Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/26/2006 6:44:16 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

You know what?  I am so sick of the intolerance I have seen being bred on these boards.  You people are supposed to be so "tolerant", especially considering the lifestyle we live in.  You plead tolerance for homosexuality.  You plead tolerance for depravity.  You plead tolerance for the lifestyle.  You speak about every filth known to man...  But then because of the actions of a select few everyone gets painted with your same sickening brush of hatred.

Thank you.  I have quietly tolerated the hateful views against my own faith but it is getting old.  I am not a born-again.  I am not a radical.  I don't even go to church.  But at every turn (not just here) I see remarks made against Christianity that would have people arrested for making the same remarks against any other religious faith.  There are bad seeds in every sect. Point out the seeds if you  must, but please stop painting us all with the same soiled brush.


*emphasis added*
 
Exactly, owned. Saying all Christians, or Muslims, etc, are _________ (fill in the blank) is a sign of a lazy mind. Hard to respect that.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/26/2006 6:47:10 PM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Exactly, owned. Saying all Christians, or Muslims, etc, are _________ (fill in the blank) is a sign of a lazy mind. Hard to respect that.

You always say something that makes me smile.  Thank you, Level.

Interestingly, in my current studies I am learning about Hinduism, which I am finding quite fascinating.  When you dig down into the different religions, you eventually find there are more similarities than differences.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/26/2006 6:50:49 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Exactly, owned. Saying all Christians, or Muslims, etc, are _________ (fill in the blank) is a sign of a lazy mind. Hard to respect that.

You always say something that makes me smile.  Thank you, Level.

Interestingly, in my current studies I am learning about Hinduism, which I am finding quite fascinating.  When you dig down into the different religions, you eventually find there are more similarities than differences.


You are welcome .
 
I agree with what you say about the similarities. I think that maybe god speaks to us in different ways, as we're different people, so there will be differences, but yes, dig deep, and you'll find love, and compassion, and truth, and know that there is where we are all god's children.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/26/2006 6:52:46 PM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level
You are welcome .
 
I agree with what you say about the similarities. I think that maybe god speaks to us in different ways, as we're different people, so there will be differences, but yes, dig deep, and you'll find love, and compassion, and truth, and know that there is where we are all god's children.

You will indeed find those things.  Now if only we did not simply meet intolerance with more intolerance.  BTW, you have mail.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/26/2006 6:57:28 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
As do you, owned.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 12:28:12 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
God did, and does, take idolatry very seriously.


Rhetorically, you are engaging in special pleading.

Our cultures decry religious intolerance and yet your sacred text prescribes not only intolerance but also violence against those of other faiths. You make a weak spirited attempt to claim that such intolerance was acceptable at a certain time and within a certain context and yet you also make the statement "God did, and does, take idolatry very seriously." because you know that these exhortations have never been done away with.

Idolatry, or god's supposed dislike of idolatry, creates no special case to justify religious intolerance - it's exactly what Jews or Muslims would think about Christians: that they are worshipping nonsense and should be destroyed. Again, despite having the same origins each of these faiths think of the other faiths as wrong-headed apostasy of some perceived original or more authentic faith.

There are no special time limits placed upon the intolerance within the text itself - that's your add-on to the text because I see that you maintain a "saved by grace" view of your faith. You would claim that such activity was acceptable before the advent of Jesus, but not as much afterward. But again, you said: "God did, and does, take idolatry very seriously." because you know that this kind of intolerance is an active part of your faith - that the old testament is still in effect. More on the "law vs grace" issue below...

My point was to show that someone would defend this kind of intolerance as acceptable within the thinking of their faith. Thank you, Sir Kenin.

Mission accomplished.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
Now you will notice that Jesus never preached this concept, and there is a reason for it.  The face of Christianity changed after his arrival, death and resurrection forever.  We are no longer required to slay the "enemy", and this is where your "logic" falls flat on it's face.  The Israelites of that time lived under Deuteronomic Law, otherwise known as the "Old Law".  Modern day Christians live under the New Law.


The number one most anticipated argument: Jesus saves us through grace so we are no longer under Mosaic law. It's a great argument for everyone that wants to cherry-pick the portions of the Bible they are going to follow. I am not a believer so I have no such desires at stake; when I read the Bible I give passages no special consideration over others and I don't cherry-pick or pull things out of context. Someone said you might as well rip the book in two and throw away the first half - but that would be letting you off too easy. No Christian faith throws away the first half (the old testament), almost all Christian faiths teach the old testament right alongside the new testament - and there is a reason for that:

You are not saved by grace. You are under Mosaic law.

In other words, there is no "Judaism-Lite" under Jesus. Jesus made some very minor changes by adding onto the existing laws of Moses. That's what the Bible says he did. And we have it in Jesus' own words (well, supposedly).

