RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LordODiscipline -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 5:41:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crouchingtigress

LOD it is painful to see you defending yourself on this one.
 
You continue to refer to it as a "defense"
 
I am not defending myself - only responding to your questions as asked... there is a huge difference - as I do not have a NEED to defend myself.
 
It is akin to asking me "When did you stop beating your wife?"
 
You asked me for my reasons 
I give them to you
and
you characterize it as a "defense" 
Rather a poorly thought out means of expressing yourself and vaguely insulting.
 
i think it is just an issue of sematics, you are not happy with the word preditor, and to be honest i do see your point because there are two deffinitons one where one needs intentionalty for.
 
i am using the other one "one who attacks prey" and if this has ever happened to you, you do feel attacked: you feel blind sided, and gut punched.
 
"Feelings" are a subjective determinant... one "feels" something and believes it to be true - but, it is not always.
 
In this instance, no one was actually "attacked" no matter what you or anyone else would infer or 'feel'.... and, we still do not know if this person planned on this course of action - or, if he is a simple moron out for personal gratification without any empathy or concern for others.

quote:

Predator (again) infers pre-disposition and fore thought of knowledge and fore thought of actrion


something occurred to me though, maybe you are using red as a way of having your text stand out from my text, instead of as a way to denote an angry, frustrated intonation, as i originally thought.

And you would be right... If I am angry, I will let you know.
 
if so i am happy to introduce you to the quote button....see the little balloon next to the ABC check mark...click on that you will get  quote and unquote brackets displayed, and then simply copy and paste what ever text you want to in between the two brackets.
 
I know where it is (I have been in CM for quite a while) - I was pressed for time earlier today and did not care to bother with it... and, now I am simply keeping the reading in contextual continuity...
 
~J




LordODiscipline -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 5:46:43 PM)

And a few people choose to debate personalities, rather than the issue as it makes them feel better about themselves to demean another and they do not have anything pertinent to say that adds to a conversation...

Amazing how these poorly contrived stereotypes and assumptions on another's character are significantly cutting when someone abuses them
 
More than enough said.
 
~J

quote:

ORIGINAL: texancutie

Sigh....a few people on these boards just have to mince words, and show off how well they write...lol.  They rarely have anything nice or even helpful to say.  Enough said.




mnottertail -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 5:52:57 PM)

I know how personal all this shit seems, but trust me, nobody sees anyone here as a real human being, it is just that some can carry that up to face-to-face.

If you ain't seeing these colors on your tv, then you need to check in to alternative electronics, because with all the people out here, to find a match and a love and a lifetime statistically should be a can of corn, but some motherfuckers gotta have hearts and feelings and hopes and dreams that go beyond a dick whipping, such is the condition of the human heart.

Oh, sure; we may muse on this phenomenon; in passing; but until it parks at our doorstep it just ain't got the new car smell................

Ron






imtempting -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 6:05:41 PM)

You were played. Its as simple as that.

He has left some subs pregnant but is he paying for the children? Unless you know one of these women for sure you cannot answer.

Also don't these people know about protection themselve? Using the birth controll pill etc.

Take out all the bdsm elements and people would just be saying you were played. Put in the bdsm elements and now your got a predator on your hands. You upset becuase this happened to you, I'm sorry but it does not make him a predator.

Also I disagree with the term predator. As someone else said the word predator brings up images of people getting hacked up.

All this reference stuff can also be a load of rubbish as someone can have a bad experience with someone then want them to be destroyed in the local lifestyle.

Could it be that he saw a lady who was all mixed up. Stepped in, tried to help her. As the OP state the best sex in her life, then see things were going too far for what he wanted and decided to leave  as not to hurt the lady later on?

The sub he left pregnant and alone might of just been someone he was in a relationship with but it ended. Unless you get his side of the story then he could be the victim...




dsamethyst -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 6:06:29 PM)

someone asked how an intelligent 37 year old woman could not spot a rat like the OP had been involved with.....I can tell you  they are rats  that is what they do!!

