mstrjx
Posts: 2045
Joined: 11/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: fusion Did not seem to object to his delayed stopping. It would probably be helpful to learn more about this. Lacking that...... I suppose you already had an understanding with her that you would allow another to play with her. Your wording made it seem as if you felt obligated because of your prior relationship with the man, and that your sub was 'payment in kind' or somesuch. Perhaps I am just reading too literally. As to the actual question, in my mind he should have done the honorable thing and stopped immediately. Then again, you, the person in control of your own property, should have better protected your property. That she took the three more but 'didn't seem to object' makes me wonder about her as well. If she 'cried wolf' when she used the safe word the first time, but happily took three more, then of what value are safe words at all. I'm the first one to admit that I'll try and determine limits, be they physical, psychological, emotional. I'll freely admit that they are templates for the present and future, that the lines can be extended as time goes on. Most submissives in my care in the past understand that a safe word is really a last resort. I probably haven't heard a safe word but two or three times in all my years. Submissives often like to 'be' pushed, and they don't really wish to 'cry wolf'. If anything, they would rather die than use a safe word, just for their pride if nothing else. But I stop when I think it's appropriate, or when a safe word is used, whichever comes first. Jeff
_____________________________
Know thyself. It's the best gift you can ever give yourself.
|