Before I move on to the bigger issue of defending the above assertion with textual support from the Bible, let's refocus on your motives for cherry-picking biblical ideas. To claim that you are under grace and not under Mosaic law is an admission that you don't care about the letter of the bible. Which in turn means there is no authority for your views. You are a law unto yourself, which is fine by me - but just please admit this important point. My problem with people claiming "under grace" status is that they act as if the god of the old testament is an "old timey" bogeyman and that the Jesus of the new stestament is the true God. But why should the Christian god be so mutable? That's way too convenient and neatly does away with the whole of the old testament. Frankly, it's an admission that your faith is going to be whatever you say it is rather than what God or Jesus supposedly said it should be. Very slippery,

My literal reading of the bible suggests that you are under the laws of Moses because that's the law - period. Full stop. You are also saved by grace because man is seen as incapable of perfection. I recognize that is a very strict and literal interpretation of the Bible, but then I have no stake in making any other kind of interpretation - I read what it says, and I then assume it means what it says. One point people often miss is that Jesus was obviously a practicing Jew: he taught at temple, practiced Jewish holy feasts and so on. What some people call the "last supper" was Jesus practicing the Passover (even if you want to argue the precise timing is off, the activities are in imitation of a Passover Seder). Jesus did not institute a new faith, if anything he added onto the existing Jewish faith. No more and no less.

Moving onto textual support for these views...

Jesus claimed the authority of Mosiac Law in the Book of Mark:
7:6 He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
7:7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the
commandments of men.
7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
7:10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
7:11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
7:12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

If the above is supposed to be Jesus repudiating Mosaic law, I must be reading it all wrong. Isn't Jesus here teaching from the Old Testament? Why would he do that if you are saved by grace? Jesus is here specifically comparing Mosiac law to other interpretations made by men, and finding the latter lacking in the extreme. To me Jesus sounds fairly pissed off in this passage. And that's red letter Jesus too - his own words supposedly, just like the parables.

Of the Mosaic Laws, Jesus also had this to say: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and Earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 5:17-19).

Read the rest for a good understanding of what he was saying. Basically, it means the Christians should be practicing Judaic customs. I realize most Christians do not follow these teachings, which I find of great interest: they claim the authority of the Bible and then do whatever they like instead.

"Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition..."

Here's one of the reasons you obey Mosaic law: you are saved by grace but you show your love of God by following his commandments (i.e. starting with all the Mosaic laws and up to and including all of the add-on laws established by Jesus himself). Textual Support from the Book of John:

14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
14:7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
14:8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
14:11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.
14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
14:13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
14:14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
14:16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
14:17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
14:18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
14:19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.
14:20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
14:21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
14:22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?
14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
14:24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.

This sure sounds to me like Jesus is saying that you are supposed to follow the Mosaic law. What other commandments would a practicing Jew be talking about here?

What I see in all of this is Jesus saying that he supports and practices Mosaic Law - in fact, to do so is his own commandment: "If ye love me, keep my commandments."

Jesus also makes a point of noting that you must practice not only the spirit of the law, but follow it to the tiniest detail: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and Earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."

So if Jesus did away with the laws of Moses, it's news to me:
"For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do."

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 1:05:53 PM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
Chain - whilst I understand your interpretation - there is one thing you neglect to see, even thought you have mentioned it.
 
A christian can follow mosaic laws.  Follow them to the letter.  Practise and preach every text, every hand written word.  Makes really no damn bit of difference.
 
quote:

14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

God went to the gentiles - he opened himself to - he blessed with the holy spirit.  The gentiles didn't 'adopt' god - He adopted them.  Peters vision was Gods love.
 
Christians are not Jewish.  There are Jewish believers of Jesus that exist.  However - the majority of christians are not jewish decendants.  They are decendants of the gentiles who God 'technically' saved through prophacy fulfilment and visions (Peter) .  That is where the distinction lies.
 
quote:

Do not call anything impure that God has made clean (Acts)

Peace and Rapture
 

_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 1:19:23 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: darkinshadows
A christian can follow mosaic laws.  Follow them to the letter.  Practise and preach every text, every hand written word.  Makes really no damn bit of difference.


Way to show your love there, Darkinshadows. Why bother to call yourself a Christian if you apparently feel free to disregard red letter biblical citations?

"If ye love me, keep my commandments."

"Whosoever therefore shall break one of these commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."

So I guess your all saved, it just depends where you are going. I guess you'll end up at one of the "many mansions" without hot tub or sauna and be known as "the least in the kingdom of heaven."