I was invovled with a man i lovingly called snake....i was his lady love for 18 months  he spent nearly every evening with myself and the kids...it was my impression we were heading toward marriage.  He would leave at 1-2am nearly every evening  I do not do the live together thing  and if i added up all of th enights he actually slept over it was maybe 5  and that was becasu ei had had medical issues during that time....okay so you have the picture...basically he was playing house with myself and the kids...

well imagine my surprise when after spending 3 days in the hospital related to some female issues again he not leaving my side...his fami;ly even came up to keep me company while waiting for surgery...well imagine my surprise when 3 days after coming home he disappeared fro 2day  no contact nothing...i was concerned and sent hima  few text messages....low and behold i got a phone call first thing int he morning, no actully it was 2nd thing the 1st thing as a phone call from him tellingme that he loved me and that he spent the other days sleeping off the stress...which was a belivable thing,  the 2nd calli recieved was a phone call from another woman who was mad that i was sending her "boyfrend" textmessages...i put her on hold and called him on my house phone and wanted to know if he could come over because i was having a problem....I proceeded to ask her to call me back in  an hour  (when he was going to be there)  

I then asked himto answer the call....well it seemsthat he had been LIVING with her for the last 6 months of our relationship!  His mother wasnt aware of it...he had been paying the rent on the apartment that he had built on her house  he was just living a total lie....

so tel me oh smart person How could I have avoided this??  how was I to know?  he was "home for dinner" I would say 4-5 nights a week...and left after 1am.... his family didnt know anything about this situation...How could i have changed this situation?

see when my hubby messed around he gave it away.... he was more attnetive to me, bathed more, dressedbetter......well snake  he didnt change at all that i could see.

and so  like on the post regarding tests...yeah i test...can you blame me??
little red




mnottertail -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 6:22:44 PM)

yeah, women have been so fucked..............it is actually sad how you as a package of gash has been used, because you FEEL..........

Men, the glorious pigs they are, sit back and take all this in and in the fullness of time, are mene mene tehkle pahrsin----------

god, if we all thunk the same way, we could have prevented korea--

no one sect (however you have divided up life in your own mind) is so unique that you should not get just as fucked as the rest of us.............

So, assume I write you an email, honey, saying on your knees and do your legendary thing and you come back with something like .............EWWWWWWWWW how icky is that? a man as old as you?  OMFG, I will never be like you.........

then you twitch out,

take it from there kid, life don't work the way we think, but it is not because you are operating in unknown waters but the earth is 3/4 water and you are in it as all of us are, and we are all fish, but some of us are laying on the bottom and snapping what we can and some of us are  cruising the ocean in all its  magestic glory and saying nothing can harm me, and I will if preturbed, call ALL the sharks to my aid......

There is the problem, honey, some sharks are  happily on the reef and take a tourist or two, not a huge appetite, but you may or not be a chew toy.........

What is on your gravestone?

Ron




KnightofMists -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 7:12:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gardenbluebird

.............  Sometimes things are not what they seem.  ...............


True.. But..

Sometimes... What they seem to be is a result of our own choice to close our eyes from the flags and warnings signs.

Sometimes... What they seem to be is a result of someone's manipulation and deciet

Sometimes it is a little of both.

I was driving into a strange city... I had my city map and was pretty confident I could find my way.  But as it would happen, I found that the map didn't provide enough detail and I needed to make a choice on how to find this place.

Well... I could wander around abit and maybe I would find this place that I learned about but yet I didn't have the exact address to it.  Some how wander around aimlessly doesn't seem to be the right thing to do... It would really just be luck to find it. Damn I wish I would of ask for the street address before I came here.. that would of helped I am sure.

I could also stop and ask for some directions... but who do I ask...

mmmmmm or maybe the convenience/gas store... maybe they could help me and I could get at little snack and gas while I am at it.

well.. I have found getting directions from these types of places are a hit and miss.  They could talk a good line and I could follow it and still not find where I want to go.  So who would be to blame... When you think about it they are there to sell their stuff not give directions.  But .. maybe I get lucky and happen to come across a person just happen to work in an Tourist information place before and could get me right where I want to go... or maybe they been there themselves.  But. really it would be luck that I find the place not because of any good judgement on my part still it would be better odds than riding around aimlessly.

mmmmm well there is a city information booth.... maybe they would be the best place to stop.  Seems to me that If I look for someone that is paid to direction and help people get where they want to go... well my odds of actually getting there gets decidedly better.  Sure.. I still might screw up the directions after I leave or the person didn't really understood where it was I need to go and provide me with bad information.


so what if this place I was trying to find was a happy loving relationship?

should I wander around aimless?  jumping from relationship to relationship and maybe get lucky and find the one I want.

should I just say yes... to someone that seems to have what I want at the moment?  and hope that I get lucky they want what I want in the long run?  which is better than wandering around aimlessly I suppose.

should I just take my time and consider what I want... and look for it.  Not just for the moment.. but when that someone comes along... invest myself slowly and thoughtfully into the relationship.  Let them earn my trust as I earn theirs. 


