marieToo
Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Craftsman quote:
ORIGINAL: marieToo quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen marie - probably best to leave it now? SirK presents testimony in a way that to me makes him a reliable witness, and contributed from what appears to be genuine experience which was painful to him. I base my conclusion on other posts of his which do not feature such language. Sure, his ex isnt here to comment, but it doesnt do any good to start calling into question what he wrote I feel. Also I'll be surprised if the Mods let this go on much longer in this vein - which would be a shame as its a valuable thread. E Well, the mods let it go on, so I have no reason to believe that expressing one's opinion on spousal abuse is against any TOS violation. My original comment on this thread was prefaced with the sentence "This is general commentary about the subject matter." It was Kenin himself who decided to address me directly with anger,insults, and name calling, while explaining to me the supposed gory details of his marriage, none of which I solicited. But I did respond with what I thought was helpful advice. Now, If you want to help someone, perhaps you should reach out to Kenin on the other side and tell him that his blatant displays of anger and mud-slinging with those who feel a different way than he does, are not helping his credibility. Oh and for your future reference, (since we do not know one another) I will speak freely, and I will do so as I see fit, in accordance with my own judgement calls, not yours. Thank you and have a lovely day. I'm surprised anyone would respond to you with any kind of name-calling. You certainly would not respond with any kind of prejudice, now would you? Look, whoever you are...I spoke of my feelings on spousal abuse and personal accountabitlity, when along came Kenin to tell me that what I felt was "wrong" and how I know nothing, simply because my mileage varies from his. Guess what? people say things around here all the time that I dont agree with, but I dont address them, call them names, becomed enraged with them and then tell them that they better shut the fuck up. If the shoe doesn't fit, Kenin needn't wear it, nor did he have to address me directly and make my statement about his marriage. Had he spoken to me with mutual respect, he wouldve received the same in return and we could've had a civilized discussion (even if we disagreed and both felt passionate about our respective POV's.) But Kenin lacks self control. Frankly, after his insults and tirade of misplaced anger towards me, my response was uncommonly mild. quote:
Talk about asserting one's freedom to speak while trampling on others' speech rights. So go ahead and speak freely while denying the validity of what any one else says. First of all denying "validity" of what someone says and denying someone their speech rights are two very different animals. Now that we have that cleared up....I've trampled on no one's right to speak. I've only protected my own, after having been told by both Kenin and Ellen to stop speaking. I didn't tell either of them to not respond to me. I only told them that they're attempts to silence me are going to be futile. Surely even a simple-minded person like yourself can see the difference there. quote:
All I can say is, Thank God we do not know one another. I would certainly do my utmost to eliminate you from my aquaintances, Do you always engage in conversation with people that you would do your 'utmost to eliminate from your life" ? Apparently you dont understand that when you want to eliminate people from your life, you avoid them, you dont initiate conversation with them. quote:
Very good iinvalidating of others for your own high and mighty self. I could be described as mighty, but given your obvious confusion, I think you're the one who's high. quote:
If the sexes were reversed in Kenin's posts, would you feel the same? Absolutely. quote:
Don't bother to respond. Why not? Because you know Im going to eat your lame argument for lunch? Or because you're not all that secure about anything you've said here? You're so far the third person on this thread who has given me a piece of their mind, then ended their litany by telling me I shouldn't respond. Do you realize how ludicrous it is to directly address another person, critisize them, call them names, make assumptions about them, sling mud at them, and then demand that they don't respond to it? Now that would be attempting "to trample on someone's speech rights". I hope I've helped you to understand these big terms that you've used today. In closing, Im going to leave you with a hypothetical question to ponder...It's about personal responsibility for one's own choices and it's about self-control..... If I don't wish to debate something, Should I be the one to stop responding? Or should I tell you to stop repsonding? This is a tough one, I know. But I think you can handle it.
_____________________________
marie. I give good agita.
|