Jesus said it. It's your faith, not mine.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 1:41:01 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang
The number one most anticipated argument: Jesus saves us through grace so we are no longer under Mosaic law. It's a great argument for everyone that wants to cherry-pick the portions of the Bible they are going to follow. I am not a believer so I have no such desires at stake; when I read the Bible I give passages no special consideration over others and I don't cherry-pick or pull things out of context. Someone said you might as well rip the book in two and throw away the first half - but that would be letting you off too easy. No Christian faith throws away the first half (the old testament), almost all Christian faiths teach the old testament right alongside the new testament - and there is a reason for that:


Well you went to a lot of hard work that is for sure, but we are now going to blow your entire argument out of the water with just one verse:

Romans 6:14
 
"For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law, but under grace".

So, as you can see, you CAN indeed take everything out of context and not understand a damn thing you are reading.  You have just proven it.  Not only that, you have equally demonstrated yourself to be an author of falsehoods.  You do pick and choose what you are going to use.  You have satisfactorily proven it in your post.

Oh, and just before you come up with any more out of context jibberish, I suggest you read this webpage:

http://www.godandscience.org/doctrine/grace.html

It explains everything you need to know about the concept of grace, with plenty of references to back it up, seeing as how you like references so much.

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 8/27/2006 1:42:08 PM >


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 1:57:23 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
I did make a mistake up there, my bad:

You *are* saved by grace, but you are also under Mosaic law - that's what I meant say. The rest of the argument is in keeping with that view. That's what the "good book" says. And it's not cherry-picking if I can show several citations - it's an idea continually repeated by Jesus in the gospels.

BTW, why are you quoting Paul? Who cares what Paul says when we have "red letter" Jesus stuff to work by?

You don't know what you are talking about, SirKenin, as usual.

And no, I didn't go to much trouble. I know this stuff off the top of my head actually and I can quote whole passages of the bible from memory. I have read the Bible many times. In fact, not only did I not trouble myself much, I have a text very similar to the one above on file to basically just cut and paste it.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:16:19 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
What Law do you suppose Paul was talking about?  If you read the context, which you did not, you would know he is talking about Mosaic Law.  If you read that website, which you did not, you would know that he is talking about Mosaic Law.

See, you do not read.  It is you that has no idea what you are blathering about.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:18:56 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
I challenge you, Chain, to find ONE reference in the Bible that says we are under both Mosaic Law and grace.  ONE.  Let Me help you out.  There is not ONE reference to that effect.  You are just making shit up in hopes that nobody calls you on it and that you might actually look like you know what you are talking about, but I hate to tell you, you chose the wrong guy to argue with on this.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:31:54 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
quote:

14. For Sin shall not have dominion over you--as the slaves of a tyrant lord.
  for ye are not under the law, but under grace--The force of this glorious assurance can only be felt by observing the grounds on which it rests. To be "under the law" is, first, to be under its claim to entire obedience; and so, next under its curse for the breach of these. And as all power to obey can reach the sinner only through Grace, of which the law knows nothing, it follows that to be "under the law" is, finally, to be shut up under an inability to keep it, and consequently to be the helpless slave of sin. On the other hand, to be "under grace," is to be under the glorious canopy and saving effects of that "grace which reigns through righteousness unto eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord" (see on JF & B for Ro 5:20, 21). The curse of the law has been completely lifted from off them; they are made "the righteousness of God in Him"; and they are "alive unto God through Jesus Christ." So that, as when they were "under the law," Sin could not but have dominion over them, so now that they are "under grace," Sin cannot but be subdued under them. If before, Sin resistlessly triumphed, Grace will now be more than conqueror.


- Jamieson, Fausset and Brown

The Law was given so that the Jews might know sin.  Jesus came to fulfill the Law, making a statement that they were no longer under the oppression of the Scribes and Pharisees, who upheld the Law to the letter, but they might be saved through Jesus Christ.  Jesus' death and resurrection was designed to present an alternative, to give people a way to salvation.

To tell us that we are still under the Law is to deny the purpose and works of Christ.  But you already knew that, I suppose.  Sorry guy, no disrespect intended but you have no idea what you are talking about.  Even Satan can fling Bible verses around, but you made it apparent to us all that not everybody can apply them in their proper context.

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 8/27/2006 2:33:06 PM >


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:33:09 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Well, who do you follow? Paul or Jesus?

BTW, I already answered your question in one of my quotes above. That's red letter Jesus - not someone else's sermon to whomever. The supposed words of Jesus himself. You know, the guy you claim to follow and whose actions you claim to be saved by...

John
14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
...
14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

-----

What I see is that you prefer the words of Paul over those of Jesus himself. Interesting...

Mark
7:6 He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
7:7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

-----

Why bother calling yourself a Christian? Just do whatever you want to do, or whatever it is you think Paul wants you to do and be done with it.

Are you saved by Paul? Did Paul die for your sins?

