NorthernGent
Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub I understand your opinion however, Justice Kennedy is saying it is a basic right and therefore guaranteed under the Constitution. I find it hard to understand how some Republicans and fewer Democrats that believe in basic human rights don't agree. It seems against their tenets when it comes to governing. Butch How is it a basic right? I agree with Aylee that it would come under the authority of the States, and not the Federal Government. To be clear, I have no problem with homosexuals having all the same options as heterosexuals. I support allowing gay marriage. If it is a "basic human right" for a gay couple to marry, is it going to be illegal for a church to refuse to perform a gay marriage? I agree, but when you all talk of inalienable rights I think the exact the same thing. You don't have any rights, none whatsoever, just ways of doing things and ideas and these things may or may not become the social norm. I don't think it is right to force the Catholic Church to marry people. It's a private institution. I'm not a catholic, and I'm not a fan of Catholicism, but I just can't see how and why it is a good thing to force them to go against their collective conscience. It would seem to me that this would be a direct violation of their first amendment rights, the government cannot dictate theological stands to a church. That would clearly be establishment of religion. I suppose to me the Catholic Church doesn't have a right to anything. Clearly anything that can be taken away from you is not a right, and the Catholic Church could, in theory, be shut down tomorrow. But, purely from a reasonable stand point, the Catholic Church is surely a private institution, one that raises it's own funds; and considering the idea of marriage is central to its purpose then it has to have discretion over these matters. Although I think this question has been answered by the poster who said they will not be forced to. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe for a second that anyone of gay orientation is any different to me except I like cabbage and they like cauliflower - a matter of personal taste - but the answer isn't to force people to agree with you. As for the bullying matter, it's not bullying. They have a view and others can take it or leave it. I could have been religious, possibly, because my parents and grandparents are, but for me the idea that actually we're not all equal and God is not there for everyone, well I couldn't get over that hurdle on point of principle. I like religion; I like much of what Christianity has to say; I think moral guidance is generally a good thing. But, they lost me when the message of charity only applied to some. So, I chose to leave it.
_____________________________
I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits. Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.
|