I think sometimes we get exactly what we ask for.. and those that lie and manipulate us only succeed because we invest ourselves too quickly... just because they are giving us what we need in the moment.  We don't stop to consider who they actually are as a person... what is their character?  What our their virtues as a person?  What are their values and principles?  Instead... we see what they can give us ... what needs they seem to fulfill.  By putting our desires to fulfill our needs before consideration of the type person that we should allow to fulfil those needs/wants... we open ourselves to lies/manipulation.  They play on our desires.. and we forget to consider the person they are.

I have learned that it is a priviledge to allow someone into my life to that is there to contribute to the fulfillment of my needs and wants.  Such a person should be worthy of that priviledge.. and I needed to consider what kind of person is worthy. 

The flip side... Is that I must realize that it is a priviledge for me to contribute to the fulfillment of someone elses needs and wants.  It is a reciprocal arrangement in my opinion.

So why where you selected.. because like me in a past relationship.. you focused on your needs being fulfilled and not on if this person was deserving or worthy of the priviledge.


KoM







onlythewindknows -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 7:54:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

I think sometimes we get exactly what we ask for.. and those that lie and manipulate us only succeed because we invest ourselves too quickly... just because they are giving us what we need in the moment.  We don't stop to consider who they actually are as a person... what is their character?  What our their virtues as a person?  What are their values and principles?  Instead... we see what they can give us ... what needs they seem to fulfill.  By putting our desires to fulfill our needs before consideration of the type person that we should allow to fulfil those needs/wants... we open ourselves to lies/manipulation.  They play on our desires.. and we forget to consider the person they are.



wonderful post.  i might add that for those who are sub it is in our realm of desire to see what WE can give THEM and not fully recognize that they are taking advantage of that (in a bad way.)




Morrigel -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 8:05:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

In terms of preventing pregnancy knowing that he was fucking around isn't information that will help prevent a pregnancy.


I could not possibly disagree more.  I think that was EXACTLY the information that would prevent the pregnancy.  Women are not nearly as likely to get pregnant by men when they don't believe that he is invested in the relationship.  They are much, much more likely to use protection, to insist on condoms, to hold back emotionally, etc. when they know they are not in an exclusive relationship.  And that is exactly why he lied about it.

He wanted them to be completely emotionally and sexually open, in ways that only women who are deeply committed can be.  He was not interested in wearing the raincoat or hearing "Um, just let me put in my diaphragm."

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

I simply don't think that someone who fucks around is a predator.


I think anyone who deliberately does ANYTHING that causes others pain can qualify as such.  And I've never been sympathetic to the "women who get pregnant are just stupid" line of logic.

Personally, I find that both the body and the emotional make-up of the average human female are designed to make the continuation of the species a likely prospect.  If women were always living in the brain and never got emotional or visceral about men--before, during and after sex?  There would be a hell of a lot fewer of us monkeys on this planet.

Not that I'm saying that would be a bad thing.  I'm just pointing out it ain't so.

It is a pretty natural subconscious, semi-conscious or fully conscious urge in most women, when they feel they have achieved a deep level of emotional bonding and investment with a man, to relax their precautions of various kinds.  Only with rigorous mutual control is pregnancy avoided when a woman is having extremely frequent sex with a man who chooses to remain fertile.

*shrug*  Anyway...whatever.  I'm not sure what your agenda is to let Mr. Fucksalot off the hook for being a deeply and deliberately hurtful human being.  I've stated my reasons for regarding him as a predator.  And I have zero sympathy for sexist attitudes about women having to take sole responsibility for human reproduction--regardless of whether that sexism is couched in the rhetoric of the 18th century, the 7th century, or the 20th century.

--M




KnightofMists -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 8:17:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

Personally, I find that both the body and the emotional make-up of the average human female are designed to make the continuation of the species a likely prospect.  If women were always living in the brain and never got emotional or visceral about men--before, during and after sex?  There would be a hell of a lot fewer of us monkeys on this planet.



