to change over night.

So march all you want, protest in front of embassies, get angry and scream...

Those Arab oil sheiks are laughing at you as they ride around in half million dollar cars going to the bank to deposit the money that YOU spent to fill up your mini van to take your precious darlings to soccer practice, ballet and to run to walmart every time there is a sale.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 6:54:54 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
The difference between you and me Greta is that you view human beings as objects (body = object) and i don't. If you view the baby as an object, then the mother is an object too... just like the clothes you have on are objects. That was the point i was making about the clothes.


Mother and Baby situation. And while another human is tresspassing another human's body. No matter what, you are making a decision which life is more important.

In your case, you are CHOOSING the baby's life to be more important than the Woman's life.

For me, because the baby has intruded into a woman's body, she comes first. Not the baby.

And yes, when there come to be a time, and THERE IS! We have a pro-life woman here who basically had cancer while she got pregnant.

Her doctor says, she can only save one. If she wants to save herself. She aborts the baby and take her chemotherapy.

If she wants to save the baby. She can't take her cancer treatments and she will die but her baby can live, she will be able to birth it.

So she is pro-life. She believes her baby life is worth more than hers. So she chose to die so her baby could live. And she did die.

I thought the saddest part of that story is, her husband said, "Everytime I look at our child, I just remember this child took away the life of the love of my life. And I can't feel anything for this child. I begged her to take the treatment, we can have more children, but she refused."

If she wasn't pro-life like me, she would put her own life first. Live, try for another baby another time.

I don't think pro-life is any good at all. I don't see what purpose it serves. A baby born unwanted and does not receive love. Serves zero positive purposes.

I am of course an example of having a pro-life mom who should have aborted me but she couldn't because she is pro-life. Her husband, my father wanted me aborted and spent at least until a son was born, being cold towards her for refusing to go through with the abortion.

And as a baby who would be happier aborted. I think my mom made a terrible choice. It ruin her marriage, causes unhappiness between her and her husband. And she hates and blames my existence of her husband treatment of her. So she should have aborted me.


< Message edited by Greta75 -- 1/24/2017 7:01:39 PM >

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:02:40 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Comes here to talk to himself.....continuity is everything…bit slow,all. Now, I have a rather bold cock greta75 perhaps you would like to crash-land on it… if the Russians dont shoot you out of the sky first..fingers crossed fuking mess…but I will tell you this you are more real than 99% of the men on this forum strutting their cuntery

shame indeed

Do you have brown eyes and single?...smiles...did you now i am the only person who knows where you are on a map...I wager none know where I am...not even you

Anyhoos



< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 1/24/2017 7:05:11 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:11:23 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
It would therefore be perfectly acceptable for people in this country to try and pressure your government to allow for more freedoms of the press, less oppressive justice system and basically changing everything about your legal and government control of the press, and failing that, pressure our president into sending troops to force change?

Let me share with you something about our country.

Our government listens to our people. Whatever laws we have currently is because it is what majority wants. Currently, majority Singaporeans feel they are happy with death penalty, and caning as punishments for their respective crimes involved.

Everything like gay marriage too, could happen here. Abolishment of those two laws could happen here. IF one day, a foreign group is convincing enough to change the beliefs of the people here. And when those beliefs change. The government will adhere to what the public wants.

In Singapore, the government is not pushing their personal beliefs. The way they operate is find out what the majority would be happy with, take away things that people are unhappy about, and things that are working and people are content with, they stay.

It's really as simple as that.

So, yes, these groups should keep trying. If they can change enough people in that country, which-ever country it is, to believe in the more humane way of handling things. The government will change. Especially in democratic societies, because people will vote for the government who can execute their beliefs systems.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:33:27 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Difficult to argue with nothing at all you should all be ashamed,

To be clear i excuse jlf1961 we have never spoken nor did he ask for that :)

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:34:23 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Difficult to argue with nothing at all you should all be ashamed,

Check your PM. Should brighten up your bored day!

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 7:43:55 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
You get a bare pass wifey5 You have more balls than almost all men on here.....cheeky scamp - is it your eyes(now i told you this)?

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: Women's March - 1/24/2017 8:25:21 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75



So, yes, these groups should keep trying. If they can change enough people in that country, which-ever country it is, to believe in the more humane way of handling things. The government will change. Especially in democratic societies, because people will vote for the government who can execute their beliefs systems.




Are you really that dense?

We are talking about Muslim countries, with Muslim leadership, and even IF they appear to be democratic, the people elected are basically whoever the leading clerics support.

However, the countries where these incidents are most prevalent are NOT democratic societies. Saudi Arabia is a monarchy, at least two are religious theocracies, as for the others, again they might as well be theocracies.

In other words.....


As long as the majority of citizens are followers of that particular belief system, IT AINT GOING TO CHANGE.

People can protest till they are blue in the face, until the cows come home or until humans fly to another star system in a hot air balloon, nothing will change because the majority of the people do not want it to change.

Look, the only reason that economic and international sanctions were used against South Africa and its Apartheid rule was because, in all honesty, South Africa really did not have anything that could not be found else where, including the gold and diamonds.

And even then, there were enough loop holes in the sanctions that they really were not that effective.

Now you are talking about countries that export a lot of stuff that the industrial world needs, and is pretty much limited to where it is available.

Do you HONESTLY think any government is going to jeopardize its oil because of a group of women protesting the treatment of women in those countries?

and yes, your government listens to its people, however, if it dont like what the people are saying, they put those people in jail without trial, so there really is no way those critics have a snow ball's chance in hell to gain a majority.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Women's March Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109