I don't believe any of that in any case, but I find your position odd - rejecting red letter quotesn in favor of Pauline thought.


_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:36:25 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
What commandments, Chain?  See, you fail to make the distinction.  Jesus was not talking about the Law either, he was talking about his own commandments.  See, again, you can not interpret and apply what you read.  You take the verses, take them out of context and twist them out of shape.  You apply what you want and scrap the rest.  There is a whole picture painted throughout the New Testament and you have missed all of it in your failed attempts at being a scholar.

Paul was speaking on behalf of God.  When he is not, he makes it very clear.  God and Jesus are one and the same.. Wrap your brain around that for awhile.  Face it, you came in here half cocked, not having a clue what you were talking about, dragging passages out of context, flinging shit around, picking and choosing what worked for you in your feeble attempt at trying to insult and belittle Christianity and then being so brazen as to accuse everyone else of what you yourself are doing.  Sorry man, but in My eyes you look pretty foolish.  But keep it up.  If you need more references I will give them to you, but READ WHAT I ALREADY GAVE YOU.

And remember..  Even Satan and his minions can pull the same stunt you are, so you should not exactly be proud of yourself right about now.

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 8/27/2006 2:43:13 PM >


_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:41:53 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
To tell us that we are still under the Law is to deny the purpose and works of Christ.


I am not telling you anything. I don't have a stake in this. But I am supposedly quoting Jesus himself. It is Jesus that tells you what to do...

Matthew 5:17-19
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and Earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven"

That's a fucking red letter quote - supposedly having fallen from the lips of your savior himself. That's not me saying that, it's the Bible itself. Aren't you teaching that there is no law, whereas Jesus warns against that very thing?

"Whosoever therefore shall break one of these commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..."

What am I supposed to think if you claim to follow this guy's teachings, and then ignore them in preference to the words of his disciples instead? Aren't you ignoring the words of your diety to follow the words of a mere man?

What's the word I am seeking here? Oh yeah...

Hypocrite.


_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:49:42 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin
What commandments, Chain?  See, you fail to make the distinction.  Jesus was not talking about the Law either, he was talking about his own commandments.


Okay, as hilariously ignorant as that statement is I will try again...

Matthew 5:17-19
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and Earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. "

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law" = Mosaic Law

"or the prophets" = Like Moses, all the Old testment Prophets

"I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and Earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." = Until the heavens and the earth are destroyed the Mosaic Law is in effect to the last detail.

Seriously, what else can I say? That's a red letter quote - how can it be taken out of context? It can be misinterpreted - but how is that possible when Jesus is talking about the law and the prophets in the same breath? He's plainly talking about the Old Testament Prophets and the Old Testament Mosaic Laws. WTF?

Let's try the quote above another way:
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law" = Laws imposed by Jesus.

That makes no sense whatever.




_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:51:38 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
See, again you have no idea what you are talking about, even after I just finished telling you.  Jesus WAS the fulfillment of the Law.  His death and resurrection WAS the fulfillment of the Law.  See, you do not understand the purpose of the Law (it was designed to show every Jew that they were a sinner because it was found that they were spiralling into wickedness).  You do not understand who it was directed to (the Jews, not the Gentiles) and you do not understand the final outcome (Jesus' death and resurrection fulfilled the Law "in while you were yet sinners, Christ died for you").  In fact, you do not understand ANYTHING when it comes to Biblical truths, yet you come here and make an ass of yourself to those of us that do in your feable attempt at flaming and belittling. Well, you have been called on it and it has been found that you are severely lacking.

Next time, stick to topics where you know what you are talking about and stop trying to fling your shit at My faith. 

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:52:34 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang
why are you quoting Paul? Who cares what Paul says when we have "red letter" Jesus stuff to work by?

I consider Paul an incarnation of the Creator. Without Paul christianity would be a minor jewish sect. Jesus performed 'miracles'. Paul was a miracle.
 
However that may be, there are solutions to ancient problems that still apply today, but also there are other solutions and new solutions and better solutions and our own solutions.
 
Beware of philosophers, for there are and have been untold billions of them and all except perhaps one must have been wrong.
 
As to idols: in ancient Egypt when one of the Gods was unable to attend a ceremony in person, an idol was used as a stand-in. The mediterranean custom of carrying statues of saints around goes back to this Egyptian custom.
 
Worshipping a saint (image) is one way to eventually connect to God (in fact, according to the Hindu faith one may worship anything to this purpose; what matters is the act of worshipping, not what is being worshipped).

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence - 8/27/2006 2:53:02 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
Oh, here is another reference for those that ARE reading to prove that Chain does not have a clue what he is talking about:

http://www.gotquestions.org/abolish-fulfill-law.html

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Religion of Religious Intolerance and Violence Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109