I wish that I could recall where I found it...  at least would of saved it.

but anyways.. a scientific study and maybe others might be out their as well... that is suggesting that women during sexual intercourse release chemicals in their body that contributes signficantly to the emotional connection and perceptions of their partners.  Which leads and seems to support the idea that woman will have a greater tendency to become emotional attached to their lovers.  This study also reflects that men don't produce to a significant degree these chemicals that heighten emotional connection and therefore is less likely to become emotional attached due to the acts of sexual intercourse.

It was an interesting report.. wish I could remember where I saw it.




Morrigel -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 8:41:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

This study also reflects that men don't produce to a significant degree these chemicals that heighten emotional connection and therefore is less likely to become emotional attached due to the acts of sexual intercourse.


I would say that producing the "love stew" during sex depends greatly on both the individual man and the woman.  Human pair bonding--from both partners--is a constant force around the globe.  And, to be honest, it has a sound basis in evolutionary biology for men to get emotionally involved with their sexual partners.  Any human infant needs a lot of investment from adults in order to survive--more investment than any one human being can give.  Fathers who stick around and care for their mates during pregnancy, delivery, infancy and childhood are a hundred times more likely to produce offspring that survive and reproduce themselves.

A good father and husband is a winner, in evolutionary terms--he passes on his genes AND his cultural practice.  Whereas Mr. Fuck-and-Run is a lot more likely to produce offspring that his partner leaves to die in a garbage can.  [:'(]

--M




juliaoceania -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 9:27:26 PM)

quote:

I would say that producing the "love stew" during sex depends greatly on both the individual man and the woman.  Human pair bonding--from both partners--is a constant force around the globe.  And, to be honest, it has a sound basis in evolutionary biology for men to get emotionally involved with their sexual partners.  Any human infant needs a lot of investment from adults in order to survive--more investment than any one human being can give.  Fathers who stick around and care for their mates during pregnancy, delivery, infancy and childhood are a hundred times more likely to produce offspring that survive and reproduce themselves.

A good father and husband is a winner, in evolutionary terms--he passes on his genes AND his cultural practice.  Whereas Mr. Fuck-and-Run is a lot more likely to produce offspring that his partner leaves to die in a garbage can.


The man that fucks and runs AND pair bonds has even a larger chance of reproducing offspring to survive into adulthood, the two are not mutually exclusive... it is not necessarily wise to put all your swimmers into one pond. I am sure you are also familiar with a certain theory of the "four year itch', which basically states that men and women form pair bonds for four years before their relationship disintigrates because that is the time it takes to bring a child out of infancy to some form of self reliance.  These are functional arguments though, and hard to substantiate in an academic sense, but they make interesting forum conversations[:D]

Edited for clarity and typos




LRODANDMASTER -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 9:31:58 PM)

THAT DEFINATELY SOUNDS RIGHT WOMEN ARE LAWAYS FALLING IN LOVE WIT ME AFTER I FUCKSEM

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

a scientific study and maybe others might be out their as well... that is suggesting that women during sexual intercourse release chemicals in their body that contributes signficantly to the emotional connection and perceptions of their partners.  Which leads and seems to support the idea that woman will have a greater tendency to become emotional attached to their lovers.




ChaOz -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/4/2006 11:47:01 PM)

HHmm.... after deciding to be a Dom I knew I had a lot to learn so I got something to offer a sub. It might be wierd for a Dom but I am eager to please by nature and I'm also very interested in the mind, ego, and anything spiritual + am into sales. Anyway, while Dommes can lead guys around my the dick, I feel women need to be controlled by emotions and their mind, the fantasy of it all. Women can after all cum without being touched if they are mentally invested in it. So.. I read around. And you know what? There's tonnes of info out there on how to emotionally manipulate a woman into believing you are that special someone, to get past her mental defences, and force her subtly to love you. Some of them even use light hypnosis techniques. This is in some cases developed to the level of a psudo-science as it employs psychology as well as social sciences. Its lame IMHO to emotionally blackmail a woman into bed, but its powerful to have it done to you, and anyone can fall for it. And the justification that its all down to evolution is a common one in the pickup community, but I think its bullshit, lots of species mate for life as a solid family life can enhance a childs ability to function in society. The theory of evolution is practically a fractal, you can get whatever justifications you want from it, depending on what parts of nature you look at. They even used to use evolution to justify that blacks are inferior.

Lets just face facts, the guy in question who leaves a string of broken hearts and pregnant subs is a preditor and more importantly, is dysfunctional as a human being and messed up on an egotistical/psychological level. The best sex is always when your in love and they love you, that connection is amazing and this guy is incapable of that. Having a harem you drop at a moments notice, are not emotionally invested in, and exposing them to AIDS is just messed up. So ladies, get confident by being educated. Look into the pickup community, find the techniques they employ and learn to spot them. Its useful to know as most of it can be applied to any social situation, not just to get one night stands. It is poweful though so dont feel bad if he hit you with it, and someone who is that invested in getting chicks and developing long term relationships on lies and bullshit probably does know a bit about it. Would be interesting to see if the sub spots any techniques used on her. Dont feel bad though, this stuff can get a wife cheating on a husband or a non-bi curious girl in bed with a lesbian, I do think its that powerful as it turns your emotions against you and is actually designed to work against confident, educated and sexy women. But it is lame and personally, I'm against it. I... just cant not be myself you know? Never used it on anyone, but was surprised how invested a lot of people are in living that lifestyle.And that guy.. pitty him.. deep down he is a loser who cant find true happiness. Take it as a lesson learnt and move on to greater things. (the techniques on giving a women the ultimate orgasms are cool though lol which is the other justification of people who do this, the great sex)




mons -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/5/2006 2:39:33 AM)

greetings

focus you are not a woman i think but to come out and say oh she should had known? known what not to fall in love and see this man as a prince to hold her to love her not all man are apes and aniamls this is why she did not see this love is different when you a man and it is different when you a woman. we all want the same thing love and caring, i at age 24 ran into a nightmare man. he was  my dream boat, he and i were in engaged but the moment i was pregant he ran so far. i thought it was me but it was not, i just found out after to many years he did this to another woman who had a girl who not runs around looking for him. if someone would had told me he was like this i would have depend him to the end, he show not sign of a fool. no sign he had other woman. so focus i know your thinking right but be kind to the woman who heart are rip out. i have a son i can never be a father but i am a hell of a mother. it is hard when you think you found that one person who os like you smart intellgent kind and loves things you adore. i am a domme now so i am more smarter then i was i still look out for fool i ran into many. kindness is a gift use it

mons




LordODiscipline -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/5/2006 5:49:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

And, to be honest, it has a sound basis in evolutionary biology for men to get emotionally involved with their sexual partners.  Any human infant needs a lot of investment from adults in order to survive--more investment than any one human being can give.  Fathers who stick around and care for their mates during pregnancy, delivery, infancy and childhood are a hundred times more likely to produce offspring that survive and reproduce themselves.

A good father and husband is a winner, in evolutionary terms--he passes on his genes AND his cultural practice.  Whereas Mr. Fuck-and-Run is a lot more likely to produce offspring that his partner leaves to die in a garbage can.  [:'(]

--M


Is this based on anything solid -  or, is this simply a reflection of your beliefs?

I know many people who were raised by one parent (male or female) and the parent did well by them and they are outstanding individuals... so, although my observations are entirely subjective... I cannot recognize your statements as something factual without attribution of some source or reference to some study.

I do know that the most recent studys of ancient man (hunter gatherer phase) demonstrated a quasi-matriarchal culture with a mostly absentee father out hunting for weeks/months at a time in packs of 3-4.

Interaction between the male packs and the society was limited to the winter months and brief periods when they would return with their 'catch'. 

That the men and women may have had several steady partners over the course of a life (and, they apparently did 'ok').

Thank you in advance for clearing this up.

~J




LordODiscipline -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/5/2006 5:54:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mons

greetings

focus you are not a woman i think but to come out and say oh she should had known? known what not to fall in love and see this man as a prince to hold her to love her not all man are apes and aniamls this is why she did not see this love is different when you a man and it is different when you a woman. we all want the same thing love and caring, i at age 24 ran into a nightmare man. he was  my dream boat, he and i were in engaged but the moment i was pregant he ran so far. i thought it was me but it was not, i just found out after to many years he did this to another woman who had a girl who not runs around looking for him. if someone would had told me he was like this i would have depend him to the end, he show not sign of a fool. no sign he had other woman. so focus i know your thinking right but be kind to the woman who heart are rip out. i have a son i can never be a father but i am a hell of a mother. it is hard when you think you found that one person who os like you smart intellgent kind and loves things you adore. i am a domme now so i am more smarter then i was i still look out for fool i ran into many. kindness is a gift use it

mons


I am not sure what you are trying to say, or if this is actually aimed at myself.
 
But -
If you are (*indeed) sending this in response to myself, you might consider going back and reading my writing again more slowly... no where did I say it was "her fault" and, (again, if this was aimed at me) you are off base and wrong in your assumption.
 
~J




Wildfleurs -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/5/2006 7:22:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wildfleurs

In terms of preventing pregnancy knowing that he was fucking around isn't information that will help prevent a pregnancy.


I could not possibly disagree more.  I think that was EXACTLY the information that would prevent the pregnancy.  Women are not nearly as likely to get pregnant by men when they don't believe that he is invested in the relationship.  They are much, much more likely to use protection, to insist on condoms, to hold back emotionally, etc. when they know they are not in an exclusive relationship.  And that is exactly why he lied about it.


You know, I am a woman and have been in a long term (sexually) monogamous loving relationship and yet I don’t want to get pregnant.  There are women who make decisions on their body and whether they want to have children that have nothing to do with the persons fidelity. 

Basically what I’m saying is what I said earlier, either the women wanted to have a child with him and decided not to take birth control (or use norplant or an IUD), or the women did not want to have a child, took preventative measures and they had an accident.  Fidelity is something that they obviously found out about after the fact and would probably cause regret.  But he didn’t force them to have children, this was a function of their choice about something happening within their body.

quote:


He wanted them to be completely emotionally and sexually open, in ways that only women who are deeply committed can be.  He was not interested in wearing the raincoat or hearing "Um, just let me put in my diaphragm."


Contraception 101: there are ways to prevent pregnancy that are not invasive (that he didn’t even have to know about unless they wanted to tell him – again if they wanted to take responsibility for their body and their ability to have children.

quote:


I think anyone who deliberately does ANYTHING that causes others pain can qualify as such.  And I've never been sympathetic to the "women who get pregnant are just stupid" line of logic.


Except that your original definition of predator was much more specific and that’s how this whole disagreement began, namely that I said that your definition of predator didn’t fit with a guy who was a cheater.  To remind you, your definition was:

A predator, by contrast, has no emotional investment in anyone but himself/herself.  They coldly calculate, lie and deceive, hit and run, and then vanish very easily.  They may enjoy their power and they may get a thrill from doing others harm--sometimes great harm--but it is rarely personal and they rarely view their victims as special, or even as individuals really.  The victim is just another mark, regardless of what sort of harm they are targeted for--rape, death, a con job, etc..

In terms of the parameters of your definition:
  • Unless you know him personally you don’t know what emotional investment he had in them (or didn’t have)
  • She said that she ended the relationship, so obviously he didn’t vanish or cut ant run
  • They are targeted for some kind of harm – you said rape, death or a con job.  Unless the OP is communicating from the grave she isn’t dead, she said the sex was fantastic so rapes out of the question, and she didn’t mention missing any money so a con job is out of the question.

Using the term predator sounds dramatic and urgent which is why I’m sure you are using the word.  But it simply doesn’t fit no matter how much you try to magically make him into someone that he may or may not be (unless again you know this man personally).

And yes, I’ll go out on a limb and say that women that don’t use contraception (condoms, IUD, birth control, Norplant, contraceptive jelly, etc, etc) and don’t expect to get pregnant are stupid

quote:


Personally, I find that both the body and the emotional make-up of the average human female are designed to make the continuation of the species a likely prospect.  If women were always living in the brain and never got emotional or visceral about men--before, during and after sex?  There would be a hell of a lot fewer of us monkeys on this planet.


The problem is that you are making this invisible jump from emotional connection and sexual connection to desire to procreate.  I'm saying that love and sexual connection do not automatically create the desire (to the point of actually doing it) to procreate.

quote:


*shrug*  Anyway...whatever.  I'm not sure what your agenda is to let Mr. Fucksalot off the hook for being a deeply and deliberately hurtful human being.  I've stated my reasons for regarding him as a predator.  And I have zero sympathy for sexist attitudes about women having to take sole responsibility for human reproduction--regardless of whether that sexism is couched in the rhetoric of the 18th century, the 7th century, or the 20th century.


Somehow with this paragraph I can’t help but think that you just haven’t been paying attention.  Unless there is swift and complete condemnation of the Ops ex (without any suggestion of responsibility on the part of all of the adults), apparently one becomes a sexist for suggesting that women are responsible for making sure they don’t get pregnant.  Its just shocking to suggest, I know.  I really should be ashamed of myself.

C~




LordODiscipline -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/5/2006 7:31:58 AM)

I could not agree with you more...
 
I was going to respond to that posting in the same vane - however... I have decided that speaking logic and sense in an emotionally created and charged posting is pretty much akin to "peeing in the wind".
 
It makes me feel warm and fuzzy to debate with the illogical assertions brought forth by people too emotionally invested in something to see your point (*and, who are reading more and less into what is being said than is existing in reality) - but, it definitively leaves me wet and smelling funky as a result.
 
Pardon me while I go change my pants....

~J




Morrigel -> RE: Why I was selected as a target for a predator (11/5/2006 8:06:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

Is this based on anything solid -  or, is this simply a reflection of your beliefs?

 
This is based on the science of anthropology.  Human infants, even in comparison to other primates, are physically helpless and need constant input from adults for a very long time.  A human female, pregnant, isolated and without support, is extremely unlikely to survive pregnancy and childbirth in the wild.  She needs community, preferably a community that includes strong males who can protect her from predators, and who will help to forage the protein sources she and her developing child will need during pregnancy and especially the first year of life.  From birth until the first birthday, for example, a human infant will need to physically double in size with no food source other than its mother's breastmilk--under natural conditions.  60% of the calories consumed will go straight into brain development for the first two-three years.  Etc..

Even in this very unnatural society, of course, I think "single-parent upbringing" is a misnomer.  There may been only one person legally responsible or bound to a child in those situations, but "single mother" or "single father" households are rarely islands in which one person has worked and performed all actions necessary since the moment of conception.  The number of contributions made by other adults in those situation, which sustain and educate the child, is scientifically measurable.  The available support mechanisms in this specific society/culture are very broad.

The majority of women who become single mothers, even if the father of the child gave them no support during gestation, child-birth, etc., had countless social and personal support mechanisms in raising that child and providing for the child, including:

hosiptals
relatives
day-cares
social services
schools (minding a young child during many of the normal working hours of the day is not to be underestimated for a woman who needs to work to support two)
friends
neighbors
boyfriends/lovers/new husbands

If you see what I'm saying.

quote:

I do know that the most recent studys of ancient man (hunter gatherer phase) demonstrated a quasi-matriarchal culture with a mostly absentee father out hunting for weeks/months at a time in packs of 3-4.

Interaction between the male packs and the society was limited to the winter months and brief periods when they would return with their 'catch'. 


I know of no study or research which confirms this statement.  Sexual segregation lasting for months at a time of ALL males from ALL females in any society is rarely (I would say "never", but in science you never say "never") seen in hunter-gatherers in the modern age and there is little evidence for it in the prehistoric archaeology of which I am aware.  Our nearest cousins in primatology do not live this way; chimpanzee troops practice a fission-fusion social order in which the group tends to break up into smaller units to forage and then re-forms into larger groups for social interaction, to deal with predators and interlopers, etc..

So far as human patterns go--it seems to be true that men have traditionally been the meat-seekers in human societies, and that women have tended to forage for fruits and vegetables, or handle agricultural resources and processing of food.  A number of reasons for this, and I wouldn't want to bore everyone here with a huge dissertation on the subject, but the point is that given this nutritional division of labor, it is very unlikely that either men OR women would do without the resources provided by their gender counterparts for any significant length of time.  People do not need/want meat once every six months; people do not need fruits and nuts once every six months.  Humans in fact suffer significant consequences if they are deprived of any of the types of nutrition they need for any length of time--but especially in childhood.  I assume you've seen what kwashiokor, ricketts and scurvy look like.

I also think your premise is extremely unlikely simply in terms of the predators that were abounding in most of the environments in which our ancestors lived.

The evidence is that most of our human forebears lived in groups of roughly 30 people; I don't see all fifteen of the men in that group taking off for months at a time and leaving a group of fifteen women, children, and elderly humans (ample evidence that humans have always cared for the infirm and kept them alive long after the time that they were unable to walk unassisted) to face predators like the dire wolf, the short-faced bear, three different kinds of hunting cat including smilodon, etc., completely undefended.

Humans who gender-separate for ritual purposes or small groups of men leaving to form hunting parties, while women go on brief foraging expeditions?  Absolutely.  Splinter groups of unpaired males without mates who break off or segregate from the main group or go off seeking mates of their own and eventually form a new group?  Absolutely.

But strict division within the same group which allegedly goes on for months and months?  Seems extremely unlikely, to me.  To the point that I am very curious where you got this information...

--M




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.699707E-02